On December 12, 2017 Janssen Research & Development, LLC reported data from the Phase 3 ALCYONE study, showing that DARZALEX (daratumumab) in combination with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) significantly improved clinical outcomes, including reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 50 percent, in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, DEC 12, 2017, View Source [SID1234522596]). These data were presented as a late-breaking abstract today at the 59th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Atlanta (Abstract #LBA-4). Study findings were simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These Phase 3 results for DARZALEX demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements with a manageable safety profile," said Dr. Maria-Victoria Mateos, Ph.D., lead ALCYONE study investigator and Director of the Myeloma Unit at University Hospital of Salamanca-IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain. "Selecting the right treatment regimen is critical for patients who are newly diagnosed, especially if they are transplant ineligible, as these patients tend to be older and more frail. These findings strongly support this DARZALEX frontline regimen as a new standard of care for these patients."

At a median follow-up of 16.5 months, DARZALEX-VMP reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 50 percent, compared to treatment with VMP alone (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.50; 95 percent CI [0.38-0.65], p<0.0001).1 The median progression-free survival (PFS) for DARZALEX-VMP had not yet been reached, compared to an estimated median PFS of 18.1 months for patients who received VMP alone.1

In addition to reducing the risk of disease progression or death, DARZALEX significantly improved overall response rates (ORR) (91 percent vs. 74 percent) compared to VMP alone, including more than doubling rates of stringent complete response (sCR) (18 percent vs. 7 percent) and significantly improving rates of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (71 percent vs. 50 percent) and complete response (CR) or better (43 percent vs. 24 percent).1 Patients receiving DARZALEX also reported a more than three-fold increase in the minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate (22 percent vs. 6 percent) compared to those who received VMP alone.1

The most common (≥10 percent) Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for DARZALEX-VMP vs. VMP were neutropenia (40 percent vs. 39 percent), thrombocytopenia (34 percent vs. 38 percent), anemia (16 percent vs. 20 percent) and pneumonia (11 percent vs. 4 percent).1 One patient in each arm discontinued treatment due to pneumonia, and 0.9 percent of patients discontinued DARZALEX due to an infection.1 Twenty-eight percent of patients experienced infusion reactions (IRs) due to DARZALEX.1 In the DARZALEX-VMP arm, 42 percent of patients experienced a serious adverse event (SAE), compared to 33 percent in the VMP arm.1 The most common (≥2 percent) SAEs were pneumonia (10 percent vs. 3 percent), anemia (2 percent vs. 3 percent), bronchitis (2 percent vs. 1 percent), lower respiratory tract infection (2 percent vs. 1 percent), upper respiratory tract infection (2 percent vs. 1 percent), febrile neutropenia (1 percent vs. 2 percent) and cardiac failure (<1 percent vs. 2 percent) for DARZALEX-VMP vs. VMP, respectively.1

"DARZALEX offers compelling and consistent clinical benefit across all lines of therapy in multiple myeloma," said Sen Zhuang, M.D. Ph.D., Vice President, Oncology Clinical Research, Janssen Research & Development. "These latest results convey the promise of DARZALEX in newly diagnosed patients for whom the initial therapy is most critical for long-term survival."

On November 21, 2017, Janssen submitted a supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for DARZALEX in combination with VMP for this patient population. Janssen requested Priority Review of this sBLA, which would shorten FDA review to six months, compared to 10 months for Standard Review. If approved, this would be the fifth indication for DARZALEX in the U.S. and its first in the frontline setting. On November 21, 2017, Janssen also submitted an application for this patient population to the European Medicines Agency.

About the ALCYONE Trial1
The randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase 3 ALCYONE (MMY3007) study enrolled 706 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. In the DARZALEX-VMP arm, the median age was 71 years (range: 40-93), 30 percent were ≥75 years and 46 percent were male. Patients were randomized to receive nine cycles of either DARZALEX combined with VMP, or VMP alone. In the DARZALEX-VMP arm, patients received 16 mg/kg of DARZALEX once weekly for six weeks (Cycle 1; 1 Cycle = 42 days), followed by once every three weeks (Cycles 2-9). Following the nine cycles, patients in the DARZALEX-VMP arm continued to receive 16 mg/kg of DARZALEX once every four weeks until disease progression.

About DARZALEX (daratumumab) Injection, for Intravenous Infusion
DARZALEX (daratumumab) injection for intravenous use is the first CD38-directed antibody approved anywhere in the world.2 CD38 is a surface protein that is highly expressed across multiple myeloma cells.3 DARZALEX is believed to induce tumor cell death through multiple immune-mediated mechanisms of action, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), as well as through apoptosis, in which a series of molecular steps in a cell lead to its death.2 A subset of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), CD38+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and CD38+ B cells (Bregs) were decreased by DARZALEX.2 DARZALEX is being evaluated in a comprehensive clinical development program across a range of treatment settings in multiple myeloma, such as in frontline and relapsed settings.4,5,6,7,8 Additional studies are ongoing or planned to assess its potential for a solid tumor indication and in other malignant and pre-malignant diseases in which CD38 is expressed, such as smoldering myeloma.9,10,11 DARZALEX was the first CD38-directed antibody to receive regulatory approval to treat relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.2

In August 2012, Janssen Biotech, Inc. and Genmab A/S entered a worldwide agreement, which granted Janssen an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialize DARZALEX.12 DARZALEX is commercialized in the U.S. by Janssen Biotech, Inc.12 For more information, visit www.DARZALEX.com.

About Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma is an incurable blood cancer that occurs when malignant plasma cells grow uncontrollably in the bone marrow.13,14 Refractory cancer occurs when a patient’s disease is resistant to treatment or in the case of multiple myeloma, patients progress within 60 days of their last therapy.15,16 Relapsed cancer means the disease has returned after a period of initial, partial or complete remission.17 It is estimated that 30,280 people will be diagnosed and 12,590 will die from the disease in the United States in 2017.18 While some patients with multiple myeloma have no symptoms at all, most patients are diagnosed due to symptoms, which can include bone fracture or pain, low red blood counts, fatigue, calcium elevation, kidney problems or infections.19

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
CONTRAINDICATIONS – None
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Infusion Reactions – DARZALEX can cause severe infusion reactions. Approximately half of all patients experienced a reaction, most during the first infusion. Infusion reactions can also occur with subsequent infusions. Nearly all reactions occurred during infusion or within 4 hours of completing an infusion. Prior to the introduction of post-infusion medication in clinical trials, infusion reactions occurred up to 48 hours after infusion. Severe reactions have occurred, including bronchospasm, hypoxia, dyspnea, hypertension, laryngeal edema and pulmonary edema. Signs and symptoms may include respiratory symptoms, such as nasal congestion, cough, throat irritation, as well as chills, vomiting and nausea. Less common symptoms were wheezing, allergic rhinitis, pyrexia, chest discomfort, pruritus, and hypotension.

Pre-medicate patients with antihistamines, antipyretics, and corticosteroids. Frequently monitor patients during the entire infusion. Interrupt infusion for reactions of any severity and institute medical management as needed. Permanently discontinue therapy for life-threatening (Grade 4) reactions. For patients with Grade 1, 2, or 3 reactions, reduce the infusion rate when re-starting the infusion.

To reduce the risk of delayed infusion reactions, administer oral corticosteroids to all patients following DARZALEX infusions. Patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may require additional post-infusion medications to manage respiratory complications. Consider prescribing short- and long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Interference with Serological Testing – Daratumumab binds to CD38 on red blood cells (RBCs) and results in a positive Indirect Antiglobulin Test (Indirect Coombs test). Daratumumab-mediated positive indirect antiglobulin test may persist for up to 6 months after the last daratumumab infusion. Daratumumab bound to RBCs masks detection of antibodies to minor antigens in the patient’s serum. The determination of a patient’s ABO and Rh blood type are not impacted. Notify blood transfusion centers of this interference with serological testing and inform blood banks that a patient has received DARZALEX. Type and screen patients prior to starting DARZALEX.

Neutropenia – DARZALEX may increase neutropenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. DARZALEX dose delay may be required to allow recovery of neutrophils. No dose reduction of DARZALEX is recommended. Consider supportive care with growth factors.

Thrombocytopenia – DARZALEX may increase thrombocytopenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. DARZALEX dose delay may be required to allow recovery of platelets. No dose reduction of DARZALEX is recommended. Consider supportive care with transfusions.

Interference with Determination of Complete Response – Daratumumab is a human IgG kappa monoclonal antibody that can be detected on both, the serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for the clinical monitoring of endogenous M-protein. This interference can impact the determination of complete response and of disease progression in some patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein.

Adverse Reactions – In patients who received DARZALEX in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, the most frequently reported adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) were: neutropenia (92%), thrombocytopenia (73%), upper respiratory tract infection (65%), infusion reactions (48%), diarrhea (43%), fatigue (35%), cough (30%), muscle spasms (26%), nausea (24%), dyspnea (21%) and pyrexia (20%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 49%. Serious adverse reactions were pneumonia (12%), upper respiratory tract infection (7%), influenza (3%) and pyrexia (3%).

In patients who received DARZALEX in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, the most frequently reported adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) were: thrombocytopenia (90%), neutropenia (58%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (47%), infusion reactions (45%), upper respiratory tract infection (44%), diarrhea (32%), cough (27%), peripheral edema (22%), and dyspnea (21%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 42%. Serious adverse reactions were upper respiratory tract infection (5%), diarrhea (2%) and atrial fibrillation (2%).

In patients who received DARZALEX as monotherapy, the most frequently reported adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) were: neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (48%), infusion reactions (48%), fatigue (39%), nausea (27%), back pain (23%), pyrexia (21%), cough (21%), and upper respiratory tract infection (20%). Serious adverse reactions were reported in 51 (33%) patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions were pneumonia (6%), general physical health deterioration (3%), and pyrexia (3%).

In patients who received DARZALEX in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone, the most frequent adverse reactions (>20%) were infusion reactions (50%), diarrhea (38%), constipation (33%), nausea (30%), vomiting (21%), fatigue (50%), pyrexia (25%), upper respiratory tract infection (50%), muscle spasms (26%), back pain (25%), arthralgia (22%), dizziness (21%), insomnia (23%), cough (43%) and dyspnea (33%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 49%. Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥5% patients included pneumonia (7%).

DRUG INTERACTIONS
Effect of Other Drugs on daratumumab: The coadministration of lenalidomide, pomalidomide or bortezomib with DARZALEX did not affect the pharmacokinetics of daratumumab.

Effect of Daratumumab on Other Drugs: The coadministration of DARZALEX with bortezomib did not affect the pharmacokinetics of bortezomib.

On December 12, 2017 Onconova Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ONTX), a Phase 3 clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing novel products to treat cancer, reported two poster presentations highlighting drug activity and the mechanism of action of rigosertib in Myelodysplastic Syndromes during the 59th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting and Exposition in Atlanta (Press release, Onconova, DEC 12, 2017, View Source [SID1234522584]). Rigosertib, the Company’s lead compound, is being evaluated in Phase 3 and Phase 2 clinical trials in both intravenous and oral forms, respectively.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Rigosertib Oral is Active as a Single Agent in Lower-risk Transfusion Dependent MDS

Title: Rigosertib Oral in Transfusion Dependent Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS): Optimization of Dose and Rate of Transfusion Independence (TI) or Transfusion Reduction (TR) in a Single-Arm Phase 2 Study

Eighty-two patients with a median age of 70 years (range 54-90) were enrolled at 5 clinical sites, and received a median of 5.4 months (range 0.1-28.8) of oral rigosertib. Of the 82 enrolled patients, 9 patients were treated with 560 mg BID continuously, 7 patients were treated with 560 mg in the AM and 280 mg in the PM continuously, 35 patients were treated with 560mg BID intermittently (as defined as 2 out of 3 weeks), and 31 patients were treated with 560mg in the AM and 280mg in the PM intermittently. Sixty patients were treated with ESA and oral rigosertib during the study.

Of the 82 patients, 66 patients received intermittent dosing for at least 8 consecutive weeks; and 20 of 62 evaluable patients (32%) achieved TI lasting 8 to 85+ weeks; with a median of 18 weeks. The highest rate of TI (44%) was observed in the 560 mg BID intermittent cohort: 15 of 34 eligible patients achieved TI lasting 8 to 85+ weeks; with a median of 18 weeks. Ninety-three percent (93%) of these 15 patients received rigosertib with continued ESA.

The safety assessable population (n = 82) received at least 1 week of rigosertib treatment. Notably, no significant treatment emergent myelosuppression, or other notable adverse events (AEs), were evident in these patients. Continuous rigosertib dosing cohorts were closed early due to higher urinary AEs. For all intermittent patients (n=66), the most frequent treatment emergent AEs observed were urinary with pollakiuria (42.4%), fatigue and micturition urgency (33.3%), urinary tract pain (28.8%), hematuria and dysuria (24.2%). Intermittent and reduced dosing of rigosertib (560 mg AM, 280 mg PM during 14 days of 21-day cycles) was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of urinary toxicity. All AEs were reversible once rigosertib dosing was reduced or discontinued. Strategies to ameliorate or manage the urinary AEs are under investigation.

In conclusion, oral rigosertib treatment resulted in high rates of transfusion reduction and TI. Patients administered rigosertib for 2 out of 3 weeks at a dose of 560 mg BID (1120 mg over 24 hours) achieved an impressive TI rate of 44% (15/34). Based on the rate of TI, and the observed urinary AEs, the risk benefit profile of oral intermittent dosing is favorable. Oral rigosertib at a total dose of 1120 mg over 24 hours administered intermittently in HR-MDS patients in combination with azacitidine is now being studied, with further exploration to optimize dose and mitigate urinary AEs.

Dr. Azra Raza, lead investigator of the study, commented, "This collaborative study originated at our clinic in Columbia and spanned several years of treatment and follow-up of transfusion dependent lower-risk MDS patients treated with oral rigosertib. The very high response rate reported is remarkable, as is the noted durable benefit to patients who are burdened by the need for frequent transfusions. Since these patients have few FDA approved therapeutic options, we are excited about expanding these studies to pivotal trials. The tolerability and convenience of administration of oral rigosertib will be key determinants of success in future studies."

This poster presentation was delivered by lead co-author Aref Al-Kali, MD, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN on Saturday, December 9, 2017. The reported results updated a study lead by Azra Raza, MD, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.

A copy of the presentation is available by visiting the Scientific Presentations section of Onconova’s website.

Mechanistic Rationale of Combination Therapy with Rigosertib

Title: Effects of Rigosertib (RIGO) Alone or in Combination with Azacitidine or Vorinostat on Epigenetic Reprogramming of CD34+ Cells in the Myelodysplastic Syndrome

This presentation reported the findings of rigosertib alone or in combination with azacitidine or vorinostat on epigenetic reprogramming or molecular changes of CD34+ cells in MDS. The study results indicate that epigenetic effects of rigosertib on chromatin alterations may lead to improved hematopoietic function and response in the clinical setting, and expanded the understanding of the mechanism of action of rigosertib in combination with azacitidine. These preclinical models suggest potential novel clinical strategies with rigosertib and azacitidine to improve outcomes for patients with higher-risk MDS. Oral rigosertib in combination with azacitidine is now being studied in higher-risk MDS patients.

Dr. Lewis Silverman, the lead investigator of the study, commented, "A large body of evidence with both intravenous and oral rigosertib supports the activity of this novel agent in MDS patients. Based on our laboratory studies and a US patent, a combination regimen of oral rigosertib with azacitidine has been explored in Phase 2 trials and the promising results of these trials are providing the basis for the design of a pivotal Phase 3 study. Our research continues to explore the mechanistic basis of the impressive and durable responses noted in higher-risk MDS patients at Mount Sinai and other collaborating institutions. Such understanding may permit design of other combinations, as well as biomarkers for patient selection and theranostic uses in the near future."

This poster presentation was delivered by lead author Lewis R Silverman, MD, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY on Monday, December 11, 2017.

A copy of the presentation is available by visiting the Scientific Presentations section of Onconova’s website.

About Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.
Onconova Therapeutics, Inc. is a Phase 3-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing novel small molecule drug candidates to treat cancer, with a primary focus on Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Rigosertib, Onconova’s lead candidate, is a proprietary Phase 3 small molecule agent, which the Company believes blocks cellular signaling by targeting RAS effector pathways. Using a proprietary chemistry platform, Onconova has created a pipeline of targeted agents designed to work against specific cellular pathways that are important in cancer cells. Onconova has three product candidates in the clinical stage and several pre-clinical programs. The advanced clinical trial with the Company’s lead compound, rigosertib, is aimed at what the Company believes are unmet medical needs of patients with MDS. For more information, please visit View Source

About IV Rigosertib
The intravenous form of rigosertib has been employed in Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials involving more than 800 patients, and is currently being evaluated in the randomized Phase 3 international INSPIRE trial for patients with higher-risk (HR) MDS, after failure of hypomethylating agent, or HMA, therapy.

About INSPIRE
The INternational Study of Phase III IV RigosErtib, or INSPIRE, trial design was finalized following guidance received from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. INSPIRE is a multi-center, randomized controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of IV rigosertib in HR-MDS patients who had progressed on, failed to respond to, or relapsed after previous treatment with an HMA within the first 9 months or nine cycles over the course of one year after initiation of HMA treatment. This time frame optimizes the opportunity to respond to treatment with an HMA prior to declaring treatment failure, as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines. The trial will enroll approximately 225 patients randomized at a 2:1 ratio into two treatment arms: IV rigosertib plus Best Supportive Care versus Physician’s Choice plus Best Supportive Care. The primary endpoint of INSPIRE is overall survival and an interim analysis is anticipated. Full details of the INSPIRE trial, such as inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as secondary endpoints, can be found on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02562443).

About Oral Rigosertib
The oral form of rigosertib was developed to provide more convenient dosing for use where the duration of treatment may extend to multiple years. This dosage form also supports many combination therapy modalities. To date, 368 patients have been treated with the oral formulation of rigosertib. Initial studies with single-agent oral rigosertib were conducted in hematological malignancies, lower-risk MDS, and solid tumors. Combination therapy of oral rigosertib with azacitidine and chemoradiotherapy has also been explored. Currently, oral rigosertib is being developed as a combination therapy together with azacitidine for patients with higher-risk MDS who require HMA therapy. A Phase 1/2 trial of the combination therapy has been fully enrolled and the preliminary results were presented in 2016. This novel combination is the subject of an issued US patent with earliest expiration in 2028.

On December 12, 2017 Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: CYCC, NASDAQ: CYCCP; "Cyclacel" or the "Company"), a biopharmaceutical company developing oral therapies that target various phases of cell cycle control for the treatment of cancer and other serious disorders, reported results from the Company’s Phase 3 SEAMLESS study (Press release, Cyclacel, DEC 12, 2017, View Source [SID1234522595]). Cyclacel had previously announced top-line results from its Phase 3 SEAMLESS study in February 2017. The study enrolled elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and compared alternating cycles of decitabine and sapacitabine versus decitabine. Data were reported at an oral presentation on Monday, December 11, at 6:45 PM EST at the 59th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Although the study did not reach its primary endpoint of superiority in survival, we are encouraged by the higher complete remission rate on the sapacitabine-decitabine arm, especially in the subgroup with low white blood cell count; additional analysis of the data should be pursued," said Hagop Kantarjian, M.D., Professor and Chair, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and chair of the study.

"We are pleased to report detailed results of the SEAMLESS study, which as previously announced, did not reach its primary endpoint," said Spiro Rombotis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cyclacel. "We believe that the subgroup results have defined a patient population for whom the decitabine-sapacitabine regimen may represent an improvement over low intensity treatment by decitabine alone. We plan to discuss the data, the statistical robustness of the subgroup results and the optimal baseline peripheral white blood cell (WBC) cutpoint with European and US regulatory authorities and will provide updates as appropriate. We are grateful to the patients, their families and the investigators for their contributions to this large study. In parallel, we are progressing our other clinical programs in transcriptional regulation with CYC065 and DNA damage response with sapacitabine-seliciclib in biomarker-selected patients with solid tumors, such as those with BRCA mutations or resistance to existing cancer therapies."

Study Design & Intent-to-Treat Results

The randomized, open label, Phase 3 SEAMLESS study enrolled 482 patients, aged 70 years or older, with newly diagnosed AML who were not candidates for or refused intensive therapy at 110 US and EU sites. Patients were stratified by WBC, antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD), and marrow blasts, and randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous decitabine administered in alternating cycles with oral sapacitabine versus intravenous decitabine alone.

The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of demonstrating statistically significant improvement in overall survival. A higher complete remission (CR) rate, a secondary endpoint, was observed on the decitabine-sapacitabine arm (17% versus 11%). Other endpoints and safety were similar between the arms.

Prespecified Subgroup Analysis

Baseline WBC

In the less than 10,000 WBC subgroup (n=319) a trend towards improved overall survival (median 8.0 versus 5.8 months, HR=0.84 [0.66, 1.06], p=0.14) favoring decitabine-sapacitabine and a significantly higher CR rate (21.0% versus 8.6%, p=0.0017) was achieved on decitabine-sapacitabine.

In the 10,000 or more WBC subgroup (n=163) significantly better overall survival (median 3.8 versus 5.5 months, HR=1.57 [1.12, 2.19], p=0.007) was observed on decitabine. A trend in CR rate (8.3% versus 15.2%, p=0.18) favoring decitabine was observed but it did not reach statistical significance.

Prior AHD

In the subgroup with prior AHD (n=136) a significantly higher CR rate (16.7% versus 5.7%, p=0.0398) was achieved on decitabine-sapacitabine. There was a numerical difference in median survival (6.4 versus 5.0 months, HR=0.85 [0.59, 1.24], p=0.41) favoring decitabine-sapacitabine but overall survival did not reach statistical significance.

In the subgroup without prior AHD (n=346) there was a numerical difference in median survival (5.9 versus 6.7 months, HR=1.08 [0.86, 1.35], p=0.52) favoring decitabine and CR rate (16.6% versus 12.9%) favoring decitabine-sapacitabine but neither reached statistical significance.

Cytogenetics

In the subgroup with other than unfavorable cytogenetics (n=288) there was a numerical difference in median survival (8.2 versus 5.7 months, HR=0.89 [0.69, 1.15], p=0.38) and CR rate (19.9% versus 11.6%, p=0.16) favoring decitabine-sapacitabine but neither reached statistical significance.

In the subgroup with unfavorable cytogenetics (n=194) there was a numerical difference in median survival (3.8 months versus 5.7 months, HR=1.27 [0.94, 1.73], p=0.12) favoring decitabine but overall survival did not reach statistical significance. There was a numerical difference in CR rate favoring decitabine-sapacitabine (12.0% versus 9.6%) but it did not reach statistical significance.

In the subgroup of patients with below 50% and with 50% or higher bone marrow blasts there were no statistically significant differences in overall survival between the arms.

Presentation

The presentation (abstract 891), titled "Results of a Phase 3 Study of Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML Treated with Sapacitabine and Decitabine Administered in Alternating Cycles," is available on the Cyclacel website at www.cyclacel.com.

About Sapacitabine

Sapacitabine (CYC682), an orally-available nucleoside analogue, is currently being studied in an ongoing, extension of a Phase 1 study evaluating a combination regimen of sapacitabine and seliciclib, a first generation CDK inhibitor. Parts 1 and 2 of the study evaluated approximately 90 patients with advanced cancers. Part 3 is ongoing in patients with BRCA positive, breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer. Over 1,000 patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors have received sapacitabine.

About AML

AML is a rapidly progressing cancer of the blood characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature blast cells in the bone marrow. The American Cancer Society estimates there will be approximately 21,380 new cases of AML and approximately 10,590 deaths from AML in the U.S. in 2017. AML is generally a disease of older adults and the median age is about 67 years. Newly diagnosed elderly patients with poor prognostic risk factors typically die within one year.

On December 12, 2017 TapImmune Inc. (NASDAQ: TPIV), a leading clinical-stage immuno-oncology company with ongoing clinical trials in ovarian and breast cancer, reported that the first patient has been enrolled in a Phase 2 randomized, multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of TapImmune’s novel therapeutic vaccine candidate TPIV200 (Press release, TapImmune, DEC 12, 2017, View Source [SID1234523779]). The 280-patient trial, sponsored by Mayo Clinic, received $13.3 million in grant funding from the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to evaluate the prevention of cancer recurrence in women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have completed first-line surgery and radiotherapy/chemotherapy.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

TPIV200 is a novel, multi-epitope, peptide-based cancer vaccine that has been shown to induce a robust and long-lasting "memory" T-cell immune response directed against folate receptor alpha (FRa), a molecule that is overexpressed on the surface of the vast majority of TNBC cancer cells and is associated with cancer recurrence. As an off-the-shelf vaccine consisting of several carefully chosen FRa peptides, TPIV200 is uniquely able to stimulate both T "helper" cells and T "killer" cells to target tumor cells and is expected to cover greater than 85% of human genotypes worldwide.

"We remain grateful to the U.S. Department of Defense and Mayo Clinic for enabling TapImmune to gain invaluable clinical safety and efficacy insight for TPIV200 under this grant," said TapImmune President and CEO Peter Hoang. "We believe TPIV200 and our other vaccine candidates have an important role to play within the current immuno-oncology ecosystem by potentially bridging a critical gap not currently addressed by other immunotherapies, which have shown promise in only a small number of patients. Unlike current approaches, TapImmune’s vaccines are designed to produce broad-based, durable T-cell responses in the vast majority of patients, which we believe are essential for improving clinical outcomes and ensuring potential regulatory and commercial success. We look forward to providing updates appropriately as this exciting Phase 2 study continues to enroll patients."

TapImmune and its clinical partners are evaluating TPIV200 in multiple ongoing Phase 2 trials for treating ovarian and breast cancer, including a randomized dosing trial in TNBC that recently completed patient enrollment. The four-arm trial is designed to help determine the optimal TPIV200 vaccine dose and regimen to maximize patients’ anti-tumor immune responses. Interim immunogenicity results from this ongoing study are anticipated in the first half of 2018.

Keith L. Knutson. Ph.D., Professor of Immunology in the Department of Immunology, and Edith A. Perez, M.D., Professor of Medicine in the Division of Hematology and Oncology, both at Mayo Clinic’s Florida campus in Jacksonville, Florida, are the recipients of the U.S. Department of Defense grant and are leading the Phase 2 trial.

Mayo Clinic and Dr. Knutson have a financial interest in TapImmune for the triple negative breast cancer treatment.

On December 12, 2017 VBI Vaccines Inc. (Nasdaq: VBIV) (TSX:VBV) (VBI) reported that Jeff Baxter, President and CEO, will present at the BMO Capital Markets Prescriptions for Success Healthcare Conference on Thursday, December 14, 2017, at 11:00 AM ET in New York (Press release, VBI Vaccines, DEC 12, 2017, View Source [SID1234522586]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The presentation will be webcast live and can be accessed through the below link or through the Investors page of VBI’s website at: www.vbivaccines.com/investors/events-presentations/. A replay of the presentation will be available at the same location for 90 days following the conference.

Event Details

● Event: BMO Capital Markets Prescriptions for Success Healthcare Conference

● Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017

● Time: 11:00 – 11:30 AM ET

● Event Website: View Source

● Webcast: https://cc.talkpoint.com/bmoc001/121417a_as/?entity=38_GTRNEFD