On June 5, 2016 Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, reported updated findings from a study evaluating KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), the company’s anti-PD-1 therapy, in patients with advanced cancers characterized as deficient for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) (Press release, Merck & Co, JUN 5, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513008]). Results showed that among previously treated patients with MMR-deficient tumors, there was an overall response rate (ORR) of 53 percent (n=16/30) (95% CI, 36-70) in patients with a range of advanced non-colorectal solid tumors and an ORR of 57 percent (n=16/28) (95% CI, 39-73) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer; in contrast, no responses were observed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer whose tumors were characterized as MMR-proficient (n=0/25). The findings, from a phase 2 study led by researchers from Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center in collaboration with Merck, were presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago (Abstracts #3003, #103).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We continue to be encouraged by the findings of this ongoing study evaluating KEYTRUDA in patients with mismatch repair deficient tumors," said Dr. Roger Dansey, senior vice president and therapeutic area head, oncology late-stage development, Merck Research Laboratories. "Characterization of biomarkers with the potential to predict clinical outcomes for patients receiving immune therapy for cancer is an important element of our clinical program for KEYTRUDA."

Merck is conducting a phase 2 registration study (KEYNOTE-164) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KEYTRUDA monotherapy in patients with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic (Stage IV) MMR-deficient or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer and a phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-177) in a treatment-naïve patient population. An additional phase 2 clinical trial (KEYNOTE-158) is evaluating patients with advanced tumors classified as MSI-H, excluding colorectal carcinoma.

The KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) clinical development program includes more than 30 tumor types in more than 270 clinical trials, including more than 100 trials that combine KEYTRUDA with other cancer treatments.

Updated Findings from Non-Colorectal Cancer Cohort (Abstract #3003) and Colorectal Cancer Cohort (Abstract #103)

The phase 2 study evaluated the clinical activity of KEYTRUDA monotherapy (10 mg/kg every two weeks) in patients with previously treated, progressive metastatic disease with or without MMR-deficiency. Three groups were evaluated: MMR-deficient non-colorectal cancers (n=30), MMR-deficient colorectal cancer (n=28), and MMR-proficient colorectal cancer (n=25). MMR status was assessed locally using a standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for detection of microsatellite instability. The key endpoints of the study were ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) measured by RECIST v1.1, and overall survival (OS).

Abstract #3003 described findings from a cohort of patients with MMR-deficient non-colorectal cancers (including ampullary/biliary, endometrial, gastric, pancreatic, prostate, sarcoma, and small bowel) who received KEYTRUDA. Results demonstrated an ORR of 53 percent (n=16/30) (95% CI, 36-70) – 30 percent were complete responses (n=9/30) and 23 percent were partial responses (n=7/30). Additionally, 17 percent of patients had stable disease (n=5/30), and the disease control rate was 70 percent (n=21/30) (95% CI, 52-83). Median PFS and OS were not reached at the time of analysis; median duration of follow-up was 10 months.

Abstract #103 described findings from two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer (MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient) who received KEYTRUDA. Among those patients with MMR-deficient tumors, an ORR of 57 percent was observed (n=16/28) (95% CI, 39-73) – 11 percent were complete responses (n=3/28) and 46 percent were partial responses (n=13/28). Additionally, 32 percent of patients had stable disease (n=9/28) and the disease control rate was 89 percent (n=25/28) (95% CI, 73-96). The median PFS and OS were not reached; median duration of follow-up was 9.3 months. Among patients with MMR-proficient tumors, no responses were observed (n=0/25) and the disease control rate was 16 percent (n=4/25) (95% CI, 6-35); 16 percent had stable disease (n=4/25). Additionally, in patients with MMR-proficient tumors, the median PFS was 2.3 months and the median OS was 5.98 months; median duration of follow-up was 6 months.

The safety profile of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies. For patients in the MMR-deficient non-colorectal cancers cohort, Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea/colitis (n=3) and pancreatitis (n=1). For patients in the colorectal cancer cohorts (MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient), Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea/colitis (n=1), pancreatitis (n=2), rash/pruritus (n=1), anemia (n=1), leukopenia (n=1), and thrombocytopenia (n=1).

Initial findings from this study evaluating KEYTRUDA (41 patients) were presented at the 2015 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting and simultaneously published online in the New England Journal of Medicine (Le et al. New Eng. J. Med. 372, 26, 2509). On November 2, 2015, Merck announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation to KEYTRUDA for the treatment of patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer.

About DNA Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability

Analysis of tumor DNA for microsatellite instability can be used to identify tumors with defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) systems. DNA MMR is a process that in normal cells permits the recognition and repair of genetic mismatches generated during DNA replication. A defective MMR system results in the persistence of DNA mismatches that may then be incorporated into the genetic code as mutations. The average tumor has dozens of mutations; however, tumors with DNA MMR-deficiency may harbor thousands, especially in regions of repetitive DNA known as microsatellites. Tumors that are found to have mutations in select microsatellite sequences, called microsatellite instability (MSI), are considered DNA MMR-deficient. These tumors are referred to as being "MSI-high." Overall, DNA MMR-deficiency is present in approximately 15-20 percent of tumors in Stage II disease, 10 percent in Stage III disease and approximately 5 percent or less in Stage IV disease. In colorectal cancers, MMR-deficiency is seen in approximately 15-20 percent of non-hereditary colorectal cancers and in most hereditary colorectal cancers associated with Lynch Syndrome.

About KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Injection 100 mg

KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by increasing the ability of the body’s immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. KEYTRUDA blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

KEYTRUDA is also indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 as determined by an FDA-approved test with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving KEYTRUDA. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. An improvement in survival or disease-related symptoms has not yet been established. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every three weeks for the approved indications.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab)

Immune-mediated pneumonitis, including fatal cases, occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Pneumonitis occurred in 32 (2.0%) of 1567 patients with melanoma, including Grade 1 (0.8%), 2 (0.8%), and 3 (0.4%) pneumonitis. Pneumonitis occurred in 19 (3.5%) of 550 patients with NSCLC, including Grade 2 (1.1%), 3 (1.3%), 4 (0.4%), or 5 (0.2%) pneumonitis and more frequently in patients with a history of asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.4%) or prior thoracic radiation (6.0%). Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Evaluate suspected pneumonitis with radiographic imaging. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent Grade 2 pneumonitis.

Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 31 (2%) of 1567 patients with melanoma, including Grade 2 (0.5%), 3 (1.1%), and 4 (0.1%) colitis. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 4 (0.7%) of 550 patients with NSCLC, including Grade 2 (0.2%) or 3 (0.4%) colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater colitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 or 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 colitis.

Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Hepatitis occurred in 16 (1%) of 1567 patients with melanoma, including Grade 2 (0.1%), 3 (0.7%), and 4 (0.1%) hepatitis. Monitor patients for changes in liver function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hepatitis and, based on severity of liver enzyme elevations, withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Hypophysitis occurred in 13 (0.8%) of 1567 patients with melanoma, including Grade 2 (0.3%), 3 (0.3%), and 4 (0.1%) hypophysitis. Hypophysitis occurred in 1 (0.2 %) of 550 patients with NSCLC, which was Grade 3 in severity. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis (including hypopituitarism and adrenal insufficiency). Administer corticosteroids and hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) for Grade 2; withhold or discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 hypophysitis.

Hyperthyroidism occurred in 51 (3.3%) of 1567 patients with melanoma, including Grade 2 (0.6%) and 3 (0.1%) hyperthyroidism. Hypothyroidism occurred in 127 (8.1%) of 1567 patients with melanoma, including Grade 3 (0.1%) hypothyroidism. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 10 (1.8%) of 550 patients with NSCLC, including Grade 2 (0.7%) or 3 (0.3%) hyperthyroidism. Hypothyroidism occurred in 38 (6.9%) of 550 patients with NSCLC, including Grade 2 (5.5%) or 3 (0.2%) hypothyroidism. Thyroid disorders can occur at any time during treatment. Monitor patients for changes in thyroid function (at the start of treatment, periodically during treatment, and as indicated based on clinical evaluation) and for clinical signs and symptoms of thyroid disorders. Administer replacement hormones for hypothyroidism and manage hyperthyroidism with thionamides and beta-blockers as appropriate. Withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) for Grade 3 or 4 hyperthyroidism.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus, including diabetic ketoacidosis, occurred in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes, and withhold KEYTRUDA and administer anti hyperglycemics in patients with severe hyperglycemia.

Immune-mediated nephritis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Nephritis occurred in 7 (0.4%) of 1567 patients with melanoma including, Grade 2 (0.2%), 3 (0.2%), and 4 (0.1%) nephritis. Monitor patients for changes in renal function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater nephritis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 nephritis.

Other clinically important immune-mediated adverse reactions can occur. For suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, ensure adequate evaluation to confirm etiology or exclude other causes. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, withhold KEYTRUDA and administer corticosteroids. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Based on limited data from clinical studies in patients whose immune-related adverse reactions could not be controlled with corticosteroid use, administration of other systemic immunosuppressants can be considered. Resume KEYTRUDA when the adverse reaction remains at Grade 1 or less following corticosteroid taper. Permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) for any Grade 3 immune-mediated adverse reaction that recurs and for any life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reaction.

The following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% (unless otherwise indicated) of 1567 patients with melanoma: arthritis (1.6%), exfoliative dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid, uveitis, myositis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis, vasculitis, pancreatitis, hemolytic anemia, and partial seizures arising in a patient with inflammatory foci in brain parenchyma. The following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% of 550 patients with NSCLC: rash, vasculitis, hemolytic anemia, serum sickness, and myasthenia gravis.

Severe and life-threatening infusion-related reactions have been reported in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of infusion related reactions including rigors, chills, wheezing, pruritus, flushing, rash, hypotension, hypoxemia, and fever. For Grade 3 or 4 reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab).

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. If used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant during treatment, apprise the patient of the potential hazard to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of KEYTRUDA.

In Trial 6, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 9% of 555 patients with advanced melanoma; adverse reactions leading to discontinuation in more than one patient were colitis (1.4%), autoimmune hepatitis (0.7%), allergic reaction (0.4%), polyneuropathy (0.4%), and cardiac failure (0.4%). Adverse reactions leading to interruption of KEYTRUDA occurred in 21% of patients; the most common (≥1%) was diarrhea (2.5%). The most common adverse reactions with KEYTRUDA vs ipilimumab were fatigue (28% vs 28%), diarrhea (26% with KEYTRUDA), rash (24% vs 23%), and nausea (21% with KEYTRUDA). Corresponding incidence rates are listed for ipilimumab only for those adverse reactions that occurred at the same or lower rate than with KEYTRUDA.

In Trial 2, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 12% of 357 patients with advanced melanoma; the most common (≥1%) were general physical health deterioration (1%), asthenia (1%), dyspnea (1%), pneumonitis (1%), and generalized edema (1%). Adverse reactions leading to interruption of KEYTRUDA occurred in 14% of patients; the most common (≥1%) were dyspnea (1%), diarrhea (1%), and maculo-papular rash (1%). The most common adverse reactions with KEYTRUDA vs chemotherapy were fatigue (43% with KEYTRUDA), pruritus (28% vs 8%), rash (24% vs 8%), constipation (22% vs 20%), nausea (22% with KEYTRUDA), diarrhea (20% vs 20%), and decreased appetite (20% with KEYTRUDA). Corresponding incidence rates are listed for chemotherapy only for those adverse reactions that occurred at the same or lower rate than with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab).

KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 14% of 550 patients with NSCLC. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported at least 2% of patients were pleural effusion, pneumonia, dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonitis. The most common adverse reactions (reported in at least 20% of patients) were fatigue (44%), cough (29%), decreased appetite (25%), and dyspnea (23%).

No formal pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies have been conducted with KEYTRUDA.

It is not known whether KEYTRUDA is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, instruct women to discontinue nursing during treatment with KEYTRUDA and for 4 months after the final dose.

Safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA have not been established in pediatric patients.

Our Focus on Cancer

Our goal is to translate breakthrough science into innovative oncology medicines to help people with cancer worldwide. At Merck Oncology, helping people fight cancer is our passion and supporting accessibility to our cancer medicines is our commitment. Our focus is on pursuing research in immuno-oncology and we are accelerating every step in the journey – from lab to clinic – to potentially bring new hope to people with cancer.

As part of our focus on cancer, Merck is committed to exploring the potential of immuno-oncology, with one of the fastest-growing development programs in the industry. We are currently executing an expansive research program that includes more than 270 clinical trials evaluating our anti-PD-1 therapy across more than 30 tumor types. We also continue to strengthen our immuno-oncology portfolio through strategic acquisitions and prioritizing the development of several promising immunotherapeutic candidates with the potential to improve the treatment of advanced cancers.

For more information about our oncology clinical trials, visit www.merck.com/clinicaltrials.

On June 5, 2016 Foundation Medicine, Inc. (NASDAQ:FMI) and it collaborators reported data showing that higher tumor mutational burden, as estimated by comprehensive genomic profiling with FoundationOne, successfully predicted a greater likelihood of response and longer response duration to cancer immunotherapies in patients with advanced bladder cancer and metastatic melanoma as well as several other tumor types (Press release, Foundation Medicine, JUN 5, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513005]). The results were presented in two oral sessions, and several poster discussions at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) taking place in Chicago.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Successful application of cancer immunotherapy in the clinic is one of the most important advances in cancer treatment in decades," said Vincent Miller, M.D., chief medical officer at Foundation Medicine. "These data suggest that tumor mutational burden could serve as an independent predictive biomarker to aid clinicians in identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from cancer immunotherapies that target either the PD-1 or PD-L1 proteins."

Cancer immunotherapy works by helping the immune system mount an effective anti-cancer response, a process that depends in part on the recognition of cancer-specific proteins called neoantigens. Tumor mutational burden has been shown to correlate well with the number of neoantigens, and therefore it may help identify patients most likely to respond to cancer immunotherapies. By combining comprehensive genomic profiling of 315 genes utilizing the FoundationOne assay, with Foundation Medicine’s advanced and proprietary algorithm that filters out normal individual genomic variants, FoundationOne can reliably and accurately measure tumor mutational burden without the need for whole exome sequencing. Foundation Medicine expects to provide a CLIA-certified version of tumor mutational burden on all FoundationOne and FoundationOne Heme reports to physicians in the third quarter 2016.

Overview of Data Presentations

The IMvigor 210 study of TecentriqTM (atezolizumab; anti-PD-L1; Genentech/Roche) in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma evaluated three separate biomarkers: PD-L1 protein expression as measured by immunohistochemistry, molecular subtype as measured by gene expression and The Cancer Genome Atlas, and mutational load (often referred to as tumor mutational burden) as measured by FoundationOne. All three biomarkers were shown to be independent predictors of response to Tecentriq.

"PD-L1 Expression, Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Subtype and Mutational Load are Independent Predictors of Response to Atezolizumab (atezo) in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (mUC; Imvigor210)", by Jonathan E. Rosenberg, M.D., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [Abstract #104, Clinical Science Symposium, Sunday June 5, 9:57-10:09 AM].
"These results are particularly exciting given the amount of variability inherent to using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to measure biomarkers. There are many different PD-L1 IHC tests, for example, and pathologists often do not see agreement between them," stated Vamsidhar Velcheti, M.D., assistant professor, Solid Tumor Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic. "We need a truly quantitative and reproducible approach to predicting response to immunotherapies, and measuring tumor mutational burden using FoundationOne may provide us with that solution."

In a separate melanoma study, higher mutational burden as measured by FoundationOne was associated with a greater likelihood of response and a more durable response to pembrolizumab; anti-PD-1; Merck, nivolumab; anti-PD-1; Bristol Myers Squibb, and Tecentriq, thereby providing oncologists with greater confidence in the potential for clinical benefit from a host of newly approved immunotherapies.

"Hybrid Capture-Based Next Generation Sequencing (HC NGS) in Melanoma Identifies Markers of Response to Anti-PD1/PD-L1", by Douglas Buckner Johnson, M.D., M.S.C.I., Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center [Abstract #105, Clinical Science Symposium, Sunday June 5, 10:21-10:33 AM]
Dr. Miller continued, "The clinical reality is that some patients respond very well to cancer immunotherapies and others do not. As a result, the ability to leverage our molecular information platform to identify the right candidates for these immunotherapies is an important advance for the field of precision medicine. Matching the right therapy with the right patient has the potential to both improve outcomes and increase efficiency in the current care model."

These conclusions were further supported by two additional presentations at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 that demonstrated that total mutational burden could also predict response to cancer immunotherapy in lung and colorectal cancers:

"Total Mutational Burden (TMB) in Lung Cancer and Relationship with Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Targeted Therapies", by David R. Spigel, M.D., Sarah Cannon Research Institute [Abstract #9017, Poster Session, Saturday June 4, 8:00-11:30 AM].
"Tumor Mutational Burden as a Potential Biomarker for PD1/PD-L1 Therapy in Colorectal Cancer", by Thomas J. George, M.D., F.A.C.P., University of Florida [Abstract #3587, Poster Session, Saturday June 4, 8:00-11:30 AM].

On June 5, 2016 Exelixis, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXEL) and Ipsen (Euronext:IPN; ADR:IPSEY) reported overall survival (OS) results from the phase 3 METEOR trial of CABOMETYX (cabozantinib) tablets in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy (Press release, Exelixis, JUN 5, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175112 [SID:1234513004]). The findings will be presented during an oral abstract session today at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago, and were published today in The Lancet Oncology.1 The OS results demonstrate that CABOMETYX reduces the risk of death by one third versus everolimus.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Exelixis previously announced that METEOR met its primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints, OS and objective response rate.

"The overall survival benefit conferred by treatment with CABOMETYX — which was consistently favorable across a variety of prespecified and post-hoc patient subgroups — is a strong complement to the progression-free survival and objective response rate findings previously reported," said Toni Choueiri, M.D., Clinical Director, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. "With the recent FDA approval of CABOMETYX, patients in need of additional options now have access to a differentiated treatment demonstrated to help them live longer while also delaying the progression of their cancer."

In METEOR, at a median follow-up of nearly 19 months, CABOMETYX demonstrated an increase in median OS of nearly 5 months versus everolimus: 21.4 months versus 16.5 months for everolimus (HR 0.66, 95% CI [0.53-0.83], P=0.0003), corresponding to a 34 percent reduction in the risk of death.

CABOMETYX treatment resulted in consistent benefits in OS and PFS across various pre-specified and post-hoc analysis subgroups. Benefits were independent of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group (favorable, intermediate, or poor), number and type of prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies (one, or more than one), duration of first VEGFR TKI treatment (6 months or less, or more than 6 months), presence of bone and/or visceral metastases, and levels of the MET biomarker in tumors (high, low, or unknown). Additional details on benefits seen in subgroups of patients based on the presence of bone metastases and prior VEGFR TKI therapy will be presented in a poster session at 1 p.m. CDT on June 6.

"We are excited to share the detailed overall survival results from the METEOR trial with the oncology community at this year’s ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting," said Michael M. Morrissey, Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of Exelixis. "The five-year survival rate for patients diagnosed with advanced kidney cancer is only 12 percent, underscoring the need for new treatment options that help patients live longer while delaying the progression of their disease. Critically, CABOMETYX — the first FDA-approved therapy to demonstrate a benefit in all three key efficacy parameters — now shows consistent survival benefit across all subgroups of patients evaluated in METEOR."

"Recent data from the METEOR trial confirms the benefit in median overall survival of almost 5 months that CABOMETYX can provide to patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma," said Marc de Garidel, Chairman and CEO, Ipsen. "We are dedicated to diligently working with Exelixis and regulatory authorities to bring cabozantinib to patients who seek new therapeutic options with established survival benefits."

At the time of the analysis, the median duration of treatment in the trial was 8.3 months with CABOMETYX versus 4.4 months with everolimus. Dose reductions occurred for 62 percent and 25 percent of patients, respectively. Discontinuation rate due to an adverse event not related to disease progression was 12 percent with CABOMETYX and 11 percent with everolimus.

The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (15 percent), diarrhea (13 percent) and fatigue (11 percent) in the CABOMETYX arm and anemia (17 percent), fatigue (7 percent) and hyperglycemia (5 percent) in the everolimus arm. Serious adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 130 (39 percent) of cabozantinib-treated patients and in 129 (40 percent) of everolimus-treated patients.

On April 25, 2016 CABOMETYX was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

Please see Important Safety Information below and full U.S. prescribing information for CABOMETYX (cabozantinib) tablets at View Source

About the METEOR Phase 3 Pivotal Trial

METEOR was an open-label, event-driven trial of 658 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had failed at least one prior VEGFR TKI therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS in the first 375 patients treated. Secondary endpoints included OS and objective response rate in all enrolled subjects. The trial was conducted at approximately 200 sites in 26 countries, and enrollment was weighted toward Western Europe, North America, and Australia.

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 60 mg of CABOMETYX daily or 10 mg of everolimus daily and were stratified based on the number of prior VEGFR TKI therapies received and on MSKCC risk criteria. No cross-over was allowed between the study arms.

METEOR met its primary endpoint of significantly improving PFS. Compared with everolimus, CABOMETYX was associated with a 42 percent reduction in the rate of disease progression or death. Median PFS for CABOMETYX was 7.4 months versus 3.8 months for everolimus (HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.74, P<0.0001). CABOMETYX also significantly improved the objective response rate compared with everolimus (P<0.0001). These data were presented at the European Cancer Congress in September 2015 and published in The New England Journal of Medicine.2

Exelixis to Host Investor/Analyst Briefing Later Today

Exelixis will host a live investor/analyst briefing today, Sunday, June 5, 2016, from 7:30-9:30 p.m. EDT / 6:30-8:30 p.m. CDT / 4:30-6:30 p.m. PDT. During the briefing, Exelixis management and invited guest speakers will review and provide context for the cabozantinib data presented at the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting. The briefing will be webcast live and can be accessed by logging on to www.exelixis.com and proceeding to the Event Calendar page under Investors & Media. Please connect to the company’s website at least 15 minutes prior to the webcast to ensure adequate time for any software download that may be required to listen to the webcast. An archived replay of the webcast will also be available on the Event Calendar page under Investors & Media at www.exelixis.com for one year. A telephone replay of the webcast will be available until 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 7, 2016. Access numbers for the phone replay are: 855-859-2056 (domestic) and 404-537-3406 (international); the passcode is 15007787.

About Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

The American Cancer Society’s 2016 statistics cite kidney cancer as among the top ten most commonly diagnosed forms of cancer among both men and women in the U.S.3 Clear cell RCC is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults.4 If detected in its early stages, the five-year survival rate for RCC is high; for patients with advanced or late-stage metastatic RCC, however, the five-year survival rate is only 12 percent, with no identified cure for the disease.3 Approximately 17,000 patients in the U.S. and 37,000 globally require second-line or later treatment.5

The majority of clear cell RCC tumors have lower than normal levels of a protein called von Hippel-Lindau, which leads to higher levels of MET, AXL and VEGF.6,7 These proteins promote tumor angiogenesis (blood vessel growth), growth, invasiveness and metastasis.8-11 MET and AXL may provide escape pathways that drive resistance to VEGFR inhibitors.7,8

About CABOMETYX

CABOMETYX targets include MET, AXL and VEGFR-1, -2 and -3. In preclinical models, cabozantinib has been shown to inhibit the activity of these receptors, which are involved in normal cellular function and pathologic processes such as tumor angiogenesis, invasiveness, metastasis and drug resistance.

CABOMETYX, the tablet formulation of cabozantinib, is available in 20 mg, 40 mg or 60 mg doses. The recommended dose is 60 mg orally, once daily.

On April 25, 2016, the FDA approved CABOMETYX tablets for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

On January 28, 2016, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) validated Exelixis’ Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) for cabozantinib as a treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received one prior therapy. The MAA has been granted accelerated assessment, making it eligible for a 150-day review, versus the standard 210 days. On February 29, 2016, Exelixis and Ipsen jointly announced an exclusive licensing agreement for the commercialization and further development of cabozantinib indications outside of the United States, Canada and Japan.

Important Safety Information

Hemorrhage: Severe hemorrhage occurred with CABOMETYX. The incidence of Grade ≥3 hemorrhagic events was 2.1% in CABOMETYX-treated patients and 1.6% in everolimus-treated patients. Fatal hemorrhages also occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Do not administer CABOMETYX to patients that have or are at risk for severe hemorrhage.

Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforations and Fistulas: Fistulas were reported in 1.2% (including 0.6% anal fistula) of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0% of everolimus-treated patients. GI perforations were reported in 0.9% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0.6% of everolimus-treated patients. Fatal perforations occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Monitor patients for symptoms of fistulas and perforations. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who experience a fistula that cannot be appropriately managed or a GI perforation.

Thrombotic Events: CABOMETYX treatment results in an increased incidence of thrombotic events. Venous thromboembolism was reported in 7.3% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 2.5% of everolimus-treated patients. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 3.9% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0.3% of everolimus-treated patients. Events of arterial thromboembolism were reported in 0.9% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 0.3% of everolimus-treated patients. Fatal thrombotic events occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop an acute myocardial infarction or any other arterial thromboembolic complication.

Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis: CABOMETYX treatment results in an increased incidence of treatment-emergent hypertension. Hypertension was reported in 37% (15% Grade ≥3) of CABOMETYX-treated patients and 7.1% (3.1% Grade ≥3) of everolimus-treated patients. Monitor blood pressure prior to initiation and regularly during CABOMETYX treatment. Withhold CABOMETYX for hypertension that is not adequately controlled with medical management; when controlled, resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose. Discontinue CABOMETYX for severe hypertension that cannot be controlled with anti-hypertensive therapy. Discontinue CABOMETYX if there is evidence of hypertensive crisis or severe hypertension despite optimal medical management.

Diarrhea: Diarrhea occurred in 74% of patients treated with CABOMETYX and in 28% of patients treated with everolimus. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 11% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and in 2% of everolimus-treated patients. Withhold CABOMETYX in patients who develop intolerable Grade 2 diarrhea or Grade 3-4 diarrhea that cannot be managed with standard antidiarrheal treatments until improvement to Grade 1; resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose. Dose modification due to diarrhea occurred in 26% of patients.

Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia Syndrome (PPES): Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) occurred in 42% of patients treated with CABOMETYX and in 6% of patients treated with everolimus. Grade 3 PPES occurred in 8.2% of CABOMETYX-treated patients and in <1% of everolimus-treated patients. Withhold CABOMETYX in patients who develop intolerable Grade 2 PPES or Grade 3 PPES until improvement to Grade 1; resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose. Dose modification due to PPES occurred in 16% of patients.

Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS): RPLS, a syndrome of subcortical vasogenic edema diagnosed by characteristic finding on MRI, occurred in the cabozantinib clinical program. Perform an evaluation for RPLS in any patient presenting with seizures, headache, visual disturbances, confusion, or altered mental function. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop RPLS.

Embryo-fetal Toxicity: CABOMETYX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with CABOMETYX and for 4 months after the last dose.

Adverse Reactions: The most commonly reported (≥25%) adverse reactions are: diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, PPES, hypertension, vomiting, weight decreased, and constipation.

Drug Interactions: Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers: Reduce the dosage of CABOMETYX if concomitant use with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors cannot be avoided. Increase the dosage of CABOMETYX if concomitant use with strong CYP3A4 inducers cannot be avoided.

Lactation: Advise a lactating woman not to breastfeed during treatment with CABOMETYX and for 4 months after the final dose.

Reproductive Potential: Contraception―Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with CABOMETYX and for 4 months after the final dose. Infertility ―CABOMETYX may impair fertility in females and males of reproductive potential.

Hepatic Impairment: Reduce the CABOMETYX dose in patients with mild (Child-Pugh score [C-P] A) or moderate (C-P B) hepatic impairment. CABOMETYX is not recommended for use in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Please see full Prescribing Information at View Source

On June 5, 2016 Exelixis, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXEL) reported that its collaborator Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, will present preliminary results from a phase 1b clinical trial evaluating the safety and clinical activity of cobimetinib, an Exelixis-discovered MEK inhibitor, in combination with atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody discovered and developed by Genentech, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Press release, Exelixis, JUN 5, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175111 [SID:1234513003]). The results will be the subject of an oral presentation (Abstract #3502) today at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting, which is being held June 3-7 in Chicago, Illinois. Johanna Bendell, M.D., director of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Program at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, will present the results.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These early data on the combination of cobimetinib, an Exelixis-discovered MEK inhibitor, and atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody discovered and developed by Genentech, are encouraging and warrant further study in people with previously-treated metastatic colorectal cancer, including those with microsatellite stable disease," said Michael M. Morrissey, Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of Exelixis. "Based on these results, Genentech has initiated the COTEZO phase 3 trial in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer."

This ongoing phase 1b trial includes both a dose escalation stage and dose expansion stage. The trial’s primary objective is the evaluation of the safety and tolerability of the combination. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), as well as evaluation of biomarkers.

As of the February 12, 2016 data cut-off, 23 patients with advanced CRC (22 with mutant KRAS and one with wild-type KRAS) were enrolled during the trial’s escalation and expansion phases. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The median follow-up for safety in CRC patients was 3.8 months, with a range of 1.1 to 15.1 months. There were no all-cause grade 5 or treatment-related grade 4 AEs reported, and incidence of treatment-related grade 3 AEs was 35% (n=8). The most common treatment-related AEs, regardless of severity, included: diarrhea (70% of patients); fatigue (52%); dermatitis acneiform (44%); rash (35%); and nausea, maculopapular rash and pruritus (each 26%).

The ORR for the combination was 17%, including four confirmed partial responses; additionally five patients achieved stable disease. The median duration of response was not yet reached, with a range of 5.4 to more than 11.1 months.

Median PFS for all CRC patients enrolled in the trial was 2.3 months, with a range of 1.8 to 9.5 months. The six-month PFS was 35%. Median OS for all CRC patients was not evaluable, while six-month OS was 72%.

Recently Initiated COTEZO Phase 3 Pivotal Trial

In June 2016 Genentech initiated COTEZO, a phase 3 pivotal trial of the combination of cobimetinib and atezolizumab in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. The trial is expected to enroll 360 patients who have received at least two prior chemotherapies in the metastatic disease setting. The primary endpoint of the COTEZO trial is overall survival. More information about the COTEZO phase 3 pivotal trial is available at www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Additional Cobimetinib Data Presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016

The oral presentation in colorectal cancer is one of eight cobimetinib abstracts being presented at the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 Annual Meeting this week. Additional data presentations include studies of cobimetinib in combination with other therapies to treat triple-negative breast cancer and BRAF-mutant melanoma. For full logistical information on these other presentations, please see Exelixis’ ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) announcement press release issued on April 20, 2016, available online here.

About the Cobimetinib Development Collaboration

Exelixis discovered cobimetinib internally and advanced the compound to investigational new drug (IND) status. In late 2006, Exelixis entered into a worldwide collaboration agreement with Genentech, under which Exelixis received initial upfront and milestone payments for signing the agreement and submitting the IND. Following the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in phase 1 by Exelixis, Genentech exercised its option to further develop cobimetinib.

Under the terms of the collaboration, Exelixis is entitled to an initial equal share of U.S. profits and losses resulting from sales of cobimetinib to treat any form of cancer, which will decrease as sales increase, and will share in U.S. marketing and commercialization costs. In November 2013, Exelixis exercised its option to co-promote cobimetinib in the United States and, under the terms of the agreement, the company is fielding 25 percent of the U.S. sales force for the product’s first commercial indication in specific forms of BRAF mutation-positive advanced melanoma, closely coordinating its efforts with Genentech. Outside of the United States, Exelixis is eligible to receive royalties on any sales.

Cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib is now approved in multiple countries, including the United States, European Union, Switzerland, Canada, Australia and Brazil, to treat specific forms of BRAF mutation-positive advanced melanoma. Further country approvals are anticipated in 2016 and beyond. Cobimetinib is also the subject of a clinical development program aimed at evaluating its potential in combination with a variety of investigational and approved therapies in disease settings including metastatic melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer and advanced solid tumors.

COTELLIC Indication

COTELLIC (cobimetinib) is a prescription medicine that is used with ZELBORAF (vemurafenib), to treat a type of skin cancer called melanoma that has spread to other parts of the body or cannot be removed by surgery, and that has a certain type of abnormal "BRAF" gene.

A patient’s healthcare provider will perform a test for the BRAF gene to make sure that COTELLIC is right for them. It is not known if COTELLIC is safe and effective in children under 18 years of age.

COTELLIC Important Safety Information

Patients should avoid sunlight during treatment with COTELLIC. COTELLIC can make their skin sensitive to sunlight. They may burn more easily and get severe sunburns. To help protect against sunburn, they should wear clothes that protect their skin, including their head, face, hands, arms, and legs. They should use lip balm and a broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF 30 or higher.

COTELLIC may cause serious side effects, including risk of new skin cancers, bleeding problems, heart problems, severe rash, eye problems, liver problems, muscle problems (rhabdomyolysis), and photosensitivity. Patients should tell their doctor if they are pregnant or plan to become pregnant, as COTELLIC and ZELBORAF can harm an unborn baby. Patients who take COTELLIC should use effective methods of birth control during treatment, for 2 weeks after stopping COTELLIC, and for at least 2 months after stopping ZELBORAF. Do not breastfeed during treatment with COTELLIC and for 2 weeks after the final dose. Patients along with their healthcare provider should decide if they will take ZELBORAF or breastfeed. Patients should not do both.

Patients should tell their healthcare provider about all the medicines they take. Some types of medicines will affect the blood levels of COTELLIC.

Common side effects of COTELLIC include diarrhea, sunburn or sun sensitivity, nausea, fever, and vomiting. COTELLIC can also cause changes in blood test results.

Patients should tell their healthcare provider if they have any side effect that bothers them or that does not go away. These are not all the possible side effects of COTELLIC. For more information about side effects, patients should ask their healthcare provider or pharmacist.

Patients should call their doctor for medical advice about side effects. They may report side effects to FDA at (800) FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. They may also report side effects to Genentech at (888) 835-2555.

Please see full COTELLIC Prescribing Information and Patient Information for additional Important Safety Information.

On June 5, 2016 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY) reported the first presentation of interim data from the Phase 2 CheckMate -142 trial evaluating Opdivo alone or in combination with Yervoy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer, including those with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) (Press release, Bristol-Myers Squibb, JUN 5, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513002]). In these first-time clinical results, the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 25.5% (95% CI: 15.4-38.1) for Opdivo monotherapy and 33.3% (95% CI: 18.6-50.9) for the Opdivo and Yervoy combination regimen. The six-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 45.9% (95% CI: 29.8-60.7) for Opdivo monotherapy and 66.6% (95% CI: 45.5-81.1) for the Opdivo and Yervoy combination. MSI-H, a specific tumor biomarker, is present in approximately 15% of early stage metastatic colorectal cancers, and 4% of Stage IV colorectal cancers. The safety profile of Opdivo alone or in combination with Yervoy was consistent with other tumor types and prior combination studies. These data will be presented today during an oral presentation at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) from 8:12 AM – 8:24 AM CDT in Chicago, IL (Abstract #3501).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Michael J. Overman, M.D., Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, commented, "It is exciting to see these results for nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, in the subset of metastatic colorectal cancer patients that are characterized by deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability. The response and survival data reported today suggest that this subset of colorectal cancer is responsive to immune therapy and support further investigation into the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition to provide benefits to patients with this type of metastatic colorectal cancer."

"Through our deep scientific expertise in Immuno-Oncology research, we have a growing understanding of how our combination approach could stimulate anti-tumor activity in a variety of hard-to-treat cancers," said David Feltquate, M.D., Ph.D., Development Lead, Oncology Life Cycle Management, Bristol-Myers Squibb. "We believe the data presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) support our hypothesis that the combination of Opdivo with Yervoy has the potential to lead to greater clinical activity than Opdivo monotherapy in patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. We are encouraged by the preliminary results from our ongoing efforts to evaluate the full potential of this combination regimen across a range of malignancies."

About CheckMate -142

CheckMate -142 is an international Phase 2, open-label, non-comparative trial evaluating Opdivo as a single-agent or in combination with Yervoy in recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, including patients with and without high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). The MSI-H patients received Opdivo 3 mg/kg every two weeks (n=70) or Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg (n=30) for four doses followed by Opdivo 3 mg/kg every two weeks until an unacceptable toxicity occurred, or until disease progression. Enrollment of MSI-H patients to Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg every two weeks is ongoing. Twenty-three microsatellite stable (MSS) patients received one of three doses of the Opdivo and Yervoy combination.

The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in MSI-H patients, and the secondary endpoint was independent radiology review of ORR in MSI-H patients. Exploratory endpoints included safety and tolerability, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MSI-H patients, as well as investigator-assessed ORR in MSS patients. Interim results for both MSI-H and MSS patients will be presented.

The investigator-assessed ORR for MSI-H patients receiving Opdivo 3 mg/kg with at least 12 weeks of follow up was 25.5% and 33.3% for the Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg combination. Median duration of response was not reached in either group. The six-month PFS rates were 45.9% (95% CI: 29.8-60.7) for Opdivo 3 mg/kg and 66.6% (95% CI: 45.5-81.1) for the Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg combination. Survival data are also reported, with nine-month OS rates of 75.0% (95% CI: 58.5-85.7) for Opdivo 3 mg/kg and 85.1% (95% CI: 65.0-94.2) for the Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg combination. At the time of analysis, 67.1% of MSI-H patients in the Opdivo 3 mg/kg arm and 60.0% of those in the Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg combination arm remained on treatment.

In MSI-H patients, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 58.6% of patients in Opdivo 3 mg/kg group and 83.3% of patients in the Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg group. The most common AEs of any grade occurring in ≥15% of MSI-H patients were fatigue (18.6% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg; 20.0% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg), diarrhea (14.3% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg; 43.3% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg), pruritus (11.4% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg; 16.7% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg), nausea (7.1% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg; 20.0% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg), and pyrexia (4.3% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg; 23.3% with Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 14.3% of patients in the Opdivo 3 mg/kg group and 26.7% of patients in the Opdivo 3 mg/kg and Yervoy 1 mg/kg group. One patient in the Opdivo 3 mg/kg group died due to a Grade 5 treatment-related AE of sudden death. In MSS patients, AEs of any grade occurred in 80% of the patients with diarrhea (30%), nausea (25%), pyrexia (25%), fatigue (20%), vomiting (20%), and pruritus (10%) being the most common.

About Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer, or CRC, is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer, with worldwide incidence expected to increase from 1.4 million cases diagnosed in 2012 to 2.4 million cases by 2036. High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) tumors are present in approximately 15% of early stage metastatic colorectal cancers and 4% of Stage IV colorectal cancers, and are known to have an exceptionally high mutation burden. MSI-H CRC occurs when there are DNA mismatch repair deficiencies, which is a change that occurs in the DNA of certain cells. Survival rates of CRC vary depending on the stage and type of the cancer when it is diagnosed. Globally, the five-year survival rate for Stage I CRC is about 92%, and 11% for Stage IV.

Bristol-Myers Squibb & Immuno-Oncology: Advancing Oncology Research

At Bristol-Myers Squibb, we have a vision for the future of cancer care that is focused on Immuno-Oncology, now considered a major treatment choice alongside surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and targeted therapies for certain types of cancer.

We have a comprehensive clinical portfolio of investigational and approved Immuno-Oncology agents, many of which were discovered and developed by our scientists. Our ongoing Immuno-Oncology clinical program is looking at broad patient populations, across multiple solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, and lines of therapy and histologies, with the intent of powering our trials for overall survival and other important measures like durability of response. We pioneered the research leading to the first regulatory approval for the combination of two Immuno-Oncology agents, and continue to study the role of combinations in cancer.

We are also investigating other immune system pathways in the treatment of cancer including CTLA-4, CD-137, KIR, SLAMF7, PD-1, GITR, CSF1R, IDO, and LAG-3. These pathways may lead to potential new treatment options – in combination or monotherapy – to help patients fight different types of cancers.

Our collaboration with academia, as well as small and large biotech companies, to research the potential Immuno-Oncology and non-Immuno-Oncology combinations, helps achieve our goal of providing new treatment options in clinical practice.

At Bristol-Myers Squibb, we are committed to changing survival expectations in hard-to-treat cancers and the way patients live with cancer.

About Opdivo

Cancer cells may exploit "regulatory" pathways, such as checkpoint pathways, to hide from the immune system and shield the tumor from immune attack. Opdivo is a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor that binds to the checkpoint receptor PD-1 expressed on activated T-cells, and blocks the binding of PD-L1 and PD-L2, preventing the PD-1 pathway’s suppressive signaling on the immune system, including the interference with an anti-tumor immune response.

Opdivo’s broad global development program is based on Bristol-Myers Squibb’s understanding of the biology behind Immuno-Oncology. Our company is at the forefront of researching the potential of Immuno-Oncology to extend survival in hard-to-treat cancers. This scientific expertise serves as the basis for the Opdivo development program, which includes a broad range of Phase 3 clinical trials evaluating overall survival as the primary endpoint across a variety of tumor types. The Opdivo trials have also contributed toward the clinical and scientific understanding of the role of biomarkers and how patients may benefit from Opdivo across the continuum of PD-L1 expression. To date, the Opdivo clinical development program has enrolled more than 18,000 patients.

Opdivo was the first PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive regulatory approval anywhere in the world in July 2014, and currently has regulatory approval in 51 countries including the United States, Japan, and in the European Union.

U.S. FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS FOR OPDIVO

OPDIVO (nivolumab) as a single agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 wild-type unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) as a single agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving OPDIVO.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and post- transplantation brentuximab vedotin. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

Please refer to the end of the Important Safety Information for a brief description of the patient populations studied in the Checkmate trials.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNING: IMMUNE-MEDIATED ADVERSE REACTIONS

YERVOY can result in severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions. These immune- mediated reactions may involve any organ system; however, the most common severe immune- mediated adverse reactions are enterocolitis, hepatitis, dermatitis (including toxic epidermal necrolysis), neuropathy, and endocrinopathy. The majority of these immune-mediated reactions initially manifested during treatment; however, a minority occurred weeks to months after discontinuation of YERVOY.

Assess patients for signs and symptoms of enterocolitis, dermatitis, neuropathy, and endocrinopathy and evaluate clinical chemistries including liver function tests (LFTs), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function tests at baseline and before each dose.

Permanently discontinue YERVOY and initiate systemic high-dose corticosteroid therapy for severe immune-mediated reactions.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

Immune-mediated pneumonitis, including fatal cases, occurred with OPDIVO treatment. Across the clinical trial experience with solid tumors, fatal immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred with OPDIVO. In addition, in Checkmate 069, there were six patients who died without resolution of abnormal respiratory findings. Monitor patients for signs with radiographic imaging and symptoms of pneumonitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 and withhold until resolution for Grade 2. In Checkmate 069 and 067, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 6% (25/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Fatal (n=1), Grade 3 (n=6), Grade 2 (n=17), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 1.8% (14/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2) and Grade 2 (n=12). In Checkmate 057, immune- mediated pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 3.4% (10/287) of patients: Grade 3 (n=5), Grade 2 (n=2), and Grade 1 (n=3). In Checkmate 025, pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 5% (21/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 18% (73/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 4.4% (18/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 4 (n=1), Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=12), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 205 and 039, pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 4.9% (13/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.4% (9/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 2 (n=8).

Immune-Mediated Colitis

Immune-mediated colitis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 (of more than 5 days duration), 3, or 4 colitis. As a single agent, withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 or recurrent colitis upon restarting OPDIVO. When administered with YERVOY, withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent colitis upon restarting OPDIVO. In Checkmate 069 and 067, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 56% (228/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 26% (107/407) of patients: Grade 4 (n=2), Grade 3 (n=60), Grade 2 (n=32), and Grade 1 (n=13). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 31% (242/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 4.1% (32/787) of patients: Grade 3 (n=20), Grade 2 (n=10), and Grade 1 (n=2). In Checkmate 057, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 17% (50/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.4% (7/287) of patients: Grade 3 (n=3), Grade 2 (n=2), and Grade 1 (n=2). In Checkmate 025, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 25% (100/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 32% (126/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune-mediated diarrhea or colitis occurred in 3.2% (13/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=5), Grade 2 (n=7), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 205 and 039, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 30% (80/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated diarrhea (Grade 3) occurred in 1.1% (3/263) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal (diarrhea of ≥7 stools above baseline, fever, ileus, peritoneal signs; Grade 3-5) immune-mediated enterocolitis occurred in 34 (7%) patients. Across all YERVOY-treated patients in that study (n=511), 5 (1%) developed intestinal perforation, 4 (0.8%) died as a result of complications, and 26 (5%) were hospitalized for severe enterocolitis.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

Immune-mediated hepatitis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for abnormal liver tests prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater transaminase elevations. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 immune- mediated hepatitis. In Checkmate 069 and 067, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 13% (51/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 4 (n=8), Grade 3 (n=37), Grade 2 (n=5), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 2.3% (18/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 4 (n=3), Grade 3 (n=11), and Grade 2 (n=4). In Checkmate 057, one patient (0.3%) developed immune-mediated hepatitis. In Checkmate 025, there was an increased incidence of liver test abnormalities compared to baseline in AST (33% vs 39%), alkaline phosphatase (32% vs 32%), ALT (22% vs 31%), and total bilirubin (9% vs 3.5%) in the OPDIVO and everolimus arms, respectively. Immune-mediated hepatitis requiring systemic immunosuppression occurred in 1.5% (6/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=5) and Grade 2 (n=1). In Checkmate 205 and 039, hepatitis occurred in 11% (30/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 3.4% (9/263): Grade 3 (n=7) and Grade 2 (n=2).

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal hepatotoxicity (AST or ALT elevations >5x the ULN or total bilirubin elevations >3x the ULN; Grade 3-5) occurred in 8 (2%) patients, with fatal hepatic failure in 0.2% and hospitalization in 0.4%.

Immune-Mediated Dermatitis

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal immune-mediated dermatitis (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or rash complicated by full thickness dermal ulceration, or necrotic, bullous, or hemorrhagic manifestations; Grade 3-5) occurred in 13 (2.5%) patients. 1 (0.2%) patient died as a result of toxic epidermal necrolysis. 1 additional patient required hospitalization for severe dermatitis.

Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, 1 case of fatal Guillain-Barré syndrome and 1 case of severe (Grade 3) peripheral motor neuropathy were reported.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

Hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, thyroid disorders, and type 1 diabetes mellitus can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis, signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency during and after treatment, thyroid function prior to and periodically during treatment, and hyperglycemia. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hypophysitis. Withhold for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hypophysitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Administer hormone-replacement therapy for hypothyroidism. Initiate medical management for control of hyperthyroidism. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hyperglycemia.

In Checkmate 069 and 067, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (36/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 3 (n=8), Grade 2 (n=25), and Grade 1 (n=3). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, hypophysitis occurred in 0.9% (7/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 1 (n=2). In Checkmate 025, hypophysitis occurred in 0.5% (2/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 069 and 067, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5% (21/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 4 (n=1), Grade 3 (n=7), Grade 2 (n=11), and Grade 1 (n=2). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (8/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=5), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 057, 0.3% (1/287) of OPDIVO-treated patients developed adrenal insufficiency. In Checkmate 025, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 2.0% (8/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=3), Grade 2 (n=4), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 205 and 039, adrenal insufficiency (Grade 2) occurred in 0.4% (1/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. In Checkmate 069 and 067, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis occurred in 22% (89/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 3 (n=6), Grade 2 (n=47), and Grade 1 (n=36). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 8% (34/407) of patients: Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=17), and Grade 1 (n=13). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis occurred in 9% (73/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1), Grade 2 (n=37), Grade 1 (n=35). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 4.4% (35/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1), Grade 2 (n=12), and Grade 1 (n=22). In Checkmate 057, Grade 1 or 2 hypothyroidism, including thyroiditis, occurred in 7% (20/287) and elevated thyroid stimulating hormone occurred in 17% of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 1 or 2 hyperthyroidism occurred in 1.4% (4/287) of patients. In Checkmate 025, thyroid disease occurred in 11% (43/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO, including one Grade 3 event, and in 3.0% (12/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Hypothyroidism/thyroiditis occurred in 8% (33/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=17), and Grade 1 (n=14). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.5% (10/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 2 (n=5) and Grade 1 (n=5). In Checkmate 205 and 039, hypothyroidism/thyroiditis occurred in 12% (32/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 2 (n=18) and Grade 1: (n=14). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 1.5% (4/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 2: (n=3) and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 069 and 067, diabetes mellitus or diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 1.5% (6/407) of patients: Grade 4 (n=3), Grade 3 (n=1), Grade 2 (n=1), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, diabetes mellitus or diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 0.8% (6/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 025, hyperglycemic adverse events occurred in 9% (37/406) patients.

Diabetes mellitus or diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 1.5% (6/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=3), Grade 2 (n=2), and Grade 1 (n=1). In Checkmate 205 and 039, diabetes mellitus occurred in 0.8% (2/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 1 (n=1).

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe to life-threatening immune-mediated endocrinopathies (requiring hospitalization, urgent medical intervention, or interfering with activities of daily living; Grade 3-4) occurred in 9 (1.8%) patients. All 9 patients had hypopituitarism, and some had additional concomitant endocrinopathies such as adrenal insufficiency, hypogonadism, and hypothyroidism. 6 of the 9 patients were hospitalized for severe endocrinopathies.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis and Renal Dysfunction

Immune-mediated nephritis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for elevated serum creatinine prior to and periodically during treatment. For Grade 2 or 3 increased serum creatinine, withhold and administer corticosteroids; if worsening or no improvement occurs, permanently discontinue. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 4 serum creatinine elevation and permanently discontinue. In Checkmate 069 and 067, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 2.2% (9/407) of patients: Grade 4 (n=4), Grade 3 (n=3), and Grade 2 (n=2). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, nephritis and renal dysfunction of any grade occurred in 5% (40/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 0.8% (6/787) of patients: Grade 3 (n=4) and Grade 2 (n=2). In Checkmate 057, Grade 2 immune-mediated renal dysfunction occurred in 0.3% (1/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO. In Checkmate 025, renal injury occurred in 7% (27/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 3.0% (12/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 3.2% (13/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 5 (n=1), Grade 4 (n=1), Grade 3 (n=5), and Grade 2 (n=6). In Checkmate 205 and 039, nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 4.9% (13/263) of patients treated with OPDIVO. This included one reported case (0.3%) of Grade 3 autoimmune nephritis.

Immune-Mediated Rash

Immune-mediated rash can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Severe rash (including rare cases of fatal toxic epidermal necrolysis) occurred in the clinical program of OPDIVO. Monitor patients for rash. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 rash. Withhold for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4. In Checkmate 069 and 067, immune-mediated rash occurred in 22.6% (92/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 3 (n=15), Grade 2 (n=31), and Grade 1 (n=46). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (72/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=7), Grade 2 (n=15), and Grade 1 (n=50). In Checkmate 057, immune-mediated rash occurred in 6% (17/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO including four Grade 3 cases. In Checkmate 025, rash occurred in 28% (112/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 36% (143/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune- mediated rash, defined as a rash treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids, occurred in 7% (30/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=7), and Grade 1 (n=19). In Checkmate 205 and 039, rash occurred in 22% (58/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated rash occurred in 7% (18/263) of patients on OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 1 (n=11).

Immune-Mediated Encephalitis

Immune-mediated encephalitis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Withhold OPDIVO in patients with new-onset moderate to severe neurologic signs or symptoms and evaluate to rule out other causes. If other etiologies are ruled out, administer corticosteroids and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for immune-mediated encephalitis. In Checkmate 067, encephalitis was identified in one patient (0.2%) receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY. In Checkmate 057, fatal limbic encephalitis occurred in one patient (0.3%) receiving OPDIVO. In Checkmate 205 and 039, encephalitis occurred in 0.8% (2/263) of patients after allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Based on the severity of adverse reaction, permanently discontinue or withhold treatment, administer high-dose corticosteroids, and, if appropriate, initiate hormone-replacement therapy. In < 1.0% of patients receiving OPDIVO, the following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred: uveitis, iritis, pancreatitis, facial and abducens nerve paresis, demyelination, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, hypopituitarism, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, gastritis, duodenitis, and sarcoidosis. Across clinical trials of OPDIVO as a single agent administered at doses of 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, additional clinically significant, immune- mediated adverse reactions were identified: motor dysfunction, vasculitis, and myasthenic syndrome.

Infusion Reactions

Severe infusion reactions have been reported in <1.0% of patients in clinical trials of OPDIVO. Discontinue OPDIVO in patients with Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with Grade 1 or 2. In Checkmate 069 and 067, infusion- related reactions occurred in 2.5% (10/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 2 (n=6) and Grade 1 (n=4). In Checkmate 037, 066, and 067, Grade 2 infusion related reactions occurred in 2.7% (21/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=8), and Grade 1 (n=11). In Checkmate 057, Grade 2 infusion reactions requiring corticosteroids occurred in 1.0% (3/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO. In Checkmate 025, hypersensitivity/infusion-related reactions occurred in 6% (25/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 1.0% (4/397) of patients receiving everolimus. In Checkmate 205 and 039, hypersensitivity/infusion- related reactions occurred in 16% (42/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=24), and Grade 1 (n=16).

Complications of Allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO

Complications, including fatal events, occurred in patients who received allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO. Outcomes were evaluated in 17 patients from Checkmate 205 and 039, who underwent allogeneic HSCT after discontinuing OPDIVO (15 with reduced-intensity conditioning, 2 with myeloablative conditioning). Thirty-five percent (6/17) of patients died from complications of allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO. Five deaths occurred in the setting of severe or refractory GVHD. Grade 3 or higher acute GVHD was reported in 29% (5/17) of patients. Hyperacute GVHD was reported in 20% (n=2) of patients. A steroid-requiring febrile syndrome, without an identified infectious cause, was reported in 35% (n=6) of patients. Two cases of encephalitis were reported: Grade 3 (n=1) lymphocytic encephalitis without an identified infectious cause, and Grade 3 (n=1) suspected viral encephalitis. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred in one patient, who received reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic SCT and died of GVHD and multi-organ failure. Other cases of hepatic VOD after reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic HSCT have also been reported in patients with lymphoma who received a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody before transplantation. Cases of fatal hyperacute GVHD have also been reported. These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between PD-1 blockade and allogeneic HSCT.

Follow patients closely for early evidence of transplant-related complications such as hyperacute GVHD, severe (Grade 3 to 4) acute GVHD, steroid-requiring febrile syndrome, hepatic VOD, and other immune- mediated adverse reactions, and intervene promptly.

Embryo-fetal Toxicity

Based on their mechanisms of action, OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with an OPDIVO- or YERVOY- containing regimen and for at least 5 months after the last dose of OPDIVO.

Lactation

It is not known whether OPDIVO or YERVOY is present in human milk. Because many drugs, including antibodies, are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from an OPDIVO-containing regimen, advise women to discontinue breastfeeding during treatment. Advise women to discontinue nursing during treatment with YERVOY and for 3 months following the final dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 067, serious adverse reactions (73% and 37%), adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation (43% and 14%) or to dosing delays (55% and 28%), and Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (72% and 44%) all occurred more frequently in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm relative to the OPDIVO arm. The most frequent (≥10%) serious adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm and the OPDIVO arm, respectively, were diarrhea (13% and 2.6%), colitis (10% and 1.6%), and pyrexia (10% and 0.6%). In Checkmate 037, serious adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 42% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse drug reactions reported in 2% to <5% of patients receiving OPDIVO were abdominal pain, hyponatremia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased lipase. In Checkmate 066, serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (3.9%) and diarrhea (3.4%). In Checkmate 057, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, dyspnea, pleural effusion, and respiratory failure. In Checkmate 025, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were acute kidney injury, pleural effusion, pneumonia, diarrhea, and hypercalcemia. In Checkmate 205 and 039, among all patients (safety population [n=263]), adverse reactions leading to discontinuation (4.2%) or to dosing delays (23%) occurred. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥1% of patients were infusion-related reaction, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pyrexia, rash and pneumonitis. Ten patients died from causes other than disease progression, including 6 who died from complications of allogeneic HSCT. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 21% of patients in the safety population (n=263) and 27% of patients in the subset of patients evaluated for efficacy (efficacy population [n=95]).

Common Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 067, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm were fatigue (59%), rash (53%), diarrhea (52%), nausea (40%), pyrexia (37%), vomiting (28%), and dyspnea (20%). The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO arm were fatigue (53%), rash (40%), diarrhea (31%), and nausea (28%). In Checkmate 037, the most common adverse reaction (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO was rash (21%). In Checkmate 066, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO vs dacarbazine were fatigue (49% vs 39%), musculoskeletal pain (32% vs 25%), rash (28% vs 12%), and pruritus (23% vs 12%). In Checkmate 057, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO were fatigue (49%), musculoskeletal pain (36%), cough (30%), decreased appetite (29%), and constipation (23%). In Checkmate 025, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO vs everolimus were asthenic conditions (56% vs 57%), cough (34% vs 38%), nausea (28% vs 29%), rash (28% vs 36%), dyspnea (27% vs 31%), diarrhea (25% vs 32%), constipation (23% vs 18%), decreased appetite (23% vs 30%), back pain (21% vs 16%), and arthralgia (20% vs 14%). In Checkmate 205 and 039, among all patients (safety population [n=263]) and the subset of patients in the efficacy population (n=95), respectively, the most common adverse reactions (reported in at least 20%) were fatigue (32% and 43%), upper respiratory tract infection (28% and 48%), pyrexia (24% and 35%), diarrhea (23% and 30%), and cough (22% and 35%). In the subset of patients in the efficacy population (n=95), the most common adverse reactions also included rash (31%), musculoskeletal pain (27%), pruritus (25%), nausea (23%), arthralgia (21%), and peripheral neuropathy (21%).

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, the most common adverse reactions (≥5%) in patients who received YERVOY at 3 mg/kg were fatigue (41%), diarrhea (32%), pruritus (31%), rash (29%),

and colitis (8%).

CHECKMATE Trials and Patient Populations

Checkmate 069 and 067 – advanced melanoma alone or in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 037 and 066 – advanced melanoma; Checkmate 057 – non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Checkmate 025 – renal cell carcinoma; Checkmate 205/039 – classical Hodgkin lymphoma