Exelixis Announces Positive Preliminary Data From an Investigator-Sponsored Phase 1 Trial of XL888 and Vemurafenib

On November 16, 2014 Exelixis reported preliminary results from a phase 1 investigator-sponsored trial (IST) evaluating the safety and activity of XL888, an Exelixis-discovered small molecule oral inhibitor of Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90), in combination with vemurafenib in patients with unresectable stage III/IV BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma (Press release, Exelixis, NOV 16, 2014, View Source;p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1990028 [SID1234517436]). Safety and efficacy results support the further investigation of 90 mg of XL888 twice weekly (BIW) and vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily (BID) in additional studies that would include a third agent.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The trial results were presented today by Keiran Smalley, Ph.D., an investigator on the trial and an associate professor at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, in a late-breaking oral presentation session at the Society for Melanoma Research 2014 International Congress, which is taking place November 13-16, 2014, in Zurich, Switzerland. Based on these results, as well as findings from coBRIM, the phase 3 pivotal trial of cobimetinib, an Exelixis-discovered MEK inhibitor, and vemurafenib in previously untreated metastatic melanoma patients with a BRAF V600 mutation, the Moffitt Center plans to initiate a phase 1b IST of the triple combination of vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and XL888 in a similar patient population.

"The BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is active in BRAF-mutated malignant melanoma, but development of resistance is common. Preclinical studies led by Keiran Smalley, Ph.D. suggested that most BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms involve proteins that are clients of HSP90, and the preclinical evaluation of XL888 showed that it is highly active in vemurafenib-resistant melanoma models," said Jeffrey Weber, MD, Ph.D., director of the Donald A. Adam Comprehensive Melanoma Research Center at the Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute in Tampa, FL. "The current phase 1 data show that both drugs can be given together, and compelling initial response results suggest potential cooperative activity."

"About half of metastatic melanoma patients whose tumors harbor a BRAF V600 mutation respond to vemurafenib, but most of them develop resistance and their tumors begin to regrow," said Michael M. Morrissey, Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of Exelixis. "Multiple mechanisms drive this resistance, and the team at Moffitt found that many of them involve upregulation of HSP90 client proteins that are sensitive to XL888. We look forward to supporting the Moffitt team as they continue to evaluate XL888 as part of our IST program."

Study Design

The phase 1 multi-cohort study is designed to evaluate the combination of vemurafenib plus escalating doses of XL888 in patients with unresectable stage III/IV BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. The trial enrolls four cohorts; patients receive 960 mg of vemurafenib BID along with XL888 BIW at one of four dose levels: 30 mg (cohort 1), 45 mg (cohort 2), 90 mg (cohort 3), or 135 mg (cohort 4). Eligible patients must have a confirmed BRAF V600 mutation and have not received treatment with a BRAF or HSP90 inhibitor. The primary endpoint of the trial is to determine the safety and tolerability of the combination, including a maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (RECIST-1 criteria), estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, and analysis of pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

Study Results

The trial had enrolled fifteen subjects (cohorts 1-3, n=3; cohort 4, n=6), and the median age was 60 years. Seventy-three percent of the subjects were male, and the majority of subjects (14/15) were assessed as having the stage IV metastatic form of their disease.

The most common adverse events were consistent with previous studies of vemurafenib and included anorexia, fatigue, arthralgia, and rash. Diarrhea and vision changes were seen at all dose levels, with the highest rates being seen in cohort 4. These events resolved upon dose interruption. Dose-limiting toxicities only occurred in cohort 4 (grade 3 diarrhea and pancreatitis), and an MTD has not yet been established. The trial also reported fewer secondary cutaneous neoplasms in higher XL888 dose cohorts.

At the time of data cut-off, objective tumor regression was observed in 11 of 12 response-evaluable patients (two complete responses and nine partial responses), for an objective response rate of 92%. Additionally, one stage IIIC patient with a partial response underwent resection of residual disease and pathology showed no viable tumor cells. Three patients who did not have post baseline tumor assessments were excluded from the response analysis; two patients elected alternative treatment prior to the first post baseline scan, and the third patient was still in the first cycle of study treatment. The estimated PFS at 6- and 12-months was 63% (95% CI: 28 – 84%) and 39% (95% CI: 11 – 68%), respectively.

About XL888

XL888 is a highly potent and selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of HSP90, a molecular chaperone protein that affects the activity and stability of a range of key regulatory proteins, including kinases such as BRAF, MET, and VEGFR2. In preclinical studies, XL888 has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of a broad panel of human tumor cell lines and induce marked degradation of HSP90 client proteins, which include a number of kinases implicated in cancer cell growth and survival. After completing phase 1 testing, Exelixis deprioritized XL888 and its other pipeline assets to focus its limited resources on the company’s lead compound, cabozantinib. Investigators at the Moffitt Cancer Center conducted preclinical work showing activity of XL888 in vemurafenib-resistant melanoma models. These preclinical results provided the rationale for the current investigator-sponsored phase 1 trial.

Pipeline

BVD-AB1 is a therapeutic antibody under development by BioMed Valley for the treatment of cancer (Company Pipeline BioMed Valley Discoveries, NOV 14, 2014, View Source [SID:1234500980]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!


ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Presents Updated ICT-107 Phase II Data at the Society for Neuro-Oncology Annual Meeting 2014

On November 14, 2014 ImmunoCellular Therapeutics reported the presentation of updated efficacy data from the Phase II trial of dendritic cell-based immunotherapeutic vaccine ICT-107 at the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting and Education Day of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, being held in Miami, FL (Press release ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, NOV 14, 2014, View Source [SID:1234500964]). Patrick Y. Wen, MD, Director of the Center for Neuro-Oncology at Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, and principal investigator on the trial, will present the maturing data set in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in an oral presentation.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Consistent with prior data presentations in December 2013 and June 2014, the results demonstrate a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit, and a numeric overall survival (OS) benefit in ICT-107 treated patients compared to the control group. The ICT-107 treatment effect continues to be strongest in the pre-defined HLA-A2 subgroup of patients in which the MGMT methylated patients showed the largest treatment effect, with a significant PFS advantage over the control group, and continued potential for the OS advantage to move toward significance as more events occur. There were no differences in adverse events between the ICT-107 treated group and the control group.

"ICT-107 continues to hold promise for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, as no other immunotherapy has shown statistical benefit for a clinical outcome in a controlled trial in this patient population," said Dr. Wen. "I think that the data from the phase II trial strongly support advancing to a registrational program."

"With this second update of the original trial results, we remain confident that there is a meaningful treatment benefit in HLA-A2 patients. In the per-protocol population, OS hazard ratios are in the 0.6-0.7 range for all HLA-A2 patients as a group as well as for each of the MGMT subgroups. If our upcoming phase III program generates statistically significant results in this range, ICT-107 could represent a clinically meaningful advance for GBM patients," said Andrew Gengos, ImmunoCellular’s Chief Executive Officer. "The US FDA and three national European regulators have indicated support for phase III testing. We anticipate hearing shortly from the EMA, and then expect to be in position to finalize our phase III design and move into trial execution in 2015."

Updated ICT-107 Phase II OS and PFS Results

As of October 2014, a total of 88 events (patient deaths) had been recorded from the 124 randomized patients, representing 9 additional events since these data from the phase II trial were last updated in June 2014. There were 25 active and 11 control patients alive for a total of 36 patients available for additional follow-up.
Median PFS for the HLA-A2 methylated MGMT per-protocol (PP) population was 24.1 months for the ICT-107 treated group and 8.5 months for control, representing a statistically significant 15.6-month PFS benefit for the ICT-107 treated group (age stratified HR = 0.257 [0.095-0.697], p = 0.004).
Median OS for the HLA-A2 methylated MGMT PP population was 23.9 months for the control group, and the median has not yet been reached for the ICT-107 treated group. At the time of the analysis, 65% of ICT-107 patients and 50% of the control patients were alive (age stratified HR = 0.631 [0.212-1.880], p = 0.404), suggesting the potential for long-term survival with ICT-107 treatment.
Median PFS for the HLA-A2 unmethylated MGMT PP population was 10.5 months for the ICT-107 treated group and 6.0 months for the control group, representing a 4.5-month median PFS benefit for the ICT-107 treated group (age stratified HR = 0.720 [0.351-1.474], p = 0.364).
Median OS for the HLA-A2 unmethylated MGMT PP population, was 15.8 months for ICT-107 patients, and 11.8 months for the control group, representing a 4-month median OS benefit for the ICT-107 treated group (age stratified HR = 0.652 [0.320-1.325], p = 0.233).
Median PFS in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (all phase II patients) was 11.4 months for the ICT-107 treated group and 10.1 months for the control group, representing a statistically significant benefit in the ICT-107 treated group (age stratified HR = 0.640 [0.423-0.968], p = 0.033).
Median OS in the ITT population was 18.3 months for the ICT-107 treated group and 16.7 for the control group, representing a numeric, but not statistically significant, advantage for the treatment group (age stratified HR = 0.854 [0.547-1.334], p = 0.487).

The Company is utilizing all available information from the controlled phase II trial to design phase III testing in order to increase its probability of success, including the timing of randomization within the standard-of-care treatment these patients receive, in an attempt to limit the number of patients who are "early progressors" and unlikely to respond to therapy.

AstraZeneca and Isis Pharmaceuticals to Co-Develop Targeted Oligonucleotide Delivery Methods

On November 13, 2014 Isis Pharmaceuticals and AstraZeneca reported a strategic alliance to discover and develop novel delivery methods for antisense oligonucleotides (Press release Isis Pharmaceuticals, NOV 13, 2014, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=1989207 [SID:1234500960]). The new delivery approaches seek to target the desired tissue more effectively. The agreement builds on an existing collaboration between AstraZeneca and Isis Pharmaceuticals, a leader in the field of antisense, and supports AstraZeneca’s research and development capabilities in the area of antisense oligonucleotide-based therapeutics and RNA biology. Initial project areas will be oncology and cardiovascular and metabolic diseases (CVMD).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Antisense oligonucleotides are short, single strands of DNA or RNA molecules. Rather than modulating the activity of already-formed proteins, antisense oligonucleotides act before proteins are produced at the level of messenger RNA in the cell, thus opening up new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. The new delivery methods will aim to enhance the access of antisense oligonucleotides into specific organs and cells. The methods build on Isis Pharmaceuticals’ successful Ligand Conjugation Antisense (LICA) technology. The first example of this technology being Isis’ GalNac-conjugated antisense oligonucleotides targeting liver hepatocytes, which lowers the therapeutic dose needed for liver targets by approximately 10-fold.

Under the terms of the agreement, each party will fund its own contribution and commit investigators to the collaboration. In line with AstraZeneca’s open innovation approach, the companies will work together on an agreed programme and share rights to the results. Isis can apply learnings from this collaboration broadly across its antisense technology platform and AstraZeneca can similarly apply learnings across its broader RNA-based, small molecule and antibody research and development activities.

Isis Pharmaceuticals and AstraZeneca entered into a collaboration, development and license agreement in 2012 in oncology, subsequently expanded in 2013 to include CVMD. Under the 2012 agreement, one of the molecules being developed is AZD9150 (ISIS-STAT3Rx), a first-in-human, first-in-class, antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of STAT3, which is being developed as an immunomodulatory agent in combination with MEDI4736, AstraZeneca’s investigational anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor. A second product of that collaboration, an antisense oncology compound targeting the androgen receptor AZD5312 (ISIS-ARRx), is in Phase I trials. The new delivery collaboration announced today builds on this existing relationship and is expected to also bring benefits to these programs.

"This exciting collaboration very much supports AstraZeneca’s research and development in the area of RNA-based therapeutics. If successful, we’ll have a way to selectivity modulate therapeutic targets in specific cell types that are intractable to small molecules and antibodies. This could lead to a number of ground breaking drugs for both oncology and cardiovascular and metabolic diseases," said Susan Galbraith, Head of the Oncology Innovative Medicines Unit, AstraZeneca.

Brett Monia, Senior Vice President of Antisense Drug Discovery, Isis Pharmaceuticals said, "The collaboration expansion announced today builds upon an already successful agreement between Isis and AstraZeneca. Together, we have advanced ISIS-STAT3Rx and ISIS-ARRx in clinical development, both of which are being evaluated in patients with cancer. This opportunity also complements our internal efforts to expand the use of our technology and develop drugs with broad therapeutic applicability."

"RNA molecules play an increasingly important role in our research portfolio. We are delighted to be expanding our existing, strong collaboration with Isis Pharmaceuticals, who are leading players in RNA biology, with the aim of improving the delivery of antisense oligonucleotides to specific cardiovascular and metabolic tissue targets," said Marcus Schindler, Head of the CVMD Innovative Medicines Unit, AstraZeneca.

8-K – Current report

On November 13, 2014 Puma Biotechnology reported top line results from a Phase II clinical trial of Puma’s investigational drug PB272 (neratinib) for the treatment of first-line HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (NEfERTT trial) (Filing 8-K , Puma Biotechnology, NOV 13, 2014, View Source [SID:1234500962]). The NEfERTT trial is a randomized, two-arm Phase II trial of neratinib plus the anticancer drug paclitaxel versus trastuzumab (Herceptin) plus paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for HER2- positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

The NEfERTT trial enrolled 479 patients in 33 countries with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had not received prior anticancer therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic disease. Patients were randomized to receive first-line treatment with either paclitaxel plus neratinib or paclitaxel plus trastuzumab. The primary endpoint of the trial was progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints of the study included objective response rate (ORR) and the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, including brain metastases.

The safety results of the study showed that the most frequently observed adverse event for the patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus neratinib was diarrhea, with approximately 30% of the patients experiencing grade 3 diarrhea. The rate of grade 3 diarrhea in the patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab was approximately 4%. Patients who received neratinib in this trial did not receive any prophylaxis with antidiarrheal agents to prevent the neratinib related diarrhea. Puma’s recently reported clinical data from a Phase II trial of neratinib in HER2 mutated non-small cell lung cancer demonstrated that the use of high dose loperamide greatly reduces the rate of grade 3 diarrhea with neratinib. In that trial the grade 3 diarrhea rate was 8% in the patients who received neratinib monotherapy. In all of its current ongoing studies Puma is instituting the use of high dose loperamide in order to continue to reduce the neratinib related diarrhea.

The primary endpoint of the NEfERTT trial was progression free survival. The results of the trial demonstrated that the progression free survival for the patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus neratinib was 16.6 months and the progression free survival for the patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab was 16.7 months (p=0.35). The objective response rate in the trial for the patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus neratinib was 74.8% and the objective response rate for the patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab was 75.1% (p=0.94). These results did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the PFS and ORR results for the two treatment arms, which was consistent with expectations.

With respect to the incidence of central nervous system metastases (e.g., brain metastases), treatment with the combination of paclitaxel plus neratinib resulted in a 52.6% reduction in the incidence of CNS metastases compared to the incidence of CNS metastases in patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab. The incidence of CNS metastases was 7.4% in the patients who received paclitaxel plus neratinib, while the incidence of CNS metastases in the patients who received the combination of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab was 15.6% (p=0.006). These results reflect a statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms.

Full results of the NEfERTT trial for PB272 will be presented at a future scientific meeting in 2015.

“We are very pleased with the results of the NEfERTT trial with neratinib,” said Alan H. Auerbach, Chief Executive Officer and President. “As expected, there was no statistically significant difference in progression free survival and objective response rate for the paclitaxel plus neratinib arm compared to the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab arm. However, the paclitaxel plus neratinib arm showed a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of CNS metastases compared to the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab arm. This represents the first randomized trial with a HER2 targeted agent that has shown a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of CNS metastases, which we believe provides a meaningful point of differentiation for neratinib in the treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer. While the development of other HER2 targeted drugs has produced a clinically meaningful benefit to patients with HER2 positive breast cancer, these drugs have had little impact on CNS metastases. As a result, we believe that there remains an unmet clinical need for reducing the incidence of CNS metastases and the results of the NEfERTT study demonstrate that we may be able to provide this type of improvement with neratinib.”