STORM Therapeutics wins Life Science Innovation Award

On March 27, 2018 STORM Therapeutics, the drug discovery company focused on the discovery of small molecule therapies modulating RNA epigenetics, reported that it has won the Life Science Innovation Award at the Business Weekly Awards ceremony (Press release, STORM Therapeutics, MAR 27, 2018, View Source [SID1234561045]). Held at Queen’s College, Cambridge, the Awards Dinner attracts entries from across the East of England and is the longest-running B2B competition in the UK. The Awards pride themselves on early identification of world-leading businesses.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

STORM Therapeutics was recognised by the judges for leading the field in a highly innovative area of drug discovery which has the potential to target novel disease mechanisms through the inhibition of RNA modifying enzymes.

Commenting on the award, Keith Blundy, CEO of STORM Therapeutics said: "We are very pleased to have been recognized for the Life Science Award, voted for by our peers in Cambridge. It is a credit to the team and our Investors, and a strong endorsement of STORM’s pioneering drug discovery programmes. As the first company tackling disease through harnessing the power of RNA epigenetics, we believe we are well positioned to build a world leading company."

Aptose Reports Results for the Fourth Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 2017

On March 27, 2018 Aptose Biosciences Inc. ("Aptose" or the "Company") (NASDAQ:APTO) (TSX:APS), a clinical-stage company developing highly differentiated therapeutics that target the underlying mechanisms of cancer, reported financial results for the three months and year ended December 31, 2017 and reported on corporate developments (Press release, Aptose Biosciences, MAR 27, 2018, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2340004 [SID1234525006]). Unless specified otherwise, all amounts are in US Dollars.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The net loss for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 was $3.28 million ($0.12 per share) compared with $2.97 million ($0.23 per share) for the quarter ended December 31, 2016. Total cash and cash equivalents and investments as of December 31, 2017 were $11.4 million, or $13.3 million Canadian dollars, which, based on current operations and estimations, provide the Company with sufficient resources to fund research and development and operations into Q1 2019.

"2017 was a year of tremendous progress for Aptose," said William G. Rice, Ph.D., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. "We achieved our strategic goal in bringing CG’806, our oral first-in-class pan-FLT3/pan-BTK inhibitor, from an early preclinical molecule to a stage where we are preparing to file an IND and initiate clinical trials in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and certain B-cell malignancies later this year. This required considerable scale-up manufacturing and formulation development, as well as pathway suppression analysis, xenograft efficacy, and pharmacokinetic and safety studies. Separately, we successfully completed formal root cause studies for APTO-253, our small molecule c-Myc inhibitor, as well as the manufacture of a new cGMP batch of drug supply sufficient for dosing AML patients in an ongoing Phase Ib trial. We look forward to completing the required stability and other studies with the new clinical supply to submit to the FDA, with the hope of having the CMC-related clinical hold released for a timely re-initiation of patient dosing. At the same time, we and our collaborators continued to perform mechanistic research on ‘806 and ‘253 and have generated data that compel us to advance both compounds clinically."

Corporate Highlights

Orphan drug designation and patent allowance granted for CG’806 – During the year, the USPTO issued a patent that claims numerous compounds including the CG’806 compound, pharmaceutical compositions comprising the CG’806 compound, and methods of treating various diseases. Furthermore, in December the FDA granted orphan drug designation to CG’806 for the treatment of patients with AML. The FDA assigns orphan drug designation to support the development of medicines for underserved patient populations. Orphan drug designation provides Aptose certain benefits, including market exclusivity upon regulatory approval if received, exemption of FDA application fees and tax credits for qualified clinical trials.

ASH presentations – In December, Aptose and its collaborators, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, delivered multiple poster presentations and abstracts at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) 59th Annual Meeting & Exposition. Researchers at MD Anderson elucidated the unique ability of CG’806 to kill a broad range of AML cells by suppressing multiple pathways, to overcome resistance seen with other FLT3 inhibitors, and to act synergistically with other agents. OHSU researchers evaluated the activity of CG’806 on patient primary bone marrow specimens through the Beat AML Initiative. CG’806 exhibited broad and potent single agent activity, and enhanced activity when combined with Bcl-2 or BET inhibitors, against AML and CLL patient samples. In addition, two abstracts on APTO-253, one describing its molecular target leading to suppression of c-MYC gene expression and the other describing its synthetic lethality comparable to olaparib in cells deficient in BRCA1 and BRCA2 function, were published online by ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper). Results demonstrate that, unlike olaparib, APTO-253 does not produce myelosuppression even at the maximum tolerated dose.

Completed manufacture of APTO-253 cGMP clinical supply – Aptose has completed manufacture of the cGMP clinical supply that will be required for the potential return of APTO-253 to the clinic. Stability, sterility, mock infusion, animal bridging and blood compatibility studies are currently underway. Upon successful completion of those studies, Aptose plans to submit findings to the FDA to seek release of the CMC-related clinical hold and allow resumption of patient dosing in the open Phase 1b trial in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

CG’806 pre-IND progress – Aptose successfully manufactured CG‘806 drug substance and formulated drug product, and then performed animal dose range finding preclinical studies of CG’806 in rodents and dogs, and successfully dosed up to 1000 mg/kg/day, the maximum feasible dose, with no observable toxicities noted. Also, Aptose completed manufacturing 2.6kg of a drug batch that will be used for IND-enabling GLP animal toxicity studies.

Global license agreement with OHM Oncology – Earlier this month, Aptose announced an exclusive global license agreement that provides OHM Oncology with the rights for the development, manufacture and commercialization of APL-581, as well as related molecules from Aptose’s dual bromodomain and extra-terminal domain motif (BET) protein and kinase inhibitor program. Aptose will retain reacquisition rights to certain molecules, while OHM will have the rights to develop and sublicense all other molecules.
Financial Results

Effective December 31, 2017, we changed our presentation currency to US dollars from Canadian dollars. All amounts included in this document are in US dollars unless disclosed otherwise. The change in reporting currency was accounted for on a retrospective basis as if the US dollar had always been the Company’s presentation currency. Accordingly, the financial statements for all the periods presented have been translated to the US dollar.

The decrease in the net loss during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared with the year ended December 31, 2016 results mostly from our decision in January 2017 to refocus our resources on our CG’806 development program and towards determining the root cause of the manufacturing issue with the APTO-253 program. Expenses were lower due to the cancellation of the LALS/Moffitt collaboration, lower costs associated with the APTO-253 program, and offset by increased development activities related to the CG’806 development program which were nominal in comparable periods, other than the license fee that was paid in June 2016 to acquire an option on the technology.

Research and Development
Components of research and development expenses

In the 2016 comparative period, we paid $1.0 million to CrystalGenomics, Inc. ("CG") for an option fee related to the CG’806 technology and in that period began research and development activities for this program;
An increase in research and development activities related to our CG’806 development program. Activities in the current year ended December 31, 2017 included formulation studies and PK studies and the manufacturing of a first batch of the drug substance to be used in dose range finding studies, the initiation of the dose range finding studies, and the initiation of the manufacturing of a GLP batch of drug substance to be used in the toxicity studies. CG’806 program expenses were nominal in the comparative period as the technology was licensed to us in June 2016;
Reduced expenditures on the APTO-253 program. In the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed the root cause analysis and determined the cause of the manufacturing issue, established a Corrective and Prevention Action plan to ensure the clinical supply can be manufactured in a reliable manner, and the initiation of manufacturing of a new clinical supply. In the comparative period, we were actively manufacturing a clinical batch and preparing to return APTO-253 to the clinic; and
Savings from cancellation of the LALS/Moffitt collaboration which was active in the year ended December 31, 2016. There are no costs related to this program in the year ended December 31, 2017.
General and Administrative
Components of general and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses excluding salaries, decreased slightly in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared with the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease is mostly the result of lower travel costs, consulting and rent costs in the first six months of the fiscal year related to cost containment initiatives taken in the prior fiscal year and offset by higher investor relations, professional fees and travel costs in the three months ended December 31, 2017;
Salary expenses in the year ended December 31, 2017, were slightly lower in comparison with year ended December 31, 2016. Savings from reduced headcount were partially offset by higher bonuses recognized in the current period; and
Stock-based compensation decreased in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared with the year ended December 31, 2016, due to large forfeitures in the three months ended March 31, 2017 and also due to grants in the prior periods having a greater fair value than the grants issued in the year ended December 31, 2017, and therefore contributing to higher stock-based compensation in the year ended December 31, 2016.
FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The changes in research and development expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 result from the following:

An increase in R&D activities on our CG’806 program as described above;
A decrease in R&D activities on our APTO-253 program as described above;
Savings from cancellation of the LALS/Moffitt collaboration as described above; and
Higher salaries expense mostly related to additional clinical research staff hired at the end of the year to prepare for returning APTO-253 to the clinic.

higher investor relations, professional fees and travel costs in the three months ended December 31, 2017;
higher salaries related mostly to a bonus adjustment in the comparative period; and
stock option grants issued in the current year with a lower grant date fair value than the comparative period.
Conference Call and Webcast

Aptose will host a conference call today, Tuesday, March 27, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. EDT to discuss results for the three months and year ended December 31, 2017. Participants can access the conference call by dialing (844) 882-7834 (North American toll-free number) and (574) 990-9707 (International) and using conference ID # 8873259. The conference call can be accessed here and will also be available through a link on the Investor Relations section of Aptose’s website at ir.aptose.com. An archived version of the webcast along with a transcript will be available on the Company’s website for 30 days. An audio replay of the webcast will be available approximately two hours after the conclusion of the call through April 3, 2018 by dialing (855) 859-2056, using the conference ID # 8873259.

20-F – Annual and transition report of foreign private issuers [Sections 13 or 15(d)]

argenx has filed a 20-F – Annual and transition report of foreign private issuers [Sections 13 or 15(d)] with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Filing, 20-F, argenx, 2018, MAR 26, 2018, View Source [SID1234525001]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Phase III IMpower150 study showed Roche’s TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab) plus carboplatin and paclitaxel helped people with advanced lung cancer live longer compared to Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel

On March 26, 2018 Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) reported that the Phase III IMpower150 study met its co-primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) at this interim analysis and showed that initial (first-line) treatment with the combination of TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab) plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (chemotherapy) helped people with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) live significantly longer compared with Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Press release, Hoffmann-La Roche, MAR 26, 2018, View Source [SID1234525397]). A survival benefit was observed across key subgroups, including those with varying levels of PD-L1 expression. Safety for the TECENTRIQ and Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel combination appeared consistent with the known safety profile of the individual medicines, and no new safety signals were identified with the combinations. These data will be presented at an upcoming oncology congress.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are pleased that the IMpower150 study demonstrated a clinically meaningful survival benefit for people receiving their initial treatment for this type of advanced lung cancer," said Sandra Horning, MD, Roche’s Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. "These results add to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of combining TECENTRIQ with Avastin. We will submit these additional data to global health authorities and hope to bring this potential treatment option to patients as soon as possible."

At this interim analysis, the study found that substituting Avastin with TECENTRIQ in the combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel did not show a statistically significant OS benefit in people with advanced NSCLC compared to a combination of Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel. The study will continue as planned to the final analysis. Safety in the TECENTRIQ plus carboplatin and paclitaxel arm appeared consistent with the known safety profile of the individual medicines, and no new safety signals were identified with the combination.
Previously reported results from the IMpower150 study showed that the combination of TECENTRIQ and Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel reduced the risk of disease worsening or death (progression-free survival; PFS), a co-primary endpoint, by 38 percent (HR=0.62; p<0.0001, 95 percent CI: 0.52-0.74) compared to Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of people with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This PFS benefit was observed across key subgroups, including those with varying levels of PD-L1 expression.
IMpower150 is one of eight Phase III lung cancer studies underway, evaluating TECENTRIQ alone or in combination with other medicines. Following the positive IMpower150 and IMpower131 studies, three more Phase III lung cancer studies are expected to report this year.

About the IMpower150 study
IMpower150 is a multicenter, open-label, randomised, controlled Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TECENTRIQ in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without Avastin in people with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC who had not been treated with chemotherapy for their advanced disease. It enrolled 1,202 people, of which those with ALK and EGFR mutations were excluded from the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. People were randomised (1:1:1) to receive:
TECENTRIQ plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm A), or
TECENTRIQ and Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm B), or
Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm C, control arm)

During the treatment-induction phase, people in Arm A received TECENTRIQ administered intravenously at 1200 mg in combination with intravenous infusion of carboplatin and paclitaxel on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle for 4 or 6 cycles. Following the induction phase, people received maintenance treatment with TECENTRIQ (1200 mg every 3 weeks) until loss of clinical benefit or disease progression.
People in Arm B received induction treatment with TECENTRIQ (1200 mg) and Avastin administered intravenously at 15 mg/kg in combination with intravenous infusion of carboplatin and paclitaxel on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle for 4 or 6 cycles. People then received maintenance treatment with the TECENTRIQ and Avastin regimen until disease progression (Avastin) or loss of clinical benefit/disease progression (TECENTRIQ).
People in Arm C received induction treatment with Avastin administered intravenously at 15 mg/kg plus intravenous infusion of carboplatin and paclitaxel on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle for 4 or 6 cycles. This was followed by maintenance treatment with Avastin alone until disease progression.
The co-primary endpoints were PFS and OS, as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). The co-primary OS endpoint in IMpower150 was assessed in all randomised people without an ALK or EGFR genetic mutation (intention-to-treat wild-type). Key secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed PFS and OS, safety in the ITT population and in EGFR and ALK mutation subgroups.
The primary analysis of the co-primary PFS endpoint in IMpower150 was assessed in two populations: all randomised people without an ALK or EGFR genetic mutation (intention-to-treat wild-type) and in a subgroup of people who had a specific biomarker (T-effector "Teff" gene signature expression ). IMpower150 met its PFS co-primary endpoint per study protocol for both populations assessed.

About NSCLC
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death globally.1 Each year 1.59 million people die as a result of the disease; this translates into more than 4,350 deaths worldwide every day.2 Lung cancer can be broadly divided into two major types: NSCLC and small cell lung cancer. NSCLC is the most prevalent type, accounting for around 85% of all cases.2 NSCLC comprises non-squamous and squamous-cell lung cancer, the squamous form of which is characterised by flat cells covering the airway surface when viewed under a microscope.
About TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab)
TECENTRIQ is a monoclonal antibody designed to bind with a protein called PD-L1 expressed on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating immune cells, blocking its interactions with both PD-1 and B7.1 receptors. By inhibiting PD-L1, TECENTRIQ may enable the activation of T cells. TECENTRIQ has the potential to be used as a foundational combination partner with cancer immunotherapies, targeted medicines and various chemotherapies across a broad range of cancers.

Currently, Roche has eight Phase III lung cancer studies underway, evaluating TECENTRIQ alone or in combination with other medicines.
TECENTRIQ is already approved in the European Union, United States and more than 60 countries for people with previously treated metastatic NSCLC and for people with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who are not eligible for cisplatin chemotherapy, or who have had disease progression during or following platinum-containing therapy.
About Avastin (bevacizumab)
Avastin is a biologic cancer treatment approved in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC and, to-date, has helped over 500,000 patients lead longer lives. Avastin is considered a standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC and has been proven to significantly extend overall survival (OS). Avastin is currently approved in combination with any platinum-based chemotherapy in Europe, and with paclitaxel/carboplatin in the US, in first-line non-squamous NSCLC, based on results of the pivotal Phase III E4599 study. Avastin was the first medicine to help people with previously untreated advanced, non-squamous NSCLC live longer (OS) than one year when added to chemotherapy.
About the TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab) combination
There is a strong scientific rationale to support combining TECENTRIQ and Avastin. The TECENTRIQ and Avastin regimen may enhance the potential of the immune system to combat a broad range of cancers, including first-line advanced NSCLC. Avastin, in addition to its established anti-angiogenic effects, may further enhance TECENTRIQ’s ability to restore anti-cancer immunity, by inhibiting VEGF-related immunosuppression, promoting T-cell tumour infiltration and enabling priming and activation of T-cell responses against tumour antigens.
About Roche in cancer immunotherapy
For more than 50 years, Roche has been developing medicines with the goal to redefine treatment in oncology. Today, we’re investing more than ever in our effort to bring innovative treatment options that help a person’s own immune system fight cancer.
By applying our seminal research in immune tumour profiling within the framework of the Roche-devised cancer immunity cycle, we are accelerating and expanding the transformative benefits with TECENTRIQ to a greater number of people living with cancer. Our cancer immunotherapy development programme takes a comprehensive approach in pursuing the goal of restoring cancer immunity to improve outcomes for patients.
To learn more about the Roche approach to cancer immunotherapy please follow this link:
View Source

ADI?PEG 20 and PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Lead to Strong Anti-tumor Activity in ASS1- and PD-L1-negative Fibrosarcoma Murine Model

On March 26, 2018 Polaris Group reported that its lead product ADI‑PEG 20 modulates PD-L1 expression via stimulating the release of IFN-α and -ß in several tumor cell lines and the combination of ADI‑PEG 20 and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade abrogated tumorigenesis in a murine model according to research presented by a group from Barts Cancer Institute, London at the 2018 Cancer Immunotherapy Keystone Symposia held in Montreal, Canada (Press release, Polaris Pharmaceuticals, MAR 26, 2018, View Source [SID1234526245]). These findings suggest that ADI‑PEG 20 could potentially enhance the anti-tumor activity of checkpoint inhibitors.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1 agents belong to a group of drugs called checkpoint inhibitors and work by disrupting the interaction between PD-1 on immune cells and PD-L1 on cancer cells, thereby unleashing the body’s own immune system to fight cancers. ADI‑PEG 20 converts the amino acid arginine in body’s circulation to citrulline and ammonia. Normal cells are able to synthesize arginine through the urea cycle. Certain cancer cells are deficient in argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS1), a key enzyme in the urea cycle, thereby rendered entirely dependent on arginine in the circulation for their survival and growth. These ASS1-deficient cancer cells are more sensitive to arginine depletion by ADI‑PEG 20.

In several mesothelioma and uveal melanoma cell lines, overexpression of ASS1 by transfection or prolonged treatment with ADI-PEG 20 was found to induce type I interferon genes and PD-L1 gene expression. In addition, the researchers also noted a statistically significant correlation between constitutive expressions of ASS1 and PD-L1 genes in primary mesothelioma and uveal melanoma tumor samples. Finally the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with ADI‑PEG 20 abrogated tumorigenesis in an immunocompetent ASS1 negative and PD-L1 negative fibrosarcoma murine model in which PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition alone had limited efficacy.

"The immunometabolic link between ADI‑PEG 20 and PD-1/PD-L1 is very intriguing," said John Bomalaski, M.D., Executive Vice President, Medical Affairs at Polaris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. "To explore this in the clinic, we are currently conducting a clinical study combining ADI‑PEG 20 with Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in solid tumors to investigate the potential of combining ADI‑PEG 20 with checkpoint inhibitors."

About ADI‑PEG 20

ADI‑PEG 20 is a biologic being developed by Polaris Group to treat cancers carrying a major metabolic defect that renders them unable to internally synthesize arginine. Because arginine is essential for protein synthesis and survival of cells, these cancer cells become dependent upon the external supply of arginine to survive and grow. ADI‑PEG 20 is designed to deplete the external supply of arginine, causing arginine-dependent cancer cells to die while leaving the patient’s normal cells unharmed. Multiple cancers have been reported to have a high degree of arginine-dependency and can potentially be treated with ADI‑PEG 20.