On September 28, 2015 Eli Lilly and Company’s (NYSE: LLY) reported that a Phase II study of their CYRAMZA (ramucirumab) in combination with docetaxel met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a statistically significant increase in progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who failed prior platinum-based therapy (Press release, Eli Lilly, SEP 28, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507588]). Bladder cancer accounts for the vast majority of all urothelial carcinoma. Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo! Final results of the Phase II trial were presented at the European Cancer Congress (ECC2015) in Vienna, Austria (Abstract #2508) on September 27. Based on these findings, Lilly recently initiated a Phase III trial called RANGE, which has begun to enroll patients. Know more, wherever you are: "We are encouraged with these promising findings that could help lead to much-needed progress in this area – people with advanced urothelial carcinoma have limited treatment options today," said Daniel Petrylak, M.D., professor of medicine (medical oncology) and of urology at Yale University Cancer Center and the study’s principal investigator. "This is an aggressive type of cancer and unfortunately, despite available first-line therapies, most patients who have disease progression eventually succumb to their disease. Currently, there are no agents specifically approved in the U.S., nor is there a consistently-employed single standard of care in the U.S. or globally, for the treatment of second-line bladder cancer."
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
Latest on Bladder Cancer, book your free 1stOncology demo here.
The three-arm trial evaluated 140 patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelial tract (bladder, urethra, ureter, or renal pelvis) who, after a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, had relapsed up to one year following the initial treatment. Patients were randomized to receive either a combination of ramucirumab and docetaxel (n=46), docetaxel alone (n=45), or a combination of icrucumab and docetaxel (n=49). Treatment continued until disease progression or toxicity levels resulted in an interruption of treatment with one or more of the study medicines.
Median PFS, the study’s primary endpoint, was 5.4 months (HR 0.389; 95% CI: 0.389 0.235-0.643; p < 0.001) on the ramucirumab-docetaxel arm as compared to 2.8 months for patients treated with docetaxel alone, and 1.6 months for those treated with icrucumab and docetaxel. Objective response rate (ORR) results – or patients who achieved either a complete response or partial response to treatment – also favored the ramucirumab combination arm with a significantly higher confirmed ORR (24%) compared to those on the docetaxel arm (9%) and the icrucumab combination arm (12%). A statistically significant benefit in disease control rate – or patients who achieved complete response, partial response, or stable disease – was identified on the ramucirumab arm (78%) versus the docetaxel arm (58%) and the icrucumab arm (45%). While the study was not powered for overall survival (OS), results favored the ramucirumab combination arm, but were not statistically significant, with 10.4 months median OS identified on the ramucirumab arm compared to 9.2 months on the docetaxel arm and 6.7 months on the icrucumab arm.
The observed safety findings are consistent with prior Phase III studies of ramucirumab and docetaxel. The most common ( > 5% incidence) grade ≥3 adverse events occurring at a higher rate on the ramucirumab-plus-docetaxel arm compared to the docetaxel arm were fatigue (35% vs. 13%), febrile neutropenia (17% vs. 13%), pneumonia (13% vs. 9%), anemia (13% vs. 7%), sepsis (11% vs. 7%), edema (9% vs. 2%), diarrhea (7% vs. 2%), intestinal obstruction (7% vs. 2%), urinary tract infection (7% vs. 2%), hypertension (7% vs. 0%), stomatitis (7% vs. 0%), and thrombocytopenia (7% vs. 0%).
The Phase III RANGE study, which is currently enrolling patients, is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ramucirumab and docetaxel versus placebo and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or unresectable metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02426125).
"We are pleased to advance this CYRAMZA regimen into Phase III clinical development and look forward to that trial’s results," said Richard Gaynor, M.D., senior vice president, product development and medical affairs for Lilly Oncology. "Our excitement with the overall clinical development of CYRAMZA continues to grow, with the RANGE trial in bladder cancer marking another tumor type in late-stage evaluation in this broad development program."
About Urothelial Carcinoma and Bladder Cancer
Urothelial carcinoma are cancers that arise in the urothelial or transitional cells that line the urinary collecting system including the bladder, which is the most common site for this type of tumor. Other potential primary sites of this cancer include the renal pelvis, ureter, and urethra.
Bladder cancer is the sixth most common and deadly cancer in the U.S.,i with an estimated 74,000 new cases and 16,000 deaths expected in 2015.ii Globally, bladder cancer ranks ninth in the top most common cancers overall, and the ninth leading cause of cancer-related death, affecting approximately 430,000 people per year and resulting in more than 165,000 deaths.i
About CYRAMZA (ramucirumab)
In the U.S., CYRAMZA (ramucirumab) is approved for use as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel as a treatment for people with advanced or metastatic gastric (stomach) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose cancer has progressed on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemotherapy. It is also approved in combination with docetaxel as a treatment for people with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose cancer has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Additionally, it is approved with FOLFIRI as a treatment for people with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose cancer has progressed on or after therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine.
There are several additional studies underway or planned to investigate CYRAMZA as a single agent and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies for the treatment of multiple tumor types. This broad global development program has enrolled more than 7,000 patients across more than 50 trials of CYRAMZA worldwide.
CYRAMZA is an antiangiogenic therapy. It is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Receptor 2 antagonist that specifically binds and blocks activation of VEGF Receptor 2 by blocking the binding of VEGF receptor ligands VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D. CYRAMZA inhibited angiogenesis in an in vivo animal model.
About Angiogenesis and VEGF Protein
Angiogenesis is the process of making new blood vessels. In a person with cancer, angiogenesis creates new blood vessels that give a tumor its own blood supply, allowing it to grow and spread.
Some tumors create proteins called VEGF. These proteins attach to the VEGF receptors of blood vessel cells causing new blood vessels to form around the tumors, enabling growth. Blocking the VEGF protein from linking to the blood vessels helps to inhibit tumor growth by slowing angiogenesis and the blood supply that feeds tumors. Of the three known VEGF receptors, VEGF Receptor 2 is linked most closely to VEGF-induced tumor angiogenesis.
INDICATIONS
Gastric Cancer
CYRAMZA, as a single agent or in combination with paclitaxel, is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic, gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma with disease progression on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
CYRAMZA, in combination with docetaxel, is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving CYRAMZA.
Colorectal Cancer
CYRAMZA, in combination with FOLFIRI (irinotecan, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil), is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with disease progression on or after prior therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR CYRAMZA
WARNING: HEMORRHAGE, GASTROINTESTINAL PERFORATION, AND IMPAIRED WOUND HEALING
Hemorrhage: CYRAMZA increased the risk of hemorrhage and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, including severe and sometimes fatal hemorrhagic events. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA in patients who experience severe bleeding.
Gastrointestinal Perforation: CYRAMZA can increase the risk of gastrointestinal perforation, a potentially fatal event. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA in patients who experience a gastrointestinal perforation.
Impaired Wound Healing: Impaired wound healing can occur with antibodies inhibiting the VEGF pathway. Discontinue CYRAMZA therapy in patients with impaired wound healing. Withhold CYRAMZA prior to surgery and discontinue CYRAMZA if a patient develops wound healing complications.
Warnings and Precautions
Hemorrhage
CYRAMZA increased the risk of hemorrhage and gastrointestinal hemorrhage including severe and sometimes fatal hemorrhagic events. In study 1, which evaluated CYRAMZA as a single agent in advanced gastric cancer, the incidence of severe bleeding was 3.4% for CYRAMZA and 2.6% for placebo. In study 2, which evaluated CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer, the incidence of severe bleeding was 4.3% for CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel and 2.4% for placebo plus paclitaxel. Patients with gastric cancer receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were excluded from enrollment in studies 1 and 2; therefore, the risk of gastric hemorrhage in CYRAMZA-treated patients with gastric tumors receiving NSAIDs is unknown. In study 3, which evaluated CYRAMZA plus docetaxel in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of severe bleeding was 2.4% for CYRAMZA plus docetaxel and 2.3% for placebo plus docetaxel. Patients with NSCLC receiving therapeutic anticoagulation or chronic therapy with NSAIDs or other antiplatelet therapy other than once-daily aspirin or with radiographic evidence of major airway or blood vessel invasion or intratumor cavitation were excluded from study 3; therefore, the risk of pulmonary hemorrhage in these groups of patients is unknown. In study 4, which evaluated CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer, the incidence of severe bleeding was 2.5% for CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI and 1.7% for placebo plus FOLFIRI. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA in patients who experience severe bleeding.
Arterial Thromboembolic Events (ATEs)
Serious, sometimes fatal, ATEs including myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular accident, and cerebral ischemia occurred in clinical trials including 1.7% of 236 patients who received CYRAMZA as a single agent for gastric cancer in study 1. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA in patients who experience a severe ATE.
Hypertension
An increased incidence of severe hypertension occurred in patients receiving CYRAMZA as a single agent (8%) as compared to placebo (3%), in patients receiving CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel (15%) as compared to placebo plus paclitaxel (3%), and in patients receiving CYRAMZA plus docetaxel (6%) as compared to placebo plus docetaxel (2%), and in patients receiving CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI (11%) as compared to placebo plus FOLFIRI (3%). Control hypertension prior to initiating treatment with CYRAMZA. Monitor blood pressure every 2 weeks or more frequently as indicated during treatment. Temporarily suspend CYRAMZA for severe hypertension until medically controlled. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA if medically significant hypertension cannot be controlled with antihypertensive therapy or in patients with hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy.
Infusion-Related Reactions (IRRs)
Prior to the institution of premedication recommendations across clinical trials of CYRAMZA, IRRs occurred in 6 out of 37 patients (16%), including 2 severe events. The majority of IRRs across trials occurred during or following a first or second CYRAMZA infusion. Symptoms of IRRs included rigors/tremors, back pain/spasms, chest pain and/or tightness, chills, flushing, dyspnea, wheezing, hypoxia, and paresthesia. In severe cases, symptoms included bronchospasm, supraventricular tachycardia, and hypotension. Monitor patients during the infusion for signs and symptoms of IRRs in a setting with available resuscitation equipment. Immediately and permanently discontinue CYRAMZA for grade 3 or 4 IRRs.
Gastrointestinal Perforations
CYRAMZA is an antiangiogenic therapy that can increase the risk of gastrointestinal perforation, a potentially fatal event. Four of 570 patients (0.7%) who received CYRAMZA as a single agent in advanced gastric cancer clinical trials experienced gastrointestinal perforation. In study 2, the incidence of gastrointestinal perforation was 1.2% for CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel as compared to 0.3% for placebo plus paclitaxel. In study 3, the incidence of gastrointestinal perforation was 1% for CYRAMZA plus docetaxel as compared to 0.3% for placebo plus docetaxel. In study 4, the incidence of gastrointestinal perforation was 1.7% for CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI and 0.6% for placebo plus FOLFIRI. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA in patients who experience a gastrointestinal perforation.
Impaired Wound Healing
Impaired wound healing can occur with antibodies inhibiting the VEGF pathway. CYRAMZA has not been studied in patients with serious or nonhealing wounds. CYRAMZA, an antiangiogenic therapy, has the potential to adversely affect wound healing. Discontinue CYRAMZA therapy in patients with impaired wound healing. Withhold CYRAMZA prior to surgery. Resume CYRAMZA following the surgical intervention based on clinical judgment of adequate wound healing. If a patient develops wound healing complications during therapy, discontinue CYRAMZA until the wound is fully healed.
Clinical Deterioration in Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis
Clinical deterioration, manifested by new onset or worsening encephalopathy, ascites, or hepatorenal syndrome, was reported in patients with Child-Pugh B or C cirrhosis who received single-agent CYRAMZA. Use CYRAMZA in patients with Child-Pugh B or C cirrhosis only if the potential benefits of treatment are judged to outweigh the risks of clinical deterioration.
Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS)
RPLS has been reported at a rate of < 0.1% in clinical studies with CYRAMZA. Confirm the diagnosis of RPLS with MRI and discontinue CYRAMZA in patients who develop RPLS. Symptoms may resolve or improve within days, although some patients with RPLS can experience ongoing neurologic sequelae or death.
Proteinuria Including Nephrotic Syndrome
In study 4, severe proteinuria occurred more frequently in patients treated with CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI compared to patients receiving placebo plus FOLFIRI. Severe proteinuria was reported in 3% of patients treated with CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI (including 3 cases [0.6%] of nephrotic syndrome) compared to 0.2% of patients treated with placebo plus FOLFIRI. Monitor proteinuria by urine dipstick and/or urinary protein creatinine ratio for the development of worsening of proteinuria during CYRAMZA therapy. Withhold CYRAMZA for urine protein levels that are > 2 g over 24 hours. Reinitiate CYRAMZA at a reduced dose once the urine protein level returns to < 2 g over 24 hours. Permanently discontinue CYRAMZA for urine protein levels > 3 g over 24 hours or in the setting of nephrotic syndrome.
Thyroid Dysfunction
Monitor thyroid function during treatment with CYRAMZA. In study 4, the incidence of hypothyroidism reported as an adverse event was 2.6% in the CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI-treated patients and 0.9% in the placebo plus FOLFIRI-treated patients.
Embryofetal Toxicity
Based on its mechanism of action, CYRAMZA can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women. Animal models link angiogenesis, VEGF, and VEGF Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) to critical aspects of female reproduction, embryofetal development, and postnatal development. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with CYRAMZA and for at least 3 months after the last dose of CYRAMZA.
Most Common Adverse Reactions—Single Agent
The most commonly reported adverse reactions (all grades; grade 3/4) occurring in > 5% of patients receiving CYRAMZA and > 2% higher than placebo in study 1 were hypertension (16% vs 8%; 8% vs 3%), diarrhea (14% vs 9%; 1% vs 2%), headache (9% vs 3%; 0% vs 0%), and hyponatremia (6% vs 2%; 3% vs 1%).
The most common serious adverse events with CYRAMZA in study 1 were anemia (3.8%) and intestinal obstruction (2.1%). Red blood cell transfusions were given to 11% of CYRAMZA-treated patients vs 8.7% of patients who received placebo.
Clinically relevant adverse reactions reported in > 1% and < 5% of CYRAMZA-treated patients vs placebo in study 1 were: neutropenia (4.7% vs 0.9%), epistaxis (4.7% vs 0.9%), rash (4.2% vs 1.7%), intestinal obstruction (2.1% vs 0%), and arterial thromboembolic events (1.7% vs 0%).
Across clinical trials of CYRAMZA administered as a single agent, clinically relevant adverse reactions (including grade > 3) reported in CYRAMZA-treated patients included proteinuria, gastrointestinal perforation, and infusion-related reactions. In study 1, according to laboratory assessment, 8% of CYRAMZA-treated patients developed proteinuria vs 3% of placebo-treated patients. Two patients discontinued CYRAMZA due to proteinuria. The rate of gastrointestinal perforation in study 1 was 0.8% and the rate of infusion-related reactions was 0.4%.
Most Common Adverse Reactions—Combination With Paclitaxel
The most commonly reported adverse reactions (all grades; grade 3/4) occurring in > 5% of patients receiving CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel and > 2% higher than placebo plus paclitaxel in study 2 were fatigue/asthenia (57% vs 44%; 12% vs 6%), neutropenia (54% vs 31%; 41% vs 19%), diarrhea (32% vs 23%; 4% vs 2%), epistaxis (31% vs 7%; 0% vs 0%), hypertension (25% vs 6%; 15% vs 3%), peripheral edema (25% vs 14%; 2% vs 1%), stomatitis (20% vs 7%; 1% vs 1%), proteinuria (17% vs 6%; 1% vs 0%), thrombocytopenia (13% vs 6%; 2% vs 2%), hypoalbuminemia (11% vs 5%; 1% vs 1%), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage events (10% vs 6%; 4% vs 2%).
The most common serious adverse events with CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel in study 2 were neutropenia (3.7%) and febrile neutropenia (2.4%); 19% of patients treated with CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel received granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.
Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of any component of the CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel combination in 2% or more patients in study 2 were neutropenia (4%) and thrombocytopenia (3%).
Clinically relevant adverse reactions reported in > 1% and < 5% of the CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel-treated patients in study 2 were sepsis (3.1% for CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel vs 1.8% for placebo plus paclitaxel) and gastrointestinal perforations (1.2% for CYRAMZA plus paclitaxel vs 0.3% for placebo plus paclitaxel).
Most Common Adverse Reactions—Combination With Docetaxel
The most commonly reported adverse reactions (all grades; grade 3/4) occurring in > 5% of patients receiving CYRAMZA plus docetaxel and > 2% higher than placebo plus docetaxel in study 3 were neutropenia (55% vs 46%; 49% vs 40%), fatigue/asthenia (55% vs 50%; 14% vs 11%), stomatitis/mucosal inflammation (37% vs 19%; 7% vs 2%), epistaxis (19% vs 7%; < 1% vs < 1%), febrile neutropenia (16% vs 10%; 16% vs 10%), peripheral edema (16% vs 9%; 0% vs < 1%), thrombocytopenia (13% vs 5%; 3% vs < 1%), lacrimation increased (13% vs 5%; < 1% vs 0%), and hypertension (11% vs 5%; 6% vs 2%).
The most common serious adverse events with CYRAMZA plus docetaxel in study 3 were febrile neutropenia (14%), pneumonia (6%), and neutropenia (5%). The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors was 42% in CYRAMZA plus docetaxel-treated patients versus 37% in patients who received placebo plus docetaxel.
In patients > 65 years of age, there were 18 (8%) deaths on treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation for CYRAMZA plus docetaxel and 9 (4%) deaths for placebo plus docetaxel. In patients < 65 years of age, there were 13 (3%) deaths on treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation for CYRAMZA plus docetaxel and 26 (6%) deaths for placebo plus docetaxel.
Treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions occurred more frequently in CYRAMZA plus docetaxel-treated patients (9%) than in placebo plus docetaxel-treated patients (5%). The most common adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation of CYRAMZA in study 3 were infusion-related reaction (0.5%) and epistaxis (0.3%).
For patients with nonsquamous histology, the overall incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage was 7% and the incidence of grade > 3 pulmonary hemorrhage was 1% for CYRAMZA plus docetaxel compared to 6% overall incidence and 1% for grade > 3 pulmonary hemorrhage for placebo plus docetaxel. For patients with squamous histology, the overall incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage was 10% and the incidence of grade > 3 pulmonary hemorrhage was 2% for CYRAMZA plus docetaxel compared to 12% overall incidence and 2% for grade ≥3 pulmonary hemorrhage for placebo plus docetaxel.
Clinically relevant adverse reactions reported in > 1% and < 5% of CYRAMZA plus docetaxel-treated patients in study 3 were hyponatremia (4.8% CYRAMZA plus docetaxel versus 2.4% for placebo plus docetaxel) and proteinuria (3.3% CYRAMZA plus docetaxel versus 0.8% placebo plus docetaxel).
Most Common Adverse Reactions—Combination With FOLFIRI
The most commonly reported adverse reactions (all grades; grade 3/4) occurring in > 5% of patients receiving CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI and ≥2% higher than placebo plus FOLFIRI in study 4 were diarrhea (60% vs 51%; 11% vs 10%), neutropenia (59% vs 46%; 38% vs 23%), decreased appetite (37% vs 27%; 2% vs 2%), epistaxis (33% vs 15%; 0% vs 0%), stomatitis (31% vs 21%; 4% vs 2%), thrombocytopenia (28% vs 14%; 3% vs < 1%), hypertension (26% vs 9%; 11% vs 3%), peripheral edema (20% vs 9%; < 1% vs 0%), proteinuria (17% vs 5%; 3% vs < 1%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (13% vs 5%; 1% vs < 1%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage events (12% vs 7%; 2% vs 1%), hypoalbuminemia (6% vs 2%; 1% vs 0%). Twenty percent of patients treated with CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI received granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.
The most common serious adverse events with CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI were diarrhea (3.6%), intestinal obstruction (3.0%), and febrile neutropenia (2.8%).
Treatment discontinuation of any study drug due to adverse reactions occurred more frequently in CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI-treated patients (29%) than in placebo plus FOLFIRI-treated patients (13%). The most common adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of any component of CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI as compared to placebo plus FOLFIRI were neutropenia (12.5% versus 5.3%) and thrombocytopenia (4.2% versus 0.8%). The most common adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation of CYRAMZA were proteinuria (1.5%) and gastrointestinal perforation (1.7%).
Clinically relevant adverse reactions reported in > 1% and < 5% of CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI-treated patients in study 4 consisted of gastrointestinal perforation (1.7% CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI versus 0.6% for placebo plus FOLFIRI).
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was evaluated in 224 patients (115 CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI-treated patients and 109 placebo plus FOLFIRI-treated patients) with normal baseline TSH levels. Patients received periodic TSH assessments until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. Increased TSH was observed in 53 (46%) patients treated with CYRAMZA plus FOLFIRI compared with 4 (4%) patients treated with placebo plus FOLFIRI.
Drug Interactions
No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed between ramucirumab and paclitaxel, between ramucirumab and docetaxel, or between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its active metabolite, SN-38.
Use in Specific Populations
Pregnancy: Based on its mechanism of action, CYRAMZA can cause fetal harm. Animal models link angiogenesis, VEGF, and VEGF Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) to critical aspects of female reproduction, embryofetal development, and postnatal development. There are no available data on CYRAMZA use in pregnant women to inform any drug-associated risks. No animal studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of ramucirumab on reproduction and fetal development. Advise females of reproductive potential of the potential risk for maintaining pregnancy, risk to the fetus, and risk to newborn and pediatric development, and to use effective contraception during CYRAMZA therapy and for at least 3 months following the last dose of CYRAMZA.
Lactation: Because of the potential risk for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from ramucirumab, advise women that breastfeeding is not recommended during treatment with CYRAMZA.
Females of Reproductive Potential: Advise females of reproductive potential that based on animal data CYRAMZA may impair fertility.
Please see full Prescribing Information for CYRAMZA, including Boxed Warnings for hemorrhage, gastrointestinal perforation, and impaired wound healing.3
First Human Patient Treated in Phase 1b Study of Advaxis’s ADXS-HER2 in HER2 Expressing Solid Tumors
On September 28, 2015 Advaxis, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADXS), a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing cancer immunotherapies, reported that the first patient was treated in a Phase 1b dose-escalation clinical study of ADXS-HER2 for the treatment of patients with metastatic HER2 expressing solid tumors (Press release, Advaxis, SEP 28, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507583]). Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo! The Phase 1b clinical trial is the first-in-human study of Advaxis’s lead Lm Technology immunotherapy product for HER2 expressing cancers. The dose escalation portion of the study will investigate the safety and tolerability of ADXS-HER2 as a monotherapy in approximately 18 patients diagnosed with metastatic HER2 expressing solid tumors, which include breast, gastric, esophageal and osteosarcoma. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose have been identified, up to 80 patients may be enrolled in up to four HER2 expressing tumor specific cohorts in the expansion phase of the study.
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
"We are pleased to enroll our first patient in the dose escalation portion of this Phase 1b study of ADXS-HER2 in HER2 expressing solid tumors," said Daniel J. O’Connor, President and Chief Executive Officer of Advaxis. "With the initiation of this study, we now have three clinical constructs in development and seven ongoing clinical trials, which reinforce our long-term commitment to evaluate the potential of our immunotherapy platform across different tumor types."
Advaxis plans to establish the MTD from the Phase 1b study in pediatric patients and work with Children’s Oncology Group (COG) to potentially launch a pivotal trial in pediatric osteosarcoma in 2016. The COG, a National Cancer Institute supported clinical trials group, is the world’s largest organization devoted exclusively to childhood and adolescent cancer research.
This Phase 1b study builds upon efficacy and safety data from Phase 1 clinical studies of ADXS-HER2 conducted in dogs with osteosarcoma, which may have important translational relevance for human patients with osteosarcoma and other HER2 expressing cancers. Preliminary data from a Phase 1 clinical trial in canine osteosarcoma presented at the 2014 American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) Forum suggested ADXS-HER2 safely delayed or prevented the development of metastatic disease and prolonged overall survival in pet dogs with osteosarcoma when administered after amputation and chemotherapy. Results from this trial led to ADXS-HER2 being considered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for expedited approval to treat canine osteosarcoma. Furthermore, preliminary data from a second ongoing canine Phase 1/2 trial presented at the 2015 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (Free AACR Whitepaper) Annual Meeting suggested that ADXS-HER2 in combination with palliative radiation delayed tumor progression and prolonged overall survival in pet dogs with spontaneous osteosarcoma that are not candidates for primary tumor removal (amputation).
"The Phase 1 safety and efficacy data with ADXS-HER2 in canine osteosarcoma supports our clinical development of ADXS-HER2 in HER2 expressing solid tumors," said David J. Mauro, M.D., Ph.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer of Advaxis. "We look forward to translating this canine evidence into the first human trial of ADXS-HER2 in metastatic HER2 expressing solid tumors."
About HER2 Expressing Solid Tumor Cancers
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed in a percentage of solid tumors such as breast, gastric, bladder, brain, pancreatic, ovarian and bone cancer (osteosarcoma). The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2015 in the United States alone there will be 231,840 new cases of invasive breast cancer; 24,590 new cases of gastric cancer; 74,000 new cases of bladder cancer; 22,850 new cases of brain/spinal cancer; 48,960 new cases of pancreatic cancer; 21,290 new cases of ovarian cancer; and 800 new cases of osteosarcoma. HER2 expression is associated with more aggressive disease, increased risk of relapse and decreased overall survival, and is an important target for immunotherapy.
About ADXS-HER2
ADXS-HER2 is an Lm Technology immunotherapy product candidate being developed by Advaxis to target HER2 expressing cancers. ADXS-HER2 has received orphan drug designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of osteosarcoma. Advaxis is developing ADXS-HER2 for both human and animal-health, and has seen encouraging data in canine osteosarcoma, which is considered a model for human osteosarcoma. Advaxis has licensed ADXS-HER2 and three other immunotherapy constructs to Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. for the development of pet therapeutics.
Takeda Obtained New Drug Application Approval of “Leuplin® PRO for injection kit 22.5 mg” in Japan for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer and Premenopausal Breast Cancer
On September 28, 2015 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited ("Takeda") (TSE: 4502) reported New Drug Application approval of "Leuplin PRO for injection kit 22.5 mg" (generic name: leuprorelin acetate), which is the 24 week depot of "Leuplin", a treatment for prostate cancer and premenopausal breast cancer, from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Press release, Takeda, SEP 28, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507582]). Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo! Created and developed by Takeda, Leuplin is an LH-RH agonist that consistently stimulates the pituitary gland, resulting in suppressed production of male/female hormones. Leuplin is used as a treatment for hormone-dependent diseases such as prostate cancer and premenopausal breast cancer, and it is currently available in the United States, Europe, and Asia.
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
Leuprorelin acetate was initially approved as a once-daily injection administration in the United States in 1985, but Takeda has applied multiple innovations, based on its expertise in drug formulation technology, to turn it into a sustained-release microcapsule depot formulation, enabling it to maintain stable blood concentration levels over a long period of time. At present, both 4 week and 12 week formulations are marketed in Japan.
This approval is based on the results of two clinical phase III multicenter, randomized, open label, comparative studies evaluating safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, hormone dynamics, and other factors in patients with prostate cancer and those with premenopausal breast cancer. Leuplin PRO becomes the world’s first product to obtain approval for the treatment of premenopausal breast cancer for 24 week depot.
By delivering this new treatment for both prostate cancer and premenopausal breast cancer, Takeda looks forward to further contributing to meeting the needs of patients and healthcare professionals.
Product Name Leuplin PRO for injection kit 22.5 mg
Generic Name leuprorelin acetate
Indications Prostate cancer and premenopausal breast cancer
Dosage and administration The usual adult dose is 22.5mg of Leuprorelin Acetate which is subcutaneously administrated once every 24 weeks.
When using Leuplin PRO, it should be used after suspending it completely by transferring the whole quantity of the vehicle into the powder part, by pressing the plunger rod, with the injection needle held upward, with caution against foaming.
OncoSec Announces Positive Results from Phase II Trial of ImmunoPulse™ IL-12 in Merkel Cell Carcinoma
On September 27, 2015 OncoSec Medical Incorporated ("OncoSec") (NASDAQ: ONCS), a company developing DNA-based intratumoral cancer immunotherapies, reported results from a Phase II trial demonstrating that its investigational therapy, ImmunoPulse IL-12, promotes tumor-specific, systemic anti-tumor immune responses in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) (Press release, OncoSec Medical, SEP 27, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507581]). Shailender Bhatia, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology at the University of Washington School of Medicine and Principal Investigator of the trial, presented the findings today in an oral presentation at the 2015 European Cancer Congress in Vienna, Austria.
Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
"The successful completion of the first prospective trial of immunotherapy in MCC marks an important milestone," said Dr. Bhatia. "Importantly, our findings support the hypothesis that intratumoral IL-12 DNA with electroporation promotes tumor immunogenicity. The results confirm the potential of this approach to make a clinically meaningful impact on patient outcomes for this virus-associated cancer."
In this Phase II study, 79% of patients (11/14) showed an increase in IL-12 protein levels in tumor biopsy samples obtained approximately 22 days after treatment compared to baseline, indicating that ImmunoPulse IL-12 leads to successful DNA transfection and sustained protein expression within the tumor microenvironment. ImmunoPulse IL-12 was well-tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events above Grade 2 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. The most common adverse event was Grade 1 transient pain associated with the treatment procedure.
Analysis of individual lesions found that 30% of patients (3/10) who were evaluable for systemic anti-tumor immunity had regression of at least one distant, non-injected/non-electroporated lesion. In patients considered evaluable for objective response by modified RECIST criteria (i.e., Cohort B, N=12), 25% of patients (3/12) had an objective partial response (PR) and one patient had stable disease (SD) for a disease control rate (PR + SD) of 33%. In Cohort A (N=3), one patient had a pathologic complete response and continues to be recurrence-free at six months. Another patient has been recurrence-free for over three years. Immune correlative data suggest that ImmunoPulse IL-12 can increase tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and may promote a tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell response.
"We are very excited to observe that ImmunoPulse IL-12 continues to demonstrate that intratumoral treatment with IL-12 DNA and electroporation can induce anti-tumor immune effects both locally and systemically," said Mai H. Le, MD, Chief Medical Officer at OncoSec. "These results are consistent with what we have previously observed in metastatic melanoma and underscore the broad-reaching potential of ImmunoPulse IL-12 in driving immunogenicity."
About the Phase II Study Design
OMS-I110 was a Phase II open-label study that enrolled 15 patients with MCC. The primary endpoint of the trial was IL-12 protein expression following treatment with ImmunoPulse IL-12. Secondary endpoints included: safety and tolerability; overall response rate evaluated by RECIST-modified criteria for MCC; distant lesion regression; and biological markers of pro-inflammatory changes in the tumor microenvironment. Modifications to the standard RECIST criteria included permitting more than two measurable lesions per organ (e.g., skin) to be considered evaluable as "target lesions" and the use of a combination of clinical and radiographic measurements for lesion assessment.
Patients enrolled into this study were separated into two cohorts. Cohort A (N=3) was comprised of patients whose disease status was amenable to definitive surgery or radiation following a single cycle of ImmunoPulse IL-12 treatment (i.e., neo-adjuvant). Patients with more advanced disease were enrolled into Cohort B (N=12) and permitted to receive up to four cycles of ImmunoPulse IL-12.
About Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC)
MCC is a rare, aggressive cancer with a disease-associated mortality estimated to be three times that of malignant melanoma and affects approximately 1,600 people per year in the US.1-3 The reported incidence has more than tripled over the past 20 years and the health impact of MCC is growing rapidly with a proportional increase in the aging population.2-4 The reported five year relative survival for patients with local, nodal and metastatic disease is 64%, 39% and 18% respectively.1
Treatment options in the metastatic setting are limited for patients. Responses to chemotherapy regimens are usually short-lived and the impact on survival is unclear.5 Also, chemotherapy regimens are associated with toxicity and may not be suitable for MCC patients who tend to be older with multiple co-morbidities.5 Therefore, there is a strong unmet need for biology-driven therapies in MCC.
The recent discovery of the Merkel cell polyomavirus has provided the missing link between MCC and its association with immune suppression.5 MCC tumors are able to evade the immune system by establishing a local immunosuppressive microenvironment. Evidence shows the presence of intratumoral CD8+ T-cells are associated with better prognosis. As such, therapies aimed at promoting intratumoral inflammation may improve MCC patient outcomes.
OncoGenex Presents Additional Phase 3 SYNERGY Analyses Showing Custirsen Significantly Reduced Serum Clusterin Levels in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients; Low Levels Correlate with Improved Survival in Those at Increased Risk for Poor Outcomes
On September 28, 2015 OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: OGXI) reported results from additional exploratory analyses of the Phase 3 SYNERGY trial demonstrating that custirsen treatment significantly lowered serum clusterin (sCLU) levels from baseline in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (Press release, OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, SEP 27, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507580]). In addition, these data presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (ECC 2015) in Vienna showed that sCLU reductions after custirsen treatment resulted in higher two-year survival rates in patients who were at increased risk for poor outcomes. Of those patients with lower sCLU levels, the data also showed a correlation to an overall survival benefit for custirsen-treated patients who were at increased risk for poor outcomes.
Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
"These data support that custirsen is inhibiting the production of clusterin in men with metastatic CRPC and a correlation between treatment-induced reductions in sCLU and clinical benefit in those patients at risk for poor outcomes," said Scott Cormack, President and CEO of OncoGenex. "We look forward to top line results in metastatic CRPC patients at risk for poor outcomes later this year in our Phase 3 AFFINITY trial."
Production of the protein clusterin is a fundamental cellular repair mechanism that tumor cells exploit to evade destruction by anti-cancer therapies. Overproduction of clusterin, which occurs in response to a variety of cancer treatments, is associated with faster rates of cancer progression and shorter survival. Custirsen is a highly specific clusterin inhibitor designed to improve survival in patients with advanced cancer.
A previous retrospective analysis from the SYNERGY trial showed a benefit with custirsen therapy in men with metastatic CRPC who had at least two of five common risk factors for poor prognosis. For those men, a 27 percent lower risk of death occurred when custirsen was used in combination with first-line docetaxel compared to docetaxel alone.
About the Study Results
(Abstract: 2560 – Baseline serum clusterin level in patients with poor prognostic features was associated with response to custirsen treatment: Results from the phase 3 SYNERGY trial of docetaxel +/- custirsen, Monday, September 28, 2015, 16:45 – 18:45 CEST, Hall C)
The analysis presented at ECC 2015 further demonstrates the impact of custirsen treatment on mCRPC patients at increased risk for poor outcomes, including a reduced risk of death among poor prognostic patients who achieved lower sCLU levels (Day 140 Area Under Curve (AUC)) during treatment. Patients in the poor prognostic subgroup who were treated with custirsen and had reduced Day 140 AUC sCLU levels showed a trend for higher two-year survival status. A landmark analysis also showed that overall survival benefit for the custirsen arm appeared greater in the poor prognostic patients who achieved lower Day 140 AUC sCLU levels.
In patients with lower sCLU at baseline, a trend for greater effect of custirsen treatment on survival was also observed, especially in patients at increased risk for poor outcomes. Patients at risk for poor outcomes with low baseline sCLU treated with custirsen (n=176) experienced a median survival of 18.4 months, compared to 14.4 months for patients on the control arm (n=170) [HR=0.689 (95% CI: 0.483-0.983); the median baseline sCLU was 55.30 ug/mL for patients at risk for poor outcomes. In the subpopulation of patients with a good prognosis, patients with low baseline sCLU treated with custirsen (n=171) experienced a median survival of 31.2 months in comparison to 27.2 months for patients on the control arm (n=186) [HR = 0.823 (95% CI: 0.505-1.34); the median baseline sCLU was 53.2 ug/mL for patients with a good prognosis.
Apatorsen Update
(Abstract: 2637 – Baseline circulating tumor cells (CTC) and serum heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) levels are increased in advanced bladder cancer (BC) patients with poor prognostic factors: Results from the randomized phase 2 Borealis-1TM trial of first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin plus apatorsen or placebo, Monday, September 28, 2015, 16:45 – 18:45 CEST, Hall C)
Results from the company’s other lead product candidate, apatorsen, presented at ECC 2015 confirmed that patients with advanced bladder cancer at increased risk for poor outcomes had increased baseline levels of circulating tumor cells (CTC) and of serum heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27). The study showed that baseline Hsp27 and CTC levels were independent risk factors for survival outcomes.
"Apatorsen is designed to inhibit the production of Hsp27 and thereby to disable cancer cells’ defenses and overcome treatment resistance that is common in this disease," said Cindy Jacobs, PhD, MD, Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President of OncoGenex. "Patients in the Borealis-1TM trial with advanced disease who had specific poor prognostic risk factors experienced a clinical benefit with apatorsen. We are continuing to work closely with investigators and regulatory agencies to determine next steps as we collect more evidence regarding apatorsen’s activity in this disease."
Data from the Borealis-1 trial previously reported at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting earlier this year showed that metastatic bladder cancer patients with poor prognostic features (low performance status, liver involvement, low hemoglobin and high alkaline phosphatase) showed a potential survival benefit with apatorsen 600mg added to first-line chemotherapy (HR = 0.72) compared to chemotherapy alone. Patients in the trial with a Karnofsky Performance Status of 80 percent or less, a common indicator of poor prognosis, experienced a 50 percent reduction in risk of death with the addition of apatorsen therapy (HR = 0.50).
Completion of enrollment in the Phase 2 Borealis-2 bladder cancer trial is expected to occur by the end of 2015 and will evaluate apatorsen in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer who have disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
About Clusterin
A major barrier to extending survival in patients with advanced cancer is treatment failure due to the ability of tumor cells to exploit fundamental cellular mechanisms that allow them to evade destruction by anti-cancer therapies. The production of the protein clusterin is a fundamental cellular repair mechanism that tumor cells exploit to evade destruction by anti-cancer therapies. Increased clusterin production has been linked to faster rates of cancer progression, treatment resistance and shorter survival duration in patients.
About Custirsen
Custirsen is a highly specific clusterin inhibitor designed to improve survival in patients with advanced cancer by disabling a fundamental cellular repair mechanism used by tumor cells. Custirsen binds to clusterin mRNA to block the production of clusterin protein and has enhanced the tumor cell destructive effects of multiple anti-cancer therapies across a variety of tumor models. By inhibiting clusterin, custirsen is designed to alter tumor dynamics by slowing tumor growth and inhibiting tumor resistance to partner treatments, so that the benefits of therapy, including survival, may be extended.
Custirsen has Fast Track designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for metastatic CRPC and non-small cell lung cancer.
About Apatorsen and ORCA
Apatorsen (OGX-427) is designed to inhibit production of heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27), disable cancer cells’ defenses and overcome treatment resistance. Hsp27 is an intracellular protein that protects cancer cells by helping them survive, leading to resistance and more aggressive cancer phenotypes. Both the potential single-agent activity and synergistic activity of apatorsen with cancer treatments may increase the overall benefit of existing therapies and augment the durability of treatment outcomes, which could lead to increased patient survival.
The ORCA (Ongoing Studies Evaluating Treatment Resistance in CAncer) program encompasses clinical trials of apatorsen. Phase 2 clinical trials are underway in bladder, lung, pancreatic and prostate cancers. For more information on apatorsen and ORCA, please visit www.OncoGenex.com or www.orcatrials.com.