Lilly Provides Update on MONARCH 2 Phase 3 Trial of Abemaciclib

On August 10, 2016 Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) reported that following a pre-planned interim analysis for MONARCH 2, an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) provided the recommendation to continue the study without modification as the interim efficacy criteria were not met (Press release, Eli Lilly, AUG 10, 2016, View Source [SID:1234514459]). The MONARCH 2, Phase 3 trial compares abemaciclib plus fulvestrant* versus placebo with fulvestrant in women with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We had stringent criteria set for this interim analysis and we look forward to receiving the final MONARCH 2 results in the first half of 2017," said Richard Gaynor, M.D., senior vice president, product development and medical affairs for Lilly Oncology. "We remain optimistic that treatment with abemaciclib, in combination with fulvestrant could offer improved outcomes for patients."

The Phase 3, double-blind study, designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant, was conducted across 142 sites worldwide. The intent-to-treat population of 669 patients was randomized to receive abemaciclib or placebo orally every 12 hours on a continuous dosing schedule, given in combination with fulvestrant at the approved dose and schedule, until disease progression. Patients enrolled in the study had experienced disease progression on or within 12 months of receiving endocrine treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting or while receiving first-line endocrine therapy for metastatic disease. Patients who had received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting were not eligible for the study. The primary endpoint for MONARCH 2 is progression-free survival (PFS).

The trial will continue into the first half of 2017 and will include a final analysis of PFS, overall survival and safety data.

Lilly will await further data and continue to work with the FDA to inform its submission plan for single-agent abemaciclib, based on the MONARCH 1 study. This Phase 2 study evaluated the single-agent activity and safety of abemaciclib in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer, whose disease had progressed following multiple prior treatments, including chemotherapy.

Along with MONARCH 1 and MONARCH 2, Lilly currently has three additional MONARCH trials evaluating abemaciclib in breast cancer. MONARCH 3 is a Phase 3 trial of abemaciclib in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in patients with HR+, HER2- locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Additionally, there are two Phase 2 MONARCH trials: neoMONARCH, which is evaluating abemaciclib in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in the neoadjuvant setting, and monarcHER, which is evaluating abemaciclib plus trastuzumab (with or without fulvestrant) in women with HR+, HER2+ locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

For more information on additional abemaciclib trials, a complete listing can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov.

About Metastatic Breast Cancer
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide with nearly 1.7 million new cases diagnosed in 2012.1 In the U.S. this year, approximately 246,660 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed and about 40,450 people will die from breast cancer.2 Of all early stage breast cancer cases diagnosed in the U.S., approximately 30 percent will become metastatic, spreading to other parts of the body. In addition, an estimated six to 10 percent of all new breast cancer cases are initially diagnosed as being stage IV, or metastatic.3 Metastatic breast cancer is considered incurable, but is generally treatable.

About Abemaciclib
Abemaciclib (LY2835219) is an investigational, oral cell cycle inhibitor, designed to block the growth of cancer cells by specifically inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases, CDK 4 and CDK 6. In many cancers, uncontrolled cell growth arises from a loss of cell cycle regulation due to increased signaling from CDK 4 and CDK 6. Abemaciclib inhibits both CDK 4 and CDK 6, and was shown in cell-free enzymatic assays to be most active against Cyclin D 1 and CDK 4.

In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted abemaciclib Breakthrough Therapy Designation based on data from the breast cancer cohort expansion of the company’s Phase 1 trial, JPBA, which studied the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in women with advanced or metastatic breast cancer. In addition to its current MONARCH clinical trials evaluating abemaciclib in breast cancer, a Phase 3 trial of abemaciclib in lung cancer is also underway.

Moleculin Expands Research Sponsorship at MD Anderson Cancer Center

On August 9, 2016 Moleculin Biotech, Inc., (NASDAQ: MBRX) ("Moleculin" or the "Company"), a preclinical and clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on the development of anti-cancer drug candidates, some of which are based on license agreements with The University of Texas System on behalf of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, reported it has agreed to extend through August of 2017 and expand its sponsored research agreement with MD Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson), the world’s largest cancer research facility (Press release, Moleculin, AUG 9, 2016, View Source [SID1234519562]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Moleculin’s Chairman and CEO, Walter Klemp, commented, "The research we have sponsored to date at MD Anderson has generated some very promising new technologies, including WP1066, a novel small molecule that is an effective stimulator of patients’ natural immune response and inducer of tumor cell death in the in vivo models of even the most difficult to treat cancers." He added, "We are now extending and expanding this agreement in light of new indications that we may be able to improve upon the WP1066 technology significantly."

Dr. Waldemar Priebe, Professor of Medicinal Chemistry at MD Anderson and Scientific Advisor to Moleculin, a shareholder and inventor of licensed technology, explained, "We are very excited about the potential for orally administered WP1066 in clinic, and we are now actively investigating expansion of clinical uses of Moleculin’s licensed therapeutics and researching their methods of administration while preserving drugability of this and similar compounds. For example, the injectable/iv administered versions of WP1066 would greatly expand its clinical applications and commercial potential. The continued research sponsored by Moleculin could make this possible."

Mr. Klemp concluded, "Moleculin’s continuing research sponsorship also facilitates access to grant funding from both public and private sources, and we are pleased that the expansion of this critical research collaboration will provide access to cutting edge research capability and potentially create more patentable discoveries."

Sophiris Bio Reports Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results and Key Business Highlights

On August 9, 2016 Sophiris Bio Inc. (NASDAQ: SPHS) (the "Company" or "Sophiris"), a biopharmaceutical company developing topsalysin (PRX302) for the treatment of urological diseases, reported financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 (Press release, Sophiris Bio, AUG 9, 2016, View Source [SID:1234514574]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Business Highlights:

On June 9, 2016, the Company announced successful results from its completed Phase 2a study of topsalysin in localized prostate cancer.
On May 12, 2016, the Company announced the engagement Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. as its financial advisor to assist with the evaluation of various strategic options for advancing topsalysin development programs.
On May 11, 2016, the Company announced the closing of a registered offering in which the Company raised net proceeds of $4.6 million. During June and July, the Company received proceeds of $2.4 million from the exercise of warrants included in this transaction bringing the total proceeds from this offering to $7.0 million.
On May 7, 2016, the Company presented positive data from its successful Phase 3 clinical trial of topsalysin as a treatment for the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia ("BPH") as a late breaking poster at the 111th American Urological Association Annual Meeting. A copy of the poster is available on the Company’s website at www.sophirisbio.com.
"2016 is proving to be a transformational year for Sophiris," stated Randall Woods, president and CEO of Sophiris Bio. "In the past quarter, we completed a Phase 2a proof of concept trial of topsalysin in localized prostate cancer in which topsalysin demonstrated the ability to ablate tumor cells in 50 percent of patients, including two men who experienced complete ablation of their targeted tumor with no evidence of any tumor remaining at 6 months post treatment. We also presented complete results from the Phase 3 BPH study in a late breaking presentation at the AUA 2016 Annual Meeting, demonstrating that topsalysin met the primary endpoint of a reduction in symptom score compared to the vehicle control arm. These two indications represent very large patient populations with very few adequate treatment options, and these clinical results are generating interest from investigators and the medical community. We are currently evaluating our options for moving these programs forward into additional clinical trials."

Financial Results:

At June 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.3 million and net working capital of $5.7 million. We expect that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months assuming that we do not initiate any new development activities for topsalysin. We do not plan to initiate any new clinical trials, including a second Phase 3 trial in BPH or a second Phase 2 trial in localized prostate cancer unless we obtain additional financing. We are actively evaluating strategic alternatives, including potential partnering arrangements, financings or a strategic transaction. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding principal balance of our term loan was $4.3 million on which we make principal and interest payments monthly.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016

The Company reported a net loss of $4.1 million ($0.21 per share) for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to a net loss of $3.7 million ($0.22 per share) for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses were $1.0 million for the three months, ended June 30, 2016, compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in research and development costs are primarily attributable to a decrease in the costs associated with the Company’s Phase 3 PLUS-1 clinical trial and our Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial for the low to intermediate risk prostate cancer. These decreases are partially offset by an increase in personnel related costs and a $0.1 million milestone payment payable as the result of the completion of Phase 1 clinical activities of topsalysin for the treatment of prostate cancer.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase is primarily due to increases in personnel related costs, legal costs and closing costs which were allocated to the warrants issued in our financing completed in May 2016. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation expense.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016

The Company reported a net loss of $6.3 million ($0.35 per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to a net loss of $8.0 million ($0.48 per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses were $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in research and development costs are primarily attributable to a decrease in the costs associated with the Company’s completed Phase 3 PLUS-1 clinical trial of topsalysin and costs associated with the manufacturing activities for topsalysin. These decreases are partially offset by increases in personnel related costs and a $0.1 million milestone payment payable as the result of the completion of Phase 1 clinical activities of topsalysin for the treatment of prostate cancer.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase is primarily due to an increase in legal, accounting, professional services, personnel related costs and closing costs which were allocated to the warrants issued in our financing completed in May 2016. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation expense.

QLT Announces Second Quarter 2016 Results

On August 9, 2016 QLT Inc. (NASDAQ:QLTI) (TSX:QLT) ("QLT" or the "Company") reported financial results today for the second quarter ended June 30, 2016 (Press release, QLT, AUG 9, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2194329 [SID:1234514572]). Unless otherwise specified, all amounts are reported in U.S. dollars and in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

2016 SECOND QUARTER FINANCIAL RESULTS

Operating Expenses/Income

During the second quarter of 2016, research and development ("R&D") expenditures were $2.9 million compared to $3.4 million for the same period in 2015. The $0.5 million (15%) decrease was primarily due to lower stock based compensation, lower salary and overhead costs related to R&D headcount attrition, the foreign exchange impact of the weak Canadian dollar and downsizing of our lease space. Stock-based compensation expense was significantly lower in the current period relative to the prior period due to the impact of the June 2015 accelerated vesting of all outstanding stock options in connection with the investment in and subsequent distribution of the Aralez Shares (defined below) and execution of the InSite Merger Agreement (defined below). The cost decreases described above were partially offset by an increase in costs related to preparatory activities for our planned Phase III pivotal trial for QLT091001.

During the second quarter of 2016, we incurred $3.2 million of consulting and advisory fees related to our exploration of strategic alternatives and pursuit of the merger transaction with Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Aegerion") described below. In comparison, we incurred $4.7 million of similar costs in 2015 related to our pursuit of a merger transaction with InSite Vision Incorporated ("InSite") and the Aralez Distribution (defined below). The agreement and plan of merger with InSite (the "InSite Merger Agreement") was terminated by InSite on September 15, 2015.

Excluding the strategic consulting and advisory fees discussed above, during the second quarter of 2016, selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenditures were $1.3 million compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2015. The $1.1 million (46%) decrease was primarily related to lower stock-based compensation expense during the period due to the accelerated vesting described above, lower fees paid for director compensation and lower general operating costs related to the downsizing of our lease space. These costs savings were partially offset by a lower amount of overhead being allocated to R&D expense due to R&D headcount attrition.

Other Expenses/Income

On April 5, 2016, QLT effected a distribution of 4,799,619 common shares (the "Aralez Shares") of Aralez Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Aralez"), which had a fair value of $19.3 million, and $15.0 million of cash to its shareholders of record as of February 16, 2016 (the "Aralez Distribution").

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, QLT recognized a $2.3 million fair value gain and $10.7 million fair value loss, respectively, related to the change in the value of the Aralez Shares held by QLT from the February 5, 2016 acquisition date to the April 5, 2016 distribution date.

Operating Loss and Net Loss per Share

The operating loss for the second quarter of 2016 was $7.4 million, compared to $10.7 million for the same period in 2015. As described above under "Operating Expenses/Income", the net $3.3 million change in our operating loss was primarily due to lower strategic consulting and advisory fees, significantly lower stock-based compensation expense and lower overhead costs.

Net loss per common share was $0.10 in the second quarter of 2016, compared to a net loss per common share of $0.21 for the same quarter in 2015. The change in our loss per common share was primarily due to the same factors described above.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

As at June 30, 2016, the Company’s consolidated cash and cash equivalents were $79.9 million compared to $141.8 million at December 31, 2015. The $61.9 million decrease was primarily due to: (i) the $45.0 million investment in Aralez, which was subsequently distributed to QLT’s shareholders via the Aralez Distribution described above, (ii) $5.4 million of strategic consulting and advisory fees related to the Aralez Distribution, the proposed Merger (as defined below) with Aegerion, and exploration of other strategic alternatives, (iii) $3.0 million advanced to Aegerion pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement (defined below) with Aegerion, and (iv) cash used in operating activities during the period.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

The Company believes that it was classified as a Passive Foreign Investment Company ("PFIC") for 2008 through 2015, and that it may be classified as a PFIC in 2016, which could have adverse tax consequences for U.S. shareholders. Please refer to our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K (as amended by the Form 10-K/A filed on April 29, 2016) for additional information.

Strategic Transactions

On June 14, 2016, QLT and Aegerion entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the "Merger Agreement") pursuant to which a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of QLT will be merged with and into Aegerion, with Aegerion surviving as a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of QLT (the "Merger"). On the closing of the Merger, each outstanding share of Aegerion common stock will be exchanged for 1.0256 (the "Exchange Ratio") QLT common shares, subject to potential downward adjustment in the event either the DOJ/SEC Investigations (as defined below) or the Class Action Lawsuit (as defined below) are settled for amounts in excess of the Negotiated Thresholds (as defined below) prior to the closing of the Merger. The Merger is currently expected to close before the end of 2016 and is subject to various closing conditions, including receipt of the approvals of the QLT and Aegerion shareholders.

If Aegerion does not settle either its Department of Justice or Securities and Exchange Commission investigations (the "DOJ/SEC Investigations") or its pending shareholder class action lawsuit (the "Class Action Lawsuit") prior to the closing of the Merger, QLT shareholders will receive warrants (the "Warrants"), which will become exercisable to purchase a certain number of QLT common shares for a purchase price of $0.01 in the event that (i) the DOJ/SEC Investigations are resolved for amounts in excess of $40 million, or (ii) the Class Action Lawsuit is settled for an amount that exceeds the amount, if any, available under Aegerion’s insurance coverage (the $40 million in respect of the DOJ/SEC Investigations and the available insurance coverage in respect of the Class Action Lawsuit being the "Negotiated Thresholds").

QLT plans to change its name upon closing of the Merger to Novelion Therapeutics Inc. ("Novelion") and its common shares will continue to trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the Toronto Stock Exchange. Assuming no adjustment to the Exchange Ratio, QLT shareholders, including the Investors in the Private Placement (as defined and described below), are expected to own approximately 67% of the outstanding Novelion common shares following the Merger.

Concurrent with signing the Merger Agreement, QLT and Aegerion entered into a loan and security agreement (the "Loan Agreement") under which QLT has agreed to provide Aegerion with a term loan facility to support working capital needs for an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15 million, subject to various terms and conditions. As at August 8, 2016, $3.0 million is outstanding under the Loan Agreement.

On June 14, 2016, QLT entered into a unit subscription agreement (the "Unit Subscription Agreement’) with certain investors party thereto (the "Investors") pursuant to which QLT will issue units to such investors for an aggregate subscription price of $21.8 million (the "Private Placement"). Each unit consists of one QLT common share and one Warrant, as described above. The Private Placement, which is contemplated to occur immediately prior to, and is conditional on the closing of, the Merger, is intended to provide QLT with additional capital to support future operations and business development initiatives. The completion of at least $17.5 million of the Private Placement is a condition to the closing of the Merger.

QLT Inc. – Financial Highlights
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share information)
Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, June 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015

Expenses
Research and development $ 2,929 $ 3,404 $ 5,919 $ 5,612
Selling, general and administrative 4,451 7,154 10,349 10,773
Depreciation 23 179 61 367
7,403 10,737 16,329 16,752
Operating loss (7,403 ) (10,737 ) (16,329 ) (16,752 )
Other (expense) income
Net foreign exchange (losses) gains (31 ) (60 ) (108 ) 38
Interest income 54 51 129 83
Fair value gain (loss) on investment 2,256 – (10,704 ) –
Other 9 – 9 (2 )
2,288 (9 ) (10,674 ) 119
Loss before income taxes (5,115 ) (10,746 ) (27,003 ) (16,633 )
Provision for income taxes (5 ) (5 ) (11 ) (14 )
Net loss and comprehensive loss $ (5,120 ) $ (10,751 ) $ (27,014 ) $ (16,647 )

Basic and diluted net loss per common share
Net loss per common share $ (0.10 ) $ (0.21 ) $ (0.51 ) $ (0.32 )

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (thousands)
Basic and diluted 52,829 51,779 52,829 51,508

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars) June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 79,943 $ 141,824
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts 359 287
Loan receivable 3,011 -
Income taxes receivable 14 14
Prepaid and other assets 668 611
Total current assets 83,995 142,736
Accounts receivable 2,000 2,000
Property, plant and equipment 467 430
Total assets $ 86,462 $ 145,166
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 5,219 $ 1,656
Accrued liabilities 800 1,827
Total current liabilities 6,019 3,483
Uncertain tax position liabilities 376 342
Total liabilities 6,395 3,825
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share capital
Authorized
500,000,000 common shares without par value
5,000,000 first preference shares without par value, issuable in series
Issued and outstanding common shares $ 475,333 $ 475,333
June 30, 2016 – 52,829,398 shares
December 31, 2015 – 52,829,398 shares
Additional paid-in capital 63,117 97,377
Accumulated deficit (561,352 ) (534,338 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income 102,969 102,969
Total shareholders’ equity 80,067 141,341
Total shareholders’ equity and liabilities $ 86,462 $ 145,166

Omeros Corporation Reports Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results

On August 9, 2016 Omeros Corporation (NASDAQ: OMER), a biopharmaceutical company committed to discovering, developing and commercializing both small-molecule and protein therapeutics for large-market as well as orphan indications targeting inflammation, coagulopathies and disorders of the central nervous system, reported recent highlights and developments as well as financial results for the second quarter of 2016, which include:

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

2Q 2016 total and OMIDRIA revenues were $10.0 million. Revenues from OMIDRIA sales rose 220% from the prior year quarter and 38% from 1Q 2016 (Press release, Omeros, AUG 9, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2194294 [SID:1234514571]).

Net loss in 2Q 2016 was $12.6 million, or $0.32 per share, which included $3.2 million ($0.08 per share) of non-cash expenses. Net loss in the prior year quarter was $16.7 million or $0.44 per share, which included $2.7 million ($0.07 per share) of non-cash expenses.

Completed enrollment in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required post-marketing OMIDRIA pediatric clinical study; the
product is eligible for an additional six months of U.S. marketing exclusivity upon successful completion of the study.

Completed successful meeting with European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding requirements for OMS721 Phase 3 program for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS); the same single-arm Phase 3 clinical trial will support the submission package for marketing approvals in the U.S. and Europe.

Initiated dosing in a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating OMS721 in patients with complement-related renal disorders.
"OMIDRIA generated solid sales growth in the second quarter," said Gregory A. Demopulos, M.D., chairman and chief executive officer of Omeros. "That growth was broad based; not only did we add a significant number of new accounts, but existing customers continued to increase their level of utilization – it clearly appears that we have turned the corner with respect to the recognition of the clinical benefits of OMIDRIA. The revenues from OMIDRIA are increasingly defraying the costs of our development pipeline, which continues to deliver on that investment. OMS721, our MASP-2 inhibitor program, is in a Phase 3 clinical program in aHUS and in two Phase 2 programs, one for patients with microangiopathies and the other for those with complement-related renal disease. Our PDE10 inhibitor is in a Phase 2 program in Huntington’s disease, we expect OMS405 – our PPAR-gamma agonist program for addiction – to yield additional data this year, our PDE7 inhibitor program for addiction is slated to enter the clinic next year and our MASP-3 and GPCR programs are making good progress. We look forward to building on the commercial and clinical momentum generated in the first half of 2016 and expect to continue that momentum through the remainder of the year."

Second Quarter and Recent Highlights and Developments

Highlights and developments regarding OMIDRIA include:
In June 2016, Omeros announced the completion of enrollment in an FDA required post-marketing OMIDRIA pediatric clinical trial which, if completed in compliance with FDA clinical trial regulations and pre-specified timelines, results in eligibility for an additional six months of marketing exclusivity for OMIDRIA. The trial is being conducted in compliance with FDA regulations and within the specified timelines. OMIDRIA is not yet approved for use in patients less than 18 years of age, and the trial is expected to provide clinical information on the use of OMIDRIA in the pediatric population.
As previously announced, Omeros and ITROM Trading Drug Store (ITROM) entered into an exclusive supply and distribution agreement for the sale of OMIDRIA in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and certain other countries in the Middle East. Under the agreement, ITROM will be responsible for obtaining marketing authorizations for OMIDRIA within the licensed territories in addition to marketing and distributing OMIDRIA supplied by Omeros. Omeros expects ITROM to begin selling OMIDRIA later this year on a limited basis assuming submission of appropriate regulatory applications.
Highlights and developments regarding OMS721, Omeros’ lead human monoclonal antibody in its mannan-binding lectin-associated serine protease-2 (MASP-2) program for the treatment of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), including aHUS and hematopoietic stem cell transplant-related (HSCT) TMAs, and for the treatment of complement-related renal diseases, include:
In the company’s Phase 2 clinical program evaluating OMS721 in patients with complement-related renal disorders, Omeros initiated dosing in a Phase 2 clinical trial that includes patients with IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, C3 glomerulopathy and lupus nephritis.
Omeros received scientific advice from the EMA directed to its OMS721 Phase 3 program for the treatment of aHUS. The advice received is generally consistent with that from the FDA earlier this year and will allow Omeros to submit applications for approval in the U.S. and in the European Union (EU) based on a single data set, which includes the results from one pivotal clinical trial – a single-arm (i.e., no control arm), open-label study in patients with newly diagnosed or ongoing aHUS. Based on this EMA advice, the company plans to run the same, single Phase 3 clinical program to support OMS721 marketing approval applications in both the U.S. and in the EU for the treatment of aHUS.
In August 2016, the company announced results from its OMS906 complement program showing that OMS906 reduced both the incidence and severity of disease in a well-established animal model of arthritis mediated by the alternative pathway of complement (APC). OMS906 is Omeros’ lead antibody targeting mannan-binding lectin-associated serine protease-3 (MASP-3), a protein essential for the activation of the APC. Omeros exclusively controls the use of MASP-3 inhibitors for the treatment of APC-related diseases and disorders. The company is initiating the process of manufacturing scale-up of OMS906 in preparation for clinical trials.
In May 2016, Omeros amended its existing credit facility with Oxford Finance LLC and East West Bank to provide the company with an additional $20 million in unrestricted cash by funding the remaining tranches of the facility. Omeros issued warrants to the lenders, exercisable for seven years for up to 100,602 shares of the company’s common stock at an exercise price per share of $9.94, which was the closing price of the company’s stock on the funding date. The final payment fee rate on the $20 million borrowed increased from 5.25% to 6.25%, reflecting the accelerated draw-down of these additional funds. All loan payments are interest-only until August 1, 2017.
Financial Results

For the quarter ended June 30, 2016, total revenues were $10.0 million, all relating to sales of OMIDRIA. This compares to OMIDRIA revenues of $3.1 million and grant revenue of $62,000 for the same period in 2015. On a sequential quarter basis, OMIDRIA revenue grew $2.8 million or 38% from 1Q to 2Q 2016. The quarter-over-quarter increase in OMIDRIA revenue was due to continued acceptance of and increased demand for OMIDRIA in the ophthalmic surgery community.

Total costs and expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016 were $20.9 million ($3.2 million of which were non-cash expenses) compared to $19.2 million ($2.7 million of noncash expenses) for the same period in 2015. The increase in the current year quarter was primarily due to increased legal costs associated with the Par lawsuit and increased sales and marketing costs, partially offset by a decrease in research and development costs.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, Omeros reported a net loss of $12.6 million, or $0.32 per share, which included noncash expenses of $3.2 million ($0.08 per share). This compares to the prior year quarter where Omeros reported a net loss of $16.7 million, or $0.44 per share, which included noncash expenses of $2.7 million ($0.07 per share).

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, total revenues were $17.4 million, consisting of $17.3 million of sales of OMIDRIA and $173,000 of grant revenue. This compares to OMIDRIA revenues of $3.4 million and grant revenue of $212,000 for the same period in 2015. This increase in sales of OMIDRIA is due to the continued acceptance of and increased demand for OMIDRIA in the ophthalmic surgery community.

Total costs and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were $47.8 million compared to $37.5 million for the same period in 2015. The increase in the current year compared to the prior year was primarily due to increases in OMS721 research and development costs, legal costs associated with the Par lawsuit, sales and marketing costs and stock-based compensation expense.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, Omeros reported a net loss of $33.2 million, or $0.86 per share, which included noncash expenses of $7.9 million ($0.20 per share). This compares to a net loss of $35.3 million, or $0.95 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2015, which included noncash expenses of $5.5 million ($0.15 per share).

At June 30, 2016, the company had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $21.2 million. In addition, the company had $10.7 million of restricted cash on hand to satisfy covenants under its loan agreement with Oxford Finance and East West Bank and its lease for the Omeros Building.