Cerulean to Present at the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

On May 18, 2016 Cerulean Pharma Inc. (NASDAQ:CERU), a clinical-stage company developing nanoparticle-drug conjugates (NDCs), reported a scheduled poster presentation on CRLX301 at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting being held June 3-7, 2016, at McCormick Place in Chicago (Press release, Cerulean Pharma, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512550]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Details of the poster presentation are as follows:

Title: A Phase 1 Study of CRLX301, a Novel Nanoparticle-Drug Conjugate (NDC) Containing Docetaxel (DOC), in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors
Poster Session: Developmental Therapeutics—Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Date and Time: June 5, 2016 8:00-11:30 am CDT
Abstract Number: 2526
Poster Board Number: 226
Location: Hall A
Summary: CRLX301 is generally well tolerated with hints of antitumor activity, and with differentiated pharmacokinetics compared to DOC.

An electronic copy of the poster will be available upon request following ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) by emailing [email protected].

About CRLX301

CRLX301 is a dynamically tumor-targeted NDC designed to concentrate in tumors and slowly release its anti-cancer payload, docetaxel, inside tumor cells. In preclinical studies, CRLX301 delivers up to 10 times more docetaxel into tumors, compared to an equivalent milligram dose of commercially available docetaxel and was similar to or better than docetaxel in seven of seven animal models, with a statistically significant survival benefit seen in five of those seven models. In addition, preclinical data show that CRLX301 had lower toxicity than has been reported with docetaxel in similar preclinical studies. CRLX301 is in Phase 1/2a clinical development.

About Cerulean’s Dynamic Tumor Targeting Platform

Cerulean’s Dynamic Tumor Targeting Platform creates NDCs that are designed to provide safer and more effective cancer treatments. We believe our NDCs concentrate their anti-cancer payloads inside tumors while sparing normal tissue because they are small enough to pass through the "leaky" vasculature present in tumors but are too large to pass through the wall of healthy blood vessels. Once inside tumors, our NDCs enter tumor cells where they slowly release anti-cancer payloads from within the tumor cells.

CTI BioPharma Announces Presentations At The American Society Of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting

On May 19, 2016 CTI BioPharma Corp. (CTI) (NASDAQ and MTA:CTIC) reported that data highlighting pacritinib, including additional safety and long-term follow up data from the Phase 3 PERSIST-1 clinical trial, will be presented at the upcoming American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting to be held June 3-7 in Chicago, IL (Press release, CTI BioPharma, MAY 18, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2169602 [SID:1234512572]). The abstracts are available on the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) website at www.asco.org. Details regarding the poster presentations, which will include additional data not available in the abstracts, follow.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Pacritinib (PAC) vs. best available therapy (BAT) in myelofibrosis (MF): Outcomes in patients (pts) with baseline (BL) thrombocytopenia
First Author: Claire Harrison, M.D., Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Date/Time: Monday, June 6 at 8:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m. CT
Poster Discussion Session: Monday, June 6, 11:30 a.m.-12:45 p.m. CT in Room E354b
Location: Hall A
Poster Session: Hematologic Malignancies- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant
Abstract #7011 / Poster Board #3

Pacritinib (PAC) vs. best available therapy (BAT) in myelofibrosis (MF): 60 week follow-up of the phase III PERSIST-1 trial
First Author: Ruben Mesa, M.D., Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Chair of the Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ
Date/Time: Monday, June 6 at 8:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m. CT
Location: Hall A
Poster Session: Hematologic Malignancies- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant
Abstract #7065 / Poster Board #57

Outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence in the phase III PERSIST-1 study of pacritinib vs. best available therapy
First Author: Claire Harrison, M.D., Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Date/Time: Monday, June 6 at 8:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m. CT
Location: Hall A
Poster Session: Hematologic Malignancies- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant
Abstract #7066 / Poster Board #58

Pacritinib (PAC) vs. best available therapy (BAT) in myelofibrosis (MF): Long-term follow-up of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the phase III PERSIST-1 trial
First Author: Ruben Mesa, M.D., Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Chair of the Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ
Date/Time: Monday, June 6 at 8:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m. CT
Location: Hall A
Poster Session: Hematologic Malignancies- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant
Abstract #7067 / Poster Board #59

About Pacritinib

Pacritinib is an investigational oral kinase inhibitor with specificity for JAK2, FLT3, IRAK1 and CSF1R. In August 2014, pacritinib was granted Fast Track designation by the FDA for the treatment of intermediate and high risk myelofibrosis including, but not limited to, patients with disease-related thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts); patients experiencing treatment-emergent thrombocytopenia on other JAK2 inhibitor therapy; or patients who are intolerant of, or whose symptoms are not well controlled (sub-optimally managed) on other JAK2 therapy. Clinical studies for pacritinib are currently subject to a full clinical hold issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in February 2016.

CTI BioPharma and Baxalta Incorporated are parties to a worldwide license agreement to develop and commercialize pacritinib. CTI BioPharma and Baxalta will jointly commercialize pacritinib in the U.S. while Baxalta has exclusive commercialization rights for all indications outside the U.S.

New KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) Data from KEYNOTE-006 and KEYNOTE-001 in Advanced Melanoma, Including Updated Survival Data, To Be Presented at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

On May 18, 2016 Merck (NYSE:MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, reported final overall survival (OS) data from KEYNOTE-006 and new findings from KEYNOTE-001, including updated response rates, duration of response data and three-year OS data with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), the company’s anti-PD-1 therapy, in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (Press release, Merck & Co, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512551]). Findings from the final OS analysis from KEYNOTE-006, a phase 3 study evaluating KEYTRUDA as monotherapy compared to ipilimumab, continue to show a significant survival benefit compared to ipilimumab in the first-line setting for advanced melanoma. These data will be presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago, June 3 – 7, 2016.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Long-term OS data from KEYNOTE-006 to be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) showed that with KEYTRUDA, 55.1 percent and 55.3 percent of patients were alive two years after starting treatment (10 mg/kg every two weeks and three weeks, respectively), compared to 43 percent of patients receiving ipilimumab (hazard ratio: 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87; p=0.0008] and hazard ratio: 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.86; p=0.0008], respectively). These data will be presented by Dr. Jacob Schachter, Ella Institute for Research and Treatment of Melanoma, Sheba Medical Center, in an oral session on Monday, June 6, from 2:27 to 2:39 p.m. CDT (Location: Arie Crown Theater) (Abstract #9504).

Additionally, data from KEYNOTE-001, including the long-term, three-year OS analysis, were featured in the official ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Press Program today and will be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago. The primary efficacy measure in KEYNOTE-001 was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary outcome measures included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. The data from KEYNOTE-001 discussed today will be presented along with additional findings in an oral session by Dr. Caroline Robert, Institut Gustave-Roussy, on Monday, June 6, from 2:15 to 2:27 p.m. CDT (Location: Arie Crown Theater) (Abstract #9503).

"With longer-term follow-up from two studies, including a head-to-head trial demonstrating superior survival compared to another immunotherapy, we are continuing to see durability of response with KEYTRUDA as monotherapy," said Dr. Roger Dansey, senior vice president and therapeutic area head, oncology late-stage development, Merck Research Laboratories. "These results add to the growing body of data supporting the use of KEYTRUDA as first-line treatment in advanced melanoma, and serve as an important reminder for what we are aiming to achieve through our immuno-oncology development program – enhanced survival for people with cancer."

Findings from the melanoma cohorts of the phase 1b KEYNOTE-001 trial, which included 655 patients, showed an ORR of 33 percent (per RECIST v1.1). At the time of the analysis, a response duration of two years or more was observed in 73 percent of patients. Long-term OS data showed an estimated 40 percent of patients were alive three years after starting treatment with

KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), with a median survival of 24.4 months (95% CI, 20.2-29.0). Median duration of response has not yet been reached (range, 1.3+ to 38.8+).

Data from KEYNOTE-001 served as the basis for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s accelerated approval of KEYTRUDA in September 2014. The label was subsequently updated to reflect data from the KEYNOTE-006 (phase 3) and KEYNOTE-002 (phase 2) trials, expanding the indication to include treatment of first-line advanced melanoma regardless of BRAF status. Today, KEYTRUDA is approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma in more than 50 countries, including the United States and throughout Europe.

The KEYTRUDA clinical development program includes more than 30 tumor types in more than 270 clinical trials, including more than 100 trials that combine KEYTRUDA with other cancer treatments.

Key Findings from the KEYNOTE-006 Study

KEYNOTE-006 is a global, open-label, randomized, pivotal, phase 3 study evaluating KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) compared to ipilimumab in patients with unresectable stage III or IV advanced melanoma with no more than one prior systemic therapy. The study randomized 834 patients to receive KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every three weeks, KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every two weeks, or four cycles of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every three weeks. The co-primary endpoints were PFS and OS; secondary endpoints were ORR, duration of response and safety, with an exploratory analysis for health-related quality of life (QoL). Tumor response was assessed at week 12, then every 6 weeks thereafter per RECIST v1.1 by independent, central, blinded radiographic review and investigator-assessed, immune-related response criteria.

Based on data to be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper), KEYTRUDA (10 mg/kg every two or three weeks) continued to provide superior OS, PFS and ORR compared to ipilimumab. Specifically, long-term OS data showed 55.1 percent and 55.3 percent of patients were alive two years after starting treatment with KEYTRUDA (every two weeks and three weeks, respectively) compared to 43 percent of patients receiving ipilimumab (hazard ratio: 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87; p=0.0008] and hazard ratio: 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.86; p=0.0008], respectively). Median OS was not reached for KEYTRUDA; for ipilimumab, median OS was 16 months.

Additionally, an estimated 31.2 percent and 27.8 percent of patients receiving KEYTRUDA (every two weeks and three weeks, respectively) were alive and were disease progression-free at two years compared to 13.5 percent of patients receiving ipilimumab (hazard ratio: 0.61 [95% CI, 0.50-0.75; p<0.0001] for both). For patients receiving KEYTRUDA, ORR was 36.9 percent and 36.1 percent (every two weeks and three weeks, respectively) compared to 13.3 percent for patients receiving ipilimumab (p<0.0001 for both groups).

With longer follow-up, adverse events have remained consistent with previously reported safety data. There was one treatment-related death (due to sepsis) in the KEYTRUDA every two week group.

Key Findings from the KEYNOTE-001 Study

KEYNOTE-001 is a phase 1b multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort trial evaluating KEYTRUDA in various advanced cancers, including advanced melanoma. Patients in the melanoma cohorts received 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA every three weeks or 10 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA every two weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The major efficacy outcome measure was confirmed ORR as assessed by blinded independent central review using RECIST v1.1. Tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks. The secondary outcome measures included PFS, OS and duration of response.

The findings to be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) include updated response rates and duration of response data, as well as three-year OS data from the 655 patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and progression of disease. All patients were followed for at least two years, with some being followed for almost four years (with median follow-up duration of 32 months).

Of those patients who responded to treatment with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), a complete response (CR) was observed in 10 percent of patients. Among the 61 patients who stopped treatment once a complete response had occurred, the response duration ranged from 17+ to 44+ months (median duration not reached). Only two patients who had a complete response experienced disease progression after stopping treatment. In addition, long-term survival data showed that 40 percent of patients survived three years after starting treatment with KEYTRUDA (n=655).

With longer follow-up, adverse events have remained consistent with previously reported safety data. Immune-mediated treatment-related adverse events observed in this trial were hypothyroidism (9.6%), pneumonitis (4.3%), hyperthyroidism (2.3%), colitis (2.3%), uveitis (1.5%), hepatitis (0.9%), and nephritis (0.5%).

About KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Injection 100 mg

KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by increasing the ability of the body’s immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. KEYTRUDA blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

KEYTRUDA is also indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 as determined by an FDA-approved test with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving KEYTRUDA. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. An improvement in survival or disease-related symptoms has not yet been established. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every three weeks for the approved indications.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab)

Immune-mediated pneumonitis, including fatal cases, occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Pneumonitis occurred in 32 (2.0%) of 1567 patients, including Grade 1 (0.8%), 2 (0.8%), and 3 (0.4%) pneumonitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Evaluate suspected pneumonitis with radiographic imaging. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent Grade 2 pneumonitis.

Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 31 (2%) of 1567 patients, including Grade 2 (0.5%), 3 (1.1%), and 4 (0.1%) colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater colitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 or 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 colitis.

Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 16 (1%) of 1567 patients, including Grade 2 (0.1%), 3 (0.7%), and 4 (0.1%) hepatitis. Monitor patients for changes in liver function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hepatitis and, based on severity of liver enzyme elevations, withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Hypophysitis occurred in 13 (0.8%) of 1567 patients, including Grade 2 (0.3%), 3 (0.3%), and 4 (0.1%) hypophysitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis (including hypopituitarism and adrenal insufficiency). Administer corticosteroids and hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; withhold or discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 hypophysitis.

Hyperthyroidism occurred in 51 (3.3%) of 1567 patients, including Grade 2 (0.6%) and 3 (0.1%) hyperthyroidism. Hypothyroidism occurred in 127 (8.1%) of 1567 patients, including Grade 3 (0.1%) hypothyroidism. Thyroid disorders can occur at any time during treatment. Monitor patients for changes in thyroid function (at the start of treatment, periodically during treatment, and as indicated based on clinical evaluation) and for clinical signs and symptoms of thyroid disorders. Administer replacement hormones for hypothyroidism and manage hyperthyroidism with thionamides and beta-blockers as appropriate. Withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 hyperthyroidism.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus, including diabetic ketoacidosis, occurred in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes, and withhold KEYTRUDA and administer anti-hyperglycemics in patients with severe hyperglycemia.

Immune-mediated nephritis occurred in 7 (0.4%) of 1567 patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%), 3 (0.2%), and 4 (0.1%) nephritis. Monitor patients for changes in renal function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater nephritis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 nephritis.

Other clinically important immune-mediated adverse reactions can occur. For suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, ensure adequate evaluation to confirm etiology or exclude other causes. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, withhold KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) and administer corticosteroids. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Based on limited data from clinical studies in patients whose immune-related adverse reactions could not be controlled with corticosteroid use, administration of other systemic immunosuppressants can be considered. Resume KEYTRUDA when the adverse reaction remains at Grade 1 or less following corticosteroid taper. Permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for any Grade 3 immune-mediated adverse reaction that recurs and for any life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reaction.

The following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% (unless otherwise indicated) of 1567 patients: arthritis (1.6%), exfoliative dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid, uveitis, myositis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis, vasculitis, pancreatitis, hemolytic anemia, and partial seizures arising in a patient with inflammatory foci in brain parenchyma.

Severe and life-threatening infusion-related reactions have been reported in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions including rigors, chills, wheezing, pruritus, flushing, rash, hypotension, hypoxemia, and fever. For Grade 3 or 4 reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. If used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant during treatment, apprise the patient of the potential hazard to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of KEYTRUDA.

In Trial 6, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 9% of 555 patients; adverse reactions leading to discontinuation in more than one patient were colitis (1.4%), autoimmune hepatitis (0.7%), allergic reaction (0.4%), polyneuropathy (0.4%), and cardiac failure (0.4%). Adverse reactions leading to interruption of KEYTRUDA occurred in 21% of patients; the most common (≥1%) was diarrhea (2.5%). The most common adverse reactions with KEYTRUDA vs ipilimumab were fatigue (28% vs 28%), diarrhea (26% with KEYTRUDA), rash (24% vs 23%), and nausea (21% with KEYTRUDA). Corresponding incidence rates are listed for ipilimumab only for those adverse reactions that occurred at the same or lower rate than with KEYTRUDA.

In Trial 2, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 12% of 357 patients; the most common (≥1%) were general physical health deterioration (1%), asthenia (1%), dyspnea (1%), pneumonitis (1%), and generalized edema (1%). Adverse reactions leading to interruption of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) occurred in 14% of patients; the most common (≥1%) were dyspnea (1%), diarrhea (1%), and maculo-papular rash (1%). The most common adverse reactions with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) vs chemotherapy were fatigue (43% with KEYTRUDA), pruritus (28% vs 8%), rash (24% vs 8%), constipation (22% vs 20%), nausea (22% with KEYTRUDA), diarrhea (20% vs 20%), and decreased appetite (20% with KEYTRUDA). Corresponding incidence rates are listed for chemotherapy only for those adverse reactions that occurred at the same or lower rate than with KEYTRUDA.

No formal pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies have been conducted with KEYTRUDA.

It is not known whether KEYTRUDA is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, instruct women to discontinue nursing during treatment with KEYTRUDA and for 4 months after the final dose.

Safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA have not been established in pediatric patients.

Our Focus on Cancer

Our goal is to translate breakthrough science into innovative oncology medicines to help people with cancer worldwide. At Merck Oncology, helping people fight cancer is our passion and supporting accessibility to our cancer medicines is our commitment. Our focus is on pursuing research in immuno-oncology and we are accelerating every step in the journey – from lab to clinic – to potentially bring new hope to people with cancer.

As part of our focus on cancer, Merck is committed to exploring the potential of immuno-oncology with one of the fastest-growing development programs in the industry. We are currently executing an expansive research program that includes more than 270 clinical trials evaluating our anti-PD-1 therapy across more than 30 tumor types. We also continue to strengthen our immuno-oncology portfolio through strategic acquisitions and are prioritizing the development of several promising immunotherapeutic candidates with the potential to improve the treatment of advanced cancers.

For more information about our oncology clinical trials, visit www.merck.com/clinicaltrials.

AV-380

In August 2015, AVEO announced an exclusive, worldwide license agreement with Novartis for the development and commercialization of AVEO’s first-in-class, potent, humanized inhibitory antibody targeting growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), AV-380, and related antibodies, including modified or derivative forms of any such antibody (Company Pipeline, AVEO, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512507]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

GDF15 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine whose elevated circulating levels have been correlated with cachexia in cachectic cancer patients and several animal models of cancer cachexia. Current evidence suggests that a pro- inflammatory state may be responsible for many of the symptoms associated with cachexia, a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by malnutrition and severe involuntary weight loss due to the loss of muscle and fat tissue, as well as the clinical manifestation of anemia, inflammation and suppression of immune functions.

Preclinical data show that inhibition of GDF15 results in a switch from catabolism to anabolism, suggesting that GDF15 inhibition with AV-380 may reverse the effects of cachexia.

Cachexia is a serious and common complication in patients with advanced cancer and other chronic diseases. It affects some five million individuals in the United States.

Foundation Medicine Announces Presentations at ASCO

On May 18, 2016 Foundation Medicine, Inc. (NASDAQ:FMI) reported that the company and its collaborators will have two oral presentations, six poster discussions and nineteen posters presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting 2016 taking place June 3-7 in Chicago (Press release, Foundation Medicine, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512552]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The schedule for oral presentations by Foundation Medicine and/or its collaborators is as follows:

Date and Time: Sunday, June 5, 2015 from 9:57 – 10:09 a.m. CT
Title: PD-L1 Expression, Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Subtype and Mutational Load are Independent Predictors of Response to Atezolizumab (atezo) in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (mUC; IMvigor210)
Abstract Number: 104
Location: Hall D1
Session: Immunotherapy: Now We’re Getting Personal – Using Genomics and Biomarkers to Predict Response
Session Type: Clinical Science Symposium
Presenter: Jonathan E. Rosenberg, M.D., medical oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Collaborator(s): Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Date and Time: Sunday, June 5, 2016 from 10:21 – 10:33 a.m. CT
Title: Hybrid Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing (HC NGS) in Melanoma to Identify Markers of Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1
Abstract Number: 105
Location: Hall D1
Session: Immunotherapy: Now We’re Getting Personal – Using Genomics and Biomarkers to Predict Response
Session Type: Clinical Science Symposium
Presenter: Douglas Buckner Johnson, M.D., M.S.C.I., clinical director, melanoma, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Collaborator(s): Vanderbilt University

The schedule for poster discussions by Foundation Medicine and/or its collaborators is as follows:

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Discussion Time: 3:00 – 4:15 p.m. CT
Title: Genomic Profiling to Distinguish Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Arising in Different Sites
Abstract Number: 4020
Poster Board Number: 12
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Discussion Location: Hall D1
Session: Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer
Presenter: Emily K. Bergsland, M.D., endowed chair in medical oncology, University of California San Francisco
Collaborator(s): University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Discussion Time: 3:00 – 4:15 p.m. CT
Title: Total Mutation Burden (TMB) in Lung Cancer (LC) and Relationship with Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Targeted Therapies
Abstract Number: 9017
Poster Board Number: 340
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Discussion Location: E354b
Session: Lung Cancer – Non-Small Cell Metastatic
Presenter: David R. Spigel, M.D., chief scientific officer; director, lung cancer research program; principal investigator, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Collaborator(s): Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Discussion Time: 3:00 – 4:15 p.m. CT
Title: Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of 298 Lung Cancers of Varying Histologies Harboring MET Exon 14 Alterations
Abstract Number: 9021
Poster Board Number: 344
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Discussion Location: E354b
Session: Lung Cancer – Non-Small Cell Metastatic
Presenter: Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, M.D., Ph.D., medical oncologist, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine
Collaborator(s): Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Discussion Time: 4:45 – 6:00 p.m. CT
Title: Comprehensive Genomic Sequencing (CGS) of 90 Patient Samples of Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (ATC)
Abstract Number: 6014
Poster Board Number: 336
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Discussion Location: S406
Session: Head and Neck Cancer
Presenter: Saad A. Khan, M.D., medical oncologist, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Collaborator(s): The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Discussion Time: 1:15 – 2:30 p.m. CT
Title: Evaluation of Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status in 11,573 Diverse Solid Tumors using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP)
Abstract Number: 1523
Poster Board Number: 346
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Discussion Location: S404
Session: Cancer Prevention, Hereditary Genetics and Epidemiology
Presenter: Michael J. Hall, M.D., M.S., associate professor; director, gastrointestinal risk assessment, Fox Chase Cancer Center
Collaborator(s): Fox Chase Cancer Center

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Discussion Time: 4:45 – 6:00 p.m. CT
Title: DNA-Based Genomic Profiling for Classification of Tissue of Origin for Patients with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site
Abstract Number: 11519
Poster Board Number: 216
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Discussion Location: S406
Session: Tumor Biology
Presenter: Michael Goldberg, clinical data analyst II cancer genomics, Foundation Medicine

The schedule for poster presentations by Foundation Medicine and/or its collaborators is as follows:

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: Tumor Mutational Burden as a Potential Biomarker for PD-11/PD-L1 Therapy in Colorectal Cancer
Abstract Number: 3587
Poster Board Number: 284
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancers
Presenter: Thomas J. George, M.D., F.A.C.P., medical director, gastrointestinal oncology, University of Florida
Collaborator(s): University of Florida

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: Genomic Distinctions Between Colon and Rectal Cancer in Young Patients
Abstract Number: 3574
Poster Board Number: 271
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer
Presenter: Joshua E. Meyer, M.D., assistant professor; residency/fellowship training director, department of radiation oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center
Collaborator(s): Fox Chase Cancer Center

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: MDM2 Amplification (Amp) to Mediate Cabozantinib Resistance in Patients (Pts) with Advanced RET-Rearranged Lung Cancers
Abstract Number: 9068
Poster Board Number: 391
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Lung Cancer – Non-Small cell Metastatic
Presenter: Romel Somwar, Ph.D., senior research scientist, pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Collaborator(s): Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: Lung-MAP (S1400) Lung Cancer Master Protocol: Accrual, Demographics, and Molecular Markers
Abstract Number: 9088
Poster Board Number: 411
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Lung Cancer – Non-Small Cell Metastatic
Presenter: Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou, M.D., professor, department of thoracic/head and neck medical oncology, medical oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborator(s): The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: Emerging genomic landscape and therapeutic targets in young patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Abstract Number: 3589
Poster Board Number: 286
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer
Presenter: Christopher Hanyoung Lieu, M.D., director, Colorectal Medical Oncology Program, deputy director, Cancer Clinical Trials Office, University of Colorado
Collaborator(s): University of Colorado

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: Significant Systematic and CNS Activity of the RET Inhibitor Vandetanib Combined with mTOR inhibitor Everolimus in Patients with Advanced NSCLC with RET fusion
Abstract Number: 9069
Poster Board Number: 392
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Lung Cancer – Non-Small Cell Metastatic
Presenter: Tina Cascone, M.D., Ph.D., hematology/oncology fellow, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborator(s): The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: TMPRSS-ERG Fusion in Men with Prostate cancer(PCa) and Non-prostate Malignancies: Defining a role for Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) to guide Clinical Care
Abstract Number: 5037
Poster Board Number: 294
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer
Presenter: Primo Lara, M.D., associate director for translational research, University of California, Davis
Collaborator(s): University of California, Davis

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Analysis of Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) in > 51,000 Clinical Cancer Patients to identify Novel Non-Coding PMS2 Promoter Mutations Associated with increased TMB
Abstract Number: 9572
Poster Board Number: 177
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Melanoma/Skin Cancers
Presenter: Zachary Rockow Chalmers, senior research associate, Foundation Medicine

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Prostate
Abstract Number: 5027
Poster Board Number: 284
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Genitourinary (Prostate) cancer
Presenter: Philip J. Stephens, Ph.D., chief scientific officer, Foundation Medicine

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Deep Sequencing of Metastatic Cutaneous Basal Cell and Squamous Cell Carcinomas to Reveal Distinctive Genomic Profiles and New Routes to Targeted Therapies
Abstract Number: 9522
Poster Board Number: 127
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Melanoma/Skin Cancers
Presenter: Jeffrey S. Ross, M.D., medical director, Foundation Medicine
Collaborator(s): Albany College of Medicine

Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: The Genomics of Young Lung Cancer
Abstract Number: 9083
Poster Board Number: 406
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Lung Cancer – Non-Small Cell Metastatic
Presenter: Barbara J. Gitlitz, M.D., associate professor of clinical medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine
Collaborator(s): University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine

Date and Time: Sunday, June 5, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Metastatic Breast Cancer: PD-L1 Protein Expression, CD274 Gene Amplification, and Total Mutational Burden
Abstract Number: 3057
Poster Board Number: 379
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research
Presenter: Jeffrey S. Ross, M.D., medical director, Foundation Medicine
Collaborator(s): Albany College of Medicine

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CT
Title: Distinct Age-Associated Genomic Profiles Identified in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Using FoundationOne Heme
Abstract Number: 7041
Poster Board Number: 33
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Hematologic Malignancies – Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant
Presenter: Katherine Tarlock, M.D., acting instructor, hematology-oncology, Seattle Children’s Hospital
Collaborator(s): Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Comparison of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder to Reveal Key Differences in Mutational Profile and Load
Abstract Number: 4522
Poster Board Number: 145
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Genitourinary (Nonprostate) Cancer
Presenter: Sumanta K. Pal, M.D., assistant clinical professor, department of medical oncology & therapeutics research, City of Hope
Collaborator(s): City of Hope

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Assessment of Tumor Mutation Burden from > 60,000 Clinical Cancer Patients Using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling
Abstract Number: 11558
Poster Board Number: 255
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Tumor Biology
Presenter: Garrett Michael Frampton, Ph.D., associate director, bioinformatics, Foundation Medicine

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Immunotherapy (IO) Versus Targeted Therapy Triage in Advanced Endometrial Adenocarcinoma (aEA) by Coordinate Assessment Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB), Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Status, and Targetable Genomic Alterations (GA)
Abstract Number: 5591
Poster Board Number: 414
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Gynecologic Cancer
Presenter: Alessandro Santin, M.D., professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences; clinical research program leader, gynecologic oncology program, Yale School of Medicine
Collaborator(s): Yale School of Medicine

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Comprehensive Genomic Profiling to Identify Clinically Relevant Genomic Alterations in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancers
Abstract Number: 4573
Poster Board Number: 195
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Genitourinary (Nonprostate) Cancer
Presenter: Andre Poisl Fay, M.D.
Collaborator(s): Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul School of Medicine

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Decision Impact Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study
Abstract Number: 11578
Poster Board Number: 275
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Tumor Biology
Presenter: Raquel E. Reinbolt, M.D., assistant professor, internal medicine, college of medicine, The Ohio State University
Collaborator(s): The Ohio State University Medical Center James Comprehensive Cancer Center

Date and Time: Monday, June 6, 2016 from 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. CT
Title: Investigating the Utility of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Abstract Number: TPS11617
Poster Board Number: 312b
Poster Display Location: Hall A
Session: Tumor Biology
Presenter: Casey B. Williams, Pharm.D., BCOP, director, molecular and experimental medicine, Avera Health
Collaborator(s): Avera Cancer Institute