Progression-Free Survival Data from ECHO-202 Trial of Incyte’s Epacadostat in Combination with KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) Underscore Durability of Response in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

On September 9, 2017 Incyte Corporation (Nasdaq:INCY) reported updated data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 ECHO-202 trial (KEYNOTE-037) evaluating epacadostat, Incyte’s selective IDO1 enzyme inhibitor, in combination with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), an anti-PD-1 therapy marketed by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ USA (known as MSD outside the United States and Canada), in patients with advanced melanoma (Press release, Incyte, SEP 9, 2017, View Source [SID1234520442]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Among all patients with advanced melanoma, including treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced, data showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 56 percent (n=35/63) in patients treated with the combination of epacadostat and KEYTRUDA; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months, with PFS rates of 65 percent at six months, 52 percent at 12 months, and 49 percent at 18 months. Results were generally consistent across dosing schedules of epacadostat combined with KEYTRUDA, including epacadostat 100 mg BID, the epacadostat dose being studied in the Phase 3 ECHO-301 trial.
These results will be presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2017 Congress in Madrid, Spain, in an oral presentation on Saturday, September 9 from 3-3:15 pm CEST (Location: Madrid Auditorium) (Abstract #1214O).

"The updated results of the ECHO-202 trial support earlier published findings, and continue to suggest that the novel immunotherapy combination of epacadostat plus KEYTRUDA has the potential to offer a favorable efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma," said Omid Hamid, M.D., Chief of Translational Research and Immuno-Oncology and Director of Melanoma Therapeutics, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, California. "Data have shown that combination immunotherapy can offer higher response rates and improved progression-free survival. These results show that this combination has demonstrated increased and durable response rates and improved progression-free survival, compared to what we would expect from KEYTRUDA alone, without sacrificing safety."

Key Findings from the ECHO-202 (KEYNOTE-037) Melanoma Cohort
Data at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) (as of June 9, 2017) show an ORR of 56 percent among all patients with advanced melanoma treated with the combination of epacadostat and KEYTRUDA, with a complete response (CR) in nine patients (14%); partial response (PR) in 26 patients (41%); and stable disease (SD) in 10 patients (16%). Data also show a disease control rate (DCR) of 71 percent (n=45/63). Of the 35 responses to treatment, 30 were ongoing at the time of analysis; the median duration of response was 45 weeks (range: 1+ to 121+).
ECHO-202 Overall Response Rates (ORR), Disease Control Rates (DCR), Durability of Response (DoR), and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Advanced Melanoma Cohort
All
Patients
(N=65)
Treatment-Naïve
(all epacadostat doses)
(N=54)
Treatment-Naïve (epacadostat 100 mg BID)
(N=39)
Per-protocol evaluable n (%)1 n=63 n=53 n=38
ORR 35 (56) 29 (55) 22 (58)
9 CR (14)
26 PR (41)
10 SD (16)
7 CR (13)
22 PR (42)
9 SD (17)
3 CR (8)
19 PR (50)
6 SD (16)
DCR 45 (71) 38 (72) 28 (74)
18 PD or death (29)
2 not evaluable2
15 PD or death (28)
1 not evaluable2
10 PD or death (26)
1 not evaluable2
DoR
30/35 responses ongoing

Duration of response:
<1+ to 121+ weeks

4/5 patients completing
study treatment maintained
ongoing response at last
follow-up
25/29 responses
ongoing

Duration of response:
<1+ to 121+ weeks

3/4 patients completing study
treatment maintained ongoing
response at last follow-up
20/22 responses
ongoing

Duration of response:
<1+ to 81+ weeks

1/1 patient completing study
treatment maintained ongoing response
at last follow-up
Median PFS, months (90% CI) 12.4
(6.2, 23.8)
22.8
(6.2, 23.8)
Not yet reached
(4.2, NR)
PFS rate, % (90% CI) 6-month:
65 (54, 74)

12-month:
52 (40, 63)

18-month:
49 (37, 60)
6-month:
65 (53, 75)

12-month:
52 (38, 64)

18-month:
52 (38, 64)
6-month:
64 (49, 76)

12-month:
55 (39, 69)

18-month:
55 (39, 69)
1. ≥1 post-baseline scan, or discontinuation or death before first post-baseline scan

2. Scan data not documented in the clinical trial database at time of data cutoff

The most common (≥10 percent) all grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash (46 percent), fatigue (43 percent), pruritus (29 percent), and arthralgia (17 percent). Grade ≥3 TRAEs were observed in 20 percent of patients; the most common were increased lipase (6 percent) and rash (5 percent). Four patients (6 percent) discontinued for TRAEs. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The safety profile was consistent with previously reported Phase 1 findings, as well as the Phase 1/2 safety results in other tumor cohorts and pooled safety data from this study. In general, the safety profile of the combination was also consistent with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) monotherapy.

About ECHO-202 (KEYNOTE-037)
The ECHO-202 study (NCT02178722) is evaluating the safety and efficacy of epacadostat, Incyte’s selective IDO1 enzyme inhibitor, in combination with KEYTRUDA. Patients previously treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 therapies were excluded from this trial. Enrollment is complete for the Phase 1 dose escalation (epacadostat 25, 50, 100 mg BID + KEYTRUDA 2 mg/kg IV Q3W and epacadostat 300 mg BID + KEYTRUDA 200 mg IV Q3W) and Phase 1 dose expansion (epacadostat 50, 100, and 300 mg BID + KEYTRUDA 200 mg IV Q3W) portions of the trial. For more information about ECHO-202, visit View Source

About ECHO
The ECHO clinical trial program was established to investigate the efficacy and safety of epacadostat as a core component of combination therapy in oncology. Ongoing Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies are evaluating epacadostat in combination with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in a broad range of solid tumor types as well as hematological malignancies. ECHO-301 (NCT02752074), a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating KEYTRUDA in combination with epacadostat or placebo for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, is also ongoing and fully recruited. For more information about the ECHO clinical trial program, visit www.ECHOClinicalTrials.com.

About Epacadostat (INCB024360)
The immunosuppressive effects of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) enzyme activity on the tumor microenvironment help cancer cells evade immunosurveillance. Epacadostat is an investigational, highly potent and selective oral inhibitor of the IDO1 enzyme. In single-arm studies, the combination of epacadostat and immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown proof-of-concept in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and bladder cancer. In these studies, epacadostat combined with the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab or the PD-1 inhibitors KEYTRUDA or nivolumab improved response rates compared with studies of the immune checkpoint inhibitors alone.

Exelixis and Ipsen Announce Results from Phase 2 CABOSUN Trial of Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib in Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma at ESMO 2017

On September 9, 2017 Exelixis, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXEL) and Ipsen (Euronext:IPN; ADR:IPSEY) reported updated results from the CABOSUN randomized phase 2 trial of cabozantinib in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with intermediate- or poor-risk disease per the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) (Press release, Exelixis, SEP 9, 2017, View Source [SID1234520441]). Principal investigator Toni K. Choueiri, M.D., will present detailed data from late-breaking CABOSUN abstract [#LBA38_PD] today in the Genitourinary Tumors, Non-Prostate poster discussion session, starting at 2:45 p.m. CEST (local Madrid time) / 8:45 a.m. EDT / 5:45 a.m. PDT at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2017 Congress, which is being held September 8-12, 2017 in Madrid, Spain.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

CABOSUN is being conducted by The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology as part of Exelixis’ collaboration with the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI-CTEP). The data presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2017 included the analysis from a blinded independent radiology review committee (IRC), which confirmed the primary efficacy endpoint results of investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), as well as an updated investigator-assessed analysis. Per the IRC analysis, cabozantinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant 52 percent reduction in the rate of disease progression or death (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74, two-sided P=0.0008). The median PFS for cabozantinib was 8.6 months versus 5.3 months for sunitinib, corresponding to a 3.3 month (62 percent) improvement favoring cabozantinib over sunitinib.

"These updated analyses from CABOSUN consistently show that cabozantinib provided a statistically significant decrease in the rate of disease progression or death compared to sunitinib, a current standard of care – potentially offering a new treatment option for physicians to treat patients in the first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma setting," said Toni K. Choueiri, M.D., Director, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. "The CABOSUN trial included patients with intermediate or poor prognostic factors per the IMDC criteria; in addition, patients had a notable number of other independent adverse prognostic risk factors. These included a high rate of bone metastases, two or more sites of metastatic disease, ECOG 2 performance status, and lack of prior nephrectomy. This patient population fares poorly and is in need of new therapies to better control their disease."

The following chart outlines data from the CABOSUN trial presented today at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2017, as compared to the data previously published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) in October 2016:

JCO
Investigator-assessed
(April 11, 2016 Cut-off)

ESMO 2017
Investigator-assessed
(Sept 15, 2016 Cut-off)

ESMO 2017
IRC Review

(Sept 15, 2016 Cut-off)

Cabozantinib
N = 79 Sunitinib
N = 78 Cabozantinib
N = 79 Sunitinib
N = 78 Cabozantinib
N = 79 Sunitinib
N = 78
Progression-free survival
Median PFS, months 8.2 5.6 8.3 5.4 8.6 5.3
Stratified HR
(95% CI) 0.66 (0.46-0.95) 0.56 (0.37-0.83) 0.48 (0.31-0.74)
P value 0.012 (1-sided) 0.0042 (2-sided) 0.0008 (2-sided)
Tumor Response
Objective response rate (95% CI),a % 46 (34-57) 18 (10-28) 33 (23-44) 12 (5-21) 20 (12-31) 9 (4-18)
Disease control rate,b % 78 54 76 49 75 47
Progressive disease,c % 18 26 18 24 18 29
Not evaluable or missing, % 4 21 6 27 8 23
Any reduction in target lesions, % 87 44 85 38 80 50
a One complete response was observed with cabozantinib for both investigator assessments, and one complete response was observed with sunitinib for the original investigator assessment, all other responses were partial responses; b Complete response + partial response + stable disease; c Progressive disease as best overall response.

The updated 2017 data sets and methods differ from the initial investigator analyses presented in 2016. The comprehensive image collection for IRC review used a later cut-off point (5 months) than the initial investigator analysis and followed a rigorous IRC review process. The analysis of IRC data applied U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for PFS analyses in oncology studies, including recommended censoring rules (i.e., censoring at the last adequate tumor assessment prior to initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, and censoring for events that occur after two or more missing adequate tumor assessments).1 Both the updated investigator assessment and IRC analysis demonstrated consistent and statistically significant improvement of PFS with cabozantinib as compared to sunitinib.

The updated overall survival (OS) analysis had a data cut-off of July 1, 2017, and showed a favorable trend for patients randomized to cabozantinib compared to sunitinib that was not statistically significant. Median overall survival was 26.6 months for patients receiving cabozantinib versus 21.2 months for those receiving sunitinib (HR= 0.80, 95% CI 0.53-1.21, two-sided P=0.29).

"We are very encouraged by the clinically meaningful and statistically significant efficacy results on the primary endpoint of progression-free survival, which formed the basis of the recent supplemental New Drug Application submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for cabozantinib in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma," said Michael M. Morrissey, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Exelixis. "The latest CABOSUN data continue to underscore the value that cabozantinib may offer patients with previously untreated renal cell carcinoma, and we are working tirelessly in our efforts to bring this option to patients and their physicians as quickly as possible."

David Meek, Chief Executive Officer of Ipsen stated, "Following the recent European approval of cabozantinib for second-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior VEGF-targeted therapy, the latest data from the CABOSUN study being presented this year at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) extends the clinical benefit of cabozantinib in first-line therapy setting for patients with advanced RCC. With our partner Exelixis, we are committed to strengthening the medical value of cabozantinib and to continuing to bring innovative therapeutic solutions for the treatment of patients with RCC."

The most common all-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events in more than 5 percent of patients for cabozantinib (N=78) and sunitinib (N=72), respectively, were diarrhea (10 vs. 11 percent), hypertension (28 vs. 21 percent), fatigue (6 vs. 17 percent), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 5 vs. 0 percent), decreased appetite (5 vs. 1 percent), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES; 8 vs. 4 percent), decreased platelet count (1 vs. 11 percent) and stomatitis (5 vs. 6 percent). Twenty-one percent of patients in the cabozantinib arm and 22 percent of patients in the sunitinib arm discontinued treatment due to adverse events.

Exelixis filed a supplemental New Drug Application based on the CABOSUN data with the FDA for cabozantinib as a treatment for previously untreated advanced RCC on August 16, 2017. Ipsen also submitted to EMA the regulatory dossier for cabozantinib as a treatment for first-line advanced RCC in the European Union on August 28, 2017; on September 8, 2017, Ipsen announced that the EMA validated the application.

About the CABOSUN Study

On May 23, 2016, Exelixis announced that CABOSUN met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced intermediate- or poor-risk RCC as determined by investigator assessment. The CABOSUN trial is being conducted by The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology as part of Exelixis’ collaboration with the NCI-CTEP. These results were first presented in a plenary session by Dr. Toni Choueiri at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress, and published in the JCO.2 In June 2017, a blinded IRC confirmed that cabozantinib provided a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in the primary efficacy endpoint of investigator-assessed PFS.

CABOSUN is a randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase 2 trial that enrolled 157 patients with advanced RCC determined to be intermediate- or poor-risk by the IMDC criteria. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) or sunitinib (50 mg once daily, 4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included OS and objective response rate.

Eligible patients were required to have locally advanced or metastatic clear-cell RCC, ECOG performance status 0-2 and had to be intermediate or poor risk per the IMDC criteria (Heng, JCO, 2009).3 Prior systemic treatment for RCC was not permitted. Baseline characteristics included:

Characteristic Cabozantinib
(N=79) Sunitinib
(N=78)
ECOG performance status, %
0 46 46
1 42 41
2 13 13
IMDC risk group, %
Intermediate 81 81
Poor 19 19
Bone metastasis per IxRS,a %
Yes 37 36
No 63 64
Prior nephrectomy, %
Yes 72 77
No 28 23
Number of metastatic sites per investigator, %
1 22 33
2 47 26
≥3 32 41
a interactive voice/web response system

Please see Important Safety Information below and full U.S. prescribing information at View Source

About Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

The American Cancer Society’s 2017 statistics cite kidney cancer as among the top ten most commonly diagnosed forms of cancer among both men and women in the U.S.4 Clear cell RCC is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults.5 If detected in its early stages, the five-year survival rate for RCC is high; for patients with advanced or late-stage metastatic RCC, however, the five-year survival rate is only 12 percent, with no identified cure for the disease.6 Approximately 30,000 patients in the U.S. and 68,000 globally require treatment, and an estimated 14,000 patients in the U.S. each year are in need of a first-line treatment for advanced kidney cancer.7

The majority of clear cell RCC tumors have lower than normal levels of a protein called von Hippel-Lindau, which leads to higher levels of MET, AXL and VEGF.8,9 These proteins promote tumor angiogenesis (blood vessel growth), growth, invasiveness and metastasis.10-13 MET and AXL may provide escape pathways that drive resistance to VEGF receptor inhibitors.8,9

About CABOMETYX (cabozantinib)

CABOMETYX is the tablet formulation of cabozantinib. Its targets include MET, AXL and VEGFR-1, -2 and -3. In preclinical models, cabozantinib has been shown to inhibit the activity of these receptors, which are involved in normal cellular function and pathologic processes such as tumor angiogenesis, invasiveness, metastasis and drug resistance. CABOMETYX is available in 20 mg, 40 mg or 60 mg doses. The recommended dose is 60 mg orally, once daily.

On April 25, 2016, the FDA approved CABOMETYX tablets for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy. In February of 2016, Exelixis and Ipsen jointly announced an exclusive licensing agreement for the commercialization and further development of cabozantinib indications outside of the United States, Canada and Japan. This agreement was amended in December of 2016 to include commercialization rights for Ipsen in Canada. On September 9, 2016, the European Commission approved CABOMETYX tablets for the treatment of advanced RCC in adults who have received prior vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in the European Union, Norway and Iceland.

On January 30, 2017, Exelixis and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited announced an exclusive licensing agreement for the commercialization and further clinical development of cabozantinib for all future indications in Japan, including RCC.

CABOMETYX is not indicated for the treatment of previously untreated advanced RCC.

U.S. Important Safety Information

Hemorrhage: Severe hemorrhage occurred with CABOMETYX. The incidence of Grade ≥3 hemorrhagic events was 2.1% in CABOMETYX-treated patients and 1.6% in everolimus-treated patients. Fatal hemorrhages also occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Do not administer CABOMETYX to patients that have or are at risk for severe hemorrhage.

Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforations and Fistulas: Fistulas were reported in 1.2% (including 0.6% anal fistula) of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0% of everolimus-treated patients. GI perforations were reported in 0.9% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0.6% of everolimus-treated patients. Fatal perforations occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Monitor patients for symptoms of fistulas and perforations. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who experience a fistula that cannot be appropriately managed or a GI perforation.

Thrombotic Events: CABOMETYX treatment results in an increased incidence of thrombotic events. Venous thromboembolism was reported in 7.3% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 2.5% of everolimus-treated patients. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 3.9% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0.3% of everolimus-treated patients. Events of arterial thromboembolism were reported in 0.9% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0.3% of everolimus-treated patients. Fatal thrombotic events occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop an acute myocardial infarction or any other arterial thromboembolic complication.

Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis: CABOMETYX treatment results in an increased incidence of treatment-emergent hypertension. Hypertension was reported in 37% (15% Grade ≥3) of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 7.1% (3.1% Grade ≥3) of everolimus-treated patients. Monitor blood pressure prior to initiation and regularly during CABOMETYX treatment. Withhold CABOMETYX for hypertension that is not adequately controlled with medical management; when controlled, resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose. Discontinue CABOMETYX for severe hypertension that cannot be controlled with anti-hypertensive therapy. Discontinue CABOMETYX if there is evidence of hypertensive crisis or severe hypertension despite optimal medical management.

Diarrhea: Diarrhea occurred in 74% of patients treated with CABOMETYX and in 28% of patients treated with everolimus. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 11% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and in 2% of everolimus-treated patients. Withhold CABOMETYX in patients who develop intolerable Grade 2 diarrhea or Grade 3-4 diarrhea that cannot be managed with standard antidiarrheal treatments until improvement to Grade 1; resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose. Dose modification due to diarrhea occurred in 26% of patients.

Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia Syndrome (PPES): Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) occurred in 42% of patients treated with CABOMETYX and in 6% of patients treated with everolimus. Grade 3 PPES occurred in 8.2% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and in <1% of everolimus-treated patients. Withhold CABOMETYX in patients who develop intolerable Grade 2 PPES or Grade 3 PPES until improvement to Grade 1; resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose. Dose modification due to PPES occurred in 16% of patients.

Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS): RPLS, a syndrome of subcortical vasogenic edema diagnosed by characteristic finding on MRI, occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Perform an evaluation for RPLS in any patient presenting with seizures, headache, visual disturbances, confusion, or altered mental function. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop RPLS.

Embryo-fetal Toxicity: CABOMETYX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with CABOMETYX and for 4 months after the last dose.

Adverse Reactions: The most commonly reported (≥25%) adverse reactions are: diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, PPES, hypertension, vomiting, weight decreased, and constipation.

Drug Interactions: Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers: Reduce the dosage of CABOMETYX if concomitant use with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors cannot be avoided. Increase the dosage of CABOMETYX if concomitant use with strong CYP3A4 inducers cannot be avoided.

Lactation: Advise a lactating woman not to breastfeed during treatment with CABOMETYX and for 4 months after the final dose.

Reproductive Potential: Contraception―Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with CABOMETYX and for 4 months after the final dose. Infertility ―CABOMETYX may impair fertility in females and males of reproductive potential.

Hepatic Impairment: Reduce the CABOMETYX dose in patients with mild (Child-Pugh score [C-P] A) or moderate (C-P B) hepatic impairment. CABOMETYX is not recommended for use in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Please see full Prescribing Information at View Source

Amgen And Allergan Present Phase 3 Data On Biosimilar Trastuzumab Candidate ABP 980 At The European Society For Medical Oncology 2017 Congress

On September 9, 2017 Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) and Allergan plc. (NYSE:AGN) reported data from a Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ABP 980, a Herceptin (trastuzumab) biosimilar, compared with the originator product in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) early breast cancer (Press release, Amgen, SEP 9, 2017, View Source [SID1234520439]). Results from the neoadjuvant efficacy phase of the study, including pathologic complete response assessed both by local investigators and also by independent pathology review, were presented today during a poster discussion at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2017 Congress. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity data support ABP 980 as a trastuzumab biosimilar and add to the totality of evidence currently under review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Biosimilars have the potential to provide more patients access to high-quality therapies with proven safety and efficacy profiles," said Serafin Morales, M.D., medical oncologist, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain. "The results presented today add to the data package demonstrating similarity between ABP 980 and trastuzumab."

The co-primary endpoints of the study were risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) of pathologic complete response in breast tissue and axillary lymph nodes, and the prespecified equivalence margins were +/-13 percent for RD and 0.759 to 1.318 for RR. According to local review, 48 percent and 40.5 percent of patients in the ABP 980 arm and trastuzumab arm, respectively, achieved pathologic complete response. RD and RR of pathologic complete response were 7.3 percent (90 percent CI: 1.2, 13.4) and 1.19 (90 percent CI: 1.033, 1.366) respectively. Based on central independent review, which was conducted as part of a sensitivity analysis, 47.8 percent and 41.8 percent in the ABP 980 arm and trastuzumab arm, respectively, achieved pathologic complete response. RD and RR of pathologic complete response respectively were 5.8 percent (90 percent CI: -0.5, 12.0) and 1.14 (90 percent CI: 0.993, 1.312).

Frequency, type and severity of adverse events were similar between ABP 980 and trastuzumab. No new safety signals compared to the known safety profile of trastuzumab were detected.

"At the heart of Amgen’s commitment to biosimilars is our mission to serve patients. We are leveraging our more than 35 years of biotechnology experience and using the same personnel, services and manufacturing expertise from the company’s innovative business to produce high-quality, reliably supplied biosimilars for some of the most complex diseases," said Sean E. Harper, M.D., executive vice president of Research and Development at Amgen. "The results presented today reinforce the potential of ABP 980 for breast cancer patients, and we look forward to continued discussions with regulatory authorities."

"Allergan is proud to be collaborating with Amgen on the development of several oncology biosimilars that require significant expertise, infrastructure and investment to ensure safe therapies for patients," said David Nicholson, Ph.D., chief research and development officer, Allergan. "We are excited about the progress of ABP 980 and are committed to its development in hopes of providing patients with an effective alternative option."

Amgen and Allergan are collaborating on the development and commercialization of four oncology biosimilars. Amgen has a total of 10 biosimilars in its portfolio, one of which has been approved by the FDA and European authorities.

ABP 980 Phase 3 Study Design
The ABP 980 Phase 3 LILAC study was a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, active-controlled study (study number 20120283) that evaluated safety and efficacy of ABP 980 compared to trastuzumab in adult female patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. There were 725 patients randomized, with 364 patients in the ABP 980 group and 361 patients in the trastuzumab group.

In the neoadjuvant phase, enrolled patients received run-in chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) every three weeks (Q3W) for four cycles. Once run-in chemotherapy was completed, patients with adequate cardiac function were randomized 1:1 to receive ABP 980 or trastuzumab, plus paclitaxel, Q3W for four cycles. Surgery (breast and sentinel node or axillary lymph node resection) was complete three to seven weeks after the last dose of either ABP 980 or trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant phase, and pathologic complete response was analyzed.

In the adjuvant phase, following surgery, patients received ABP 980 or trastuzumab Q3W for up to one year from the first day either product was administered in the neoadjuvant phase. Patients who received ABP 980 during the neoadjuvant phase continued to receive ABP 980 Q3W for the adjuvant phase. Patients who received trastuzumab during the neoadjuvant phase either underwent a single switch to ABP 980 or continued on trastuzumab Q3W for the adjuvant phase. The allocation to a treatment group during the neoadjuvant or adjuvant phase occurred by randomization, as did the single switch from trastuzumab to ABP 980 after the neoadjuvant phase.

The primary analysis was conducted when the last patient completed the surgery following the neoadjuvant therapy. Statistical equivalence was assessed by comparing the confidence interval of the RD and RR of the pathologic complete response in breast tissue and axillary lymph nodes with the prespecified equivalence margins.

About HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer
HER2-positive early breast cancer is a breast cancer that tests positive for a protein called human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which promotes the growth of cancer cells.1 Approximately 20 percent of all breast cancers are HER2-positive.2 Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Europe for females, and the most common cancer overall, with more than 464,000 new cases diagnosed each year.3 HER2-positive breast cancers tend to grow and spread more aggressively than HER2-negative breast cancers.1

About ABP 980
ABP 980 is being developed as a biosimilar to trastuzumab, a recombinant DNA-derived humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 kappa antibody approved in many regions for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing early breast cancer, adjuvant breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer and metastatic gastric cancer. The active ingredient of ABP 980 is a humanized monoclonal antibody that has the same amino acid sequence as trastuzumab. ABP 980 has the same pharmaceutical dosage form and strength as trastuzumab. In March and July of 2017 respectively, Amgen and Allergan submitted a Marketing Authorization Application to the EMA and a Biologics License Application to the FDA for ABP 980.

Phase 3 COLUMBUS Part 2 Results in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Presented at European Society for Medical Oncology Congress

On September 9, 2017 Array BioPharma (Nasdaq: ARRY) and Pierre Fabre reported results from Part 2 of the Phase 3 COLUMBUS study evaluating binimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, and encorafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced, unresectable or metastatic melanoma (Press release, Array BioPharma, SEP 9, 2017, View Source [SID1234520436]). The primary analysis of Part 2 compared progression free survival (PFS) in patients treated with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily plus encorafenib 300 mg daily (COMBO300) to patients treated with encorafenib 300 mg daily as a single agent. Part 2 of the study was designed specifically to measure the contribution of binimetinib to the combination by holding the dose of encorafenib at 300 mg in both arms.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The median PFS for patients treated with COMBO300 was 12.9 months compared to 9.2 months for patients treated with single agent encorafenib, with HR of 0.77 [95% CI 0.61-0.97, p=0.029]. As part of the trial design, the analysis was based on a Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of patient scans, while results by local review at the investigative site were also analyzed. COMBO300 was generally well-tolerated and reported dose intensity and adverse events were consistent with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily plus encorafenib 450 mg daily (COMBO450) results in COLUMBUS Part 1. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in 5% or more of patients receiving COMBO300 were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) (5%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (CK) (5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (5%). The incidence of selected any grade AEs of special interest, defined based on toxicities commonly associated with commercially available MEK+BRAF-inhibitor treatments for patients receiving COMBO300 included: pyrexia (17%), rash (15%), retinal pigment epithelial detachment (9%) and photosensitivity (2%). Full safety results of COLUMBUS Part 2 were presented at the 2017 ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress.

"The totality of the COLUMBUS results, across Part 1 and 2, including median PFS, objective response rate, dose intensity and tolerability of the combination, provide a strong and consistent theme across multiple endpoints, underscoring the promise of binimetinib plus encorafenib as an attractive treatment option for patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutant melanoma," said Keith T. Flaherty, M.D., Director of the Termeer Center for Targeted Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School.

Reinhard Dummer, M.D., investigator, University Hospital Zurich, noted: "Results from COLUMBUS Part 2 clearly demonstrated the contribution of MEK to the combination and suggest that the robust activity seen with COMBO450 in COLUMBUS Part 1 may be related to the ability to increase the dose of encorafenib."

On July 5, 2017, Array announced that it submitted two NDAs to the FDA to support use of the combination of binimetinib 45 mg twice daily and encorafenib 450 mg once daily (COMBO450) for the treatment of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced, unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Array completed its NDA submissions based on findings from the pivotal Phase 3 COLUMBUS trial. In addition, Array’s European partner, Pierre Fabre, announced on August 28, 2017, that the European Medicines Agency has validated the review of the MAAs for binimetinib and encorafenib.

COLUMBUS Results
As presented at the 2016 Society for Melanoma Research Annual Congress, results from Part 1 of the COLUMBUS study showed that COMBO450 significantly extended PFS in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, with a PFS of 14.9 months compared with 7.3 months observed with vemurafenib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, (95% CI 0.41-0.71, P<0.001)]. As part of the trial design, the primary analysis was based on a BICR of patient scans, while results by local review at the investigative site were also analyzed. The table below outlines the median PFS (mPFS) results, as determined by both assessments, for COMBO450 versus vemurafenib, COMBO450 versus encorafenib, and encorafenib versus vemurafenib:

mPFS BICR

mPFS Local Review
COMBO450
vs.
Vemurafenib

COMBO450
Vemurafenib

COMBO450
Vemurafenib

14.9 months
7.3 months

14.8 months
7.3 months

HR (95% CI): 0.54 (0.41-0.71); P<0.001

HR (95% CI): 0.49 (0.37-0.64); P<0.001

COMBO450
vs.
Encorafenib

COMBO450
Encorafenib

COMBO450
Encorafenib

14.9 months
9.6 months

14.8 months
9.2 months

HR (95% CI): 0.75 (0.56-1.00); P=0.051

HR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.52-0.90); P=0.006

Encorafenib
vs.
Vemurafenib

Encorafenib
Vemurafenib

Encorafenib
Vemurafenib

9.6 months
7.3 months

9.2 months
7.3 months

HR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.52-0.90); P=0.007

HR (95% CI): 0.70 (0.54-0.91); P=0.008
In this study, COMBO450 was generally well-tolerated, with a median duration of treatment of 51 weeks and median relative dose intensity for encorafenib and binimetinib of 100% and 99.6%, respectively. Grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving COMBO450 were increased GGT (9%), increased blood CK (7%) and hypertension (6%). The incidence of selected any grade AEs of special interest, defined based on toxicities commonly associated with commercially available MEK+BRAF-inhibitor treatments for patients receiving COMBO450 included: rash (23%), pyrexia (18%), retinal pigment epithelial detachment (13%) and photosensitivity (5%). Full safety results of COLUMBUS Part 1 were presented at the 2016 Society for Melanoma Research Annual Congress.

COLUMBUS Part 2 was designed specifically to assess the contribution of binimetinib to the combination of binimetinib and encorafenib by reducing the dose of encorafenib to 300 mg in the combination arm to allow for a comparison of equal doses across arms. In COLUMBUS Part 2, the primary analysis compared PFS in patients treated with COMBO300 to patients treated with encorafenib 300 mg daily as a single agent.

About the Phase 3 COLUMBUS Study
The COLUMBUS trial, (NCT01909453), is a two-part, international, randomized, open label Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination of binimetinib plus encorafenib to vemurafenib and to encorafenib monotherapy in 921 patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation. Prior immunotherapy treatment was allowed. Over 200 sites across North America, Europe, South America, Africa, Asia and Australia participated in the study. Patients were randomized into two parts:

In Part 1, 577 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive COMBO450, 300 mg encorafenib alone, or 960 mg vemurafenib alone. The dose of encorafenib in the combination arm is 50% higher than the single agent maximum tolerated dose of 300 mg. A higher dose of encorafenib was possible due to improved tolerability when combined with binimetinib. The primary endpoint for the COLUMBUS trial was a PFS comparison of COMBO450 versus vemurafenib. PFS is determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) by a BICR. Secondary endpoints include a comparison of the PFS of encorafenib monotherapy to that of COMBO450 and a comparison of overall survival (OS) for COMBO450 to that of vemurafenib alone.
In Part 2, 344 patients were randomized 3:1 to receive COMBO300 or 300 mg encorafenib alone. Part 2 was designed to provide additional data to help evaluate the contribution of binimetinib to the combination of binimetinib and encorafenib. As the comparison of COMBO450 to encorafenib in Part 1 did not achieve statistical significance, analyses of other endpoints including the statistical analysis conducted in Part 2 is descriptive.
About Melanoma
Metastatic melanoma is the most serious and life-threatening type of skin cancer and is associated with low survival rates[1],[2]. There are about 200,000 new cases of melanoma diagnosed worldwide each year, approximately half of which have BRAF mutations, a key target in the treatment of metastatic melanoma[1],[3],[4].

About Binimetinib and Encorafenib
MEK and BRAF are key protein kinases in the MAPK signaling pathway (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK). Research has shown this pathway regulates several key cellular activities including proliferation, differentiation, survival and angiogenesis. Inappropriate activation of proteins in this pathway has been shown to occur in many cancers, such as melanoma, colorectal and thyroid cancers. Binimetinib is a late-stage small molecule MEK inhibitor and encorafenib is a late-stage small molecule BRAF inhibitor, both of which target key enzymes in this pathway. Binimetinib and encorafenib are being studied in clinical trials in advanced cancer patients, including the Phase 3 BEACON CRC trial with encorafenib in combination with cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancer.

Binimetinib and encorafenib are investigational medicines and are not currently approved in any country.

Array BioPharma retains exclusive rights to binimetinib and encorafenib in key markets including the U.S., Canada and Israel. Array has granted Ono Pharmaceutical exclusive rights to commercialize both products in Japan and South Korea and Pierre Fabre exclusive rights to commercialize both products in all other countries, including Europe, Asia and Latin America.

10-K – Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405]

CellCeutix has filed a 10-K – Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Filing, 10-K, CellCeutix, SEP 8, 2017, View Source [SID1234520459]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!