InnoCare and KeyMed Jointly Announce the License Agreement with Prolium for CD20xCD3 Bispecific Antibody ICP-B02

On January 20, 2025 InnoCare Pharma (HKEX: 09969; SSE: 688428) and KeyMed Biosciences (HKEX: 02162) reported that the two companies, together with their joint venture, have jointly entered into an exclusive license agreement with Prolium Bioscience (Prolium) for the development and commercialization of ICP-B02 (CM355), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody (Press release, InnoCare Pharma, JAN 20, 2025, View Source [SID1234649776]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

ICP-B02 binds to CD20 on the tumor cells and CD3 on the T cells, redirects and activates T cells to eradicate tumor cells through T-cell Directed Cellular Cytotoxicity (TDCC), which has demonstrated strong potential in both oncology and non-oncology fields.

Under the terms of the agreement, Prolium will have the exclusive right to develop, register, manufacture and commercialize ICP-B02 in the non-oncology field globally and in the oncology field in ex-Asia regions.

InnoCare and KeyMed will receive aggregate payments of up to $520 million, including upfront and near-term payments and other payments subject to the achievement of certain clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones, as well as a minority equity stake in Prolium. InnoCare and KeyMed are also eligible to receive tiered royalties on future net sales of any product resulting from the collaboration.

Prolium is a Delaware company funded and backed by RTW Investments, LP, a New York-based, global, full life-cycle investment firm that focuses on identifying transformational and disruptive innovations across the biopharmaceutical and medical technologies sectors.

About ICP-B02 (CM355)

ICP-B02 is a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody jointly developed by InnoCare and KeyMed. A Phase I/II clinical trial in China is ongoing to assess the safety, tolerability, PK and the preliminary anti-tumor activity of ICP-B02 in relapsed / refractory Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The study has shown promising early results in both intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulations, particularly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Based on the encouraging results of ICP-B02 single agent, a dose expansion study of ICP-B02 in combination with other immunochemotherapies is planned to target earlier lines of treatment for NHL patients. The IND for the combination therapies has been approved.

Calquence plus chemoimmunotherapy approved in the US for patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma

On January 17, 2025 AstraZeneca reported that Calquence (acalabrutinib) in combination with bendamustine and rituximab has been approved in the US for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who are ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Press release, AstraZeneca, JAN 17, 2025, View Source [SID1234649766]).

The approval was granted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after securing Priority Review. It was based on results from the ECHO Phase III trial which were presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) 2024 Congress.

MCL is a rare and typically aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), often diagnosed at an advanced stage.[1],[2] It is estimated that there are more than 21,000 patients diagnosed with MCL in the US, UK, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Japan and China.[3]

Michael Wang, MD, Puddin Clarke Endowed Professor, Director of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Program of Excellence and principal investigator in the trial, said: "Managing this aggressive cancer requires maximising efficacy while maintaining tolerability, especially for elderly patients. Results from the pivotal ECHO trial highlight the promise of the acalabrutinib combination in defining a new standard of care, with today’s approval underscoring the transformative potential of this regimen as a first-line treatment for older patients with mantle cell lymphoma."

Dave Fredrickson, Executive Vice-President, Oncology Haematology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, said: "With today’s approval, Calquence provides a critical new treatment option to mantle cell lymphoma patients in the US, with Calquence proven to deliver nearly one and a half years of additional time without disease progression. This approval brings a new and effective treatment option to those living with this disease and further reinforces our belief in Calquence as a backbone therapy across multiple blood cancers."

Meghan Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer, Lymphoma Research Foundation, said: "New treatment options have long been needed in the first-line treatment of mantle cell lymphoma in the US. Patients with this rare and often aggressive cancer can experience severe symptoms by the time they are diagnosed – having an effective therapy that can significantly improve outcomes for patients early in the treatment process is a much-needed advancement."

Results from the ECHO trial showed Calquence plus bendamustine and rituximab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 27% compared to standard-of-care chemoimmunotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.94; p=0.016). Median PFS was 66.4 months for patients treated with the Calquence combination versus 49.6 months with chemoimmunotherapy alone.

This approval additionally converts Calquence’s accelerated approval to a full approval for adult patients with MCL treated with at least one prior therapy, as granted by the FDA in October 2017.

The ECHO trial enrolled patients throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. After censoring for COVID-19 deaths, PFS was further improved in both arms, with the Calquence combination reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 36% (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48-0.84). Although OS data were not mature at the time of the analysis, when censored for COVID-19, a favourable trend was seen for OS (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.53-1.04), despite 69% of patients in the chemoimmunotherapy arm receiving treatment with a BTK inhibitor on relapse or disease progression.

The safety and tolerability of Calquence was consistent with its known safety profile, and no new safety signals were identified.

The US regulatory submission was reviewed under Project Orbis, which provides a framework for concurrent submission and review of oncology medicines among participating international partners. As part of Project Orbis, Calquence plus chemoimmunotherapy is also under review by regulatory authorities in Australia, Canada, and Switzerland for the same indication. Regulatory applications are also under review in the EU, Japan, and other countries based on the ECHO results.

Notes

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)
While MCL patients initially respond to treatment, patients do tend to relapse.[4] MCL comprises about 3-6% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with an annual incidence of 0.5 per 100,000 population in Western countries; in the US, it is estimated that approximately 4,000 new patients are diagnosed with MCL each year.4,[5]

ECHO
ECHO is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre Phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Calquence plus bendamustine and rituximab compared to SoC chemoimmunotherapy (bendamustine and rituximab) in adult patients at or over 65 years of age (n=635) with previously untreated MCL.[6] Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either Calquence or placebo administered orally twice per day, continuously, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, all patients received six 28-day cycles of bendamustine on days 1 and 2 and rituximab on day 1 of each cycle, followed by rituximab maintenance for two years if patients achieved a response after induction therapy.6

The primary endpoint is PFS assessed by an Independent Review Committee; other efficacy endpoints include OS, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and time to response (TTR).6 The trial was conducted in 27 countries across North and South America, Europe, Asia and Oceania.6

The ECHO trial enrolled patients from May 2017 to March 2023, continuing through the COVID-19 pandemic. Prespecified PFS and OS analyses censoring for COVID-19 deaths were conducted to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the study outcome in alignment with the FDA. Patients with blood cancer remain at a disproportionately high risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19, including hospitalisation and death compared to the general population.6,[7]

Calquence
Calquence (acalabrutinib) is a second-generation, selective inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK). Calquence binds covalently to BTK, thereby inhibiting its activity.[8] In B-cells, BTK signalling results in activation of pathways necessary for B-cell proliferation, trafficking, chemotaxis and adhesion.

Calquence has been used to treat more than 85,000 patients worldwide[9] and is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in the US and Japan, approved for CLL in the EU and many other countries worldwide and approved in China for relapsed or refractory CLL and SLL. Calquence is also approved for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated MCL in the US, and in China and several other countries for the treatment of adult patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least one prior therapy. Calquence is not currently approved for the treatment of MCL in Japan or the EU.

As part of an extensive clinical development programme, Calquence is currently being evaluated as a single treatment and in combination with standard-of-care chemoimmunotherapy for patients with multiple B-cell blood cancers, including CLL, MCL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!


Datroway (datopotamab deruxtecan) approved in the US for patients with previously treated metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer

On January 17, 2025 Astrazeneca and Daiichi sankyo reported that Datroway (datopotamab deruxtecan or Dato-DXd) has been approved in the US for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative (IHC 0, IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) breast cancer who have received prior endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic disease (Press release, AstraZeneca, JAN 17, 2025, View Source [SID1234649767]). The approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was based on results from the TROPION-Breast01 Phase III trial.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, Program Director of Breast Oncology and Director of Translational Research Integration at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Global Principal Investigator for TROPION-Breast01, said: "Despite considerable progress in the HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treatment landscape, new therapies are still needed to tackle the frequent and complex challenge of disease progression after endocrine and initial chemotherapy. The approval of datopotamab deruxtecan, a novel TROP2-directed antibody drug conjugate, marks a major therapeutic milestone and provides patients with metastatic breast cancer a new treatment alternative to conventional chemotherapy."

Dave Fredrickson, Executive Vice President, Oncology Haematology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, said: "With this first approval of Datroway in the US, we continue to deliver on our ambition for antibody drug conjugates to improve upon and replace conventional chemotherapy for the treatment of multiple cancers. We are proud to bring Datroway to people living with metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, and this approval marks the eighth new medicine of the 20 we have set out to deliver across AstraZeneca by 2030."

Ken Keller, Global Head of Oncology Business, and President and CEO, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., said: "The approval of Datroway provides patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer previously treated with endocrine-based therapy and traditional chemotherapy with the opportunity to be treated with a new TROP2-directed antibody drug conjugate earlier in the metastatic setting. Datroway is the latest addition to our portfolio of innovative cancer treatments and marks the fourth medicine from our oncology pipeline to receive approval in the US."

Caitlin Lewis, Senior Vice President of Strategy & Mission, Living Beyond Breast Cancer, said: "Only one in three patients with metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer live more than five years following diagnosis, highlighting the urgent need for additional effective therapies. The approval of Datroway is a significant advance, offering patients with metastatic HR-positive breast cancer a new and much-needed treatment option."

In TROPION-Breast01, Datroway significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 37% compared to investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.76; p<0.0001) in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months in patients treated with Datroway versus 4.9 months with chemotherapy.

The safety profile of Datroway was consistent with the known profile of this medicine with no new safety concerns identified. In the Datroway arm, the interstitial lung disease (ILD) rate was 4.2% and the majority of events were low grade.

Datroway is a specifically engineered TROP2-directed antibody drug conjugate (ADC) discovered by Daiichi Sankyo and being jointly developed and commercialised by AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo.

Additional regulatory submissions for Datroway in breast cancer are under review in the EU, China and other regions.

Notes

HR-positive breast cancer
In the US, more than 300,000 cases of breast cancer are diagnosed annually.1 While survival rates are high for those diagnosed with early breast cancer, only about 30% of patients diagnosed with or who progress to metastatic disease are expected to live five years following diagnosis.2

Approximately 70% of diagnosed cases are considered what has been historically called HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (measured as HER2 score of IHC 0, IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-).2 Endocrine therapies are widely given consecutively in the early lines of treatment for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer.3 However, after initial treatment, further efficacy from endocrine therapy is often limited.3 The current standard of care following endocrine therapy is chemotherapy, which is associated with poor response rates and outcomes.3-6

TROPION-Breast01
TROPION-Breast01 is a global, randomised, multicentre, open-label Phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of intravenous Datroway (6 mg/kg) once per 21-day cycle versus investigator’s choice of single-agent chemotherapy (eribulin, capecitabine, vinorelbine or gemcitabine) in adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative (IHC 0, IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) breast cancer who have progressed on and are not suitable for endocrine therapy per investigator assessment and have received at least one prior line of chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic disease.

Following disease progression or discontinuation of Datroway or chemotherapy, patients had the option to receive a subsequent treatment at the discretion of their physician. Crossover between trial arms was not permitted.

The dual primary endpoints of TROPION-Breast01 are PFS as assessed by BICR and OS. Key secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, investigator-assessed PFS, disease control rate, time to first subsequent therapy and safety. The PFS data and additional results for key secondary endpoints of TROPION-Breast01 were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

TROPION-Breast01 enrolled 732 patients in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and South America. For more information visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

Datroway
Datroway (datopotamab deruxtecan-dlnk in the US; datopotamab deruxtecan in rest of world) is a TROP2-directed ADC. Designed using Daiichi Sankyo’s proprietary DXd ADC Technology, Datroway is one of six DXd ADCs in the oncology pipeline of Daiichi Sankyo, and one of the most advanced programmes in AstraZeneca’s ADC scientific platform. Datroway is comprised of a humanised anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, developed in collaboration with Sapporo Medical University, attached to a number of topoisomerase I inhibitor payloads (an exatecan derivative, DXd) via tetrapeptide-based cleavable linkers.

Datroway (6mg/kg) is approved in the US and Japan for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative (IHC 0, IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) breast cancer who have received prior endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic disease based on the results from the TROPION-Breast01 Phase III trial.

Datroway clinical development programme
A comprehensive global clinical development programme is underway with more than 20 trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of Datroway across multiple cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. The programme includes seven Phase III trials in lung cancer and five Phase III trials in breast cancer evaluating Datroway as a monotherapy and in combination with other anticancer treatments in various settings.

FDA APPROVES LUMAKRAS® (SOTORASIB) IN COMBINATION WITH VECTIBIX® (PANITUMUMAB) FOR CHEMOREFRACTORY KRAS G12C-MUTATED METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER

On January 17, 2025 Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved LUMAKRAS (sotorasib) in combination with Vectibix (panitumumab) for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), as determined by an FDA-approved test, who have received prior fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy (Press release, Amgen, JAN 17, 2025, View Source [SID1234649768]). Approval is based on the pivotal Phase 3 CodeBreaK 300 study, which demonstrated that LUMAKRAS plus Vectibix is the first and only targeted treatment combination for chemorefractory KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC to show superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the investigated standard-of-care (SOC).1*

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, and fewer than one in five people diagnosed with metastatic disease survive beyond five years after diagnosis," said Jay Bradner, M.D., executive vice president of Research and Development at Amgen.2 "LUMAKRAS plus Vectibix offers a targeted, biomarker-driven combination therapy that helps delay disease progression more effectively than the investigated standard of care. This new option validates our combination approach to improve outcomes for patients living with advanced KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer."

The CodeBreaK 300 clinical trial compared LUMAKRAS at two different doses (960 mg daily or 240 mg daily) in combination with Vectibix to the investigator’s choice of SOC (trifluridine and tipiracil or regorafenib) in patients with chemorefractory KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. Study results demonstrated that LUMAKRAS 960 mg daily plus Vectibix (n=53) showed an improved median PFS of 5.6 months (4.2, 6.3) compared to 2 months (1.9, 3.9) on investigator’s choice of care (n=54), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.48 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.3, 0.78) and a p-value of 0.005. The study demonstrated an improved overall response rate (ORR) of 26% (95% CI: 15, 40) compared to 0% with investigator’s choice (95% CI: 0, 7). The study was not statistically powered for overall survival (OS). The median overall survival (mOS) for patients treated with LUMAKRAS plus Vectibix was not reached (NR) (8.6, NR), and mOS for patients treated with investigator’s choice was 10.3 months (7, NR), with a HR of 0.7 (95% CI: 0.41, 1.18); the final analysis of OS was not statistically significant. Safety profiles were consistent with those historically observed for LUMAKRAS and Vectibix. The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) are rash (87%), dry skin (28%), diarrhea (28%), stomatitis (26%), fatigue (21%) and musculoskeletal pain (21%). PFS of LUMAKRAS 240 mg daily plus Vectibix (n=53) compared to investigator’s choice was not statistically significant.

The KRAS G12C mutation is present in approximately 3-5% of colorectal cancers as determined by an FDA-approved biomarker test.3-5 This emphasizes the important role of comprehensive biomarker testing in mCRC. By detecting an actionable mutation, eligible patients are now able to receive a corresponding targeted therapy that may lead to improved responses.

"In metastatic colorectal cancer, KRAS mutations are historically associated with worse mortality rates and inferior outcomes compared to non-mutated tumors, and standard treatment options have shown minimal benefit," said Marwan G. Fakih, M.D., primary study investigator and co-director of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, City of Hope.3-6 "Designed for dual blockade of KRAS G12C and EGFR pathways, the combination of sotorasib plus panitumumab provides a needed new treatment option to better overcome cancer’s escape mechanisms. The CodeBreaK 300 study showed superior progression-free survival compared to the investigated standard of care and represents a clinically meaningful benefit for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer."

"There is an immense need for continued innovation and precision medicine to help address metastatic colorectal cancer," said Michael Sapienza, Chief Executive Officer of the Colorectal Cancer Alliance. "This new combination approach is an important breakthrough for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, offering a new beneficial treatment option for patients living with this devastating and challenging disease."

*Investigator’s choice for SOC included trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib.

About CodeBreaK 300
The CodeBreaK 300 trial enrolled 160 participants and compared LUMAKRAS (sotorasib) at doses of 960 mg and 240 mg in combination with Vectibix (panitumumab) to investigator’s choice of standard of care (trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib) in patients with chemorefractory KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study met its primary endpoint showing improved progression-free survival (PFS), and the key secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) also favored the combination.

About mCRC and the KRAS G12C Mutation
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, comprising 11% of all cancer diagnoses.7 It is also the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally.8

Patients with previously treated mCRC need more effective treatment options. For patients in the third-line setting, standard therapies yield median OS times of less than one year, and patients’ response rates are less than 10%.9

KRAS mutations are among the most common genetic alterations in CRC, with the KRAS G12C mutation present in approximately 3-5% of CRC cases as determined by a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomarker test.3-5

About LUMAKRAS (sotorasib) in Combination with Vectibix (panitumumab)
In the U.S., LUMAKRAS is now approved in combination with Vectibix (panitumumab) for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC, as determined by an FDA-approved test, who have received prior fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. This targeted therapy combines LUMAKRAS, a KRASG12C inhibitor, with Vectibix, a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody. The recommended dose of LUMAKRAS is 960 mg daily, and the recommended dose of Vectibix is 6 mg/kg IV q2 weeks.

About LUMAKRAS/LUMYKRAS (sotorasib)
LUMAKRAS received accelerated approval from the FDA on May 28, 2021. The FDA completed its review of Amgen’s supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) seeking full approval of LUMAKRAS on December 26, 2023, which resulted in a complete response letter. In addition, the FDA concluded that the dose comparison postmarketing requirement (PMR) issued at the time of LUMAKRAS accelerated approval, to compare the safety and efficacy of LUMAKRAS 960 mg daily dose versus a lower daily dose, has been fulfilled. The company said LUMAKRAS at 960 mg once-daily will remain the dose for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) under accelerated approval. The FDA also issued a new PMR for an additional confirmatory study to support full approval that will be completed no later than February 2028.

About Vectibix (panitumumab)
Vectibix is the first and only human monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody fully approved by the FDA for the treatment of mCRC. Vectibix was approved in the U.S. in September 2006 as a monotherapy for the treatment of patients with EGFR-expressing mCRC following disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy.

In May 2014, the FDA approved Vectibix for use in combination with FOLFOX as first-line treatment in patients with wild-type KRAS (exon 2) mCRC. With this approval, Vectibix became the first-and-only anti-EGFR biologic therapy indicated for use with FOLFOX, one of the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens, in first-line treatment of mCRC for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC.

In June 2017, the FDA approved a refined indication for Vectibix for use in patients with wild-type RAS (defined as wild-type in both KRAS and NRAS as determined by an FDA-approved test for this use) mCRC, specifically as first-line therapy in combination with FOLFOX and as monotherapy following disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy.

LUMAKRAS (sotorasib) in Combination with Vectibix (panitumumab) U.S. Indication
Vectibix in combination with sotorasib, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC, as determined by an FDA-approved test, who have received prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

LIMITATIONS OF USE
Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with RAS-mutant mCRC unless used in combination with sotorasib in KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with mCRC for whom RAS mutation status is unknown.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR LUMAKRAS (SOTORASIB)
Hepatotoxicity

LUMAKRAS can cause hepatotoxicity and increased ALT or AST which may lead to drug-induced liver injury and hepatitis.
In the pooled safety population of NSCLC patients who received single agent LUMAKRAS 960 mg hepatotoxicity occurred in 27% of patients, of which 16% were Grade ≥ 3. Among patients with hepatotoxicity who required dosage modifications, 64% required treatment with corticosteroids.
In this pooled safety population of NSCLC patients who received single agent LUMAKRAS 960 mg, 17% of patients who received LUMAKRAS had increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST); of which 9% were Grade ≥ 3. The median time to first onset of increased ALT/AST was 6.3 weeks (range: 0.4 to 42). Increased ALT/AST leading to dose interruption or reduction occurred in 9% of patients treated with LUMAKRAS. LUMAKRAS was permanently discontinued due to increased ALT/AST in 2.7% of patients. Drug-induced liver injury occurred in 1.6% (all grades) including 1.3% (Grade ≥ 3).
In this pooled safety population of NSCLC patients who received single agent LUMAKRAS 960 mg, a total of 40% patients with recent (≤ 3 months) immunotherapy prior to starting LUMAKRAS had an event of hepatotoxicity. An event of hepatotoxicity was observed in 18% of patients who started LUMAKRAS more than 3 months after last dose of immunotherapy and in 17% of those who never received immunotherapy. Regardless of time from prior immunotherapy, 94% of hepatotoxicity events improved or resolved with dosage modification of LUMAKRAS, with or without corticosteroid treatment.
Monitor liver function tests (ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin) prior to the start of LUMAKRAS, every 3 weeks for the first 3 months of treatment, then once a month or as clinically indicated, with more frequent testing in patients who develop transaminase and/or bilirubin elevations. Withhold, reduce the dose or permanently discontinue LUMAKRAS based on severity of the adverse reaction. Consider administering systemic corticosteroids for the management of hepatotoxicity.
Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis

LUMAKRAS can cause ILD/pneumonitis that can be fatal.
In the pooled safety population of NSCLC patients who received single agent LUMAKRAS 960 mg ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 2.2% of patients, of which 1.1% were Grade ≥ 3, and 1 case was fatal. The median time to first onset for ILD/pneumonitis was 8.6 weeks (range: 2.1 to 36.7 weeks). LUMAKRAS was permanently discontinued due to ILD/pneumonitis in 1.3% of LUMAKRAS-treated patients. Monitor patients for new or worsening pulmonary symptoms indicative of ILD/pneumonitis (e.g., dyspnea, cough, fever). Immediately withhold LUMAKRAS in patients with suspected ILD/pneumonitis and permanently discontinue LUMAKRAS if no other potential causes of ILD/pneumonitis are identified.
Most Common Adverse Reactions

The most common adverse reactions ≥ 20% were diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, fatigue, hepatotoxicity, and cough.
Drug Interactions

Advise patients to inform their healthcare provider of all concomitant medications, including prescription medicines, over-the-counter drugs, vitamins, dietary and herbal products.
Inform patients to avoid proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists while taking LUMAKRAS.
If coadministration with an acid-reducing agent cannot be avoided, inform patients to take LUMAKRAS 4 hours before or 10 hours after a locally acting antacid.

Please see accompanying LUMAKRAS full Prescribing Information.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR VECTIBIX (PANITUMUMAB)
BOXED WARNING: DERMATOLOGIC TOXICITY
Dermatologic Toxicity: Dermatologic toxicities occurred in 90% of patients and were severe (NCI-CTC Grade 3 and higher) in 15% of patients receiving Vectibix monotherapy

Vectibix can cause dermatologic toxicity, which may be severe. Clinical manifestations included, but were not limited to, acneiform dermatitis, pruritus, erythema, rash, skin exfoliation, paronychia, dry skin, and skin fissures.
Among 229 patients who received Vectibix as monotherapy, dermatologic toxicity occurred in 90% including Grade 3 (15%). Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, dermatologic toxicity occurred in 96% including Grade 4 (1%) and Grade 3 (32%). In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, dermatologic toxicities occurred in 94%, including Grade 3 (16%) of patients.
Monitor patients who develop dermatologic or soft tissue toxicities while receiving Vectibix for the development of inflammatory or infectious sequelae. Life-threatening and fatal infectious complications including necrotizing fasciitis, abscesses, and sepsis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Life-threatening and fatal bullous mucocutaneous disease with blisters, erosions, and skin sloughing has also been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. It could not be determined whether these mucocutaneous adverse reactions were directly related to EGFR inhibition or to idiosyncratic immune-related effects (eg, Stevens Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis). Withhold or discontinue Vectibix for dermatologic or soft tissue toxicity associated with severe or life-threatening inflammatory or infectious complications. Dose modifications for Vectibix concerning dermatologic toxicity are provided
Vectibix monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is not indicated for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer that harbor somatic RAS mutations in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13), exon 3 (codons 59 and 61), and exon 4 (codons 117 and 146) of either KRAS or NRAS and hereafter is referred to as "RAS."
Retrospective subset analyses across several randomized clinical trials were conducted to investigate the role of RAS mutations on the clinical effects of anti-EGFR-directed monoclonal antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab). Anti-EGFR antibodies in patients with tumors containing RAS mutations resulted in exposing those patients to anti-EGFR related adverse reactions without clinical benefit from these agents. Additionally, in Study 20050203, 272 patients with RAS-mutant mCRC tumors received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX and 276 patients received FOLFOX alone. In an exploratory subgroup analysis, OS was shorter (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.45) in patients with RAS-mutant mCRC who received Vectibix and FOLFOX versus FOLFOX alone.

Vectibix can cause progressively decreasing serum magnesium levels leading to severe (Grade 3 or 4) hypomagnesemia. Among 229 patients who received Vectibix as monotherapy, hypomagnesemia occurred in 38% including Grade 4 (1.3%) and Grade 3 (2.6%). Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, hypomagnesemia occurred in 51% including Grade 4 (5%) and Grade 3 (6%). In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, decreased magnesium occurred in 69%, including Grade 4 (2.4%) and Grade 3 (14%).

Monitor patients for hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia prior to initiating Vectibix treatment, periodically during Vectibix treatment, and for up to 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Other electrolyte disturbances, including hypokalemia, have also been observed. Replete magnesium and other electrolytes as appropriate.
In Study 20020408, 4% of patients experienced infusion reactions and 1% of patients experienced severe infusion reactions (NCI-CTC Grade 3-4). Infusion reactions, manifesting as fever, chills, dyspnea, bronchospasm, and hypotension, can occur following Vectibix administration. Fatal infusion reactions occurred in postmarketing experience. Terminate the infusion for severe infusion reactions.

Severe diarrhea and dehydration, leading to acute renal failure and other complications, have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Among 229 patients who received Vectibix as monotherapy, acute renal failure occurred in 2% including Grades 3 or 4 (2%). Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, acute renal failure occurred in 2% including Grade 3 or 4 (2%). In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, acute renal failure occurred in 3.2%, including Grade 3 (0.8%). Monitor patients for diarrhea and dehydration, provide supportive care (including anti-emetic or anti-diarrheal therapy) as needed, and withhold Vectibix if necessary.
Fatal and nonfatal cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (1%) and pulmonary fibrosis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Pulmonary fibrosis occurred in less than 1% (2/1467) of patients enrolled in clinical studies of Vectibix. Grade 1 ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 0.8% (1/126) of patients enrolled in clinical studies of Vectibix in combination with sotorasib. In the event of acute onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms interrupt Vectibix therapy. Discontinue Vectibix therapy if ILD is confirmed.
In patients with a history of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, the benefits of therapy with Vectibix versus the risk of pulmonary complications must be carefully considered.

Exposure to sunlight can exacerbate dermatologic toxicity. Advise patients to wear sunscreen and hats and limit sun exposure while receiving Vectibix.

Serious cases of keratitis, ulcerative keratitis, and corneal perforation have occurred with Vectibix use. Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, keratitis occurred in 0.3%. In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, keratitis occurred in 1.6%, ulcerative keratitis occurred in 0.8%, and vernal keratoconjunctivitis in 0.8% (all were Grade 1-2). Monitor for evidence of keratitis, ulcerative keratitis, or corneal perforation. Interrupt or discontinue Vectibix therapy for acute or worsening keratitis, ulcerative keratitis, or corneal perforation.

In an interim analysis of an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in the first-line setting in patients with mCRC, the addition of Vectibix to the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy resulted in decreased OS and increased incidence of NCI-CTC Grade 3-5 (87% vs 72%) adverse reactions. NCI-CTC Grade 3-4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients included rash/acneiform dermatitis (26% vs 1%), diarrhea (23% vs 12%), dehydration (16% vs 5%), primarily occurring in patients with diarrhea, hypokalemia (10% vs 4%), stomatitis/mucositis (4% vs <1%), and hypomagnesemia (4% vs 0). NCI-CTC Grade 3-5 pulmonary embolism occurred at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients (7% vs 3%) and included fatal events in three (< 1%) Vectibix -treated patients.

As a result of the toxicities experienced, patients randomized to Vectibix, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy received a lower mean relative dose intensity of each chemotherapeutic agent (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bolus 5-FU, and/or infusional 5-FU) over the first 24 weeks on study compared with those randomized to bevacizumab and chemotherapy.
Based on data from animal studies and its mechanism of action, Vectibix can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. When given during organogenesis, panitumumab administration resulted in embryolethality in cynomolgus monkeys at exposures approximately 1.25 to 5 times the recommended human dose. Advise pregnant women and females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment, and for at least 2 months after the last dose of Vectibix.
In monotherapy, the most commonly reported adverse reactions (≥ 20%) in patients with Vectibix were skin rash with variable presentations, paronychia, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea.
The most commonly reported adverse reactions (≥ 20%) with Vectibix + FOLFOX were diarrhea, stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, asthenia, paronychia, anorexia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, rash, acneiform dermatitis, pruritus, and dry skin. Serious adverse reactions (≥ 2% difference between treatment arms) were diarrhea and dehydration.
The most common adverse reactions (≥ 20%) in patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg were rash, dry skin, diarrhea, stomatitis, fatigue and musculoskeletal pain.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves FoundationOne®CDx as a Companion Diagnostic for OJEMDA™ (tovorafenib) to Treat the Most Common Form of Childhood Brain Tumor in Pediatric Patients

On January 17, 2025 Foundation Medicine, Inc. reported that it has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for FoundationOneCDx to be used as a companion diagnostic for Day One Biopharmaceuticals’ OJEMDA, a type II RAF inhibitor, for the treatment of patients six months of age and older with relapsed or refractory pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) harboring a BRAF fusion or rearrangement, or BRAF V600 mutation (Press release, Foundation Medicine, JAN 17, 2025, View Source [SID1234649769]). FoundationOne CDx is the first and only companion diagnostic for OJEMDA.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

pLGG is the most common brain tumor diagnosed in children.1,2 In this patient population, a BRAF alteration is detected in up to 75 percent of cases. Previously, no FDA-approved treatment options were available targeting tumors harboring BRAF fusions, which represent 80% of BRAF altered patients.3,4,5,6,7

"Foundation Medicine is proud to partner with Day One to help healthcare providers connect pediatric patients and families with this treatment option," said Mia Levy, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical officer at Foundation Medicine. "Our high-quality tissue-based companion diagnostic test is uniquely capable of detecting both BRAF V600 mutations and fusions which enables providers to gain the complete genomic picture of their patient’s tumor and guide treatment decision making."

Foundation Medicine has sequenced over 2,200 pediatric central nervous system tumors8 and is the only company to offer both tissue and blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling tests that are approved by the FDA. Using a tissue sample, the FDA-approved FoundationOne CDx test analyzes more than 300 cancer-related genes in a patient’s tumor. Foundation Medicine is the global leader in approved companion diagnostic indications. Foundation Medicine also has 40% of all approved companion diagnostic indications for next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in the United States and Japan.9,10

"Historically, pediatric patients with pLGG have faced overwhelming side effects, both near- and long-term, from aggressive treatments like chemotherapy and radiation," said David Arons, president and chief executive officer at the National Brain Tumor Society. "We are thrilled to see that there are now additional treatment options available for these children, as well as an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test to help identify more patients who may benefit from Day One’s therapy."