Genprex to Present at the 11th Annual LD Micro Main Event

On December 3, 2018 Genprex, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNPX), a clinical-stage gene therapy company developing a new approach to treating cancer based upon a novel proprietary technology platform, reported that its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Rodney Varner, will present at the 11th annual LD Micro Main Event at the Luxe Sunset Boulevard Hotel in Los Angeles, CA (Press release, Genprex, DEC 3, 2018, View Source [SID1234531841]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Genprex is scheduled to present on Wed., Dec. 5, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. PST. Genprex management will also attend one-on-one meetings with institutional investors throughout the day.

The LD Micro Main Event is the largest independent conference for small/micro-cap companies and will feature 250 companies presenting to an audience of over 1,200 attendees.

Generon Presented Pre-Clinical Immunotherapy Results With CD3-Activating Bi-Specific Antibody Targeting CD19 on B Cells in Mono- and Bi-Valent Format

On December 3, 2018 Shanghai, Generon BioMed Holding Ltd (Generon), reported at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting the pre-clinical study results of two novel immunotherapies, A-319 (mono-valent) and A-329 (bi-valent), two CD19×CD3 bi-specific antibodies designed using Generon’s ITab platform (Press release, Generon (Shanghai), DEC 3, 2018, View Source [SID1234531890]). A series of studies were conducted to evaluate the bioactivities of A-319 and A-329 in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro data showed that the mono-valent and bi-valent CD19 binding had little effect on the CD3-associated activities including CD3 antigen binding affinity, T cell binding, and T cell activation. In contrast, the bi-valent binding format of A-329 showed better potency compared to the mono-valent format of A-319 in CD19 binding (KD 0.89 nM and 19.4 nM respectively) and in vitro human B cell killing (EC50 0.2 pM and 3.4 pM, respectively). Both A-319 and A-329 were capable of mediating tumor cell lysis with EC50 at 0.03~4.0 pM. A-329 demonstrated a greater killing activity on B cell lines with a low expression of CD19 antigen. In addition, The CD19 bi-valent format of A-329 revealed more B cell killing in monkeys. No significant differences of cytokine induction or liver injuries between A-319 and A-329 were observed. In human PBMC engrafted mouse models, in vivo efficacies of both formats on inhibiting tumor growth or improving animal survival rate were also confirmed. These results demonstrated that both A-319 and A-329 may benefit patients with B cell malignancies with less frequent dosing and lower levels of cytokine inductions than comparator therapies. A-329 especially has the potential to eliminate low CD19 expressing tumor stem cells.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Dr. David Lacey, chairman of Generon’s scientific advisory board, commented, "The prosecution of A-319 and A-329 ITabs targeting underscores the broadening of Generon’s portfolio into the immune-oncology space. The inherent flexibility of the ITab design and the competitive attributes of its manufacture make this bi-specific platform particularly attractive for CD19 as well as future targets."

Dr. Xiao Qiang Yan, CEO and CSO of Generon, commented, "Targeting CD19 to treat patients with B cell malignancies remains a substantial unmet medical need. Generon has been focusing on developing CD3-activating bi-specific ITabs with the goal to serve patients better through more convenient dosing, improved efficacy and reduced side-effects. The preclinical data suggest that A-319 and A-329 may have unique advantages over other technologies or therapies targeting CD19".

About A-319 and A-329

A-319 and A-329 are T cell activating bi-specific antibodies (BsAb) designed to target CD19 and CD3 (anti-CD19, anti-CD3) and are under development for the treatment of patients with B cell malignancies including B cell leukemia and B cell lymphoma. Both A-319 and A-329 activate T lymphocytes in a patient to kill CD19 expressing malignant B-cells, and A-329 may also activate T lymphocytes in a patient to kill low CD19 expressing malignant B cells. A-319 was recently approved by SFDA to initiate a phase I study in patients with B cell malignancies in China.

Takeda to Present Positive Data from TOURMALINE-MM3, First Pivotal Phase 3 Placebo Controlled Trial Evaluating Proteasome Inhibitor Treatment in Maintenance Setting

On December 2, 2018 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (TSE:4502) reported that data from the Phase 3 randomized, TOURMALINE-MM3 study evaluating the effect of single-agent oral NINLARO (ixazomib) as a maintenance therapy in adult patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma who previously responded to high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) will be presented at the 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) annual meeting on Sunday, December 2, 2018 in San Diego, California (Press release, Takeda, DEC 2, 2018, View Source [SID1234531792]). NINLARO is currently not approved as a maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma following ASCT.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The trial achieved its primary endpoint with NINLARO resulting in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in adult patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma who responded to HDT and ASCT as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) (HR 0.72; p-value=0.002). This corresponds to a 28 percent reduction in risk of progression or death and a 39 percent improvement in PFS with NINLARO compared with placebo. The safety profile of NINLARO in the maintenance setting is consistent with previously reported results of single-agent NINLARO use.

"A growing body of evidence has shown that maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma may prolong the duration of disease control," said Meletios Dimopoulos, MD, Professor and Chairman of the Department of Clinical Therapeutics at the University Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece. "As currently approved options are limited and do not include a proteasome inhibitor, there is a need for additional maintenance treatments that can sustain response and have a tolerable safety profile. Data from the TOURMALINE-MM3 clinical trial supports single-agent NINLARO as a potential oral proteasome inhibitor maintenance therapy option post-ASCT."

"The positive results from this pivotal study – the first and only Phase 3 placebo controlled study evaluating a proteasome inhibitor in this setting – support NINLARO as a potential maintenance therapy for patients who have undergone a stem cell transplant," said Jesús Gómez Navarro, M.D., Vice President, Head of Oncology Clinical Research and Development, Takeda. "It is crucial that we continue to support patients by developing treatment options aimed to maintain or deepen response and delay disease progression. According to the findings, patients treated with NINLARO had improved progression-free survival over those in the control arm, which corresponds to a reduced risk of progression or death of nearly one-third."

"As a result of continued research, the multiple myeloma treatment landscape is constantly evolving. While this is encouraging news for the multiple myeloma community, there is still work to be done to further our goal of addressing the unmet needs of patients," said Brian GM Durie, M.D., Chairman of the Board, International Myeloma Foundation. "To that end, the development of additional safe and effective maintenance therapies is essential."

Maintenance Therapy With the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) Ixazomib Significantly Prolongs Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM3 Trial Sunday, December 2, 2018, 7:30 – 9:00 a.m., Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina, Grand Ballroom 7

Key findings, which will be presented by Dr. Meletios Dimopoulos, include:

The trial achieved its primary endpoint with NINLARO resulting in a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus placebo in adult patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma who responded to HDT and ASCT as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.582, 0.890; p-value=0.002). This corresponds to a 28 percent reduction in risk of progression or death and a 39 percent improvement in PFS with NINLARO.
Per IRC assessment, median PFS for patients in the NINLARO arm was 26.5 months compared to 21.3 months in the placebo arm.
Conversion from documented minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity at study entry to MRD negativity occurred at a higher rate among patients treated with NINLARO compared with placebo (12 percent versus 7 percent, respectively).
NINLARO maintenance led to higher rates of deepened response compared with placebo (relative risk 1.41; 95 percent CI: 1.10, 1.80; p=0.0042).
PFS benefit was seen broadly across subgroups, including ISS III (HR 0.661), PI-exposed (HR 0.750), PI-naïve (HR 0.497), and patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR 0.625).
Secondary endpoints including median PFS2 and OS have not yet been reached in either arm. Median follow-up was 31 months.
Global Quality of Life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) for patients on NINLARO were similar to those on placebo.
The safety profile of NINLARO in the maintenance setting is consistent with previously reported results of single-agent NINLARO use.
Discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events (AE) was low, at 7 percent in the NINLARO arm compared to 5 percent in the placebo arm.
Grade ≥3 AEs were experienced by 42 percent of patients receiving NINLARO versus 26 percent receiving placebo.
Patients in the NINLARO arm experienced serious AEs at a rate of 27 percent versus 20 percent in the placebo arm.
Common grade ≥3 AEs in both the NINLARO and placebo arms included infections (15 and 8 percent, respectively) including pneumonia (6 and 4 percent, respectively), gastrointestinal disorders (6 and 1 percent, respectively), neutropenia (5 and 3 percent, respectively) and thrombocytopenia (5 and <1 percent, respectively).
On the NINLARO arm, peripheral neuropathy events were observed in 19 percent of patients versus 15 percent on the placebo arm. In the NINLARO arm, <1 percent of peripheral neuropathy events were Grade 3 compared with 0 in the placebo arm.
The rate of second primary malignancies was 3 percent in both arms.
One patient in the NINLARO arm died on study while no patients in the placebo arm did. The single study death was considered to be treatment-related and was due to pneumonia.
About the TOURMALINE-MM3 Trial

TOURMALINE-MM3 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 3 study of 656 patients, designed to determine the effect of NINLARO (ixazomib) maintenance therapy on progression-free survival (PFS), compared to placebo, in participants with multiple myeloma who have had a response (complete response [CR], very good partial response [VGPR], or partial response [PR]) to induction therapy followed by high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). A key secondary endpoint includes overall survival (OS). For additional information: View Source

About NINLARO (ixazomib) capsules

NINLARO (ixazomib) is an oral proteasome inhibitor which is also being studied across the continuum of multiple myeloma treatment settings as well as systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. It was the first oral proteasome inhibitor to enter Phase 3 clinical trials and to receive approval. NINLARO was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2015 following a priority review and by the European Commission in November 2016. In the U.S. and Europe, NINLARO is indicated in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. NINLARO has received marketing authorization by regulatory authorities in more than 60 countries.

Ixazomib was granted orphan drug designation in multiple myeloma in both the U.S. and Europe in 2011 and for AL amyloidosis in both the U.S. and Europe in 2012. Ixazomib received Breakthrough Therapy status by the U.S. FDA for relapsed or refractory systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, a related ultra orphan disease, in 2014. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare granted Orphan Drug designation to ixazomib in 2016.

The comprehensive ixazomib clinical development program, TOURMALINE, includes a total of six ongoing pivotal trials – five, which together are investigating every major multiple myeloma patient population, and one in light-chain amyloidosis:

TOURMALINE-MM1, investigating ixazomib versus placebo in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
TOURMALINE-MM2, investigating ixazomib versus placebo in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
TOURMALINE-MM3, investigating ixazomib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma following induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)
TOURMALINE-MM4, investigating ixazomib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have not undergone ASCT
TOURMALINE-AL1, investigating ixazomib plus dexamethasone versus physician choice of selected regimens in patients with relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis; this study is currently enrolling
TOURMALINE-MM5, investigating ixazomib plus dexamethasone versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have become resistant to lenalidomide; this study is currently enrolling
For more information about actively enrolling Phase 3 studies please visit: View Source

In addition to the TOURMALINE program, ixazomib is being evaluated in multiple therapeutic combinations for various patient populations in investigator initiated studies globally.

NINLARO (ixazomib) capsules: Global Important Safety Information

SPECIAL WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Thrombocytopenia has been reported with NINLARO (28% vs. 14% in the NINLARO and placebo regimens, respectively) with platelet nadirs typically occurring between Days 14-21 of each 28-day cycle and recovery to baseline by the start of the next cycle. It did not result in an increase in hemorrhagic events or platelet transfusions. Monitor platelet counts at least monthly during treatment with NINLARO and consider more frequent monitoring during the first three cycles. Manage with dose modifications and platelet transfusions as per standard medical guidelines.

Gastrointestinal toxicities have been reported in the NINLARO and placebo regimens respectively, such as diarrhea (42% vs. 36%), constipation (34% vs. 25%), nausea (26% vs. 21%), and vomiting (22% vs. 11%), occasionally requiring use of antiemetic and anti-diarrheal medications, and supportive care.

Peripheral neuropathy was reported with NINLARO (28% vs. 21% in the NINLARO and placebo regimens, respectively). The most commonly reported reaction was peripheral sensory neuropathy (19% and 14% in the NINLARO and placebo regimens, respectively). Peripheral motor neuropathy was not commonly reported in either regimen (< 1%). Monitor patients for symptoms of peripheral neuropathy and adjust dosing as needed.

Peripheral edema was reported with NINLARO (25% vs. 18% in the NINLARO and placebo regimens, respectively). Evaluate patients for underlying causes and provide supportive care, as necessary. Adjust the dose of dexamethasone per its prescribing information or the dose of NINLARO for severe symptoms.

Cutaneous reactions occurred in 19% of patients in the NINLARO regimen compared to 11% of patients in the placebo regimen. The most common type of rash reported in both regimens was maculo-papular and macular rash. Manage rash with supportive care, dose modification or discontinuation.

Hepatotoxicity, drug-induced liver injury, hepatocellular injury, hepatic steatosis, and hepatitis cholestatic have been uncommonly reported with NINLARO. Monitor hepatic enzymes regularly and adjust dose for Grade 3 or 4 symptoms.

Pregnancy- NINLARO can cause fetal harm. Advise male and females patients of reproductive potential to use contraceptive measures during treatment and for an additional 90 days after the final dose of NINLARO. Women of childbearing potential should avoid becoming pregnant while taking NINLARO due to potential hazard to the fetus. Women using hormonal contraceptives should use an additional barrier method of contraception.

Lactation- It is not known whether NINLARO or its metabolites are excreted in human milk. There could be potential adverse events in nursing infants and therefore breastfeeding should be discontinued.

SPECIAL PATIENT POPULATIONS

Hepatic Impairment: Reduce the NINLARO starting dose to 3 mg in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.

Renal Impairment: Reduce the NINLARO starting dose to 3 mg in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. NINLARO is not dialyzable and, therefore, can be administered without regard to the timing of dialysis.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Co-administration of strong CYP3A inducers with NINLARO is not recommended.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥ 20%) in the NINLARO regimen, and greater than in the placebo regimen, were diarrhea (42% vs. 36%), constipation (34% vs. 25%), thrombocytopenia (28% vs. 14%), peripheral neuropathy (28% vs. 21%), nausea (26% vs. 21%), peripheral edema (25% vs. 18%), vomiting (22% vs. 11%), and back pain (21% vs. 16%). Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥ 2% of patients included thrombocytopenia (2%) and diarrhea (2%). For each adverse reaction, one or more of the three drugs was discontinued in ≤ 1% of patients in the NINLARO regimen.

MEI Pharma Presents Clinical Data from Ongoing Phase 1b Study of ME-401 in Patients with Indolent B-Cell Malignancies at the 2018 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting

On December 2, 2018 MEI Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: MEIP), a late-stage pharmaceutical company focused on advancing new therapies for cancer, reported that results from an ongoing Phase 1b study support the complementary potential of intermittent and continuous dosing schedules of ME-401, a selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase ("PI3K") delta inhibitor, to optimize the clinical risk-benefit ratio in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (Press release, MEI Pharma, DEC 2, 2018, View Source [SID1234531809]). The data demonstrate that ME-401, as both a single agent and in combination with rituximab, continues to be associated with overall high objective response rates. In addition, low rates of Grade 3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in patients on the intermittent dosing schedule while maintaining a high level of clinical response. These data are being presented today at the 2018 American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The data announced today continue to support the rationale for MEI’s planned Phase 2 study that evaluates both a continuous (CS) and intermittent (IS) dosing schedule of ME-401 as a means to enhance the drug candidate’s clinical profile and thus potentially deliver improved benefits to patients. The Phase 2 study is expected to start around year-end and is intended to support MEI’s accelerated approval registration strategy if successful.

Patients in the Phase 1b study received ME-401 as a single agent (dosed on the CS or IS) and in combination with rituximab (dosed on the IS only) to explore treatment options for patients with B-cell malignancies. The IS dosing regimen consists of 60 mg given continuously, once-daily, for the first 2 cycles followed by 60 mg given on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle and results showed:

As a single agent, 76% objective response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), and 100% in all patients with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).
In combination with rituximab, 78% objective response rate in patients with FL.
Median duration of response has not been reached. The lead patient has a duration of response of approximately 20 months and the median follow-up is 9.3 months.
Low rate of irAEs; 4 irAEs were reported in 36 patients administered the IS, with all cases occurring in the first 2 cycles following the switch to IS.
89% of patients switched to IS remain on therapy.
Disease control was maintained in 72% of these patients.
70% of patients who resumed on the continuous daily dosing schedule (CS) recaptured a response after progressing on IS.
The ME-401 ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) 2018 poster can be accessed on the MEI Pharma website.

"The data presented today are very supportive of our rationale to investigate both a continuous and intermittent dosing regimen as part of our Phase 2 study evaluating ME-401 in follicular lymphoma and may also help advance its complementary potential to deliver improved benefits to patients in combination with other modalities," said Daniel P. Gold, Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of MEI Pharma. "While advances have been made in the treatment of B-cell malignancies, there remains a significant need for innovative therapies across a range of indications and patient populations not addressed by current therapeutic options; we believe the emerging clinical profile of ME-401, as both a single agent or in combination, holds the potential to deliver improved clinical benefit to patients with B-cell diseases."

ME-401 Phase 1b ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) 2018 Data
ME-401 is being evaluated in an ongoing Phase 1b dose escalation study in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Through October 2018, 60 patients were enrolled across three groups:

Group 1 included 31 patients with relapsed FL (n = 22) or CLL/SLL (n = 9) who received ME-401 CS at doses ≥60 mg per day in the dose escalation phase of the study. Beginning in December 2017 a total of 17 patients from Group 1 (FL=9, CLL/SLL=8) advanced to the IS after in cycle 4 or later cycles.
Group 2 included 16 patients with relapsed FL (n = 9), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 5), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL, n = 1), and CLL (n = 1) who received rituximab 375 mg/m2 x 8 doses over 6 months and ME-401 dosed under the IS regimen after receiving ME-401 60 mg daily for the first two cycles.
Group 3 may enroll up to 30 patients with relapsed FL/CLL/SLL in an expansion cohort of ME-401 using the IS regimen after receiving ME-401 60 mg daily for the first two cycles. In this group, 13 patients were enrolled to date with one FL patient reaching the Cycle 6 disease assessment as data cut off.
The median number of prior therapies of patients in the study is two and 50% of patients enrolled were ≥ 3rd line of therapy. Responses are assessed after 2 cycles (58 days) and 6 cycles, and then every 6 cycles. Ninety-two percent of all patients were previously treated with an anti-CD20 antibody.

Objective Response Rates

The objective response rate of patients across all groups with FL is 76% (29/38) and for CLL/SLL is 100% (11/11).
As a single agent, 76% (22/29) objective response rate in patients with FL and 100% (10/10) in patients with CLL and SLL.
In combination with rituximab, 78% (7/9) objective response rate in patients with FL.
Duration of Response

In FL and CLL/SLL patients, the median follow-up is 9.3 months (range, approximately 2.1 to 19.5 months) with no median yet reached.
Across all groups, failure-free survival (i.e. no disease progression on the continuous dosing schedule) in FL and CLL/SLL has not reached a median yet; median follow-up is 6.9 months (range 0.4 to 21.1 months).
72% of patients across all groups on the IS regimen have not experienced disease progression with a median follow-up of 7.9 months (range, 0.8 to 10.5 months).
Of the 10 patients that progressed on the IS regimen, 70% of patients retreated with daily dosing recaptured disease response.
Rates of irAEs

Of the 36 patients who switched to IS, only 11% (4/36) experienced an irAE after the switch. All 4 reported cases of irAEs occurred in the first 2 cycles after the switch to the IS regimen.
About ME-401
ME-401 is an investigational oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase ("PI3K") delta inhibitor; PI3K delta is often overexpressed in cancer cells and plays a key role in the proliferation and survival of hematologic cancer cells. ME-401 displays high selectivity for the PI3K delta isoform and has distinct pharmaceutical properties from other PI3K delta inhibitors. It is being clinically evaluated in patients with various B-cell malignancies. MEI is initiating a Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ME-401 as a single agent in patients with follicular lymphoma after failure of at least two prior systemic therapies including chemotherapy and an anti-CD20 antibody. The Phase 2 study is intended to support an accelerated approval marketing application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

MorphoSys Presents Updated Data from L-MIND Study of MOR208 plus Lenalidomide in r/r DLBCL at ASH 2018

On December 2, 2018 MorphoSys reported its Updated Data from L-MIND Study of MOR208 in combination with Lenalidomide in r/r DLBCL at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) 2018 (Press release, MorphoSys, DEC 2, 2018, View Source [SID1234531777])

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

MorphoSys AG (FSE: MOR; Prime Standard Segment; MDAX & TecDAX; Nasdaq: MOR) presented data from the ongoing single-arm phase 2 clinical trial known as L-MIND in an oral presentation at the 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting 2018 in San Diego, USA. L-MIND is designed to investigate the antibody MOR208 in combination with lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). MOR208 is an investigational humanized Fc-enhanced monoclonal antibody directed against CD19 and is currently in clinical development in blood cancer indications.

The L-MIND study enrolled patients with r/r DLBCL, who are ineligible for HDC and ASCT, after up to three prior lines of therapy, with at least one prior therapy including an anti-CD20 targeting therapy, such as rituximab. The updated interim data reported today (cut-off date June 5, 2018) included all 81 patients enrolled in the L-MIND trial, with a median observation time of 12 months. Efficacy results in this update are based on assessment by the investigators for all 81 patients. Patients enrolled had a median age of 72 years and had received a median of two prior treatment lines.

The data showed a response in 47 out of 81 patients (overall response rate, or ORR, 58%), with complete responses (CR) in 27 (33%) and partial responses (PR) in 20 (25%) patients. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 16.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3 months – not reached). Responses were durable with the median duration of response (DoR) not reached (95% CI: NR – NR) and 70% of responding patients were without progression at 12 months (12-month DoR rate: 70%, Kaplan-Meier estimate). A significant proportion of patients (37/81; 46%) were still on study treatment, with 19 having been treated for over 12 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI: 18.6 months – NR); the 12-month OS rate was 73% (95% CI: 63% – 85%).

Efficacy parameters, such as response rates and median PFS showed comparable results in most patient subgroups of interest, including low/low-intermediate versus intermediate-high/high IPI score, rituximab refractory versus not refractory and primary refractory versus not refractory, amongst others.

No unexpected toxicities were observed for the treatment combination and no infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were reported for MOR208. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with a toxicity grading of 3 or higher were neutropenia in 35 (43%), thrombocytopenia in 14 (17%), and anemia in 7 (9%) patients each. Treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 16 (19.8%) patients, the majority of which were infections or neutropenic fever. 41 (50.6%) patients required dose reduction with lenalidomide, 58 patients (72%) could stay on a daily lenalidomide dose of 20 mg or higher.

The results reported today confirm data from earlier interim analyses reported from this trial in March 2018, when 68 patients had been eligible for investigators’ efficacy assessment at the Dec 12, 2017 cut-off date.

"Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who, after having failed initial therapies, are ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), need more treatment options," commented Dr. Malte Peters, Chief Development Officer of MorphoSys AG. "We are encouraged by our most recent clinical data from the ongoing L-MIND trial. These support our plan to develop MOR208 in combination with lenalidomide, based on our current FDA breakthrough therapy designation, as a potential chemo-free treatment option for this patient population."

Details about the presentation on L-MIND data at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) 2018:

Abstract publication number: 227
Session name: 626. Aggressive Lymphoma (Diffuse Large B-Cell and Other Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas)-Results from Prospective Clinical Trials"
Session date and time: Saturday, December 1, 2018, 4:00pm-5:30pm PST
Presentation time: 5:00pm PST
Room: Marriot Marquis San Diego Marina, Pacific Ballroom 20, San Diego, California.

MorphoSys will hold an investor & analyst event after the 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting 2018 on December 5, 2018, 10:00am EST (3:00pm GMT, 4:00pm CET) in New York. The presentation, a live webcast and a replay of the webcast will be made available at View Source

About DLBCL
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent type of malignant lymphoma worldwide and accounts for approximately 30% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Between 30% and 40% of all patients with DLBCL either fail to respond to or show a relapse to initial therapy. Patients who failed frontline therapy and are not eligible to high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are reported to have a poor outcome and require more therapeutic options.

About CD19 and MOR208
CD19 is broadly and homogeneously expressed across different B cell malignancies including DLBCL and CLL. CD19 has been reported to enhance B cell receptor (BCR) signaling, which is assumed important for B cell survival, making CD19 a potential target in B cell malignancies.
MOR208 is an investigational humanized Fc-engineered monoclonal antibody directed against CD19. Fc-modification of MOR208 is intended to lead to a significant potentiation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), thus aiming to improve a key mechanism of tumor cell killing. MOR208 has been observed in preclinical models to induce direct apoptosis by binding to CD19, which is assumed to be involved in B cell receptor (BCR) signaling.
MorphoSys is clinically investigating MOR208 as a therapeutic option in B cell malignancies in a number of ongoing combination trials. An open-label phase 2 combination trial (L-MIND study) is investigating the safety and efficacy of MOR208 in combination with lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Based on interim data from L-MIND, in October 2017 the U.S. FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for MOR208 plus lenalidomide in this patient population. The pivotal phase 2/3 B-MIND study is designed to investigate MOR208 in combination with the chemotherapeutic agent bendamustine in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in comparison to the combination of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab plus bendamustine. In addition, MOR208 is currently being investigated in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL after discontinuation of a prior Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy (e.g. ibrutinib) in combination with idelalisib or venetoclax.