Celgene Corporation presents the results of the AUGMENT study evaluating lenalidomide in combination with rituximab (R2) in patients with relapsing / refractory indolent lymphoma

On December 7, 2018 Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG) reported results from the Phase 3 AUGMENT study, showing that REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with rituximab (R 2 ) has resulted in a progression-free survival (PFS) higher in patients with relapsing / refractory indolent lymphoma than patients treated with rituximab plus placebo (R-placebo) (Press release, Celgene, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531952]). The data were presented by John Leonard during an oral presentation at the 60th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper), which took place in San Diego, California.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The international randomized, double-blind phase 3 clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the experimental combination of R 2 compared to rituximab plus placebo in patients (n = 358) with follicular lymphoma (n = 295) and lymphoma of the area marginal (n = 63) recurrent / refractory. In the study, the R 2 arm demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary progression-free survival endpoint (PFS), assessed by an independent review board, compared to the R-placebo arm. Mean PFS was 39.4 months for patients treated with R 2 versus 14.1 months for patients treated with R-placebo (P <0.0001; HR: 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34-0.62).

«Data from the AUGMENT study, with R 2 more than doubling progression-free survival compared to rituximab monotherapy, represents a possible new and important treatment option for patients with follicular lymphoma or the relapsing / refractory marginal zone» , said John Leonard , researcher responsible for the AUGMENT study, The Richard T. Silver Distinguished Professor of Hematology and Medical Oncology and Director of the Joint Clinical Trials Office at Weill Cornell Medicine, who also served as a consultant for Celgene.

Overall survival (OS), a secondary endpoint, showed a positive trend in terms of improvement in the R 2 arm compared to the control arm (lethal events: 16 vs 26) (HR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0, 33 to 1.13). The two-year OS rate was 93% for patients treated with R 2 and 87% for patients treated with R-placebo.

The overall response rate (ORR), another secondary endpoint, was 78% (n = 138) in the R 2 arm compared to 53% (n = 96) of the R-placebo arm, according to the independent review committee. The duration of the response (DoR) was significantly increased for R 2 compared to R-placebo with medial DoR of 37 vs 22 months respectively (P = 0.0015; HR: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0 , 79).

The most frequent adverse event (AE) in the R 2 arm was neutropenia (58%), vs. 22% in the R-placebo arm. Other AEs commonly seen in more than 20% of patients included diarrhea (31% in the R 2 arm vs. 23% in the R-placebo arm), constipation (26% vs. 14%, respectively), cough (23% vs. 17% ) and fatigue (22% vs. 18%). Adverse events most commonly reported (> 10%) in the R arm 2 were neutropenia, constipation, leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute exacerbation of symptoms tumor ( tumor flare reaction) . During the AUGMENT study no unexpected results were observed in terms of safety.

"These data represent a new, potential treatment strategy for patients with relapsing / relapsing indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas , " said Celgene’s president of Global Clinical Development, Alise Reicin . "We are anticipating the submission of authorization applications for the first quarter of 2019. to allow patients to access this important combination as soon as possible . "

The use of REVLIMID , alone or in combination with other agents, is currently not approved in any country in the treatment of follicular lymphoma or in that of marginal zone lymphoma.

Information on REVLIMID

REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone (des) is indicated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

REVLIMID is indicated as maintenance therapy in patients with MM following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT).

REVLIMID is indicated in the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) at low or intermediate risk 1, associated with a cytogenetic abnormality with 5q deletion, with or without further cytogenetic abnormalities.

REVLIMID is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or with progression of the disease after 2 previous therapies, one of which includes bortezomib.

REVLIMID is not recommended or recommended for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphatic leukemia (LLC) outside of controlled clinical trials.

Arvinas Presents Preclinical Data on Protein Degrader, ARV-471, at the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS)

On December 7, 2018 Arvinas Inc. (Nasdaq: ARVN), a biotechnology company creating a new class of drugs based on targeted protein degradation, reported its positive preclinical data on the company’s lead clinical candidate, ARV-471, for advanced or metastatic ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer at the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), taking place December 4-8 in San Antonio, Texas (Poster P5-04-18; Session 5: Tumor Cell and Molecular Biology: Endocrine Therapy and Resistance) (Press release, Arvinas, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531969]). In this study, orally administered ARV-471 demonstrated improved potency and anti-tumor activity both as a monotherapy and in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, compared to current standard of care treatment regimens.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We believe that ARV-471 has the potential to be the first oral protein degrader for the treatment of patients with metastatic ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, when used either as a single-agent or in combination with other routinely used anti-cancer agents," said John Houston, Ph.D., President and CEO of Arvinas. "This data reinforces our growing confidence that our PROTAC protein degraders have the potential to provide distinct advantages over existing approaches across a broad range of disease targets and to improve clinical outcomes over current standard of care. We continue to expect to initiate our Phase 1 clinical trial of ARV-471 in mid-2019."

Key highlights from the poster "ARV-471, an oral estrogen receptor PROTAC degrader for breast cancer":

Orally bioavailable ARV-471 demonstrated potent ERa degradation in wild-type and mutant ERa-expressing cell lines.
Oral administration of ARV-471 caused near-complete ERa degradation and resulted in tumor shrinkage in an orthotopic MCF7/estradiol breast cancer preclinical model; ARV-471 demonstrated superior tumor growth inhibition and ERa degradation compared to standard-of-care agent, fulvestrant.
Combination of ARV-471 and a CDK4/6 inhibitor demonstrated superior tumor growth inhibition when compared to the combination of fulvestrant and a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
ARV-471 inhibited growth of tamoxifen-resistant and ERa gene (ESR1) mutant tumors while also reducing tumor ERa levels.
ARV-471 displayed no ER agonist activity.

Seattle Genetics and Takeda present positive data from the Phase 3 ECHELON-2 clinical trial for ADCETRIS ® (brentuximab vedotin) in the first-line treatment of peripheral CD30-expressing T cell lymphomas

On December 7, 2018 Seattle Genetics, Inc. (Nasdaq: SGEN) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (TSE: 4502) reported that ECHELON- step 3 were presented in an oral session 60 in theAnnual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) (Press release, Seattle Genetics, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531953]). The data demonstrated that first-line treatment with ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin) in combination with CHP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone) is effective in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with a profile comparable to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), a current standard of treatment in patients with CD30-expressing T-cell peripheral lymphomas (LPCT). These data were also published online in The Lancet. ADCETRIS is an antibody-drug (ADC) conjugate directed to CD30, which is expressed on the surface of various types of LPCT.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Positive results from the top line of the Phase 3 ECHELON-2 clinical trial were previously reported in October 2018. In November 2018, ADCETRIS was approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA) for adults with systemic anaplastic lymphoma large cells (sALCL) or other LPCT expressing CD30, including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and LPCT not specified in combination with CHP. ECHELON-2 data were the basis of a Supplemental Biological Permit (SLB), which was reviewed by the FDA under its Real-Time Oncology Review Pilot Program and approved less than two weeks after the complete submission of supplemental SLB.

"As physicians, we are always on the lookout for new strategies to address unmet needs in aggressive blood cancers and ADCETRIS has proven to be one of those agents with benefit to patients in various types of lymphoma and now in first-line LPCT," said Steven. Horwitz, MD, Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. "This research is important for patients because physicians now have a novel approach to treating newly diagnosed patients with LPCT expressing CD30, a group of aggressive cancers.Data from ECHELON-2 demonstrate that ADCETRIS plus CHP are superior in prolonging progression-free survival and overall survival compared to a current standard of treatment, CHOP, a multi-agent chemotherapy regimen that we have been using in practice for several decades. "

"This is the sixth FDA-approved indication for ADCETRIS in malignant lymphoid tumors and the second as a first-line treatment in combination with chemotherapy," said Roger Dansey, MD, medical director of Seattle Genetics. "Data presented today at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) note that the combination of ADCETRIS provides clinically significant benefits for patients with previously untreated LPCT and has the potential to be practice shifting for such patients. "

"We are pleased to share these impressive results from the ECHELON-2 study, which is based on the efficacy and safety observed with ADCETRIS in various CD30-positive lymphomas," said Jesús Gómez-Navarro, MD, vice president and research director and Takeda Clinical Development in Oncology. "The study demonstrated clinically significant results and was the first randomized first-line LPCT Phase 3 trial to show improvement in overall survival. Establishing an optimal therapy for LPCT has been a challenge for clinicians and these findings represent progress in meeting the unmet needs of people living with this serious illness.We look forward to working with regulatory authorities in our territory to bring a possible new treatment option to patients with LPCT. "

The ECHELON-2 trial: Results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase III study of brentuximab vedotin and CHP (A + CHP) versus CHOP in first-line treatment of patients with peripheral CD30 + T cell lymphomas ( abstract # 997, oral presentation on December 3, 2018 at 6:15 pm at the San Diego Convention Center, Room 6F)

ECHELON-2 is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, global study evaluating ADCETRIS as part of a first-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with previously untreated LPCT who express CD30. The primary endpoint is SLP by Independent Central Blind Review (BICR), with events defined as progression, death, or chemotherapy for residual or progressive disease. Major secondary endpoints include SLP in patients with sALCL, complete remission rate (RC), SG, and objective response rate (ORT). ECHELON-2 recruited 452 patients (226 in each segment) at 132 sites in 17 countries in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. The mean age of the patients was 58 years.

The main conclusions, which will be presented by Dr. Steven Horwitz and published in The Lancet , include:

The ECHELON-2 study reached its primary endpoint with ADCETRIS plus CHP demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in PFS, as assessed by a BICR (hazard ratio [IR] = 0.71, p = 0.0110). This corresponds to a 29% reduction in the risk of progression, death or need for additional antineoplastic therapy for residual or progressive disease.
After an average follow-up time of 36.2 months, the median PFS in ADCETRIS plus CHP control was 48.2 months (95% CI, 35.2% non-assessable) compared to 20.8 months (95% CI, , 12.7-47.6) in the control segment according to the BICR evaluation. The three-year SLP was 57.1% for ADCETRIS plus CHP compared to 44.4% in the control segment.
According to the investigator’s evaluation, ADCETRIS plus CHP demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS (RI = 0.70, p value = 0.0096).
SG in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment was statistically significant compared to CHOP (RI = 0.66, p = 0.0244). This corresponds to a 34% reduction in the risk of death.
After an average follow-up of 42.1 months, the median OS was not reached for any of the study segments. The SG estimated at three years was 76.8% for ADCETRIS plus CHP, compared to 69.1% for CHOP.
All other important secondary endpoints, including rate of CR and TRO, in addition to SLP in patients with sALCL, were statistically significant in favor of the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment. According to the BICR, the CR rate (68% versus 56%, respectively) and ORT (83% versus 72%, respectively) for the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment were significantly higher than those treated with CHOP (p = 0 value , Î »max and value of p = 0.0032, respectively). According to the investigator’s evaluation, the rate of CR and ORT showed a similar benefit for the ADCETRIS segment plus CHP versus CHOP (p value = 0.0043 and p value = 0.0018, respectively).
Excluding consolidated stem cell transplantation or radiotherapy to consolidate response to initial therapy, 74% of patients in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment versus 58% of CHOP patients did not require subsequent anti-neoplastic therapies for residual or progressive disease. Of the 226 patients who received CHOP, 49 (22%) received subsequent treatment with a therapy containing ADCETRIS.
The safety profile of ADCETRIS plus CHP in the ECHELON-2 trial was comparable to that of CHOP and consistent with the established safety profile of ADCETRIS in combination with chemotherapy.
Os eventos adversos relacionados com o tratamento mais comuns de qualquer grau que ocorreram em 20% ou mais dos pacientes no segmento ADCETRIS mais CHP e CHOP foram: náusea (46 e 38%, respectivamente), neuropatia sensitiva periférica (45 e 41%, respectivamente), neutropenia (38% cada), diarreia (38 e 20%, respectivamente), obstipação (29 e 30%, respectivamente), alopecia (26 e 25%, respectivamente), pirexia (26 e 19%, respectivamente), vômitos (26 e 17%, respectivamente), fadiga (24 e 20%, respectivamente) e anemia (21 e 16%, respectivamente).
The most common adverse events of Grade 3 or higher that occurred in the ADCETRIS plus CHP and CHOP segments were: neutropenia (35 and 34%, respectively) and anemia (13 and 10%, respectively).
The incidence and severity of neutropenia were similar between study segments and lower in the subgroup of patients receiving primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Febrile neutropenia was reported in 41 patients (18%) in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment and 33 patients (15%) in the CHOP segment.
Treatment of patients with peripheral neuropathy was observed in 117 patients (52%) in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment and 124 patients (55%) in the CHOP segment, with a majority of patients with a maximum severity of Grade 1 (64% and 71%, respectively). In the latter follow-up, peripheral neuropathy returned to the baseline or decreased by 50% in ADCETRIS plus CHP patients versus 64% in the CHOP segment, and the mean resolution time was 17 weeks and 11.4 weeks, respectively.
Adverse events leading to death occurred in seven patients (3%) in the ADCETRIS plus CHP segment and nine patients (4%) in the CHOP segment.
See the Important Safety Information, including the Warning in the box, at the end of this press release.

About T-cell lymphomas

Lymphoma is a general term for a group of cancers that originate in the lymphatic system. There are two main categories of lymphoma: Hodgkin’s lymphoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. There are over 60 non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes that are broadly divided into two major groups: B-cell lymphomas, which develop from abnormal B lymphocytes; and T-cell lymphomas, which develop from abnormal T lymphocytes. There are many different forms of T-cell lymphomas, some of which are extremely rare. T cell lymphomas can be aggressive (fast growing) or indolent (slow growing).

About ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin)

ADCETRIS is being tested in more than 70 ongoing clinical trials for CD30-expressing lymphomas. These include the completed Phase 3 ECHELON-2 assay on first-line peripheral T-cell lymphomas (also known as mature T-cell lymphoma), the completed Phase 3 ECHELON-1 assay on untreated Hodgkin’s lymphoma and the ALCANZA assay stage of T-cell lymphoma.

ADCETRIS is an ADC comprising an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody linked by a protease cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), using proprietary technology from Seattle Genetics. The ADC employs a binding system that is designed to be stable in the bloodstream, but to release MMAE after internalization into CD30-expressing tumor cells.

Injection of ADCETRIS for intravenous infusion has received FDA approval for six indications in adult patients with: (1) previously untreated systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) or other peripheral CD30-expressing T-cell lymphomas (LPCT), including angioimmunoblastic T cells and unspecified LPCT, in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone, (2) non-previously treated classic III or IV Hodgkin’s lymphoma (LHc) (III) in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine; (3) LHc with high risk of relapse or progression such as post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation,

Health Canada granted approval of ADCETRIS with conditions for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and sALCL in 2013, and unconditional approval for post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation treatment of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma at risk increased relapse or progression.

ADCETRIS received a conditional marketing authorization from the European Commission in October 2012. The indications approved in Europe are: (1) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma after ASCT or after at least two therapies when treating ASCT or multi-agent chemotherapy is not a treatment option, (2) treatment of adult patients with recurrent or refractory slam, (3) for the treatment of adult patients with CD30 positive Hodgkin’s lymphoma at increased risk of relapse or progression after ASCT, and (4) for the treatment of adult patients with cutaneous CD30-positive T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after at least one prior systemic therapy.

ADCETRIS has received marketing authorization from regulatory authorities in 72 countries for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma and sALCL. Please refer to the important safety information, including the Warning in the box, below.

Seattle Genetics and Takeda are jointly developing ADCETRIS. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, Seattle Genetics has marketing rights in the US and Canada, and Takeda has the right to market ADCETRIS in the rest of the world. Seattle Genetics and Takeda are funding joint development costs for ADCETRIS on a half-way basis, except in Japan, where Takeda is solely responsible for development costs.

FDA approves Roche’s Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy for the initial treatment of people with a specific type of metastatic lung cancer

On December 7, 2018 Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) reported that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Tecentriq (atezolizumab) in combination with Avastin (bevacizumab), paclitaxel and carboplatin (chemotherapy), for the initial (first-line) treatment of people with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumour aberrations (Press release, Hoffmann-La Roche, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531970]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"This Tecentriq regimen has demonstrated a significant survival benefit in the initial treatment of metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer," said Sandra Horning, MD, Roche’s Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. "Today’s approval supports our combination approach for Tecentriq in lung cancer and our vision to develop medicines that improve outcomes for patients with this complex disease."

This approval is based on results from the Phase III IMpower150 study, which showed that Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy helped people live significantly longer, compared to Avastin and chemotherapy (median overall survival [OS]=19.2 versus 14.7 months; hazard ratio [HR]=0.78; 95%, CI: 0.64–0.96; p=0.016) in the intention-to-treat wild-type (ITT–WT) population.[1] The safety profile of the Tecentriq combination was consistent with that observed in previous studies.

Roche is working with the FDA on post-marketing commitments (PMCs) to better understand and characterise the potential effects of Tecentriq-related anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralising antibodies (NAbs) across all of our studies. An analysis of ADAs in the IMpower150 study showed no impact on the efficacy of Tecentriq.

Tecentriq is also approved by the FDA to treat people with metastatic NSCLC who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, and have progressed on an appropriate FDA-approved targeted therapy if their tumour has EGFR or ALK genetic alterations.

About the IMpower150 study
IMpower150 is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Tecentriq in combination with chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) with or without Avastin in people with stage IV or recurrent metastatic non-squamous NSCLC who had not been treated with chemotherapy for their advanced disease.

It enrolled 1,202 people, of whom 1,045 were in the ITT-WT subpopulation, which excluded those people with EGFR and ALK mutations. People were randomised (1:1:1) to receive:

Tecentriq plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm A), or
Tecentriq and Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm B), or
Avastin plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Arm C, control arm).
The co-primary endpoints comparing Arms B and C were OS and progression-free survival (PFS), as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) and assessed in the ITT-WT subpopulation. Key secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed PFS, OS and safety in the ITT population.

A summary of the ITT-WT data from the IMpower150 study that support this approval is included below:[1]

Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy helped people live significantly longer, compared to Avastin and chemotherapy (median OS=19.2 versus 14.7 months; HR=0.78; 95%, CI: 0.64–0.96; p=0.016).
In addition, Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy reduced risk of disease worsening or death (PFS) by 29%, compared to Avastin and chemotherapy (HR: 0.71; 95%, CI: 0.59–0.85, p=0.0002).
Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy shrank tumours (overall response rate [ORR]) in 55% of people (95%, CI: 49–60) compared to 42 percent of people (95 percent CI: 37-48) on Avastin and chemotherapy.
4% of people receiving Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy experienced a complete response (CR), and 51% of people experienced a partial response (PR).
The median duration of response (DoR) for people receiving Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy was 10.8 months (95%, CI: 8.4–13.9) compared to 6.5 months (95 percent CI: 5.6-7.6) for people on Avastin and chemotherapy.
The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in people receiving Tecentriq in combination with Avastin and chemotherapy were fatigue and lack of energy (asthenia; 50%), hair loss (alopecia; 48%), nausea (39%), diarrhoea (32%), constipation (30%), decreased appetite (29%), joint pain (arthralgia; 26%), hypertension (25%), and pain from nerve damage (peripheral neuropathy; 24%).
About NSCLC
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death globally.[2] Each year 1.76 million people die as a result of the disease; this translates into more than 4,800 deaths worldwide every day.[2] Lung cancer can be broadly divided into two major types: NSCLC and small cell lung cancer. NSCLC is the most prevalent type, accounting for around 85% of all cases.[3] NSCLC comprises non-squamous and squamous-cell lung cancer, the squamous form of which is characterised by flat cells covering the airway surface when viewed under a microscope.[3]

About the Tecentriq (atezolizumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab) combination
There is a strong scientific rationale to support the use of Tecentriq plus Avastin in combination. The Tecentriq and Avastin regimen may enhance the potential of the immune system to combat first-line advanced NSCLC. Avastin, in addition to its established anti-angiogenic effects, may further enhance Tecentriq’s ability to restore anti-cancer immunity, by inhibiting VEGF-related immunosuppression, promoting T cell tumour infiltration and enabling priming and activation of T cell responses against tumour antigens.

About Tecentriq (atezolizumab)
Tecentriq is a monoclonal antibody designed to bind with a protein called PD-L1 expressed on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating immune cells, blocking its interactions with both PD-1 and B7.1 receptors. By inhibiting PD-L1, Tecentriq may enable the activation of T cells. Tecentriq has the potential to be used as a foundational combination partner with cancer immunotherapies, targeted medicines and various chemotherapies across a broad range of cancers.

Currently, Roche has nine Phase III lung cancer studies underway, evaluating Tecentriq alone or in combination with other medicines.

Tecentriq is already approved in the European Union, United States and more than 80 countries for people with previously treated metastatic NSCLC and for people with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who are not eligible for cisplatin chemotherapy, or who have had disease progression during or following platinum-containing therapy.

About Avastin (bevacizumab)
Avastin is a prescription-only medicine that is a solution for intravenous infusion. It is a biologic antibody designed to specifically bind to a protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that plays an important role throughout the lifecycle of the tumour to develop and maintain blood vessels, a process known as angiogenesis. Avastin is designed to interfere with the tumour blood supply by directly binding to the VEGF protein to prevent interactions with receptors on blood vessel cells. The tumour blood supply is thought to be critical to a tumour’s ability to grow and spread in the body (metastasise).

About Roche in cancer immunotherapy
For more than 50 years, Roche has been developing medicines with the goal to redefine treatment in oncology. Today, we’re investing more than ever in our effort to bring innovative treatment options that help a person’s own immune system fight cancer.

By applying our seminal research in immune tumour profiling within the framework of the Roche-devised cancer immunity cycle, we are accelerating and expanding the transformative benefits with TECENTRIQ to a greater number of people living with cancer. Our cancer immunotherapy development programme takes a comprehensive approach in pursuing the goal of restoring cancer immunity to improve outcomes for patients.

Data presented at the 2018 congress of ASH show the benefits of first-line treatment with IMBRUVICA ® ▼ (hybridutinib) therapy in all CLL patient populations

On December 7, 2018 Johnson & Johnson Janssen pharmaceutical companies reported new results from three important studies on IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a form of difficult blood cancer treatment as well as the most common type of leukemia in adults (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, DEC 7, 2018, View Source [SID1234531954]). 1 The results were presented during the 60th annual congress of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) in San Diego, California.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The results of the Phase 3 study (E1912) sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and led by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (ECOG-ACRIN) were presented during the oral session dedicated to abstracts late breakers. The study evaluated ibrutinib in combination with rituximab compared to a chemotherapy regimen with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in previously untreated CLL patients younger than 70 years. Following a nearly 3-year follow-up, these data showed that the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to FCR. 2

Data from the iLLUMINATE phase 3 study (PCYC-1130) were also presented during an oral session, with concurrent publication in The Lancet Oncology . The results show that the combination of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab significantly improves PFS compared to chlorambucil and obinutuzumab in recently diagnosed CLL patients. 3 These data recently supported the submission of a Type 2 variation application to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to request authorization for the extended use of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab in previously untreated CLL adults.

Data from the 1b / 2 hybridutinib study and the related extension study (PCYC-1102, PCYC-1103) with a follow-up of up to seven years on newly diagnosed relapsed / refractory (R / R) CLL patients they also demonstrated long-term and long-term survival benefits following monotherapy treatment, and constitute the longest follow-up for a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor in CLL. 4

"The results of iLLUMINATE and ECOG-ACRIN studies demonstrate an extremely prolonged progression-free survival for the relative combinations based on ibrutinib compared to commonly used chemo-immunotherapy regimens," said Dr. Carol Moreno, Hematology Consultant at Hospital de the Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ​​Barcelona, ​​Spain. "These non-chemotherapeutic regimens are a step forward in assessing how patients are treated, including the younger ones and with high-risk CLL, and offer the potential to resolve the compromise between efficacy and toxicity for patients."

"The data presented at the INA congress provide a further and convincing evidence of the clinical benefits that ibrutinib can offer to patients across the spectrum of CLL management." Long-term data are also promising in terms of long-term found for patients, "said Dr. Catherine Taylor, head of the hematology area for the EMEA region (Europe, Middle East and Africa) of Janssen-Cilag Limited. "We continue to study the full potential of ibrutinib with a comprehensive clinical development program, to improve results and modify the consequences of diagnosing blood cancer for patients."

Ibrutinib, a first class BTK inhibitor, is developed and marketed jointly by Janssen Biotech, Inc., and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company.

Results of the Randomized Phase 3 Study on Hybridinib (PCI-32765) Therapy vs. FCR Chemo-Immunotherapy in Untreated Young CLL Patients: an ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Study (E1912) ( Abstract No. LBA-4 )

The partial analysis, with a median follow-up of 33.4 months, was performed on 77 PFS events and 14 deaths. Ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly improved PFS compared to FCR (HR: 0.352; [CI, confidence interval] 95%: 0.223-0.558; P <0.0001); the predetermined limit for PFS has been exceeded. Also the treatment arm with ibrutinib plus rituximab showed an improvement in OS (HR: 0.168; 95% CI: 0.053-0.538; p = 0.0003, predetermined limit for superiority p = 0.0005). 2

In a subgroup of PFS analyzes, ibrutinib plus rituximab showed prolongation of PFS regardless of age, gender, general condition, disease stage or presence / absence of cytogenetic abnormality deletion 11q23. With the current follow-up also ibrutinib plus rituximab was superior to FCR in patients without IgHV mutation (HR: 0.262; CI 95%: 0.137-0.498; p <0.0001), but not in patients with IGHV mutation (HR: 0.435; 95% CI: 0.140-0.1350; p = 0.07). 2

Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse AE events (AEs) were observed in 58% of patients treated with ibrutinib plus rituximab and in 72% of patients treated with FCR (p = 0.0042). The FCR arm was more frequently associated with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (FCR: 44% compared to ibrutinib plus rituximab: 23%; p <0.0001) and infectious complications (FCR: 17.7% compared to rituximab: 7.1%, p <0.0001). 2

Results from the iLLUMINATED phase 3 study ( abstract No. 691 )

At a median follow-up of 31.3 months, ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab significantly prolonged the PFS assessed by an independent review board (IRC) compared to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (median not achieved [NR] vs. 19.0 months; 0.231; 95% CI: 0.145-0.367; P <0.0001), with a 77% reduction in risk of progression or death. 3

Higher PFS values ​​in the armutinib plus obinutuzumab than the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm were also observed in the high-risk population, including cases with IGHV, del11q, del17p and / or TP53 mutation, with 85% reduction in risk progression or death (median NR vs. 14.7 months; HR 0.154; 95% CI: 0.087-0.270; P <0.0001). 5The overall response rate (ORR) assessed by the IRC was also higher for the hybridutinib arm plus obinutuzumab than the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (88% vs. 73%); also the complete response rates (CR) / complete response with incomplete recovery of the blood count (CRi) were higher, respectively 19% compared to 8%. The minimal residual disease (MRD) was not detectable in the blood and / or bone marrow (<10 -4flow cytometry) in 35% of patients treated with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab compared to 25% of patients treated with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab. The 30-month OS rates were 86% for the hybridutinib plus obinutuzumab arm compared to 85% of the most obinutuzumab chlorambucil arm. 3

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse AE (AE) events in the most obinutuzumab-hybridutib arm compared to the most obinutuzumab-chlorambucil arm were: neutropenia (36% vs. 46%), thrombocytopenia (19% vs. 10%), pneumonia (7 % vs. 4%), atrial fibrillation (5% vs. 0%), febrile neutropenia (4% vs. 6%), anemia (4% vs. 8%) and infusion-related reactions (IRR; 2% vs 8%). 5No patients discontinued obinutuzumab due to IRR in the armutinib plus obinutuzumab arm compared to the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (6%). The EAs led to the interruption of ibrutinib in 16% of patients and led to the interruption of chlorambucil in 9% of patients. The AEs led to the discontinuation of obinutuzumab in the hybridutinib arm plus obinutuzumab (9%) and in the chlorambucil arm plus obinutuzumab (13%). At a follow-up of approximately three years, 70% of patients in the hybridutinib arm plus obinutuzumab continue to be treated with ibrutinib monotherapy. 3

Results from the follow-up up to seven years of the PCYC-1102 phase 1b / 2 study and its extension, PCYC-1103 ( abstract No. 3133 )

The results of these studies showed a lasting efficacy of ibrutinib in newly diagnosed CLL R / R patients. Long-term data showed sustained rates of PFS and OS. The estimated seven-year PFS rates were 80% for newly diagnosed patients and 32% for R / R patients. In particular, the administration of ibrutinib in the first lines of therapy has led to an improvement in PFS for R / R patients. 4

The ORR value was 89% for all patients (CR, 15%), with similar rates in newly diagnosed patients (87% [CR, 32%]) and in CLL R / R patients (89% [ CR, 10%]). Median response duration (DOR) was NR (CI 95%: 0 + -85 +) for newly diagnosed CLL patients and 57 months (CI 95%: 0 + -85 +) for CLL patients R / R. 6 Median PFS was NR (CI 95%: non-evaluable [NE], NE) for newly diagnosed CLL patients and was 51 months (95% CI: 37-70) for CLL R / R patients. 4.6 The median OS was NR for newly diagnosed patients (95% CI: 80-NE) or CLL R / R patients (95% CI: 63-NE), with estimated OS rates at seven years 75% and 52% respectively. 4

Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 74% of newly diagnosed patients and 89% of CLL R / R patients. Among the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred during treatment were hypertension (new diagnosis, 32%, R / R, 26%), diarrhea (new diagnosis, 16%, R / R, 4%) and hyponatraemia (new diagnosis, 10%, R / R, 0%). Severe hemorrhages of grade 3 or higher atrial fibrillation, thrombocytopenia, anemia and arthralgia have been observed in 11% or less of newly diagnosed and R / R patients. In addition, infections (newly diagnosed, 23%; R / R, 55%) occurred in CLL R / R patients. 6No new or unexpected adverse events were observed, and the frequency of most grade 3 or higher adverse events and serious adverse events decreased over time, with the exception of hypertension. 6

#END#

Information on the ECOG-ACRIN E1912 study

The phase 3 study (E1912) evaluated previously untreated CLL patients aged up to 70 years, randomized to ibrutinib (420 mg / day until disease progression) and rituximab (50 mg / m 2 on day 1 of cycle 2 325 mg / m 2 on day 2 of cycle 2, 500 mg / m 2 on day 1 of cycles 3-7) (n = 354) or six doses of fludarabine for intravenous (25 mg / m 2 ) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg / m 2 ) days 1-3 with rituximab (50 mg / m 2 on day 1 of cycle 1; 325 mg / m 2 on day 2 of cycle 1; 500 mg / m 2day 1 of cycles 2-6) every 28 days (n = 175). The primary endpoint was PFS, with a secondary endpoint of OS. 2

The federally funded study was designed by researchers with ECOG-ACRIN and was conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network of NCI. Pharmacyclics LLC provided hybridutinib under a research and development cooperation agreement with NCI and a separate agreement with ECOG-ACRIN.

Information on the iLLUMINATE study

iLLUMINATE ( PCYC-1130 ) evaluated newly diagnosed CLL patients randomized for continuous administration of hybrid 420 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, in combination with obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously over 6 cycles (n = 113); or chlorambucil on days 1 and 15 of each cycle plus obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously over 6 cycles (n = 116). The median age of patients was 71 years and 65% of patients had high-risk genomic characteristics. The primary endpoint was the PFS, assessed by an independent review board. Secondary endpoints included PFS in a high-risk population, undetectable MRD, ORR, OS, and safety. 3

Information on PCYC-1102 and PCYC-1103

With a follow-up of up to a maximum of 7 years, studies ( PCYC-1102 phase 1b / 2 and its extension, PCYC-1103 ) evaluated newly diagnosed CLL R / R patients (n = 132; diagnosis = 31, R / R = 101), including those with high-risk characteristics, who received either ibrutinib 420 mg or 840 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of the cutoff, 55% of newly diagnosed patients and 21% of R / R patients continued treatment with ibrutinib, with a median follow-up of 67 months. 4

Information on ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a first class Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTK) that acts by forming a strong covalent bond with BTK to block the transmission of cell survival signals into malignant B cells. 7 By blocking this BTK protein, ibrutinib contributes to the death and reduction of the number of tumor cells, thus slowing the aggravation of the neoplasm. 8

Currently the use of ibrutinib is approved in Europe for the following indications: 9

chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): as a single agent for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated CLL, and as a single agent or in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for the treatment of adult CLL patients who have already undergone at least one previous therapy .
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): adult patients with relapsing or refractory MCL forms.
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM): patients who have undergone at least one previous therapy or are being treated with first-line therapy in cases where chemo-immunotherapy is not appropriate.
Ibrutinib is approved in over 90 countries and, to date, has been used to treat more than 135,000 patients worldwide and for all approved indications. 10

The most common adverse reactions observed with ibrutinib include diarrhea, neutropenia, haemorrhage (for example: bruising), musculoskeletal pain, nausea, rash and pyrexia. 9

For a full list of side effects and information on dosage and administration, contraindications and other precautions for the use of ibrutinib, please see the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) .