Genomic Health Announces Multiple Studies Reinforcing Value of Oncotype DX® Tests in Guiding Treatment for Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients

On October 22, 2018 Genomic Health, Inc. (Nasdaq: GHDX) reported results from multiple studies of its Oncotype DX tests highlighting their value in optimizing treatment for patients with various stages of breast and prostate cancer (Press release, Genomic Health, OCT 22, 2018, View Source [SID1234530031]). The findings, presented at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2018 Congress in Munich, Germany, demonstrated that the Oncotype DX tests identify patients who will or will not benefit from a specific treatment.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Underscoring the growing international impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test, two European-based studies involving patients from Ireland, France and Italy demonstrated its impact on treatment decisions for women with node-negative and node-positive breast cancer. Additionally, three prostate cancer studies in the United States demonstrated how the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) and AR-V7 Nucleus Detect tests refine treatment decisions in men with clinically low-intermediate risk or metastatic prostate cancer based on the aggressiveness of their tumor or their resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted drugs.

"Oncotype DX tests have contributed to precision medicine in breast cancer for nearly 15 years, and there is now a growing body of evidence for their predictive value and clinical utility in guiding treatment selection for men with early-stage, as well as metastatic prostate cancer," said Steven Shak, M.D., chief scientific and medical officer, Genomic Health.

Oncotype DX in Node-negative and Node-positive Breast Cancer
In Ireland, researchers assessed the impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score on treatment decisions in routine clinical practice for early-stage breast cancer patients whose disease had spread to one to three lymph nodes (Poster #208P). Results showed that oncologists believed the test significantly changed their treatment recommendations 64 percent of the time, and that use of the Oncotype DX test led to a 27 percent reduction in recommendations for chemotherapy.

Additionally, results from a real-life, decision-impact study of breast cancer patients in France and Italy, including those with node-negative and node-positive disease, showed that treatment recommendations changed in 35 percent of patients based on their Oncotype DX test results (Poster #194P). This resulted in a 43 percent reduction in chemotherapy recommendations.

Importantly, in each country, the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score result, when high, also identified the minority of patients for whom chemotherapy is potentially life-saving, highlighting the distinctive predictive value that only the Oncotype DX test delivers.

"These new results strengthen published findings from our PlanB study and show the unique value of adding genomic information provided by the Oncotype DX test to better target chemotherapy. Oncotype DX identifies patients who can safely be spared chemotherapy toxicity and side effects. Furthermore, we have to be concerned about a relevant proportion of patients who seem to be undertreated if the risk of recurrence is evaluated using only traditional clinical parameters," said Prof. Ulrike Nitz, head of the breast cancer/senology unit at the Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany. "The use of the Oncotype DX test allows us to tailor treatment plans more accurately to suit the needs of individuals, and to use resources more effectively."

Oncotype DX Optimizes Treatment in Early-stage and Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Based on results from a published study, the Center for Prostatic Disease Research (CPDR) of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences conducted additional analysis of the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score test results in 395 men with clinically low, and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (Poster #837P). Results demonstrated that the GPS test was a significant, independent predictor of increased risk of biopsy upgrade in these patients. These data add to a separate recent independent study published by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and underscore the value of the GPS test in identifying patients with more aggressive tumor biology who should be more aggressively treated at diagnosis.

The Oncotype DX GPS test is the only genomic assay designed for men at the time of diagnosis with clinically low-risk or favorable intermediate-risk cancer to help make treatment decisions based on their likelihood of adverse pathology. Developed by Genomic Health, based on results from multiple studies led by Cleveland Clinic and UCSF, the GPS test optimizes treatment by providing physicians with an assessment of both the current status (adverse pathology) and future risk (metastasis and mortality) of a patient’s cancer in making confident treatment decisions regarding active surveillance versus immediate aggressive treatment.

In metastatic prostate cancer, presentations included two studies of the Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect, a CTC-based, liquid biopsy test that helps determine which patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are resistant, or not, to AR-targeted therapies, such as enzalutamide and abiraterone, and which patients may benefit from chemotherapy. The Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect test is commercially available in the United States through Epic Science’s collaboration with Genomic Health.

A new analysis, combining data from two published studies, confirmed that the Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect test for AR-V7 protein is a predictive biomarker for identifying patients who will not respond to additional AR-targeted therapy (Poster #848P). These data further support that detection of nuclear-localized AR-V7-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by the Oncotype DX test indicates that the patient will not benefit from additional treatment with commonly-prescribed AR-targeted therapy and should consider switching to an alternative therapy to increase survival.

Separately, an independent study of the Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect test conducted by Epic Sciences in collaboration with its academic partners confirmed that the use of AR-V7 optimizes therapy guidance over risk assessment alone (Poster #836P).

About Oncotype DX
The Oncotype DX portfolio of breast, colon and prostate cancer tests applies advanced genomic science to reveal the unique biology of a tumor in order to optimize cancer treatment decisions. The company’s flagship product, the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test, is the only test that has been shown to predict the likelihood of chemotherapy benefit as well as recurrence in invasive breast cancer. Additionally, the Oncotype DX Breast DCIS Score test predicts the likelihood of recurrence in a pre-invasive form of breast cancer called DCIS. In prostate cancer, the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score test predicts disease aggressiveness and further clarifies the current and future risk of the cancer prior to treatment intervention and the Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect test helps determine which patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are resistant to AR-targeted therapies. The Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect test is performed by Epic Sciences at its centralized, CLIA-certified laboratory in San Diego and offered exclusively by Genomic Health. With more than 900,000 patients tested in more than 90 countries, the Oncotype DX tests have redefined personalized medicine by making genomics a critical part of cancer diagnosis and treatment. To learn more about Oncotype DX tests, visit www.OncotypeIQ.com, www.MyBreastCancerTreatment.org or www.MyProstateCancerTreatement.org.

SOLO-1 Phase III trial demonstrates Lynparza maintenance therapy cut risk of disease progression or death by 70% in patients with newly-diagnosed, advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer

On October 22, 2018 AstraZeneca and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., US (Merck: known as MSD outside the US and Canada) reported detailed results from the Phase III SOLO-1 trial testing Lynparza (olaparib) tablets as a maintenance treatment for patients with newly-diagnosed, advanced BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) ovarian cancer who were in complete or partial response following 1st-line standard platinum-based chemotherapy (Press release, AstraZeneca, OCT 22, 2018, View Source [SID1234530223]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Results of the trial confirm the statistically-significant and clinically-meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for Lynparza compared to placebo, reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 70% (HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.23-0.41], p<0.001). At 41 months of follow-up, the median PFS for patients treated with Lynparza was not reached compared to 13.8 months for patients treated with placebo. Of those receiving Lynparza, 60% remained progression-free at 36 months compared to 27% of women in the placebo arm. The data were presented at the Presidential Symposium of the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2018 Congress (European Society for Medical Oncology) in Munich, Germany and published simultaneously online in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

Kaplan-Meier estimates of investigator-assessed PFS

Kaplan-Meier estimates of investigator-assessed PFS
From the New England Journal of Medicine, Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G, et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810858. Copyright © 2018 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.

Summary of PFS1,2

Lynparza (n=260)

Placebo (n=130)

Number of patients with event (%)3

102 (39)

96 (73)

Median (in months)

Not reached

13.8

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

0.30 (0.23-0.41)

P-value

p<0.001

1 Investigator-assessed

2 Median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up 40.7 months (34.9–42.9) for Lynparza and 41.2 months (32.2–41.6) for placebo

3 Analysis was done at 50.6% maturity

Sean Bohen, Executive Vice President, Global Medicines Development and Chief Medical Officer, said: "There is currently a significant unmet need in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer because 70% of women relapse within the first three years after their initial treatment. The remarkable results of the SOLO-1 trial, which showed that 60% of women with newly-diagnosed, advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer remained progression-free at three years, highlight the potential of Lynparza as a maintenance therapy in the 1st-line setting."

Roy Baynes, Senior Vice President and Head of Global Clinical Development, Chief Medical Officer, MSD Research Laboratories, said: "Our collective goal in oncology research is to improve long-term outcomes for people living with cancer. Based on the SOLO-1 trial results, Lynparza is the only PARP inhibitor to have demonstrated a significant and clinically-meaningful improvement in reducing the risk of progression for newly-diagnosed patients with advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer following platinum-based chemotherapy. We are working with regulatory authorities as quickly as possible to seek approval of Lynparza for these patients."

Kathleen Moore, Co-Principal Investigator of the SOLO-1 trial and Associate Director for Clinical Research at the Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, US, said: "Women with ovarian cancer are often diagnosed with advanced disease, which unfortunately is associated with poor long-term survival rates. The newly-diagnosed setting is our best opportunity to achieve a sustained remission, since once a patient’s ovarian cancer recurs, it is typically incurable. The SOLO-1 results demonstrate the potential of Lynparza maintenance therapy earlier in the treatment pathway and reinforce the importance of identifying a patient’s BRCA mutation status at the time of diagnosis – these results could change the way we treat women with advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer."

The SOLO-1 safety profile was in line with that observed in prior clinical trials. The most common adverse events (AEs) ≥20% were nausea (77%), fatigue/asthenia (63%), vomiting (40%), anaemia (39%) and diarrhoea (34%). The most common ≥ grade 3 AEs were anaemia (22%) and neutropenia (9%). Seventy-two percent of patients on Lynparza remained on the recommended starting dose. Additionally, 88% of patients on Lynparza continued treatment without an AE-related discontinuation.

AstraZeneca and MSD are exploring additional trials in ovarian cancer, including the ongoing GINECO/ENGOTov25 Phase III trial, PAOLA-1. This trial is testing the effect of Lynparza in combination with bevacizumab as a maintenance treatment for patients with newly-diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, regardless of their BRCA status. Results are expected during the second half of 2019.

Lynparza is currently approved in over 60 countries for the treatment of platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer regardless of BRCA status and in the US, Canada, Japan and Australia for germline BRCA-mutated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

About SOLO-1

SOLO-1 is a Phase III randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lynparza tablets (300 mg twice daily) as maintenance monotherapy compared with placebo, in newly-diagnosed patients with advanced BRCAm ovarian cancer following platinum-based chemotherapy. The trial randomised 391 patients with a deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who were in clinical complete or partial response following platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomised (2:1) to receive Lynparza or placebo for up to two years or until disease progression (at the investigator’s discretion). The primary endpoint was PFS and key secondary endpoints included time to second disease progression or death, time to first subsequent treatment and overall survival.

About Lynparza

Lynparza (olaparib) is a first-in-class PARP inhibitor and the first targeted treatment to potentially exploit DNA damage response (DDR) pathway deficiencies, such as BRCA mutations, to preferentially kill cancer cells. Specifically, in vitro studies have shown that Lynparza-induced cytotoxicity may involve inhibition of PARP-enzymatic activity and increased formation of PARP-DNA complexes, resulting in DNA damage and cancer cell death. Lynparza is being tested in a range of DDR-deficient tumour types.

Lynparza, which is being jointly developed and commercialised by AstraZeneca and MSD, is approved for advanced ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer and has been used in over 20,000 patients worldwide. Lynparza has the broadest and most advanced clinical trial development programme of any PARP inhibitor and AstraZeneca and MSD are working together to understand how it may affect multiple PARP-dependent tumours as a monotherapy and in combination across multiple cancer types. Lynparza is the foundation of AstraZeneca’s industry-leading portfolio of potential new medicines targeting DDR mechanisms in cancer cells.

About ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide, with a five-year survival rate of 19%.[i] In 2018, there were over 295,000 new cases diagnosed and around 184,799 deaths.[ii] For newly-diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, the primary aim of treatment is to delay progression of the disease for as long as possible and maintain the patient’s quality of life with the intent of achieving complete remission or cure.[iii],[iv],[v],[vi]

About BRCA mutations

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are human genes that produce proteins responsible for repairing damaged DNA and play an important role in maintaining the genetic stability of cells. When either of these genes is mutated, or altered, such that its protein product either is not made or does not function correctly, DNA damage may not be repaired properly, and cells become unstable. As a result, cells are more likely to develop additional genetic alterations that can lead to cancer.

About the AstraZeneca and MSD Strategic Oncology Collaboration

In July 2017, AstraZeneca and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, US, known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, announced a global strategic oncology collaboration to co-develop and co-commercialise Lynparza, the world’s first PARP inhibitor and potential new medicine selumetinib, a MEK inhibitor, for multiple cancer types. Working together, the companies will develop Lynparza and selumetinib in combination with other potential new medicines and as monotherapies. Independently, the companies will develop Lynparza and selumetinib in combination with their respective PD-L1 and PD-1 medicines.

Corvus Pharmaceuticals Announces New Data on Adenosine Gene Signature Biomarker Associated with Patient Response to CPI-444 at European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2018 Congress

On October 22, 2018 Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRVS), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of precisely targeted oncology therapies, reported new data on a biomarker associated with patient response to therapy with CPI-444, an adenosine receptor antagonist. This "adenosine gene signature" has the potential to be used as a predictive biomarker for patient selection in future clinical studies of CPI-444 and other therapies targeting the adenosine pathway, including CPI-006 (Press release, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, OCT 22, 2018, View Source [SID1234530341]). The biomarker data was presented today in a poster discussion session at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2018 Congress in Munich, Germany, by Stephen Willingham Ph.D., a senior scientist at Corvus.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

CPI-444, Corvus’ lead product candidate, is a selective and potent inhibitor of the adenosine A2A receptor. It is currently being evaluated in clinical trials in patients with various solid tumors as a single agent and in combination with Genentech’s atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody. CPI-006 is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD73. It is currently being evaluated in an early-stage, three-arm clinical trial in patients with a variety of solid tumors as a single agent, in combination with CPI-444, and in combination with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody.

"The gene expression profiles associated with the adenosine pathway have been shown to lead to the secretion of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that recruit suppressive myeloid cells and dampen T-cell function. The biomarker data presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) demonstrates that in vitro and in vivo treatment of human immune cells with CPI-444 blocks the expression of this adenosine gene signature, confirming its mechanism of action," said Dr. Willingham. "The expression of the adenosine gene signature has been shown to correlate with tumor regression in our ongoing Phase 1/1b trial of CPI-444 for the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the trial, patients with high expression of the adenosine gene signature were more likely to have tumor regression than those patients with low expression (p<0.008). Our data, together with other recently published data, indicate that tumors with an adenosine-rich environment are resistant to therapy with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies, and provide support for the addition of CPI-444 to these therapies to enhance efficacy."

"Our discovery of the adenosine gene signature biomarker represents a major step forward for therapies based on blockade of the adenosine pathway," said Richard A, Miller M.D., an oncologist; co-founder, president and chief executive officer of Corvus. "This biomarker could potentially be used in the future to select patients most likely to benefit from adenosine blockade with either CPI-444 or antibodies that inhibit adenosine production, such as CPI-006. These data, as well as our ongoing trials with CPI-444 and CPI-006, continue to advance the field and confirm the mechanism of action of CPI-444 and adenosine antagonism. Additional data on these programs will be presented at the Society of Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) (Free SITC Whitepaper) annual meeting in November."

About CPI-444
CPI-444 is a small molecule, oral, checkpoint inhibitor designed to disable a tumor’s ability to subvert attack by the immune system by blocking the binding of adenosine in the tumor microenvironment to the A2A receptor. Adenosine, a metabolite of ATP (adenosine tri-phosphate), is produced within the tumor microenvironment where it may bind to the adenosine A2A receptor present on immune cells and block their activity. CD39 and CD73 are enzymes on the surface of tumor cells and immune cells. These enzymes work in concert to convert ATP to adenosine. In vitro and preclinical studies have shown that dual blockade of CD73 and the A2A receptor may be synergistic.

About CPI-006
CPI-006 is a potent humanized monoclonal antibody that reacts with the active site of CD73, blocking the conversion of AMP to adenosine. In vitro studies of CPI-006 have shown it is capable of substantially inhibiting the production of adenosine by blocking the CD73 enzyme.

First Results of New Data of ABRAXANE in Combination with Atezolizumab Presented at ESMO 2018

On October 22, 2018 Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ:CELG) reported the first results from the IMpassion130 study evaluating ABRAXANE (paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension) (albumin-bound) in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in patients with first-line locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the IMpower130 study evaluating ABRAXANE/carboplatin in combination with atezolizumab in first-line advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (Press release, Celgene, OCT 22, 2018, View Source [SID1234530032]). These findings were presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2018 Congress, taking place from October 19-23 in Munich, Germany. Both studies were sponsored by Roche.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

IMpassion130 Demonstrated a PFS Benefit of ABRAXANE plus Atezolizumab Combination as Initial Treatment in Locally Advanced or Metastatic TNBC

Results from the Phase 3 Impassion study showed that the investigational combination of ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab significantly reduced the risk of disease worsening or death (PFS) in first-line metastatic or unresectable locally advanced TNBC patients compared to ABRAXANE alone (7.2 months vs. 5.5 months [p=0.0025; HR=0.80 (95% CI: 0.69,0.92)]) in all randomized patients and in the PD-L1 positive subgroup population (median PFS=7.5 months vs. 5.0 months; HR=0.62(95% CI: 0.49-0.78, p<0.0001).

At this first interim analysis, statistical significance was not met for overall survival (OS) in the ITT population (median OS=21.3 months in the ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab arm vs. 17.6 months in the ABRAXANE monotherapy arm; HR=0.84, 95% CI 0.69-1.02, p=0.0840). In the PD-L1-positive population (which was not tested due to hierarchal design), the ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab arm demonstrated a 9.5-month OS improvement (median OS=25.0 vs. 15.5 months; HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86). Follow-up will continue until the next planned analysis. The safety findings were consistent with the known profiles of the individual regimens investigated.

IMpassion130 is the first phase III study to demonstrate a statistically significant PFS improvement in first-line metastatic or unresectable locally advanced TNBC.

"The findings of the IMpassion130 trial illustrate that the ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab regimen has activity in an aggressive type of breast cancer with few viable treatments," said Jay Backstrom, M.D., Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Regulatory Affairs for Celgene. "We are particularly excited about these findings because triple negative breast cancer is such a difficult disease to treat and patients are in need of additional treatment options."

The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were neutropenia (8% in both treatment arms), decreased neutrophil count (ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab: 5%; ABRAXANE plus placebo: 3%), peripheral neuropathy (ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab: 6%; ABRAXANE plus placebo: 3%), fatigue (ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab: 4%; ABRAXANE plus placebo: 3%) and anemia (3% in both treatment groups). A higher proportion of patients in the ABRAXANE plus atezolizumab arm reported serious AEs (23% vs. 18%).

IMpower130 Demonstrated Significant OS and PFS Benefit of ABRAXANE/Carboplatin plus Atezolizumab in Advanced Non-Squamous NSCLC

Results from the Phase III IMpower130 study showed that first-line treatment with the investigational combination of ABRAXANE/carboplatin plus atezolizumab significantly improved overall survival of patients with previously untreated metastatic non-squamous NSCLC compared to ABRAXANE/carboplatin alone (median OS= 18.6 versus 13.9 months; HR= 0.79; 95 percent CI: 0.64–0.98; p=0.033) in the intention-to-treat wild-type (ITT-WT) population. The ABRAXANE/carboplatin plus atezolizumab combination also significantly reduced the risk of disease worsening or death (PFS) compared to ABRAXANE/carboplatin alone (median PFS=7.0 versus 5.5 months; HR=0.64; 95 percent CI: 0.54–0.77; p<0.0001) in the ITT-WT population.

Safety for the ABRAXANE/carboplatin plus atezolizumab combination appeared consistent with the known safety profile of the individual medicines. Grade 3/4 TEAEs were reported in 73.2 percent of people receiving ABRAXANE/carboplatin plus atezolizumab compared to 60.3 percent of people receiving ABRAXANE/carboplatin alone. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs in people receiving ABRAXANE/carboplatin plus atezolizumab were: an abnormal low count of a certain type of white blood cell (neutropenia, 32.1 percent), a decrease in red blood cells (anemia, 29.2 percent) and a decreased neutrophil count (12.1 percent).

"Data from these studies continue to shape our understanding of the current and future treatment landscapes in areas where historically there have been limited treatment options available to patients," said Nadim Ahmed, President, Hematology and Oncology for Celgene. "We are very encouraged by the findings of these studies as they add to the growing body of research evaluating the potential of ABRAXANE as a backbone therapy in combination with immunotherapy."

ABRAXANE alone or in combination with atezolizumab is not approved for the first-line treatment of triple negative breast cancer, and ABRAXANE/carboplatin in combination with atezolizumab is not approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Tecentriq (atezolizumab) is a registered trademark of Genentech, a member of the Roche Group.

About the IMpassion130 study

IMpassion130is a Phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ABRAXANE and atezolizumabcompared with placebo in combination with ABRAXANE alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC who have not received prior systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The study enrolled 902 people who were randomized equally (1:1). The co-primary endpoints were PFS (RECIST 1.1) in all randomized participants, as well as in those who disease expressed PD-L1, and OS in all randomized participants. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, duration of response and time to deterioration in Global Health Status/Health-Related Quality of Life.

During the treatment duration, people in:

Arm Areceived atezolizumab at a fixed dose of 840 milligrams via intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle and ABRAXANE at a dose of 100 milligrams per square meter via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle.ABRAXANEwas administered for a target of at least 6 cycles, with no maximum. Participants received both agents until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
Arm Breceived ABRAXANE at a dose of 100 milligrams per square meter via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. ABRAXANE was administered for a target of at least 6 cycles, with no maximum, and placebo was administered via IV infusion on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Participants assigned to placebo plus ABRAXANE received both agents until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
About the IMpower130 study

IMpower130 is a Phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin and ABRAXANE versus chemotherapy (carboplatin and ABRAXANE) alone for chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC. The study enrolled 723 people who were randomized (2:1) to receive:

Atezolizumab (1200 mg via IV every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL/min via IV every 3 weeks) and ABRAXANE (100 mg/m2 via IV every 3 weeks) (Arm A), or
Carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL/min via IV every 3 weeks) and ABRAXANE (100 mg/m2 via IV every 3 weeks) (Arm B, control arm)
During the treatment-induction phase, people in Arm A received atezolizumab and carboplatin on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, and ABRAXANE on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. People received atezolizumab during the maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit was observed.

During the treatment-induction phase, people in Arm B received carboplatin on day 1 and ABRAXANE on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until disease progression, whichever occurred first. People received best supportive care during the maintenance treatment phase. Switch maintenance to pemetrexed was also permitted. People who were consented prior to a protocol revision were given the option to crossover to receive atezolizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.

The co-primary endpoints were:

PFS as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 in the ITT-WT population
OS in the ITT-WT population
About ABRAXANE

ABRAXANE is indicated for the treatment of breast cancer after failure of combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease or relapse within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. Prior therapy should have included an anthracycline unless clinically contraindicated.

ABRAXANE is indicated for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer, in combination with carboplatin, in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy.

Important Safety Information

WARNING – NEUTROPENIA

Do not administer ABRAXANE therapy to patients who have baseline neutrophil counts of less than 1500 cells/mm 3 . In order to monitor the occurrence of bone marrow suppression, primarily neutropenia, which may be severe and result in infection, it is recommended that frequent peripheral blood cell counts be performed on all patients receiving ABRAXANE
Note: An albumin form of paclitaxel may substantially affect a drug’s functional properties relative to those of drug in solution. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR OR WITH OTHER PACLITAXEL FORMULATIONS
CONTRAINDICATIONS

Neutrophil Counts

ABRAXANE should not be used in patients who have baseline neutrophil counts of <1500 cells/mm3
Hypersensitivity

Patients who experience a severe hypersensitivity reaction to ABRAXANE should not be rechallenged with the drug
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Hematologic Effects

Bone marrow suppression (primarily neutropenia) is dose-dependent and a dose-limiting toxicity of ABRAXANE. In clinical studies, Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 34% of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and 47% of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Monitor for myelotoxicity by performing complete blood cell counts frequently, including prior to dosing on Day 1 (for MBC) and Days 1, 8, and 15 for NSCLC
Do not administer ABRAXANE to patients with baseline absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) of less than 1500 cells/mm3
In the case of severe neutropenia (<500 cells/mm3 for 7 days or more) during a course of ABRAXANE therapy, reduce the dose of ABRAXANE in subsequent courses in patients with either MBC or NSCLC
In patients with MBC, resume treatment with every-3-week cycles of ABRAXANE after ANC recovers to a level >1500 cells/mm3 and platelets recover to a level >100,000 cells/mm3
In patients with NSCLC, resume treatment if recommended at permanently reduced doses for both weekly ABRAXANE and every-3-week carboplatin after ANC recovers to at least 1500 cells/mm3 and platelet count of at least 100,000 cells/mm3 on Day 1 or to an ANC of at least 500 cells/mm3 and platelet count of at least 50,000 cells/mm3 on Days 8 or 15 of the cycle
Nervous System

Sensory neuropathy is dose- and schedule-dependent
The occurrence of Grade 1 or 2 sensory neuropathy does not generally require dose modification
If ≥ Grade 3 sensory neuropathy develops, withhold ABRAXANE treatment until resolution to Grade 1 or 2 for MBC or until resolution to ≤ Grade 1 for NSCLC followed by a dose reduction for all subsequent courses of ABRAXANE
Hypersensitivity

Severe and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, have been reported
Patients who experience a severe hypersensitivity reaction to ABRAXANE should not be rechallenged with this drug
Cross-hypersensitivity between ABRAXANE and other taxane products has been reported and may include severe reactions such as anaphylaxis. Patients with a previous history of hypersensitivity to other taxanes should be closely monitored during initiation of ABRAXANE therapy
Hepatic Impairment

Because the exposure and toxicity of paclitaxel can be increased with hepatic impairment, administration of ABRAXANE in patients with hepatic impairment should be performed with caution
Patients with hepatic impairment may be at an increased risk of toxicity, particularly from myelosuppression, and should be monitored for development of profound myelosuppression
For MBC and NSCLC, the starting dose should be reduced for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment
Albumin (Human)

ABRAXANE contains albumin (human), a derivative of human blood
Embryo Fetal Toxicity

Based on mechanism of action and findings in animals, ABRAXANE can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman
Advise females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus.
Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception and avoid becoming pregnant during treatment with ABRAXANE and for at least six months after the last dose of ABRAXANE
Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception and avoid fathering a child during treatment with ABRAXANE and for at least three months after the last dose of ABRAXANE
ADVERSE REACTIONS

Randomized Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Study

The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) with single-agent use of ABRAXANE vs paclitaxel injection in the MBC study are alopecia (90%, 94%), neutropenia (all cases 80%, 82%; severe 9%, 22%), sensory neuropathy (any symptoms 71%, 56%; severe 10%, 2%), abnormal ECG (all patients 60%, 52%; patients with normal baseline 35%, 30%), fatigue/asthenia (any 47%, 39%; severe 8%, 3%), myalgia/arthralgia (any 44%, 49%; severe 8%, 4%), AST elevation (any 39%, 32%), alkaline phosphatase elevation (any 36%, 31%), anemia (any 33%, 25%; severe 1%, <1%), nausea (any 30%, 22%; severe 3%, <1%), diarrhea (any 27%, 15%; severe <1%, 1%) and infections (24%, 20%), respectively
Sensory neuropathy was the cause of ABRAXANE discontinuation in 7/229 (3%) patients
Other adverse reactions of note with the use of ABRAXANE vs paclitaxel injection included vomiting (any 18%, 10%; severe 4%, 1%), fluid retention (any 10%, 8%; severe 0%, <1%), mucositis (any 7%, 6%; severe <1%, 0%), hepatic dysfunction (elevations in bilirubin 7%, 7%), hypersensitivity reactions (any 4%, 12%; severe 0%, 2%), thrombocytopenia (any 2%, 3%; severe <1%, <1%), neutropenic sepsis (<1%, <1%), and injection site reactions (<1%, 1%), respectively. Dehydration and pyrexia were also reported
Renal dysfunction (any 11%, severe 1%) was reported in patients treated with ABRAXANE (n=229)
In all ABRAXANE-treated patients (n=366), ocular/visual disturbances were reported (any 13%; severe 1%)
Severe cardiovascular events possibly related to single-agent ABRAXANE occurred in approximately 3% of patients and included cardiac ischemia/infarction, chest pain, cardiac arrest, supraventricular tachycardia, edema, thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism, pulmonary emboli, and hypertension
Cases of cerebrovascular attacks (strokes) and transient ischemic attacks have been reported
Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Study

The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) of ABRAXANE in combination with carboplatin are anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, and fatigue
The most common serious adverse reactions of ABRAXANE in combination with carboplatin for NSCLC are anemia (4%) and pneumonia (3%)
The most common adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of ABRAXANE are neutropenia (3%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and peripheral neuropathy (1%)
The most common adverse reactions resulting in dose reduction of ABRAXANE are neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and anemia (6%)
The most common adverse reactions leading to withholding or delay in ABRAXANE dosing are neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and anemia (16%)
The following common (≥10% incidence) adverse reactions were observed at a similar incidence in ABRAXANE plus carboplatin–treated and paclitaxel injection plus carboplatin–treated patients: alopecia (56%), nausea (27%), fatigue (25%), decreased appetite (17%), asthenia (16%), constipation (16%), diarrhea (15%), vomiting (12%), dyspnea (12%), and rash (10%); incidence rates are for the ABRAXANE plus carboplatin treatment group
Adverse reactions with a difference of ≥2%, Grade 3 or higher, with combination use of ABRAXANE and carboplatin vs combination use of paclitaxel injection and carboplatin in NSCLC are anemia (28%, 7%), neutropenia (47%, 58%), thrombocytopenia (18%, 9%), and peripheral neuropathy (3%, 12%), respectively
Adverse reactions with a difference of ≥5%, Grades 1-4, with combination use of ABRAXANE and carboplatin vs combination use of paclitaxel injection and carboplatin in NSCLC are anemia (98%, 91%), thrombocytopenia (68%, 55%), peripheral neuropathy (48%, 64%), edema peripheral (10%, 4%), epistaxis (7%, 2%), arthralgia (13%, 25%), and myalgia (10%, 19%), respectively
Neutropenia (all grades) was reported in 85% of patients who received ABRAXANE and carboplatin vs 83% of patients who received paclitaxel injection and carboplatin
Postmarketing Experience With ABRAXANE and Other Paclitaxel Formulations

Severe and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions have been reported with ABRAXANE. The use of ABRAXANE in patients previously exhibiting hypersensitivity to paclitaxel injection or human albumin has not been studied. In postmarketing experience, cross-hypersensitivity between ABRAXANE and other taxanes has been reported
There have been reports of congestive heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, and atrioventricular block with ABRAXANE, primarily among individuals with underlying cardiac history or prior exposure to cardiotoxic drugs
There have been reports of extravasation of ABRAXANE. Given the possibility of extravasation, it is advisable to monitor closely the ABRAXANE infusion site for possible infiltration during drug administration
DRUG INTERACTIONS

Caution should be exercised when administering ABRAXANE concomitantly with medicines known to inhibit or induce either CYP2C8 or CYP3A4
USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Pregnancy

Based on the mechanism of action and findings in animals, ABRAXANE can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise females of the potential risk to a fetus and to avoid becoming pregnant while receiving ABRAXANE
Lactation

Paclitaxel and/or its metabolites were excreted into the milk of lactating rats. Nursing must be discontinued when receiving treatment with ABRAXANE and for two weeks after the last dose
Females and Males of Reproductive Potential

Females of reproductive potential should have a pregnancy test prior to starting treatment with ABRAXANE
Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception and avoid becoming pregnant during treatment with and for at least six months after the last dose of ABRAXANE [see Warnings and Precautions]
Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception and avoid fathering a child during treatment with ABRAXANE and for at least three months after the last dose of ABRAXANE [see Warnings and Precautions]
Based on findings in animals, ABRAXANE may impair fertility in females and males of reproductive potential
Pediatric

The safety and effectiveness of ABRAXANE in pediatric patients have not been evaluated
Geriatric

A higher incidence of epistaxis, diarrhea, dehydration, fatigue, and peripheral edema was found in patients 65 years or older who received ABRAXANE for MBC in a pooled analysis of clinical studies
Myelosuppression, peripheral neuropathy, and arthralgia were more frequent in patients ≥65 years of age treated with ABRAXANE and carboplatin in NSCLC
Renal Impairment

There are insufficient data to permit dosage recommendations in patients with severe renal impairment or end stage renal disease (estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min)
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Do not administer ABRAXANE to any patient with total bilirubin greater than 5 x ULN or AST greater than 10 x ULN
For MBC and NSCLC, reduce starting dose in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment
Dose reductions or discontinuation may be needed based on severe hematologic or neurologic toxicity
Monitor patients closely

ESMO 2018: Athenex Presented Encouraging Clinical Trial Efficacy and Safety Results of Oraxol in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer

On October 22, 2018 Athenex (Nasdaq: ATNX), a global biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapies for the treatment of cancer and related conditions, reported the presentation of encouraging efficacy and safety data of Oraxol in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients who failed previous chemotherapies in a pharmacokinetics (PK) and phase II clinical trial conducted in Taiwan (Press release, Athenex, OCT 22, 2018, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2372632 [SID1234530108]). The data were presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress on October 21, 2018 in Munich, Germany. Oraxol is an innovative oral formulation of paclitaxel, a very effective and commonly used anti-cancer chemotherapy, combined with HM30181A (a novel gastrointestinal tract specific P-glycoprotein pump inhibitor).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Tumor Response
Tumor Response

Results from twenty four patients with metastatic breast cancer were reported. Common metastatic sites included bone (n=12), liver (n=9), lungs (n=9), lymph nodes (n=9) and 6 patients had > 3 metastasis. These patients failed a median of two previous chemotherapies.

Eleven patients (45.8%) achieved partial remission (PR), 10 patients (41.7%) had stable disease (SD) (two patients with SD will have their last CT scans conducted in early November and therefore, the overall PR rate may be higher), and 3 patients had progressive disease (PD), as shown in the waterfall plot of tumor responses below:

A photo accompanying this announcement is available at View Source

Note that two patients with PD showed small tumor size changes of <30% but were classified as PD because new metastatic lesions were identified by CT scans (* indicates the two patients). Two SD patients are expected to complete their last CT scans in early November and the overall PR rate may be higher in the final analysis.

Drug-related serious adverse events consisting of Grade 4 neutropenia were observed in 3 patients and all recovered completely. There was no dose-limiting neuropathy observed. The Oraxol pharmacokinetic profiles at week 1 were reproducible at week 4, and the plasma AUC exposure is similar to those reported for intravenous paclitaxel at 80mg/kg weekly.

Dr. Rudolf Kwan, Chief Medical Officer of Athenex, stated, "The encouraging pharmacokinetic profile and the positive Phase II clinical efficacy and safety data showed the excellent potential of Oraxol. We are advancing our Phase III program rapidly."

Dr. Ko-Chung Lin, Chief Executive Officer of PharmaEssentia, the licensee of Oraxol for Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam, commented, "Athenex has been an excellent partner to PharmaEssentia. We have been working closely together on the clinical studies and on our discussions with the regulatory authorities. We are delighted to see such a wonderful set of encouraging results and we are fully committed to support the development of Oraxol in the territory we have licensed from Athenex."

The Orascovery program was initially discovered by Hanmi Pharmaceuticals and licensed to Athenex. PharmaEssentia Corporation (Taiwan Stock Exchange: 6446), licensed the Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam commercialization rights of Oraxol from Athenex and is a close partner, particularly in the clinical developments of Oraxol in Taiwan.