Bio-Thera Solutions Initiates Phase I Clinical Trial for BAT4306F, an ADCC-enhanced CD20 monoclonal antibody

On December 7, 2018 Bio-Thera Solutions, a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company, reported that patient dosing has begun in a Phase I clinical study of BAT4306F in relapsed/refractory CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. BAT4306F is an ADCC-enhanced CD20 monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated enhanced potency in preclinical studies with potential to be a "best-in-class" therapeutic (Press release, BioThera Solutions, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531957]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Initiating our Phase I clinical trial for BAT4306F represents a major milestone for Bio-Thera Solutions as BAT4306F is our first clinical candidate developed for the treatment of hematologic malignancies," said Shengfeng Li, CEO, Bio-Thera Solutions. "While the BAT4306F development plan will be initially focused on CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma we believe BAT4306F also has great potential as a treatment for other hematologic malignancies."

The Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial of BAT4306F is designed to assess the safety and tolerability of BAT4306F as a single agent. The study will enroll subjects with relapsed/refractory CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Key objectives in the study include determining maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics and recommended doses for phase II clinical studies.

More information on the trial is available at View Source (CTR20181568).

About BAT4306F

BAT4306F is an investigational ADCC-enhanced CD20 monoclonal antibody that has the potential to be a "best-in-class" therapeutic. BAT4306F is currently being evaluated in relapsed/refractory CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. CD20 is a naturally occurring receptor that is overexpressed in many types of hematologic malignancies. BAT4306F is being developed for use as a single agent and in combination with other agents for a variety of hematologic malignancies.

Data presented at ASH 2018 provide evidence for the benefits of IMBRUVICA ® ▼ (ibrutinib) first-line treatment for all CLL patient populations

on December 7, 2018 Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson reported new results from three key studies on IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), a form complex to treat blood cancer and the most common form of leukemia in adults (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531955]). 1 The findings were presented at the 60 th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) in San Diego, California.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The results of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 study (E1912), led by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (ECOG-ACRIN), were presented during the oral session on last-minute abstracts . The study evaluated ibrutinib plus rituximab compared to a chemotherapy regimen with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) in previously untreated patients aged 70 years or less with CLL. With nearly three years of follow-up, data showed that ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with CRF. 2

Phase III data from the iLLUMINATE (PCYC-1130) study were also presented at an oral session and published simultaneously in The Lancet Oncology . The findings showed that the combination of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab significantly improved PFS compared with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in patients with newly diagnosed CLL. 3 These data have recently supported a request for Type II variation filed with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and aimed at approval for the expanded use of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab in adults not previously treated with

In addition, data on ibrutinib in the Phase 1b / 2 study and its extension study (PCYC-1102, PCYC-1103) with follow-up of up to 7 years in patients with CLL recently diagnosed recurrent / refractory (R / R) have demonstrated long-term, sustainable survival benefits in monotherapy, the longest follow-up for a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor in the treatment of an LLC. 4

"The results of the iLLUMINATE and ECOG-ACRIN studies demonstrate an impressive increase in progression-free survival for relevant ibrutinib-based combinations, compared to the commonly used chemo-immunotherapy protocols," says hematologist consultant Dr. Carol Moreno. at the Santa Creu Sant Pau Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, ​​Barcelona, ​​Spain. "These chemotherapy-free protocols represent a breakthrough in our approach to treating patients, including young patients and those with high-risk CLL, with the potential to reach a compromise between efficacy and patient toxicity. . "

"The data presented at the ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) provide convincing additional evidence of the clinical benefit that ibrutinib can provide to patients across all CLL therapies." Long-term data provide confidence for its prolonged activity for patients, "says Dr. Catherine Taylor, Head of Hematology Therapies for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) at Janssen-Cilag Limited. "We continue to explore the full potential of ibrutinib through a comprehensive clinical development program, to improve outcomes and change what a diagnosis of blood cancer can mean for patients."

Ibrutinib, a leading BTK inhibitor, is jointly developed and marketed by Janssen Biotech, Inc., and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company.

Results of the Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib-Based Therapy (PCI-32765) vs FCR Chemo-Immunotherapy in Young Untreated CLL Patients: An ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Study Research Group (E1912) ( Abstract No. LBA-4 )

With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the interim analysis observed 77 PHC events and 14 deaths. Ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly improved PFS compared with RCF (RR 0.352, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 0.223-0.558, p <0.0001); the pre-specified threshold for the SSP has been crossed. The ibrutinib plus rituximab group also showed an improvement in SG (RR: 0.168, 95 percent CI: 0.053-0.538, p = 0.0003, pre-specified threshold for superiority p = 0.0005). 2

In a subgroup analysis for PFS, ibrutinib plus rituximab showed lengthening of PFS regardless of age, gender, performance status, stage of illness, or presence / absence of the cytogenetic abnormality, deletion 11q23. According to current monitoring, ibrutinib plus rituximab was also superior to CRF for non-mutated IGHV patients (RR: 0.262, 95 percent CI 0.137-0.498, p <0.0001), but not IGHV patients mutated (RR 0.435, 95 percent CI 0.140-0.11350, p = 0.07). 2

Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 58 percent of patients treated with ibrutinib plus rituximab, and 72 percent of patients treated with CRF (p = 0.0042). The RCF was more frequently associated with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (RCF: 44 percent vs ibrutinib plus rituximab: 23 percent, p <0.0001) and infectious complications (RCF: 17.7 percent vs ibrutinib plus rituximab: 7.1 percent, p <0.0001). 2

Results of the iLLUMINATE Phase 3 study ( abstract n ° 691 )

At a median follow-up of 31.3 months, ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab had significantly lengthened the PFS assessed by an independent review committee (IRC), compared with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (mean unmet vs. 19.0 months; 0.231, 95 percent CI 0.145-0.367, p <0.0001), with a 77 percent reduction in the risk of progression or death. 3

A higher SSP in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group, compared to the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab group, was also observed in the high risk group, including in patients with IGHV, del11q, del17p non-mutated and / or TP53 mutation, with 85 percent reduction in risk of progression or death (mean not achieved vs. 14.7 months, RR 0.154, 95 percent CI: 0.087-0.270, p <0.0001). 5 In addition, the overall response rate (TRG) assessed by CEI was higher in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group compared to the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab group (88 percent vs. 73 percent); Complete response rates (CR) / complete response with incomplete blood recovery were also higher (19 percent vs. 8 percent, respectively). Minimal residual disease (MRM) was not detectable in the blood and / or bone marrow (<10 -4 by flow cytometry) for 35 percent of patients treated with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab, compared to 25 percent of patients treated with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab. The 30-month SG rates were 86 percent for the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group compared to 85 percent for the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab group. 3

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group, compared to the chlorambucil plusobinutuzumab group, were neutropenia (36 percent vs 46 percent), thrombocytopenia (19 percent vs. 10 percent) pneumonia (7 percent vs. 4 percent), atrial fibrillation (5 percent vs. 0 percent), febrile neutropenia (4 percent vs. 6 percent), anemia (4 percent vs. 8 percent), and perfusion (PRP, 2 percent vs 8 percent). 5No patients stopped taking obinutuzumab because of RLP in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group, compared to the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab group (6 percent). Adverse events led to discontinuation of ibrutinib in 16 percent of patients, and discontinuation of chlorambucil in nine percent of patients. Adverse events led to discontinuation of obinutuzumab in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group (9 percent) and in the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab group (13 percent). With approximately three years of follow-up, 70 percent of patients in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab group continue ibrutinib monotherapy. 3

Follow-up Results to Seven Years in PCYC-1102 Phase 1b / 2 and its Extension Study, PCYC-1103 ( Abstract # 3133 )

The results of these studies demonstrated the sustained efficacy of ibrutinib in patients with newly diagnosed R / R LLC. These long-term data showed prolonged PHC and OS. The estimated seven-year PHC rates were 80 percent for patients with newly diagnosed disease and 32 percent for patients with R / R disease. It should be noted that earlier administration of ibrutinib in the therapeutic lines resulted in an improvement in SSP for R / R patients. 4

The TRG was 89 percent for all patients (RC, 15 percent), with similar rates in newly diagnosed patients (87 percent [RC, 32 percent]) and R / R LLC patients (89 percent). cent [RC, 10 percent]). The median response time (DR) was not reached (95 percent CI: 0 + -85 +) for newly diagnosed CLL patients and was 57 months (95 percent CI: 0 + – 85+) for R / R LLC patients. 6 Median PFS was not achieved (95 percent CI: not estimable [NE], NE) for newly diagnosed CLL patients, and 51 months (95 percent CI 37-70) for R / R LLC patients. 4.6Median OS was not affected in newly diagnosed patients (95 percent of IC: 80-NE) or in R / R LLC patients (95 percent of IC: 63-NE), with seven-year GS estimates of 75 percent and 52 percent, respectively. 4

Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 74 percent of newly diagnosed patients and 89 percent of R / R LLC patients. Of the Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred during treatment, the most common were: hypertension (newly diagnosed, 32 percent, R / R, 26 percent), diarrhea (newly diagnosed, 16 percent, R / R , 4 percent), and hyponatraemia (newly diagnosed, 10 percent, R / R, 0 percent). Cases of major bleeding and atrial fibrillation, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and grade 3 or greater arthralgia have been observed in 11 percent or less of newly diagnosed patients and R / R patients. In addition, the cases of6 No new or unexpected adverse events were observed, and the occurrence of most grade 3 or higher adverse events and serious adverse events decreased over time, with the exception of hypertension. 6

#END#

About the ECOG-ACRIN E1912 study

The Phase 3 study (E1912) evaluated previously untreated CLL patients aged 70 years or less who were randomized to receive ibrutinib (420 mg / day until disease progression) and rituximab (50 mg / m 2 at day 1 of cycle 2, 325 mg / m 2 at day 2 of cycle 2, 500 mg / m 2 at day 1 of cycles 3-7) (n = 354) or six series intravenous fludarabine (25 mg / m 2 ) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg / m 2 ) on days 1-3 with rituximab (50 mg / m 2 on day 1 of cycle 1, 325 mg / m 2 on day 2 Cycle 1, 500 mg / m 2at day 1 of cycles 2-6) every 28 days (n = 175). The main criterion was SSP, with the SG as a secondary criterion. 2

From federal funding, the study was designed by ECOG-ACRIN researchers. It was conducted via NCI’s national clinical trial network. Pharmacyclics LLC provided ibrutinib as part of a cooperative research and development agreement with the NCI and a separate agreement with ECOG-ACRIN.

About the iLLUMINATE study

The iLLUMINATE study ( PCYC-1130 ) evaluated patients with newly diagnosed CLL who were randomized to receive ibrutinib 420 mg once daily continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in combination with obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenous for six cycles (n = 113); or chlorambucil on days 1 and 15 of each cycle plus obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously for 6 cycles (n = 116). The median age of the patients was 71 years and 65 percent of the patients had high risk genomic characteristics. The primary criterion was SSP, as assessed by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints included PHC in a high-risk population,3

About PCYC-1102 and PCYC-1103 studies

With follow-up up to seven years, studies (Phase 1b / 2, PCYC-1102 and its extension study, PCYC-1103 ) evaluated patients with newly diagnosed R / R CLL (n = 132; diagnosed = 31, R / R = 101), including patients with high-risk characteristics, who received 420 mg or 840 mg ibrutinib once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the cutoff date, 55 percent of newly diagnosed patients and 21 percent of R / R patients had continued ibrutinib, with a median follow-up of 67 months. 4

About ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a first-of-its-kind Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTK), which acts as a strong covalent bond to BTK to block the transmission of cell survival signals into malignant B-cells. 7 By blocking this BTK protein, ibrutinib helps kill and reduce the number of cancer cells, thus delaying cancer progression. 8

The Ibrutinib is currently approved in Europe for the following uses: 9

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): as a single agent in the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated CLL, and as a single agent or in combination with bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) for treatment adult patients with CLL who have received at least one therapy.
Mantle lymphoma: adult patients with recurrent or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM): Adult patients who have received at least one therapy or first-line treatment for patients not eligible for chemo-immunotherapy.
Ibrutinib is approved in more than 90 countries and has been used to date to treat more than 135,000 patients worldwide on all of its approved indications. 10

The most common adverse reactions observed with ibrutinib were: diarrhea, neutropenia, hemorrhage (eg bruising), musculoskeletal pain, nausea, rash, and pyrexia. 9

For a complete list of side effects and for information on dosage and administration, contraindications and other precautions on the use of ibrutinib, please refer to the summary of product characteristics .

Data presented at the 2018 congress of ASH show the benefits of first-line treatment with IMBRUVICA ® ▼ (hybridutinib) therapy in all CLL patient populations

On December 7, 2018 Johnson & Johnson Janssen pharmaceutical companies reported new results from three important studies on IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a form of difficult blood cancer treatment as well as the most common type of leukemia in adults (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531954]). 1 The results were presented during the 60th annual congress of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) in San Diego, California.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The results of the Phase 3 study (E1912) sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and led by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (ECOG-ACRIN) were presented during the oral session dedicated to abstracts late breakers. The study evaluated ibrutinib in combination with rituximab compared to a chemotherapy regimen with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in previously untreated CLL patients younger than 70 years. Following a nearly 3-year follow-up, these data showed that the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to FCR. 2

Data from the iLLUMINATE phase 3 study (PCYC-1130) were also presented during an oral session, with concurrent publication in The Lancet Oncology . The results show that the combination of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab significantly improves PFS compared to chlorambucil and obinutuzumab in recently diagnosed CLL patients. 3 These data recently supported the submission of a Type 2 variation application to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to request authorization for the extended use of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab in previously untreated CLL adults.

Data from the 1b / 2 hybridutinib study and the related extension study (PCYC-1102, PCYC-1103) with a follow-up of up to seven years on newly diagnosed relapsed / refractory (R / R) CLL patients they also demonstrated long-term and long-term survival benefits following monotherapy treatment, and constitute the longest follow-up for a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor in CLL. 4

"The results of iLLUMINATE and ECOG-ACRIN studies demonstrate an extremely prolonged progression-free survival for the relative combinations based on ibrutinib compared to commonly used chemo-immunotherapy regimens," said Dr. Carol Moreno, Hematology Consultant at Hospital de the Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ​​Barcelona, ​​Spain. "These non-chemotherapeutic regimens are a step forward in assessing how patients are treated, including the younger ones and with high-risk CLL, and offer the potential to resolve the compromise between efficacy and toxicity for patients."

"The data presented at the INA congress provide a further and convincing evidence of the clinical benefits that ibrutinib can offer to patients across the spectrum of CLL management." Long-term data are also promising in terms of long-term found for patients, "said Dr. Catherine Taylor, head of the hematology area for the EMEA region (Europe, Middle East and Africa) of Janssen-Cilag Limited. "We continue to study the full potential of ibrutinib with a comprehensive clinical development program, to improve results and modify the consequences of diagnosing blood cancer for patients."

Ibrutinib, a first class BTK inhibitor, is developed and marketed jointly by Janssen Biotech, Inc., and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company.

Results of the Randomized Phase 3 Study on Hybridinib (PCI-32765) Therapy vs. FCR Chemo-Immunotherapy in Untreated Young CLL Patients: an ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Study (E1912) ( Abstract No. LBA-4 )

The partial analysis, with a median follow-up of 33.4 months, was performed on 77 PFS events and 14 deaths. Ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly improved PFS compared to FCR (HR: 0.352; [CI, confidence interval] 95%: 0.223-0.558; P <0.0001); the predetermined limit for PFS has been exceeded. Also the treatment arm with ibrutinib plus rituximab showed an improvement in OS (HR: 0.168; 95% CI: 0.053-0.538; p = 0.0003, predetermined limit for superiority p = 0.0005). 2

In a subgroup of PFS analyzes, ibrutinib plus rituximab showed prolongation of PFS regardless of age, gender, general condition, disease stage or presence / absence of cytogenetic abnormality deletion 11q23. With the current follow-up also ibrutinib plus rituximab was superior to FCR in patients without IgHV mutation (HR: 0.262; CI 95%: 0.137-0.498; p <0.0001), but not in patients with IGHV mutation (HR: 0.435; 95% CI: 0.140-0.1350; p = 0.07). 2

Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse AE events (AEs) were observed in 58% of patients treated with ibrutinib plus rituximab and in 72% of patients treated with FCR (p = 0.0042). The FCR arm was more frequently associated with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (FCR: 44% compared to ibrutinib plus rituximab: 23%; p <0.0001) and infectious complications (FCR: 17.7% compared to rituximab: 7.1%, p <0.0001). 2

Results from the iLLUMINATED phase 3 study ( abstract No. 691 )

At a median follow-up of 31.3 months, ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab significantly prolonged the PFS assessed by an independent review board (IRC) compared to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (median not achieved [NR] vs. 19.0 months; 0.231; 95% CI: 0.145-0.367; P <0.0001), with a 77% reduction in risk of progression or death. 3

Higher PFS values ​​in the armutinib plus obinutuzumab than the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm were also observed in the high-risk population, including cases with IGHV, del11q, del17p and / or TP53 mutation, with 85% reduction in risk progression or death (median NR vs. 14.7 months; HR 0.154; 95% CI: 0.087-0.270; P <0.0001). 5The overall response rate (ORR) assessed by the IRC was also higher for the hybridutinib arm plus obinutuzumab than the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (88% vs. 73%); also the complete response rates (CR) / complete response with incomplete recovery of the blood count (CRi) were higher, respectively 19% compared to 8%. The minimal residual disease (MRD) was not detectable in the blood and / or bone marrow (<10 -4flow cytometry) in 35% of patients treated with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab compared to 25% of patients treated with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab. The 30-month OS rates were 86% for the hybridutinib plus obinutuzumab arm compared to 85% of the most obinutuzumab chlorambucil arm. 3

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse AE (AE) events in the most obinutuzumab-hybridutib arm compared to the most obinutuzumab-chlorambucil arm were: neutropenia (36% vs. 46%), thrombocytopenia (19% vs. 10%), pneumonia (7 % vs. 4%), atrial fibrillation (5% vs. 0%), febrile neutropenia (4% vs. 6%), anemia (4% vs. 8%) and infusion-related reactions (IRR; 2% vs 8%). 5No patients discontinued obinutuzumab due to IRR in the armutinib plus obinutuzumab arm compared to the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (6%). The EAs led to the interruption of ibrutinib in 16% of patients and led to the interruption of chlorambucil in 9% of patients. The AEs led to the discontinuation of obinutuzumab in the hybridutinib arm plus obinutuzumab (9%) and in the chlorambucil arm plus obinutuzumab (13%). At a follow-up of approximately three years, 70% of patients in the hybridutinib arm plus obinutuzumab continue to be treated with ibrutinib monotherapy. 3

Results from the follow-up up to seven years of the PCYC-1102 phase 1b / 2 study and its extension, PCYC-1103 ( abstract No. 3133 )

The results of these studies showed a lasting efficacy of ibrutinib in newly diagnosed CLL R / R patients. Long-term data showed sustained rates of PFS and OS. The estimated seven-year PFS rates were 80% for newly diagnosed patients and 32% for R / R patients. In particular, the administration of ibrutinib in the first lines of therapy has led to an improvement in PFS for R / R patients. 4

The ORR value was 89% for all patients (CR, 15%), with similar rates in newly diagnosed patients (87% [CR, 32%]) and in CLL R / R patients (89% [ CR, 10%]). Median response duration (DOR) was NR (CI 95%: 0 + -85 +) for newly diagnosed CLL patients and 57 months (CI 95%: 0 + -85 +) for CLL patients R / R. 6 Median PFS was NR (CI 95%: non-evaluable [NE], NE) for newly diagnosed CLL patients and was 51 months (95% CI: 37-70) for CLL R / R patients. 4.6 The median OS was NR for newly diagnosed patients (95% CI: 80-NE) or CLL R / R patients (95% CI: 63-NE), with estimated OS rates at seven years 75% and 52% respectively. 4

Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 74% of newly diagnosed patients and 89% of CLL R / R patients. Among the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred during treatment were hypertension (new diagnosis, 32%, R / R, 26%), diarrhea (new diagnosis, 16%, R / R, 4%) and hyponatraemia (new diagnosis, 10%, R / R, 0%). Severe hemorrhages of grade 3 or higher atrial fibrillation, thrombocytopenia, anemia and arthralgia have been observed in 11% or less of newly diagnosed and R / R patients. In addition, infections (newly diagnosed, 23%; R / R, 55%) occurred in CLL R / R patients. 6No new or unexpected adverse events were observed, and the frequency of most grade 3 or higher adverse events and serious adverse events decreased over time, with the exception of hypertension. 6

#END#

Information on the ECOG-ACRIN E1912 study

The phase 3 study (E1912) evaluated previously untreated CLL patients aged up to 70 years, randomized to ibrutinib (420 mg / day until disease progression) and rituximab (50 mg / m 2 on day 1 of cycle 2 325 mg / m 2 on day 2 of cycle 2, 500 mg / m 2 on day 1 of cycles 3-7) (n = 354) or six doses of fludarabine for intravenous (25 mg / m 2 ) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg / m 2 ) days 1-3 with rituximab (50 mg / m 2 on day 1 of cycle 1; 325 mg / m 2 on day 2 of cycle 1; 500 mg / m 2day 1 of cycles 2-6) every 28 days (n = 175). The primary endpoint was PFS, with a secondary endpoint of OS. 2

The federally funded study was designed by researchers with ECOG-ACRIN and was conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network of NCI. Pharmacyclics LLC provided hybridutinib under a research and development cooperation agreement with NCI and a separate agreement with ECOG-ACRIN.

Information on the iLLUMINATE study

iLLUMINATE ( PCYC-1130 ) evaluated newly diagnosed CLL patients randomized for continuous administration of hybrid 420 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, in combination with obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously over 6 cycles (n = 113); or chlorambucil on days 1 and 15 of each cycle plus obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously over 6 cycles (n = 116). The median age of patients was 71 years and 65% of patients had high-risk genomic characteristics. The primary endpoint was the PFS, assessed by an independent review board. Secondary endpoints included PFS in a high-risk population, undetectable MRD, ORR, OS, and safety. 3

Information on PCYC-1102 and PCYC-1103

With a follow-up of up to a maximum of 7 years, studies ( PCYC-1102 phase 1b / 2 and its extension, PCYC-1103 ) evaluated newly diagnosed CLL R / R patients (n = 132; diagnosis = 31, R / R = 101), including those with high-risk characteristics, who received either ibrutinib 420 mg or 840 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of the cutoff, 55% of newly diagnosed patients and 21% of R / R patients continued treatment with ibrutinib, with a median follow-up of 67 months. 4

Information on ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a first class Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTK) that acts by forming a strong covalent bond with BTK to block the transmission of cell survival signals into malignant B cells. 7 By blocking this BTK protein, ibrutinib contributes to the death and reduction of the number of tumor cells, thus slowing the aggravation of the neoplasm. 8

Currently the use of ibrutinib is approved in Europe for the following indications: 9

chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): as a single agent for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated CLL, and as a single agent or in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for the treatment of adult CLL patients who have already undergone at least one previous therapy .
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): adult patients with relapsing or refractory MCL forms.
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM): patients who have undergone at least one previous therapy or are being treated with first-line therapy in cases where chemo-immunotherapy is not appropriate.
Ibrutinib is approved in over 90 countries and, to date, has been used to treat more than 135,000 patients worldwide and for all approved indications. 10

The most common adverse reactions observed with ibrutinib include diarrhea, neutropenia, haemorrhage (for example: bruising), musculoskeletal pain, nausea, rash and pyrexia. 9

For a full list of side effects and information on dosage and administration, contraindications and other precautions for the use of ibrutinib, please see the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) .

Seattle Genetics and Takeda present positive data from the Phase 3 ECHELON-2 clinical trial for ADCETRIS ® (brentuximab vedotin) in the first-line treatment of peripheral CD30-expressing T cell lymphomas

On December 7, 2018 Seattle Genetics, Inc. (Nasdaq: SGEN) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (TSE: 4502) reported that ECHELON- step 3 were presented in an oral session 60 in theAnnual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) (Press release, Seattle Genetics, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531953]). The data demonstrated that first-line treatment with ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin) in combination with CHP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone) is effective in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with a profile comparable to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), a current standard of treatment in patients with CD30-expressing T-cell peripheral lymphomas (LPCT). These data were also published online in The Lancet. ADCETRIS is an antibody-drug (ADC) conjugate directed to CD30, which is expressed on the surface of various types of LPCT.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Positive results from the top line of the Phase 3 ECHELON-2 clinical trial were previously reported in October 2018. In November 2018, ADCETRIS was approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA) for adults with systemic anaplastic lymphoma large cells (sALCL) or other LPCT expressing CD30, including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and LPCT not specified in combination with CHP. ECHELON-2 data were the basis of a Supplemental Biological Permit (SLB), which was reviewed by the FDA under its Real-Time Oncology Review Pilot Program and approved less than two weeks after the complete submission of supplemental SLB.

"As physicians, we are always on the lookout for new strategies to address unmet needs in aggressive blood cancers and ADCETRIS has proven to be one of those agents with benefit to patients in various types of lymphoma and now in first-line LPCT," said Steven. Horwitz, MD, Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. "This research is important for patients because physicians now have a novel approach to treating newly diagnosed patients with LPCT expressing CD30, a group of aggressive cancers.Data from ECHELON-2 demonstrate that ADCETRIS plus CHP are superior in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival compared to a current standard of treatment, CHOP, a multi-agent chemotherapy regimen that we have been using in practice for several decades. "

"This is the sixth FDA-approved indication for ADCETRIS in malignant lymphoid tumors and the second as a first-line treatment in combination with chemotherapy," said Roger Dansey, MD, medical director of Seattle Genetics. "Data presented today at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) note that the combination of ADCETRIS provides clinically significant benefits for patients with previously untreated LPCT and has the potential to be practice shifting for such patients. "

"We are pleased to share these impressive results from the ECHELON-2 study, which is based on the efficacy and safety observed with ADCETRIS in various CD30-positive lymphomas," said Jesús Gómez-Navarro, MD, vice president and research director and Takeda Clinical Development in Oncology. "The study demonstrated clinically significant results and was the first randomized first-line LPCT Phase 3 trial to show improvement in overall survival. Establishing an optimal therapy for LPCT has been a challenge for clinicians and these findings represent progress in meeting the unmet needs of people living with this serious illness.We look forward to working with regulatory authorities in our territory to bring a possible new treatment option to patients with LPCT. "

The ECHELON-2 trial: Results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase III study of brentuximab vedotin and CHP (A + CHP) versus CHOP in first-line treatment of patients with peripheral CD30 + T cell lymphomas ( abstract # 997, oral presentation on December 3, 2018 at 6:15 pm at the San Diego Convention Center, Room 6F)

ECHELON-2 is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, global study evaluating ADCETRIS as part of a first-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with previously untreated LPCT who express CD30. The primary endpoint is SLP by Independent Central Blind Review (BICR), with events defined as progression, death, or chemotherapy for residual or progressive disease. Major secondary endpoints include SLP in patients with sALCL, complete remission rate (RC), SG, and objective response rate (ORT). ECHELON-2 recruited 452 patients (226 in each segment) at 132 sites in 17 countries in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. The mean age of the patients was 58 years.

The main conclusions, which will be presented by Dr. Steven Horwitz and published in The Lancet , include:

The ECHELON-2 study reached its primary endpoint with ADCETRIS plus CHP demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in PFS, as assessed by a BICR (hazard ratio [IR] = 0.71, p = 0.0110). This corresponds to a 29% reduction in the risk of progression, death or need for additional antineoplastic therapy for residual or progressive disease.
After an average follow-up time of 36.2 months, the median PFS in ADCETRIS plus CHP control was 48.2 months (95% CI, 35.2% non-assessable) compared to 20.8 months (95% CI, , 12.7-47.6) in the control segment according to the BICR evaluation. The three-year SLP was 57.1% for ADCETRIS plus CHP compared to 44.4% in the control segment.
According to the investigator’s evaluation, ADCETRIS plus CHP demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS (RI = 0.70, p value = 0.0096).
SG in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment was statistically significant compared to CHOP (RI = 0.66, p = 0.0244). This corresponds to a 34% reduction in the risk of death.
After an average follow-up of 42.1 months, the median OS was not reached for any of the study segments. The SG estimated at three years was 76.8% for ADCETRIS plus CHP, compared to 69.1% for CHOP.
All other important secondary endpoints, including rate of CR and TRO, in addition to SLP in patients with sALCL, were statistically significant in favor of the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment. According to the BICR, the CR rate (68% versus 56%, respectively) and ORT (83% versus 72%, respectively) for the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment were significantly higher than those treated with CHOP (p = 0 value , Î »max and value of p = 0.0032, respectively). According to the investigator’s evaluation, the rate of CR and ORT showed a similar benefit for the ADCETRIS segment plus CHP versus CHOP (p value = 0.0043 and p value = 0.0018, respectively).
Excluding consolidated stem cell transplantation or radiotherapy to consolidate response to initial therapy, 74% of patients in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment versus 58% of CHOP patients did not require subsequent anti-neoplastic therapies for residual or progressive disease. Of the 226 patients who received CHOP, 49 (22%) received subsequent treatment with a therapy containing ADCETRIS.
The safety profile of ADCETRIS plus CHP in the ECHELON-2 trial was comparable to that of CHOP and consistent with the established safety profile of ADCETRIS in combination with chemotherapy.
Os eventos adversos relacionados com o tratamento mais comuns de qualquer grau que ocorreram em 20% ou mais dos pacientes no segmento ADCETRIS mais CHP e CHOP foram: náusea (46 e 38%, respectivamente), neuropatia sensitiva periférica (45 e 41%, respectivamente), neutropenia (38% cada), diarreia (38 e 20%, respectivamente), obstipação (29 e 30%, respectivamente), alopecia (26 e 25%, respectivamente), pirexia (26 e 19%, respectivamente), vômitos (26 e 17%, respectivamente), fadiga (24 e 20%, respectivamente) e anemia (21 e 16%, respectivamente).
The most common adverse events of Grade 3 or higher that occurred in the ADCETRIS plus CHP and CHOP segments were: neutropenia (35 and 34%, respectively) and anemia (13 and 10%, respectively).
The incidence and severity of neutropenia were similar between study segments and lower in the subgroup of patients receiving primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Febrile neutropenia was reported in 41 patients (18%) in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment and 33 patients (15%) in the CHOP segment.
Treatment of patients with peripheral neuropathy was observed in 117 patients (52%) in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment and 124 patients (55%) in the CHOP segment, with a majority of patients with a maximum severity of Grade 1 (64% and 71%, respectively). In the latter follow-up, peripheral neuropathy returned to the baseline or decreased by 50% in ADCETRIS plus CHP patients versus 64% in the CHOP segment, and the mean resolution time was 17 weeks and 11.4 weeks, respectively.
Adverse events leading to death occurred in seven patients (3%) in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment and nine patients (4%) in the CHOP segment.
See the Important Safety Information, including the Warning in the box, at the end of this press release.

About T-cell lymphomas

Lymphoma is a general term for a group of cancers that originate in the lymphatic system. There are two main categories of lymphoma: Hodgkin’s lymphoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. There are over 60 non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes that are broadly divided into two major groups: B-cell lymphomas, which develop from abnormal B lymphocytes; and T-cell lymphomas, which develop from abnormal T lymphocytes. There are many different forms of T-cell lymphomas, some of which are extremely rare. T cell lymphomas can be aggressive (fast growing) or indolent (slow growing).

About ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin)

ADCETRIS is being tested in more than 70 ongoing clinical trials for CD30-expressing lymphomas. These include the completed Phase 3 ECHELON-2 assay on first-line peripheral T-cell lymphomas (also known as mature T-cell lymphoma), the completed Phase 3 ECHELON-1 assay on untreated Hodgkin’s lymphoma and the ALCANZA assay stage of T-cell lymphoma.

ADCETRIS is an ADC comprising an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody linked by a protease cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), using proprietary technology from Seattle Genetics. The ADC employs a binding system that is designed to be stable in the bloodstream, but to release MMAE after internalization into CD30-expressing tumor cells.

Injection of ADCETRIS for intravenous infusion has received FDA approval for six indications in adult patients with: (1) previously untreated systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) or other peripheral CD30-expressing T-cell lymphomas (LPCT), including angioimmunoblastic T cells and unspecified LPCT, in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone, (2) non-previously treated classic III or IV Hodgkin’s lymphoma (LHc) (III) in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine; (3) LHc with high risk of relapse or progression such as post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation,

Health Canada granted approval of ADCETRIS with conditions for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and sALCL in 2013, and unconditional approval for post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation treatment of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma at risk increased relapse or progression.

ADCETRIS received a conditional marketing authorization from the European Commission in October 2012. The indications approved in Europe are: (1) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma after ASCT or after at least two therapies when treating ASCT or multi-agent chemotherapy is not a treatment option, (2) treatment of adult patients with recurrent or refractory slam, (3) for the treatment of adult patients with CD30 positive Hodgkin’s lymphoma at increased risk of relapse or progression after ASCT, and (4) for the treatment of adult patients with cutaneous CD30-positive T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after at least one prior systemic therapy.

ADCETRIS has received marketing authorization from regulatory authorities in 72 countries for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and sALCL. Please refer to the important safety information, including the Warning in the box, below.

Seattle Genetics and Takeda are jointly developing ADCETRIS. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, Seattle Genetics has marketing rights in the US and Canada, and Takeda has the right to market ADCETRIS in the rest of the world. Seattle Genetics and Takeda are funding joint development costs for ADCETRIS on a half-way basis, except in Japan, where Takeda is solely responsible for development costs.

Celgene Corporation presents the results of the AUGMENT study evaluating lenalidomide in combination with rituximab (R2) in patients with relapsing / refractory indolent lymphoma

On December 7, 2018 Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG) reported results from the Phase 3 AUGMENT study, showing that REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with rituximab (R 2 ) has resulted in a progression-free survival (PFS) higher in patients with relapsing / refractory indolent lymphoma than patients treated with rituximab plus placebo (R-placebo) (Press release, Celgene, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531952]). The data were presented by John Leonard during an oral presentation at the 60th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper), which took place in San Diego, California.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The international randomized, double-blind phase 3 clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the experimental combination of R 2 compared to rituximab plus placebo in patients (n = 358) with follicular lymphoma (n = 295) and lymphoma of the area marginal (n = 63) recurrent / refractory. In the study, the R 2 arm demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary progression-free survival endpoint (PFS), assessed by an independent review board, compared to the R-placebo arm. Mean PFS was 39.4 months for patients treated with R 2 versus 14.1 months for patients treated with R-placebo (P <0.0001; HR: 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34-0.62).

«Data from the AUGMENT study, with R 2 more than doubling progression-free survival compared to rituximab monotherapy, represents a possible new and important treatment option for patients with follicular lymphoma or the relapsing / refractory marginal zone» , said John Leonard , researcher responsible for the AUGMENT study, The Richard T. Silver Distinguished Professor of Hematology and Medical Oncology and Director of the Joint Clinical Trials Office at Weill Cornell Medicine, who also served as a consultant for Celgene.

Overall survival (OS), a secondary endpoint, showed a positive trend in terms of improvement in the R 2 arm compared to the control arm (lethal events: 16 vs 26) (HR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0, 33 to 1.13). The two-year OS rate was 93% for patients treated with R 2 and 87% for patients treated with R-placebo.

The overall response rate (ORR), another secondary endpoint, was 78% (n = 138) in the R 2 arm compared to 53% (n = 96) of the R-placebo arm, according to the independent review committee. The duration of the response (DoR) was significantly increased for R 2 compared to R-placebo with medial DoR of 37 vs 22 months respectively (P = 0.0015; HR: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0 , 79).

The most frequent adverse event (AE) in the R 2 arm was neutropenia (58%), vs. 22% in the R-placebo arm. Other AEs commonly seen in more than 20% of patients included diarrhea (31% in the R 2 arm vs. 23% in the R-placebo arm), constipation (26% vs. 14%, respectively), cough (23% vs. 17% ) and fatigue (22% vs. 18%). Adverse events most commonly reported (> 10%) in the R arm 2 were neutropenia, constipation, leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute exacerbation of symptoms tumor ( tumor flare reaction) . During the AUGMENT study no unexpected results were observed in terms of safety.

"These data represent a new, potential treatment strategy for patients with relapsing / relapsing indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas , " said Celgene’s president of Global Clinical Development, Alise Reicin . "We are anticipating the submission of authorization applications for the first quarter of 2019. to allow patients to access this important combination as soon as possible . "

The use of REVLIMID , alone or in combination with other agents, is currently not approved in any country in the treatment of follicular lymphoma or in that of marginal zone lymphoma.

Information on REVLIMID

REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone (des) is indicated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

REVLIMID is indicated as maintenance therapy in patients with MM following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT).

REVLIMID is indicated in the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) at low or intermediate risk 1, associated with a cytogenetic abnormality with 5q deletion, with or without further cytogenetic abnormalities.

REVLIMID is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or with progression of the disease after 2 previous therapies, one of which includes bortezomib.

REVLIMID is not recommended or recommended for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphatic leukemia (LLC) outside of controlled clinical trials.