Phase 2 Study of Single-agent Glembatumumab Vedotin in Patients with Checkpoint-Refractory Metastatic Melanoma Meets Primary Overall Response Endpoint and Demonstrates Clinically Meaningful Duration of Response

On October 9, 2016 Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLDX) reported positive results from the Company’s Phase 2 study of glembatumumab vedotin in patients with stage III/IV checkpoint inhibitor-refractory, and, if applicable, BRAF/MEK inhibitor-refractory metastatic melanoma (n=62) (Press release, Celldex Therapeutics, OCT 9, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515680]). Glembatumumab vedotin is a fully-human monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets glycoprotein NMB (gpNMB), a protein overexpressed by multiple tumor types, including metastatic melanoma where greater than 80% of patients overexpress the marker. High tumor expression of gpNMB is associated with shorter metastasis-free survival and reduced overall survival.1 Study results were presented today at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress in Copenhagen in poster titled "A Phase 2 study of glembatumumab vedotin (GV), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting gpNMB, in advanced melanoma."

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Study Highlights

The primary endpoint of the study (6 or more objective responses in the first 52 patients enrolled) was exceeded. 7 of 62 (11%) patients experienced a confirmed response, and an additional 3 patients also experienced single timepoint responses.
Median duration of response in this heavily pre-treated patient population was 6.0 months.
53% of patients experienced stable disease (with a minimum duration of six weeks).
A 52% disease control rate (patients without progression for greater than three months) was demonstrated.
52% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage.
Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 4.4 months.
Patients who experienced rash in Cycle 1 experienced a 20% confirmed response rate and a more prolonged PFS of 5.5 months [p=0.054; HR=0.52 (0.27, 1.02)].
"While immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF targeted therapy have dramatically changed outcomes for many patients with metastatic melanoma, patients who either do not respond or progress through these treatments are faced with very limited treatment options," said Patrick Ott, M.D., Ph.D., Clinical Director of the Melanoma Center and the Center for Immuno-Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and an investigator in the study. "The single-agent activity observed in this study and the corresponding duration of response is highly encouraging. I am hopeful that pursuing combination studies of glembatumumab vedotin, including with checkpoint inhibition, could help us bring benefit to an even larger number of melanoma and other cancer patients."

"It’s clear based on these study results that refractory metastatic melanoma is a responsive target indication for glembatumumab vedotin," said Thomas Davis, M.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer of Celldex Therapeutics. "gpNMB is very highly expressed in melanoma with all tissue samples on study testing positive, and almost 80% of tumors demonstrating 100% expression in their epithelial cells. We’re encouraged by the results we’ve seen to date in this advanced, checkpoint refractory setting and believe leveraging the immune system through combination therapy is a critical next step for patients in in this indication."

Study Overview
This study was a Phase 2, open-label study of glembatumumab vedotin in patients with unresectable stage III (n=1; 2%) or stage IV (n=61; 98%) melanoma. The median number of prior therapies was three (range of 1 to 6). All patients had progressed after checkpoint therapy, and almost all patients had received both ipilimumab (n=58; 94%) and PD-1/PDL-1 (n=58; 94%) therapy. Twelve patients presented with BRAF mutation, and eleven had prior treatment with BRAF or BRAF/MEK targeted agents. Patients received glembatumumab vedotin every three weeks until disease progression or intolerance. The safety profile was consistent with prior studies of glembatumumab vedotin with rash, neutropenia, and neuropathy experienced as the most significant adverse events. Consistent with previous studies in melanoma and breast cancer, rash was associated with greater clinical benefit.

Clinical Efficacy

Primary Endpoint: Confirmed Response Rate (ORR) Met 7/62 (11%)
Duration of Response Median: 6.0 months
Range: 1.4 + to 8.6+
Any Response, Including Those not Confirmed at Subsequent Assessment 10/62 (16%)
Stable Disease 33/62 (53%)
Disease Control Rate 32/62 (52%)
Patients with Tumor Shrinkage 32/62 (52%)
Progression-free Survival Median: 4.4 months
Range: 0.4 to 15.8+
Tumor tissue (pre-treatment) was available for 58 patients at the time of analysis. All samples were gpNMB positive, and 79% of patients had tumors with 100% of their epithelial cells expressing gpNMB. Given both the high level of expression and the intensity of expression across this patient population, identifying a potential population for gpNMB enrichment is not feasible; therefore, all patients with metastatic melanoma could be evaluated as potential candidates for treatment with glembatumumab vedotin in future studies.

Next Steps
In August 2016, the Company announced that the primary endpoint had been met in this Phase 2 single-agent study of glembatumumab vedotin in metastatic melanoma (post-progression on/after checkpoint therapy) and that the Company was amending the protocol to add a second cohort of patients to a glembatumumab vedotin and varlilumab combination. Varlilumab is Celldex’s fully human monoclonal agonist antibody that binds and activates CD27, a critical co-stimulatory molecule in the immune activation cascade. This additional cohort is open to enrollment. Upon completion of enrollment in this cohort, the Company is exploring opening a new arm in the study to assess a glembatumumab vedotin and checkpoint combination. This rationale is strongly supported by preclinical data that suggest that the anti-tumor activity may be enhanced with the combination. In addition, due to their direct cytotoxic properties, microtubule-depolymerizing agents like MMAE also appear to convert tumor-resident tolerogenic dendritic cells into active antigen-presenting cells.2 The Company also intends to conduct exploratory analyses of pre-entry skin biopsies in future patients to investigate potential predictors of response to glembatumumab vedotin, given the association of rash and outcome.

About Glembatumumab Vedotin
Glembatumumab vedotin is a fully-human monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets glycoprotein NMB (gpNMB). gpNMB is a protein overexpressed by multiple tumor types, including breast cancer, melanoma, lung cancer, uveal melanoma and osteosarcoma. gpNMB has been shown to be associated with the ability of the cancer cell to invade and metastasize and to correlate with reduced time to progression and survival in breast cancer. The gpNMB-targeting antibody, CR011, is linked to a potent cytotoxic, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), using Seattle Genetics’ proprietary technology. Glembatumumab vedotin is designed to be stable in the bloodstream but to release MMAE upon internalization into gpNMB-expressing tumor cells, resulting in a targeted cell-killing effect. Glembatumumab vedotin is in development for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an initial focus in triple negative disease, stage III and IV melanoma, squamous cell lung cancer, uveal melanoma and osteosarcoma.

Novartis ALK+ metastatic NSCLC therapy Zykadia® extends progression-free survival beyond 18 months in Phase II study

On October 9, 2016 Novartis reported updated results from a Phase II study (ASCEND-3), which demonstrated that anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients taking Zykadia (ceritinib) as their first ALK inhibitor (post-chemotherapy) had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18.4 months [95% CI: 10.9-26.3; median follow-up time of 25.9 months, as measured by blinded independent review committee (BIRC)][1] (Press release, Novartis, OCT 9, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515677]). Results were presented during an oral session at the Annual European Society for Medical Oncology Congress (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) in Copenhagen.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

These results are consistent with findings from the Phase I ASCEND-1 study, which demonstrated a median PFS of 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.2-not reached) as per BIRC assessment with a median follow-up of 11.1 months[2]. The previous analysis by BIRC in ASCEND-3 indicated that the median PFS had not been reached after a median follow-up time of 8.3 months[3].

Further, in a sub-analysis of these data, patients who entered the study with brain metastases at baseline experienced an overall response rate (ORR) of 63.3% (95% CI: 48.3-76.6) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 83.7% (95% CI: 70.3-92.7), both as measured by BIRC. These results were similar to those in patients without brain metastases, who demonstrated an ORR of 64.0% (95% CI: 52.1-74.8) and DCR of 88.0% (95% CI: 78.4-94.4), based on BIRC assessment[1].

"The unfortunate reality of ALK+ NSCLC is that advancement is needed to delay disease progression in these patients," said lead investigator Dr. Enriqueta Felip, Head of the Thoracic Tumors Group, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital. "These data, coupled with a compelling response in the sub-analysis of patients with baseline brain metastases, provide greater evidence of Zykadia’s potential efficacy in the ALKi-naïve population."

At the time of analysis, the estimated 18-month overall survival (OS) rate was 73.4% (95% CI: 64.6-80.4). This population also demonstrated an ORR of 63.7% (95% CI: 54.6-72.2) and median duration of response of 23.9 months (95% CI: 16.6-not estimable), according to BIRC assessment. A decrease in tumor burden from baseline was shown in 94.7% patients (investigator assessment only, no BIRC assessment available)[1].

"Novartis is committed to extending lives of patients with difficult-to-treat forms of cancer, and these data presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) affirm our desire to improve outcomes for those with metastatic NSCLC, specifically," said Alessandro Riva, MD, Global Head, Oncology Development and Medical Affairs, Novartis Oncology. "With our first-line Phase III results forthcoming as well as ongoing brain metastases studies, we look forward to sharing further evidence of Zykadia’s full potential."

Results from the randomized Phase III ASCEND-5 study were also presented for the first time, and were included as part of a late-breaking oral session as well as in the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) press program. The ASCEND-5 study assessed median PFS in patients previously treated with crizotinib and one or two prior regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy (including platinum doublet), who then received either Zykadia or standard chemotherapy. Results demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in median PFS by BIRC for patients taking Zykadia versus chemotherapy (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.67; p<0.001 one sided). Median PFS by BIRC for Zykadia and chemotherapy were 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.1-6.9) vs. 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.4-2.8), respectively[4].

The ALK gene arrangement, one of the three most common biomarkers – or genetic drivers -of NSCLC, affects approximately 2-7% of cases each year[5],[6]. More than half of these patients are either former smokers or have never smoked[7],[8],[9]. These patients are candidates for treatment with a targeted ALK inhibitor[6].

About ASCEND-3
ASCEND-3 is a Phase II single-arm, open-label, multicenter study which included 124 patients with ALK+ NSCLC who had received up to three lines of chemotherapy and had no prior experience with an ALK inhibitor. Brain metastases at baseline were seen in 39.5% of patients. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea [85.5% (3.2% grade 3/4)], nausea [77.4% (6.5% grade 3/4)] and vomiting [71.8% (6.5% grade 3/4)][1].

About ASCEND-5
ASCEND-5 is an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of Zykadia to standard second-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed or docetaxel) in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC who progressed on prior crizotinib and one or two prior regimens of chemotherapy. Of 231 patients, 115 were randomized to ceritinib and 116 to chemotherapy. Of patients discontinuing chemotherapy due to disease progression, 75 crossed over to Zykadia. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea [72.2% (4.3% grade 3/4)], nausea [66.1% (7.8% grade 3/4)] and vomiting [52.2% (7.8% grade 3/4)] with ceritinib; fatigue [28.3% (4.4% grade 3/4)], nausea [23.0% (1.8% grade 3/4)], alopecia [21.2% (0% grade 3/4)] and neutropenia [20.4% (15.0% grade 3/4)] with chemotherapy[4].

About Zykadia
Zykadia is an oral, selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a gene that can fuse with others to form an abnormal "fusion protein" that promotes the development and growth of certain tumors in cancers including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Zykadia was granted conditional approval in the EU for the treatment of adult patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC previously treated with crizotinib. In the US, Zykadia was granted accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib.

Zykadia is currently approved in over 55 countries worldwide. Please visit www.NovartisOncology.com/news/product-portfolio/zykadia (link is external) for additional information.

Zykadia Important Safety Information
Zykadia may cause serious side effects.

Zykadia may cause stomach upset and intestinal problems in most patients, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and stomach-area pain. These problems can be severe. Patients should follow their doctor’s instructions about taking medicines to help these symptoms, and should call their doctor for advice if symptoms are severe or do not go away.

Zykadia may cause severe liver injury. Patients should have blood tests prior to the start of treatment with Zykadia, every two weeks for the first month of treatment and monthly thereafter, and should talk to their doctor right away if they experience any of the following symptoms: tiredness (fatigue), itchy skin, yellowing of the skin or the whites of the eyes, nausea or vomiting, decreased appetite, pain on the right side of the abdomen, urine turns dark or brown, or bleeding or bruising more easily than normal.

Zykadia may cause severe or life-threatening swelling (inflammation) of the lungs during treatment that can lead to death. Symptoms may be similar to those symptoms from lung cancer. Patients should tell their doctor right away about any new or worsening symptoms, including trouble breathing or shortness of breath, fever, cough, with or without mucous, or chest pain.

Zykadia may cause very slow, very fast, or abnormal heartbeats. Doctors should check their patient’s heart during treatment with Zykadia. Patients should tell their doctor right away if they feel new chest pain or discomfort, dizziness or lightheadedness, faint, or have abnormal heartbeats, blue discoloration of lips, shortness of breath, swelling of lower limbs or skin, or if they start to take or have any changes in heart or blood pressure medicines.

Zykadia may cause high levels of glucose in the blood. People who have diabetes or glucose intolerance, or who take a corticosteroid medicine have an increased risk of high blood sugar with Zykadia. Patients should have glucose blood tests prior to the start of treatment with Zykadia and during treatment. Patients should follow their doctor’s instructions about blood sugar monitoring and call their doctor right away with any symptoms of high blood sugar, including increased thirst and/or urinating often.

Zykadia may cause high levels of pancreatic enzymes in the blood and may cause pancreatitis. Patients should have blood tests prior to the start of treatment with Zykadia and as needed during their treatment with Zykadia. Patients should talk to their doctor if they experience signs and symptoms of pancreatitis which including upper abdominal pain that may spread to the back and get worse with eating.

Before patients take Zykadia, they should tell their doctor about all medical conditions, including liver problems; diabetes or high blood sugar; heart problems, including a condition called long QT syndrome; if they are pregnant, if they think they may be pregnant, or if they plan to become pregnant; are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed.

Zykadia may harm unborn babies. Women who are able to become pregnant must use a highly effective method of birth control (contraception) during treatment with Zykadia and up to 3 months after stopping Zykadia. It is not known if Zykadia passes into breast milk. Patients and their doctor should decide whether to take Zykadia or breastfeed, but should not do both.

Patients should tell their doctor about medicines they take, including prescription medicines, over-the-counter medicines, vitamins and herbal supplements. If they take Zykadia while using oral contraceptives, the oral contraceptives may become ineffective.

The most common adverse reactions with an incidence of >=10% were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, tiredness (fatigue), liver laboratory test abnormalities (requires blood test monitoring), abdominal pain, decreased appetite, constipation, rash, kidney laboratory test abnormalities (requires blood test monitoring), heartburn and anemia. Grade 3-4 adverse reactions with an incidence of >=5% were liver laboratory test abnormalities, tiredness (fatigue), diarrhea, nausea and hyperglycemia (requires blood test monitoring).

Patients should stop taking Zykadia and seek medical help immediately if they experience any of the following, which may be signs of an allergic reaction:

Difficulty in breathing or swallowing
Swelling of the face, lips, tongue or throat
Severe itching of the skin, with a red rash or raised bumps
Patients should tell their doctor of any side effect that bothers them or does not go away. These are not all of the possible side effects of Zykadia. For more information, patients should ask their doctor or pharmacist.

Patients should take Zykadia exactly as their health care provider tells them. Patients should not change their dose or stop taking Zykadia unless their health care provider advises them to. Zykadia should be taken once a day on an empty stomach. Patients should not eat for at least 2 hours before and 2 hours after taking Zykadia. If a dose of Zykadia is missed, they should take it as soon as they remember. If their next dose is due within the next 12 hours, they should skip the missed dose and take the next dose at their regular time. They should not take a double dose to make up for a forgotten dose. Patients should not drink grapefruit juice or eat grapefruit during treatment with Zykadia, as it may make the amount of Zykadia in their blood increase to a harmful level. If patients have to vomit after swallowing Zykadia capsules, they should not take more capsules until their next scheduled dose.

Please see full Prescribing Information for Zykadia.

New Data on the Combination of Lilly’s ALIMTA® (pemetrexed) and Merck’s KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) Show a Near-Doubling of Objective Response Rate Compared to Standard of Care Alone in First-Line Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

On October 9, 2016 Important clinical study results from one of Eli Lilly and Company’s (NYSE: LLY) ongoing immuno-oncology collaborations with Merck (known as MSD outside the U.S. and Canada) were reported today at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress, the annual meeting of the European Society for Medical Oncology (Press release, Eli Lilly, OCT 9, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515675]). Specifically, data released from KEYNOTE-021, Cohort G, which evaluated ALIMTA (pemetrexed) plus carboplatin in combination with Merck’s KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showed that the combination of ALIMTA, KEYTRUDA and carboplatin demonstrated superior efficacy compared to ALIMTA and carboplatin – standard of care – alone.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In KEYNOTE-021, Cohort G, which included patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression level, the combination of pemetrexed, pembrolizumab and carboplatin achieved a 55 percent objective response rate (ORR) compared to 29 percent for pemetrexed-plus-carboplatin alone, and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 47 percent. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.0 months with the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination. To date, this combination of pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin is the only anti-PD-1-containing regimen to demonstrate superior efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone in NSCLC patients receiving first-line treatment.

"These randomized study data of ALIMTA and KEYTRUDA in first-line nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer build on the early results we’ve seen in this combination and are very encouraging," said Richard Gaynor, M.D., senior vice president, product development and medical affairs for Lilly Oncology. "To see a near-doubling in the number of patients responding to this combination gives us hope for what may be able to be achieved above and beyond what is seen with the ALIMTA-containing standard-of-care regimen. These types of clinical advancements are truly exciting as we continue our pursuit to bring meaningful benefits to patients facing cancer."

Dr. Gaynor added, "These data also reflect the progress that Lilly is making in its oncology R&D strategy to develop cancer treatments across three key areas of disease modification: tumor cell signaling, tumor microenvironment and immuno-oncology. This approach allows for testing of combinations of internally derived agents to address tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance, through our own efforts and research collaborations."

KEYNOTE-021, Cohort G, included 123 previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression and whose tumors did not have EGFR mutations or ALK translocations. Patients were randomized to receive the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination (n=60) or pemetrexed-plus-carboplatin (n=63). Patients randomized to the pemetrexed-plus-carboplatin control arm had the option of crossing over to pembrolizumab monotherapy upon disease progression. The median follow-up was 10.6 months (range, 0.8-19.3).

The findings demonstrated that ORR nearly doubled with the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination, with an ORR of 55 percent (n=33/60), compared to 29 percent (n=18/63) for the control arm alone (treatment difference 26%, 95% CI, 9-42% p=0.0016); all responses were partial. Median duration of response was not reached in either group (range, 1.4+-13.0+ for the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination; 1.4+-15.2+ for the control arm). Responses in both groups were durable, with 88 percent (n=29/33) of responders in the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination group and 78 percent (n=14/18) of responders in the control arm group experiencing ongoing response at the time of data cut-off.

Additionally, the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death compared to the control arm (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI, 0.31-0.91, p=0.0102). Median PFS was 13.0 months with the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination compared to 8.9 months in the control arm. Overall survival (OS) was similar between the two arms, with 92 percent survival at six months in both, and 75 percent and 72 percent survival at 12 months in the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination and control arm, respectively.

Of treated patients on the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination arm, 47 percent remained on treatment as of the cut-off date, compared to 31 percent on the control arm. Of the treated patients who discontinued treatment on the control arm, 52 percent (n=32/62) subsequently received anti-PD-L1 therapy, with 32 percent crossing over to pembrolizumab monotherapy as allowed by the study protocol and 19 percent receiving it outside of study crossover.

Additional Safety Information from KEYNOTE-021, Cohort G
The most common treatment-related adverse events (occurring in at least 15% of patients) for the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination were fatigue, nausea, anemia, rash, vomiting, diarrhea, increased AST, constipation, decreased appetite, increased ALT, dysgeusia, and decreased neutrophils. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in this arm included fatigue, nausea, anemia, rash, vomiting, increased AST, increased ALT, and decreased neutrophils. The most common immune-mediated adverse events in patients receiving the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination were hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. Additionally, pneumonitis, infusion reactions, and severe skin toxicity were noted. These immune-mediated adverse events occurred at similar rates to patients receiving pembrolizumab as a single agent. There was one treatment-related death from sepsis in a patient receiving the pemetrexed-pembrolizumab-carboplatin combination, and two (one from sepsis and one from pancytopenia) in patients on the control arm.

About KEYNOTE-021, Cohort G
Cohort G of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 multi-cohort KEYNOTE-021 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin compared with pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with advanced, nonsquamous, EGFR- and ALK-negative NSCLC in the first-line treatment setting. Patients were randomized 1:1 to four cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 every three weeks) plus carboplatin AUC 5 (5 mg/mL/min), or pemetrexed plus carboplatin alone, followed by maintenance pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab. Randomization was stratified by PD-L1 expression (positive expression defined as TPS of one percent or more; negative expression defined as TPS of less than one percent). Patients randomized to the control arm were allowed to cross over to pembrolizumab monotherapy if they experienced disease progression. Response was assessed by blinded, independent central review using RECIST 1.1 every six weeks for the first 18 weeks, every nine weeks through the first year, and every 12 weeks in the second year. The primary endpoint was ORR; secondary endpoints included PFS, duration of response, and OS.

About KEYNOTE-189, a Phase 3 Trial of Pemetrexed-Pembrolizumab-Platinum Combination
KEYNOTE-189, a randomized Phase 3 study evaluating pemetrexed-plus-platinum chemotherapy (carboplatin or cisplatin) with and without pembrolizumab as initial therapy in NSCLC patients, is currently enrolling. The first results from this study could be available before the end of 2017.

Pemetrexed (marketed under the brand name ALIMTA) is a folate analog metabolic inhibitor that exerts its action by disrupting folate-dependent metabolic processes essential for cell replication. In vitro studies have shown that pemetrexed inhibits thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT), which are folate-dependent enzymes involved in the de novo biosynthesis of thymidine and purine nucleotides.

Pembrolizumab (marketed under the brand name KEYTRUDA) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by increasing the ability of the body’s immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. Pembrolizumab blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes, which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

NOTES TO EDITORS

About ALIMTA (pemetrexed)
In 2004, ALIMTA received consecutive approvals: it was the first agent to be approved in combination with cisplatin as a treatment for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, whose disease is unresectable or who are otherwise not candidates for curative surgery, and then as a single agent for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after prior treatment.

In 2008, ALIMTA, in combination with cisplatin, was approved as an initial chemotherapy treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC for patients with nonsquamous histology. At the time of this initial treatment approval, the FDA also approved a change to the indication for subsequent treatment. ALIMTA is now indicated as a single agent for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC after prior therapy.

In 2009, ALIMTA was approved as a maintenance therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, specifically for patients with a nonsquamous histology whose disease has not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based initial chemotherapy.

In 2012, ALIMTA was approved by the FDA as maintenance therapy for locally-advanced or metastatic NSCLC, following initial ALIMTA-plus-cisplatin treatment for locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC.

ALIMTA is not indicated for treatment of patients with squamous cell NSCLC. Myelosuppression is usually the dose-limiting toxicity with ALIMTA therapy.

Indications and Important Safety Information for ALIMTA (pemetrexed for injection)

Indications
ALIMTA is indicated in combination with cisplatin therapy for the initial treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

ALIMTA is indicated for the maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer whose disease has not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.

ALIMTA is indicated as a single agent for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer after prior chemotherapy.

Limitations of Use: ALIMTA is not indicated for the treatment of patients with squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer.

ALIMTA in combination with cisplatin is indicated for the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma whose disease is unresectable or who are otherwise not candidates for curative surgery.

Important Safety Information

Myelosuppression is usually the dose-limiting toxicity with ALIMTA therapy.

Contraindication
ALIMTA is contraindicated in patients who have a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to pemetrexed.

Warnings and Precautions
Prior to treatment with ALIMTA, patients must be instructed to initiate supplementation with oral folic acid. Additionally, intramuscular injections of vitamin B12 are also required prior to ALIMTA treatment. Folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation should be continued throughout treatment as they may reduce the severity of treatment-related hematologic and GI toxicities.

Dexamethasone or its equivalent should be administered the day before, the day of, and the day after ALIMTA treatment.

ALIMTA can suppress bone marrow function, as manifested by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia (or pancytopenia). Reduce doses for subsequent cycles based on hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities.

ALIMTA should not be administered to patients with a creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min. One patient with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 19 mL/min) who did not receive folic acid and vitamin B12 died of drug-related toxicity following administration of ALIMTA alone.

Caution should be used when administering NSAIDs concurrently with ALIMTA to patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance from 45 to 79 mL/min). Patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency should avoid taking NSAIDs with short elimination half-lives for a period of 2 days before, the day of, and 2 days following administration of ALIMTA. In the absence of data regarding potential interaction between ALIMTA and NSAIDs with longer half-lives, all patients taking these NSAIDs should interrupt dosing for at least 5 days before, the day of, and 2 days following ALIMTA administration. If concomitant administration of NSAIDs is necessary, patients should be monitored closely for toxicity, especially myelosuppression, renal, and gastrointestinal toxicity. No dose adjustment of ALIMTA is needed with concomitant NSAIDs in patients with normal renal function.

Do not initiate a cycle of treatment in patients unless the ANC is ≥1500 cells/mm3, the platelet count is ≥100,000 cells/mm3, and creatinine clearance is ≥45 mL/min.

Pregnancy Category D—ALIMTA may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Women should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus and should be advised to use effective contraceptive measures to prevent pregnancy during treatment with ALIMTA.

Drug Interactions
See Warnings and Precautions for specific information regarding NSAID administration in patients with renal insufficiency.

Concomitant administration of nephrotoxic drugs or substances that are tubularly secreted could result in delayed clearance of ALIMTA.

Use in Specific Patient Populations
It is recommended that nursing be discontinued if the mother is being treated with ALIMTA or discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug for the mother.

Efficacy of ALIMTA in pediatric patients has not been demonstrated. The most common toxicities reported in the studied pediatric patients were hematological (leukopenia, neutropenia/granulocytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia), liver function abnormalities (increased ALT/AST), fatigue, and nausea.

Dosage and Administration Guidelines
Complete blood cell counts, including platelet counts and periodic chemistry tests, which include renal and hepatic function tests, should be performed on all patients receiving ALIMTA.

Dose adjustments at the start of a subsequent cycle should be based on nadir hematologic counts or maximum nonhematologic toxicity from the preceding cycle of therapy. Modify or suspend therapy according to the Dosage Reduction Guidelines in the full Prescribing Information.

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (% incidence) – 1st-line advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS NSCLC)
The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3-4) with ALIMTA in combination with cisplatin versus gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin, respectively, for the 1st-line treatment of patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were neutropenia (15% vs 27%); leukopenia (5% vs 8%); thrombocytopenia (4% vs 13%); anemia (6% vs 10%); fatigue (7% vs 5%); nausea (7% vs 4%); vomiting (6% vs 6%); anorexia (2% vs 1%); creatinine elevation (1% vs 1%); and diarrhea (1% vs 2%).

Common adverse reactions (all grades) with ALIMTA in combination with cisplatin versus gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin, respectively, were nausea (56% vs 53%); fatigue (43% vs 45%); vomiting (40% vs 36%); anemia (33% vs 46%); neutropenia (29% vs 38%); anorexia (27% vs 24%); constipation (21% vs 20%); leukopenia (18% vs 21%); stomatitis/pharyngitis (14% vs 12%); alopecia (12% vs 21%); diarrhea (12% vs 13%); thrombocytopenia (10% vs 27%); neuropathy/sensory (9% vs 12%); taste disturbance (8% vs 9%); rash/desquamation (7% vs 8%); dyspepsia/heartburn (5% vs 6%); and creatinine elevation (10% vs 7%).

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (% incidence) – Maintenance in advanced NS NSCLC following non-ALIMTA containing, platinum-based induction therapy
The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3-4) with ALIMTA as a single agent versus placebo, respectively, for the maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS NSCLC) following non-ALIMTA containing platinum-based induction therapy were anemia (3% vs 1%); neutropenia (3% vs 0%); leukopenia (2% vs 1%); fatigue (5% vs 1%); nausea (1% vs 1%); anorexia (2% vs 0%); mucositis/stomatitis (1% vs 0%); diarrhea (1% vs 0%); infection (2% vs 0%); and neuropathy-sensory (1% vs 0%).

Common adverse reactions (all grades) with ALIMTA as a single agent versus placebo, respectively, after non-ALIMTA containing platinum-based induction therapy were anemia (15% vs 6%); neutropenia (6% vs 0%); leukopenia (6% vs 1%); increased ALT (10% vs 4%); increased AST (8% vs 4%); fatigue (25% vs 11%); nausea (19% vs 6%); anorexia (19% vs 5%); vomiting (9% vs 1%); mucositis/stomatitis (7% vs 2%); diarrhea (5% vs 3%); infection (5% vs 2%); neuropathy-sensory (9% vs 4%); and rash/desquamation (10% vs 3%).

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (% incidence) – Maintenance in advanced NS NSCLC following ALIMTA plus cisplatin induction therapy
The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3-4) with ALIMTA as a single agent versus placebo, respectively, for the maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS NSCLC) following ALIMTA plus cisplatin induction therapy were anemia (4.8% vs 0.6%); neutropenia (3.9% vs 0%); and fatigue (4.5% vs 0.6%).

Common adverse reactions (all grades) with ALIMTA as a single agent versus placebo, respectively, following ALIMTA plus cisplatin induction therapy were anemia (15% vs 4.8%); neutropenia (9% vs 0.6%); fatigue (18% vs 11%); nausea (12% vs 2.4%); vomiting (6% vs 1.8%); mucositis/stomatitis (5% vs 2.4%); and edema (5% vs 3.6%).

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (% incidence) – 2nd-line advanced NS NSCLC
The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3-4) with ALIMTA as a single agent versus docetaxel, respectively, for the 2nd-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were neutropenia (5% vs 40%); leukopenia (4% vs 27%); thrombocytopenia (2% vs 0%); anemia (4% vs 4%); fatigue (5% vs 5%); nausea (3% vs 2%); anorexia (2% vs 3%); vomiting (2% vs 1%); increased ALT (2% vs 0%); increased AST (1% vs 0%); and stomatitis/pharyngitis (1% vs 1%).

Common adverse reactions (all grades) with ALIMTA as a single agent versus docetaxel, respectively, were fatigue (34% vs 36%); nausea (31% vs 17%); anorexia (22% vs 24%); anemia (19% vs 22%); vomiting (16% vs 12%); stomatitis/pharyngitis (15% vs 17%); rash (14% vs 6%); diarrhea (13% vs 24%); leukopenia (12% vs 34%); thrombocytopenia (8% vs 1%); increased ALT (8% vs 1%); increased AST (7% vs 1%); constipation (6% vs 4%); fever (8% vs 8%); pruritus (7% vs 2%); alopecia (6% vs 38%); and neutropenia (11% vs 45%).

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (% incidence) – MPM
The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3-4) with ALIMTA in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone, respectively, for the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) were neutropenia (23% vs 3%); leukopenia (15% vs 1%); thrombocytopenia (5% vs 0%); anemia (4% vs 0%); nausea (12% vs 6%); vomiting (11% vs 4%); fatigue (10% vs 9%); creatinine elevation (1% vs 1%); stomatitis/pharyngitis (3% vs 0%); anorexia (1% vs 1%); diarrhea (4% vs 0%); constipation (1% vs 1%); dyspepsia (1% vs 0%); dehydration (4% vs 1%); neuropathy-sensory (0% vs 1%); rash (1% vs 0%); and creatinine clearance decrease (1% vs 2%).

Common adverse reactions (all grades) with ALIMTA in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone, respectively, were neutropenia (56% vs 13%); leukopenia (53% vs 17%); anemia (26% vs 10%); thrombocytopenia (23% vs 9%); nausea (82% vs 77%); vomiting (57% vs 50%); fatigue (48% vs 42%); creatinine elevation (11% vs 10%); creatinine clearance decreased (16% vs 18%); conjunctivitis (5% vs 1%); anorexia (20% vs 14%); diarrhea (17% vs 8%); constipation (12% vs 7%); dyspepsia (5% vs 1%); dehydration (7% vs 1%); neuropathy-sensory (10% vs 10%); taste disturbance (8% vs 6%); rash (16% vs 5%); alopecia (11% vs 6%); and stomatitis/pharyngitis (23% vs 6%).

Adaptimmune Provides Update on Study of NY-ESO SPEAR® T-cell Therapy in Synovial Sarcoma at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2016 Congress

On October 9, 2016 Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc (Nasdaq:ADAP), a leader in T-cell therapy to treat cancer, reported a poster presentation of updated data on its lead clinical program, an NY-ESO SPEAR (Specific Peptide Enhanced Affinity Receptor) T-cell receptor therapy, in patients with synovial sarcoma at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress (Press release, Adaptimmune, OCT 9, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2210294 [SID:SID1234515673]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These data help clarify the design of our upcoming pivotal studies in sarcoma," said Dr. Rafael Amado, Adaptimmune’s Chief Medical Officer. "We have seen durable tumor responses to our SPEAR T-cells and the preliminary benefit:risk profile appears favorable. Further, although the data are preliminary, we do see activity against tumors with lower levels of NY-ESO expression, which we hope will further expand the utility of this therapy, and we have evidence that fludarabine is required in the pre-conditioning regimen. With these data in hand, we will initiate Cohort 4 with our modified fludarabine pre-conditioning regimen, and continue toward our goal of bringing this novel TCR-based immunotherapy to sarcoma patients."

In a poster presentation entitled, "Open Label Non-Randomized Multi-Cohort Pilot Study of Genetically Engineered NY-ESO-1 Specific NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells in HLA-A*02+ Patients with Synovial Sarcoma," Crystal Mackall, M.D., Professor of Pediatrics and Medicine; Associate Director of the Stanford Cancer Institute, provided an update on the following synovial sarcoma cohorts:

Cohort 1: Subjects with high (≥50 percent 2+/3+ by IHC) NY-ESO-1 antigen expression and lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine
Cohort 2: Subjects with low (>1 percent to <50 percent 2+/3+ by IHC) NY-ESO-1 antigen expression and lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine
Cohort 3: Subjects with high (≥ 50 percent 2+/3+ by IHC) NY-ESO-1 antigen expression and lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide alone (no fludarabine)
Cohort 4: Subjects with high (≥ 50 percent 2+/3+ by IHC) NY-ESO-1 antigen expression and lymphodepletion with a modified (lower) dose than Cohort I of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine
Cohort 1
Adaptimmune has previously announced that in the first cohort of synovial sarcoma patients, NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells demonstrated a robust clinical response, including a 50 percent (6/12) response rate, and a 60 percent response rate (6/10) in those who received the target dose of at least 1×109 transduced cells. The median duration of response is reported to be approximately 31 weeks (August 31 data cutoff). Ongoing NY-ESO SPEAR T-cell persistence has been observed for up to 36 months.

Cohort 2
Four subjects of a targeted 10 are currently enrolled in the second cohort; three patients have been treated with NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells. As of August 31, 2016 best responses seen in these three patients were: one partial response (PR), one stable disease (SD), and one progressive disease (PD).

Cohorts 3 and 4
Five patients are currently enrolled in the third cohort; no objective responses have been observed to date. As pre-specified in the protocol, enrollment in cohort 3 has ceased, and company has initiated enrollment in Cohort 4.

Tolerability
NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells continue to demonstrate a generally acceptable benefit: risk profile in all treated patients to date. The most common (>30%) related adverse events include pyrexia, lymphopenia, decreased white blood cell (WBC), nausea, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, decreased platelet count (PLT), sinus tachycardia, and rash. Most common toxicities related to therapy can be monitored and managed with medical intervention and supportive care. While there are differences in the patient populations, incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with NY-ESO-1c259 SPEAR T appears to be of lower frequency and severity than reported with CD19 CAR-T therapy. As previously reported at the 2016 Annual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Meeting, there was one fatal SAE of bone marrow failure in Cohort 2 of our synovial sarcoma trial. Internal investigations have not identified a mechanism by which NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells may have caused bone marrow failure.

Adaptimmune’s SPEAR T-cell candidates are novel cancer immunotherapies that have been engineered to target and destroy cancer cells by strengthening a patient’s natural T-cell response. T-cells are a type of white blood cell that play a central role in a person’s immune response. Adaptimmune’s goal is to harness the power of the T-cell and, through its multiple therapeutic candidate, significantly impact cancer treatment and clinical outcomes of patients with solid and hematologic cancers.

Overall survival data from LUX-Lung 7 head-to-head trial of Gilotrif® (afatinib) versus Iressa® (gefitinib) presented at ESMO

On October 9, 2016 Boehringer Ingelheim reported results from the LUX-Lung 7 trial that directly compared the efficacy and safety of second-generation EGFR-directed therapy Gilotrif (afatinib) and first-generation Iressa (gefitinib), in the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Press release, Boehringer Ingelheim, OCT 9, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515672]). The trial investigated overall survival (OS) as a primary endpoint and a reduction in the risk of death (14%) was observed for patients treated with afatinib versus gefitinib. The median survival of patients treated with afatinib was 27.9 months compared to 24.5 months for those receiving gefitinib, without reaching significance. The OS outcomes observed with afatinib were consistent across common EGFR mutation types.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Details of the analysis will be presented today at the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress in Copenhagen, Denmark, October 7 – 11 (abstract #LBA43 – Oral presentation, NSCLC, metastatic 1, Sunday, October 9, 11:45 – 12:00 CEST (5:45 – 6:00 ET)).

"The LUX-Lung 7 trial provides new insight into first-line treatment options for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients and is the first global head-to-head trial directly comparing two EGFR-directed therapies," commented Shirish Gadgeel, M.D., leader of the Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary, Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit. "These study findings may help inform treatment decisions for patients whose tumors have EGFR mutations."

Updated results also confirmed the primary analysis that showed the global Phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial met two of its three co-primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review and time to treatment failure (a measure of time between start and discontinuation of treatment for any reason). Results from the primary analysis, presented in 2015, showed that afatinib significantly reduced the risk of lung cancer progression and the risk of treatment failure, both by 27% versus gefitinib. The improvement in PFS became more pronounced over time. After two years of treatment, more than twice as many patients on afatinib were alive and progression-free than those on gefitinib (after 18 months; 27% vs 15% and after 24 months; 18% vs 8%). Additionally, significantly more patients experienced an objective response (ORR; a clinically meaningful decrease in tumor size) with afatinib when compared to gefitinib.

Both afatinib and gefitinib demonstrated similar improvements in patient-reported outcome measures in the LUX-Lung 7 trial with no significant differences in health-related quality of life with afatinib compared to gefitinib treatment. Treatment with both afatinib and gefitinib were generally tolerable, leading to an equal rate of treatment-related discontinuation in both arms (6%). Adverse events (AEs) observed in the trial were consistent with the known safety profiles of both treatments. The overall frequency of serious AEs was 44.4% for afatinib and 37.1% for gefitinib. The most common grade ≥3 related AEs with afatinib were: diarrhea (13%) and rash/acne (9%), and with gefitinib: aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase (9%) and rash/acne (3%). Drug-related interstitial lung disease was reported for four patients on gefitinib and no patients on afatinib. Dose modification of afatinib was available in patients who met a set criteria in order to better manage AEs. As gefitinib is only available in one dose formulation, no dose reduction was administered.

"We believe that the latest results of the LUX-Lung 7 trial data adds to the growing body of evidence that reinforces the treatment benefits of afatanib in patients with these types of tumors," said Martina Flammer, M.D., Vice President, Clinical Development & Medical Affairs Specialty Care, Boehringer Ingelheim.

Afatinib is approved in over 70 countries for the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Approval of afatinib in this indication was based on the primary endpoint of PFS from the LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial where afatinib significantly delayed tumor growth when compared to standard chemotherapy. In addition, afatinib is the first treatment to have shown an OS benefit for patients with specific types of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC compared to chemotherapy. A significant OS benefit was demonstrated independently in the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials for patients with the most common EGFR mutation (del19) compared to chemotherapy. Afatinib is also approved in the U.S., EU and other markets for the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung whose disease has progressed on or after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. Approval of afatinib in this indication is based on results of the LUX-Lung 8 study, which showed a significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared to Tarceva (erlotinib) in patients with SqCC of the lung.

About the LUX-Lung 7 trial
LUX-Lung 7 is the first global, head-to-head trial comparing second- and first-generation EGFR-directed therapies (afatinib and gefitinib respectively) for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who received no prior treatment. The Phase IIb trial included 319 patients with advanced stage NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations (del19 or L858R). The trial’s co-primary endpoints were PFS by independent review, time to treatment failure and OS; and the secondary endpoints included ORR, disease control rate, tumor shrinkage, patient-reported outcomes and safety.

Results from the primary analysis: compared to gefitinib, afatinib significantly improved:

PFS (HR=0.73; 95% CI, 0.57‒0.95; p=0.017; median: 11.0 months [afatinib] versus 10.9 months [gefitinib]). The improvement in PFS with afatinib was consistent across pre-defined clinical subgroups, including gender, age, race and EGFR mutation type
Time to treatment failure (HR=0.73; 95% CI, 0.58‒0.92; p=0.0073; median: 13.7 months [afatinib] versus 11.5 months [gefitinib])
ORR (70% vs 56%, p=0.0083)
Data from the trial showed a reduction in the risk of death for patients treated with afatinib compared to gefitinib, without reaching significance (HR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.66‒1.12; p=0.2580; median: 27.9 months [afatinib] versus 24.5 months [gefitinib]). These OS data have a maturity of 71%, with further analysis to follow once full maturity has been reached.

What is GILOTRIF?

GILOTRIF is a prescription medicine used to treat people with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC):

that has certain types of abnormal epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genes. Your doctor will perform a test to check for certain types of abnormal EGFR genes, and make sure that GILOTRIF is right for you. GILOTRIF may be used when you have not had previous treatment for cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. It is not known if GILOTRIF is safe and effective in treating lung cancer with other abnormal EGFR genes.
or

that is squamous type and has spread to other parts of the body after you have tried chemotherapy that contains platinum.
It is not known if GILOTRIF is safe and effective in children.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION ABOUT GILOTRIF

Before you take GILOTRIF, tell your doctor if you:

have kidney or liver problems
have lung or breathing problems other than lung cancer
have a history of severe dry eye or any other eye problems. Tell your doctor if you wear contact lenses.
have heart problems
have any other medical conditions
are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. GILOTRIF can harm your unborn baby. You should not become pregnant while taking GILOTRIF.
Women who are able to become pregnant should use effective birth control during treatment with GILOTRIF and for at least 2 weeks after your last dose of GILOTRIF. Talk to your doctor about birth control methods that may be right for you.
Tell your doctor right away if you become pregnant or think you are pregnant while taking GILOTRIF.
are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed. It is not known if GILOTRIF passes into your breast milk. Do not breastfeed while taking GILOTRIF and for 2 weeks after your last dose of GILOTRIF. Talk to your doctor about the best way to feed your baby if you take GILOTRIF.
Tell your doctor about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements. GILOTRIF may affect the way other medicines work, and other medicines may affect the way GILOTRIF works.

What to avoid while taking GILOTRIF

Limit your time in the sun. GILOTRIF can make your skin sensitive to the sun. You could get or have worsening rash or acne. You could get a severe sunburn. Use sunscreen and wear a hat and clothes that cover your skin while you are taking GILOTRIF if you have to be in sunlight.

GILOTRIF may cause serious side effects, including:

Diarrhea. Diarrhea is common with GILOTRIF and may sometimes be severe. Severe diarrhea can cause loss of body fluid (dehydration) and kidney problems that can sometimes lead to death. During your treatment with GILOTRIF, your doctor should prescribe medicines to treat diarrhea. Take this medicine exactly as your doctor tells you to. Tell your doctor if you have diarrhea. Get medical attention right away if your diarrhea does not go away or becomes severe.
Skin reactions. GILOTRIF can cause redness, rash, and acne. It is important to get treatment for skin reactions as soon as you notice them. Take medicines to help skin reactions exactly as your doctor tells you to. Get medical attention right away if you develop severe skin reactions such as peeling or blistering of the skin, or blisters in your mouth.
Lung or breathing problems. GILOTRIF may cause inflammation of the lung that may lead to death. Symptoms may be similar to those symptoms from lung cancer. Tell your doctor right away if you have any new or worsening lung problems, or any combination of the following symptoms: trouble breathing or shortness of breath, cough, or fever.
Liver problems. GILOTRIF can cause liver problems that can sometimes lead to death. Tell your doctor right away if you have any symptoms of a liver problem which may include:
yellowing of your skin or the white part of your eyes (jaundice)
dark or brown (tea-colored) urine
pain on the upper right side of your stomach area (abdomen)
bleeding or bruising more easily than normal
feeling very tired
Your doctor will do blood tests to check your liver function during your treatment with GILOTRIF.

Eye problems. Tell your doctor right away if you have symptoms of eye problems. Symptoms may include:
eye pain, swelling, redness, or tearing
blurred vision
sensitivity to light
other changes in your vision
Heart problems. Tell your doctor right away if you have any symptoms of a heart problem which may include:
new or worsening shortness of breath while at rest or with activity
cough
tiredness
swelling of your ankles, feet, or legs
feeling that your heart is pounding or racing (palpitations)
sudden weight gain
The most common side effects of GILOTRIF include diarrhea, rash, mouth sores, nail inflammation, dry skin, acne, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, itching.

GILOTRIF may cause decreased fertility in females and males. Talk to your doctor if you have concerns about your fertility.

Tell your doctor if you have any side effect that bothers you or that does not go away.

These are not all of the possible side effects of GILOTRIF. For more information, ask your doctor or pharmacist.

Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects.

You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088 .

Please see the full Prescribing Information, including Patient Information.