Adaptimmune Announces First Patient to Receive One Billion Target Cell Dose after Positive Safety Data from Pilot Study with MAGE-A4 SPEAR T-cells

On June 4, 2018 Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc (Nasdaq:ADAP), a leader in T-cell therapy to treat cancer, reported that the independent safety review committee has recommended dose escalation in the MAGE-A4 basket study, based on an acceptable safety profile in three patients dosed with 100 million cells (Press release, Adaptimmune, JUN 4, 2018, View Source;p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2352953 [SID1234527138]). The company will start treating patients with the target dose of one billion transduced MAGE-A4 SPEAR T-cells in the ongoing basket study.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In addition, after confirming expression levels for MAGE-A4 from synovial sarcoma and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS) tumor samples, Adaptimmune has amended the study to add these two indications to the ongoing basket study, which already includes bladder, melanoma, head & neck, esophageal, gastric, ovarian, and non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancers. Screening of patients with synovial sarcoma and MRCLS is ongoing.

"Today’s announcement that we are dosing patients with one billion cells, which we believe is a potentially therapeutic dose based on data from NY-ESO, means that we are on target to get response data in our MAGE-A4 study, to which we have added two solid tumor indications, in 2018," said James Noble, Adaptimmune’s Chief Executive Officer. "This follows the earlier announcement that pilot studies in our other program, MAGE-A10, have also moved to the one billion cells dose."

Target validation, investigating antigen expression in tumor samples, has been a key focus for Adaptimmune to understand the breadth of patients that have the potential to benefit from SPEAR T-cell treatment. Data from monitoring target antigen expression levels across literature, databases, and tumor samples indicate that MAGE‑A4 is expressed in both synovial sarcoma and MRCLS. Evaluation of expression of target antigens, including MAGE-A4, in other cancers will continue.

The MAGE-A4 basket study is a Phase 1, open-label, pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Adaptimmune’s SPEAR T-cells targeting MAGE-A4 in cancers in which MAGE-A4 is expressed.

Conference Call Information
The Company will host a live teleconference to answer questions about the updated safety data today, June 4, 2018, at 8:00 a.m. EDT (1:00 p.m. BST). The live webcast of the conference call will be available via the events page of Adaptimmune’s corporate website at https://bit.ly/2shwniM. An archive will be available after the call at the same address. To participate in the live conference call, if preferred, please dial please dial +1-(833) 652-5917 (U.S.) or +1-(430) 775-1624 (International). After placing the call, please ask to be joined into the Adaptimmune conference call and provide the confirmation code (9199456).

Seattle Genetics Highlights Additional Analyses from Phase 3 ECHELON-1 Clinical Trial of ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab Vedotin) in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma at 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 4, 2018 Seattle Genetics, Inc. (Nasdaq:SGEN) reported that highlighted data from the phase 3 ECHELON-1 clinical trial evaluating ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin) in combination with chemotherapy in newly diagnosed stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting being held June 1-5 in Chicago, Illinois (Press release, Seattle Genetics, JUN 4, 2018, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2353005 [SID1234527154]). In March 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ADCETRIS in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classical HL based on the positive results of the phase 3 ECHELON-1 clinical trial. ADCETRIS is being evaluated globally as the foundation of therapy for HL in more than 50 ongoing clinical trials, including trials led by Seattle Genetics and its development and commercialization partner, Takeda, as well as by independent investigators.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"For over 40 years, the standard of care for the treatment of frontline HL in North America has been combination chemotherapy with ABVD. Unfortunately, approximately 30 percent of advanced stage HL patients will not respond or relapse to this therapy," said Radhakrishnan Ramchandren, M.D., Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center. "The ECHELON-1 phase 3 clinical trial is the first trial to demonstrate superior clinical activity utilizing a novel therapeutic agent, ADCETRIS, in combination with AVD in comparison to ABVD. At ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2018, we presented outcomes specifically evaluating the North American population, which demonstrated a two-year modified progression-free survival benefit of approximately 11 percent over ABVD. Importantly, an analysis of traditional progression-free survival at two years also demonstrated a benefit for ADCETRIS plus AVD versus ABVD with a difference of 11.7 percent, a Hazard Ratio of 0.500 and a p-value of 0.002. These findings represent a significant and meaningful difference in outcomes for these patients."

"Our goal is to establish ADCETRIS as the foundation of care for CD30-expressing lymphomas, including HL, and the data presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) continue to support this goal," said Nancy Whiting, Pharm.D., Senior Vice President, Clinical Affairs at Seattle Genetics. "Multiple posters featuring additional analyses from the ECHELON-1 trial for ADCETRIS combination use in the treatment of patients with stage III or IV classical HL demonstrate superior efficacy benefit when compared with ABVD. In addition, data from an ongoing phase 2 study evaluating frontline use of ADCETRIS in older HL patients demonstrate a durable efficacy benefit with both monotherapy and combination therapy. Our data at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) highlight the substantial potential for ADCETRIS to address the needs of patients with lymphoma."

Three poster presentations highlight analyses from the ECHELON-1 phase 3 clinical trial evaluating ADCETRIS in combination with AVD (Adriamycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) compared to ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) in stage III or IV frontline classical HL patients. The ECHELON-1 poster presentations include the results of the North American patient population, optimizing therapy with the use of primary prophylactic growth factors (G-CSF) and improvement of modified progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in patients who received ADCETRIS plus AVD regardless of cycle 2 PET (PET2) status. In addition, long-term follow-up from an ongoing phase 2 clinical trial in newly diagnosed older HL patients was reported.

Brentuximab Vedotin plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: North American Results (Abstract #7541, poster presentation on Monday, June 4, 2018)

Of the 1,334 advanced stage classical HL patients who participated in the ECHELON-1 clinical trial, 497 patients were treated in North America, with 250 patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm and 247 patients in the ABVD control arm. The North American results presented by Dr. Radhakrishnan Ramchandren, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center, are included below and a video summary of the poster presentation can be found here:

Per Independent Review Facility (IRF) assessment, the two-year modified PFS rate for patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm was 84.3 percent compared to 73.7 percent in the control arm (HR 0.596; p-value=0.012), which corresponds to a difference of 10.6 percent.
Per investigator assessment, the two-year modified PFS rate for patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm was 86.4 percent compared to 73.6 percent in the control arm (HR 0.516; p-value=0.002), which corresponds to a difference of 12.8 percent.
Per investigator assessment, the two-year PFS rate for patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm was 88.1 percent compared to 76.4 percent in the control arm (HR 0.500; p-value=0.002), which corresponds to a difference of 11.7 percent.
Consistent improvement in modified PFS per IRF was observed among patients treated with ADCETRIS plus AVD compared with ABVD across all pre-specified subgroups, including age, disease stage, International Prognostic Score and baseline ECOG score.
On the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm, peripheral neuropathy events were observed in 80 percent of patients compared to 56 percent on the ABVD arm. In the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm, the majority of peripheral neuropathy events were Grade 1 or 2 (41 percent and 21 percent, respectively). Grade 3 events were reported in 17 percent of patients. In the ABVD arm, Grade 3 events were reported in less than one percent of patients. There were no Grade 4 events on either arm. Across both arms of the study, approximately 75 percent of the patients with peripheral neuropathy reported resolution or improvement at last follow-up.
Febrile neutropenia during treatment was reported in 20 percent of patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm compared with nine percent in the ABVD arm. In the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm, 35 patients received primary prophylactic G-CSF within five days of starting treatment and nine percent (three patients) reported febrile neutropenia.
Pulmonary toxicity was reported in three percent of patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm versus ten percent of patients in the ABVD arm. Grade ≥3 events were reported in two percent versus six percent of patients, in the ADCETRIS plus AVD and ABVD arms, respectively.
Improving Outcomes with Brentuximab Vedotin plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (Abstract #7534, poster presentation on Monday, June 4, 2018)

During the ECHELON-1 clinical trial, an independent monitoring committee (IDMC) recommended the use of primary prophylactic G-CSF for patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm of the study due to an increased risk of febrile neutropenia. In the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm, 83 patients received G-CSF primary prophylaxis (defined as receipt of G-CSF by day five of the first treatment cycle) and 579 patients did not. An analysis of these two patient populations in the ECHELON-1 study presented by Dr. David Straus, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, included:

The two-year modified PFS rate for patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm who received G-CSF primary prophylaxis was 84.6 percent compared to 81.7 percent for those who did not (HR 0.737; 95% CI, 0.396 to 1.372) and compared to 77.2 percent in the ABVD control arm (HR 0.586; 95% CI, 0.317 to 1.081).
Use of G-CSF primary prophylaxis in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm was associated with a decrease in neutropenia (35 percent versus 73 percent), overall febrile neutropenia (11 percent versus 21 percent) and febrile neutropenia in the first treatment cycle (one percent versus 11 percent). Seven of the nine deaths that occurred in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm were associated with neutropenia, none of whom had received primary prophylaxis with G-CSF before the onset of neutropenia.
There was no evidence of an association between use of G-CSF primary prophylaxis and pulmonary toxicity.
In the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm, incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 57 percent in patients with G-CSF primary prophylaxis versus 68 percent without.
Lastly, use of G-CSF primary prophylaxis was associated with a lower rate of ADCETRIS dose delays and dose reductions compared to those without.
Brentuximab Vedotin with Chemotherapy for Stage III or IV Hodgkin Lymphoma: Impact of Cycle 2 PET Result on Modified Progression-Free Survival (Abstract #7539, poster presentation on Monday, June 4, 2018)

A post-hoc analysis of the ECHELON-1 clinical trial was conducted to evaluate modified PFS outcomes and clinical characteristics by PET2 status per IRF. In the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm of the study, 588 patients were PET2-negative (Deauville score ≤3) and 47 were PET2-positive (Deauville score ≥4). In the ABVD arm of the study, 577 patients were PET2-negative and 58 were PET2-positive. The analysis presented by Dr. Robert Chen, City of Hope National Medical Center, included:

ADCETRIS plus AVD improved modified PFS outcomes in patients regardless of PET2 status. The modified PFS in PET2-negative patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm was 85.2 percent compared to 80.9 percent in the ABVD arm (HR 0.774; 95% CI, 0.586 to 1.022). The modified PFS in PET2-positive patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm was 57.5 percent compared to 42.0 percent in the ABVD arm (HR 0.609; 95% CI, 0.341 to 1.088). PET2-positive patients in the ADCETRIS plus AVD arm had superior results compared to historical controls.
The safety profile of ADCETRIS plus AVD in the ECHELON-1 trial was generally consistent with that known for the single-agent components of the regimen. There were no notable differences in the safety profile between PET2-positive or PET2-negative subgroups in either arm of the study.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Brentuximab Vedotin +/- Dacarbazine as First-Line Therapy in Elderly Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (Abstract #7542, poster presentation on Monday, June 4, 2018)

Long-term follow-up results were presented from an ongoing phase 2 clinical trial evaluating ADCETRIS alone or in combination with dacarbazine as frontline therapy for HL patients age 60 years or older. Data were reported from 27 patients treated with ADCETRIS monotherapy and 22 patients treated with ADCETRIS in combination with dacarbazine. The median age of patients was 78 years in the ADCETRIS monotherapy arm and 69 years in the dacarbazine combination arm. Over 60 percent of patients in each arm had stage III/IV disease at the time of diagnosis and the majority were frail with multiple comorbidities. Long-term data highlighted by Dr. Jonathan Friedberg, University of Rochester, included:

In the ADCETRIS monotherapy arm, the median observation time from first dose was 42.6 months. Estimated three-year PFS and overall survival rates were 34 percent and 71 percent, respectively, with no deaths occurring within 30 days of last treatment. Median PFS was 10.48 months and median overall survival had not yet been reached.
In the dacarbazine combination arm, the median observation time from first dose was 37.8 months. Estimated three-year PFS and overall survival rates were 52 percent and 90 percent, respectively, with no deaths occurring within 30 days of last treatment. Both median PFS and overall survival had not yet been reached.
Treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy of any grade was observed in 24 patients (89 percent) in the ADCETRIS arm and 19 patients (86 percent) in the dacarbazine combination arm, with most Grade 1 or 2 and sensory in nature. The majority of patients with treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy had either complete resolution or some resolution or improvement.
Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation in the ADCETRIS monotherapy arm were peripheral sensory neuropathy (30 percent), peripheral motor neuropathy (seven percent) and orthostatic hypotension (four percent). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation in the dacarbazine combination arm were peripheral sensory neuropathy (36 percent); asthenia, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypotension and non-cardiac chest pain (five percent each).
ADCETRIS in combination with dacarbazine is not approved for use in frontline HL.

About ECHELON-1

ECHELON-1 is a randomized, open-label, two-arm, multi-center phase 3 study designed to compare ADCETRIS plus (Adriamycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) to ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) as frontline therapy in patients with previously untreated advanced classical HL. The primary endpoint is modified progression-free survival (PFS) per Independent Review Facility (IRF). Modified PFS is defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy per IRF followed by subsequent anticancer therapy. The study enrolled 1,334 patients who had histologically-confirmed diagnosis of Stage III or IV Hodgkin lymphoma and had not been previously treated with systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

About Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Lymphoma is a general term for a group of cancers that originate in the lymphatic system. There are two major categories of lymphoma: Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma is distinguished from other types of lymphoma by the presence of one characteristic type of cell, known as the Reed-Sternberg cell. The Reed-Sternberg cell expresses CD30.

According to the American Cancer Society, approximately 8,500 cases of Hodgkin lymphoma will be diagnosed in the United States during 2018 and more than 1,000 will die from the disease. Approximately half of all newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma patients have Stage III/IV disease. According to the Lymphoma Coalition, over 62,000 people worldwide are diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma each year and approximately 25,000 people die each year from this cancer.

About ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin)

ADCETRIS is being evaluated broadly in more than 70 clinical trials, including two ongoing phase 3 studies: the ECHELON-2 trial in frontline mature T-cell lymphomas (also known as peripheral T-cell lymphoma) and the CHECKMATE 812 trial of ADCETRIS in combination with Opdivo (nivolumab) for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

ADCETRIS is an ADC comprising an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody attached by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), utilizing Seattle Genetics’ proprietary technology. The ADC employs a linker system that is designed to be stable in the bloodstream but to release MMAE upon internalization into CD30-expressing tumor cells.

ADCETRIS injection for intravenous infusion has received FDA regular approval for five indications in adult patients with: (1) previously untreated Stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), in combination with chemotherapy, (2) cHL at high risk of relapse or progression as post-autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) consolidation, (3) cHL after failure of auto-HSCT or failure of at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens in patients who are not auto-HSCT candidates, (4) sALCL after failure of at least one prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen, and (5) primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL) or CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides (MF) who have received prior systemic therapy.

Health Canada granted ADCETRIS approval with conditions for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and sALCL in 2013, and non-conditional approval for post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma patients at increased risk of relapse or progression.

ADCETRIS received conditional marketing authorization from the European Commission in October 2012. The approved indications in Europe are: (1) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory CD30-positive Hodgkin lymphoma following ASCT, or following at least two prior therapies when ASCT or multi-agent chemotherapy is not a treatment option, (2) the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory sALCL, (3) for the treatment of adult patients with CD30-positive Hodgkin lymphoma at increased risk of relapse or progression following ASCT, and (4) for the treatment of adult patients with CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after at least one prior systemic therapy.

ADCETRIS has received marketing authorization by regulatory authorities in 71 countries for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and sALCL. See select important safety information, including Boxed Warning, below.

Seattle Genetics and Takeda are jointly developing ADCETRIS. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, Seattle Genetics has U.S. and Canadian commercialization rights and Takeda has rights to commercialize ADCETRIS in the rest of the world. Seattle Genetics and Takeda are funding joint development costs for ADCETRIS on a 50:50 basis, except in Japan where Takeda is solely responsible for development costs.

Opdivo (nivolumab) 3 mg/kg Demonstrates Sustained, Superior Recurrence-Free Survival Versus Yervoy (ipilimumab) 10 mg/kg for Broad Range of Patients with Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma

On June 4, 2018 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY) reported updated results from the Phase 3 CheckMate -238 trial evaluating Opdivo (nivolumab) versus Yervoy (ipilimumab) in patients with stage IIIB/C or stage IV melanoma who are at high risk of recurrence following complete surgical resection (Press release, Bristol-Myers Squibb, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527123]). In updated results from the study, Opdivo continued to demonstrate statistically longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 62.6%, the primary endpoint of the study, versus 50.2% for Yervoy (HR: 0.66, P<0.0001) at a minimum follow-up of 24 months across key subgroups, including disease stages and BRAF mutation status.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

No new safety data were generated as part of the 24-month analysis. As previously reported from the 18-month analysis, Opdivo demonstrated a significantly lower rate of adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation (9.7% of patients in the Opdivo arm compared to 42.6% of patients in the Yervoy arm) and treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs (14.4% of patients in the Opdivo arm compared to 45.9% in the Yervoy arm).

Findings will be presented on Monday, June 4 from 8:24-8:36 AM CDT during the Melanoma/Skin Cancers session at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting 2018 in Chicago (Abstract #9502).

"The broader use of Immuno-Oncology agents has changed the cancer treatment landscape and, with advances in research, we have been able to extend the use of these agents to adjuvant therapy in melanoma in order to help prevent disease recurrence," noted Jeffrey S. Weber, M.D., Ph.D., principal investigator of CheckMate -238. "Results from the study’s 24-month follow-up, the longest follow-up of any PD-1 inhibitor in the adjuvant setting, continue to strongly support the benefit of nivolumab across multiple stages of melanoma and BRAF mutation status."

Arvin Yang, M.D., Ph.D., development lead, melanoma and genitourinary cancers, Bristol-Myers Squibb, said, "The updated CheckMate -238 data continue to show that adjuvant treatment can change the course of melanoma by preventing relapse and progression to an advanced stage."

Additional Data from CheckMate -238 at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2018

In the study, Opdivo demonstrated superior RFS versus Yervoy, regardless of disease stage, PD-L1 expression or BRAF mutation status, with RFS rates of 62.6% with Opdivo compared to 50.2% with Yervoy in the intent-to-treat patient population. In patients with stage IIIB melanoma, RFS rates at 24 months for Opdivo were 70.8% versus 60.7% with Yervoy; for patients with stage IIIC melanoma, RFS rates were 58.0% with Opdivo versus 45.4% with Yervoy; and for patients with stage IV melanoma, RFS rates for Opdivo were 58.0% versus 44.3% with Yervoy. In patients with BRAF mutant melanoma, RFS rates for Opdivo were 61.9% versus 51.7% with Yervoy; in patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma, Opdivo demonstrated a RFS of 63.5% versus 46.2% with Yervoy.

About CheckMate -238

CheckMate -238 is an ongoing Phase 3, randomized double-blind study of Opdivo versus Yervoy in patients who have undergone complete resection of stage IIIB/C or stage IV melanoma. The trial randomized 906 patients 1:1 to receive either Opdivo 3 mg/kg every two weeks (n=453) or Yervoy 10 mg/kg (n=453) every three weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks starting at week 24. Patients were treated until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent for up to one year. The primary endpoint is RFS, defined as the time between randomization and the date of first recurrence, new primary melanoma or death. After meeting the primary endpoint, the trial will continue to evaluate for overall survival, a secondary endpoint.

Adjuvant Therapy in Melanoma

Melanoma is separated into five staging categories (stages 0 to 4) based on the in-situ feature, thickness and ulceration of the tumor, whether the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes, and how far the cancer has spread beyond lymph nodes.

Stage III melanoma has reached the regional lymph nodes but has not yet spread to distant lymph nodes or to other parts of the body (metastasized), and requires surgical resection of the primary tumor as well as the involved lymph nodes. Some patients may also be treated with adjuvant therapy. Despite surgical intervention and possible adjuvant treatment, most patients experience disease recurrence and progress to metastatic disease. By five years, the majority of stage IIIB and IIIC patients (68% and 89%, respectively) experience disease recurrence.

“Pharmacodynamics and Genomic Profiling of Patients Treated With Cabiralizumab + Nivolumab Provide Evidence of On-Target Tumor Immune Modulations and Support Future Clinical Applications”


On June 4, 2018, a poster titled "Pharmacodynamics and Genomic Profiling of Patients Treated With Cabiralizumab + Nivolumab Provide Evidence of On-Target Tumor Immune Modulations and Support Future Clinical Applications" was presented at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting (Presentation, Five Prime Therapeutics, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527139]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

SELLAS Life Sciences Presents Interim Phase 1 Clinical Data of Galinpepimut-S (GPS) in Combination with Nivolumab to Treat Wilms Tumor 1 Positive (WT1+) Ovarian Cancer Patients at ASCO 2018

On June 4, 2018 SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SLS) ("SELLAS" or "the Company") reported that interim Phase 1 data of GPS in combination with nivolumab in patients with WT1+ ovarian cancer in second or third remission after salvage chemotherapy at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting (Press release, Sellas Life Sciences, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527155]). The presentation, "A phase I study of concomitant galinpepimut-S (GPS) in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with WT1+ ovarian cancer (OC) in second or third remission," is being delivered by Roisin E. O’Cearbhaill, M.D., Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, during the "Gynecologic Cancer" session from 1:15 to 4:45 p.m. CT. The primary endpoint of the study is safety and assessment of toxicity, and treatment is continued until disease progression or toxicity. The secondary endpoint is immune response, and the exploratory endpoints include landmark 1-year PFS rate compared to historical controls and correlative analyses between clinical and immune responses.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Exploratory efficacy interim data from this open-label Phase 1 investigator-sponsored trial showed that GPS, when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor, demonstrated PFS of 64% at one year in an intent to treat (ITT) group of 11 evaluable patients with WT1+ ovarian cancer in second or greater remission. Among patients who received at least three doses of GPS in combination with nivolumab, PFS at one year was 70% (7/10). The historical rates with best standard treatment do not exceed 50% in this disease setting. The most common adverse events were Grade 1 or 2, including fatigue and injection site reactions. Dose limiting toxicity was observed in one patient, following the second dose of the combination. No additional adverse event burden was observed for the combination as compared to nivolumab monotherapy. WT1 is a tumor antigen that is expressed in about half of ovarian cancers. The combination induced a high frequency of T- and B-cell immune responses.

Based on these safety, clinical activity and immunogenicity data, SELLAS expects to initiate a Phase 1/2 clinical study of GPS in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in a variety of tumor types, including WT1+ ovarian cancer in the third quarter of 2018.

"Patients with advanced relapsed ovarian cancer, in which WT1 is highly expressed, have few treatment options with limited efficacy," said Angelos Stergiou, MD, ScD h.c., President & Chief Executive Officer of SELLAS. "The interim data being presented today further support the therapeutic potential of GPS in high-risk cancer populations, including ovarian cancer. In this Phase 1 trial, the combination of GPS and nivolumab showed promising clinical and immune response activity with no additional adverse event burden as compared to nivolumab monotherapy, warranting further evaluation. These data bolster our commitment to developing GPS, alone and in combination, across a wide range of cancers, and we look forward to initiating our Phase 1/2 basket trial investigating the combination of GPS with pembrolizumab in five WT1+ tumor types, including ovarian, small cell lung, colorectal and triple negative breast cancer and acute myeloid leukemia."

Of the 11 patients evaluated:

7 patients were in second remission and 4 patients were in third remission
10 patients received six total doses of GPS (800 mcg) over 12 weeks in combination with seven infusions of I.V. nivolumab (3 mg/kg) over 14 weeks
all underwent toxicity assessments with each dose of GPS, and three weeks after the completion of therapy at Week 15. Non-progressors at Week 15 were permitted to receive four additional GPS doses, administered every eight weeks.
With regard to clinical and immune responses:

in 11 evaluable patients, the landmark 1-year PFS rate was 64% in the ITT group and 70% in the ten patients who received at least three doses of GPS + nivolumab. Historical rates do not exceed 50% in this disease setting
serum levels of antigen-specific IgG, against both individual WT1 peptides within GPS and the full-length WT1 protein, were induced in 86% of patients
achievement of high titers of WT1-specific IgG post-GPS results from Immunoglobulin (Ig) M to IgG class switching, the latter being a surrogate marker of induction of activated T-helper (Th) cells after vaccination
antigen-specific T-cell responses to individual WT1 peptides were observed between Weeks 6-15, primarily CD4 T-cells and, to a smaller extent, CD8 T-cells
"Effective consolidation or maintenance strategies are needed to prevent further recurrence or to prolong remission in patients with ovarian cancer after successful salvage from a previous relapse. In this setting, immune-directed therapy with a combination of blocker nivolumab and GPS, a multivalent, heteroclitic peptide vaccine targeting WT1, an antigen expressed in about half of ovarian cancers, led to high rates of antigen-specific immunization. We anticipate that this enhanced immunogenicity will translate into a reduction in relapses in larger studies," mentioned Dr. O’Cearbhaill. She added "these encouraging interim data suggest that the combination of GPS plus PD-1 inhibitors deserves further study in WT1+ ovarian cancer."

About Galinpepimut-S (GPS):
GPS is a heteroclitic multivalent, multi-peptide cancer immunotherapeutic agent composed of four peptides, addressing over 20 epitopes, and derived from the WT1 protein, which has been ranked by the National Cancer Institute as a top priority among cancer antigens for immunotherapy. Importantly, because the WT1 antigen is overexpressed in many malignancies, and is not found in most normal tissues, GPS has the potential to be a broad immunotherapy, effective across a multitude of diverse cancer types and patient populations.