FoRx Therapeutics Announces Development Candidate Nomination of Potential Best-in-Class PARG Inhibitor FORX-428

On May 3, 2024 FoRx Therapeutics AG, a company committed to discovering and developing innovative drugs targeting cancer-relevant DNA Damage Response (DDR) pathways, reported the nomination of its first preclinical development candidate, FORX-428, an inhibitor of Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) (Press release, FoRx Therapeutics, MAY 3, 2024, View Source [SID1234644973]). FORX-428 has strong best-in-class potential and is being developed for the treatment of solid tumors. IND-enabling activities have already been initiated.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

FORX-428 is an oral, highly potent and selective inhibitor of PARG that shows excellent single-agent activity in multiple relevant preclinical tumor models. The compound is well tolerated and demonstrates a favorable pharmacological and safety profile. In addition to single-agent activity resulting in tumor regressions, FORX-428 exhibits synergistic tumor cell killing in combination with various targeted agents, underscoring the compound’s outstanding potential in both monotherapy and combination settings to address genetically defined cancers. FoRx Therapeutics has identified novel predictive biomarkers which allow for the selection of patient populations most likely to benefit from treatment. FORX-428 has the potential to achieve transformative outcomes in patients with cancers of high medical need or affected by therapy resistance.

FoRx Therapeutics holds all development and commercial rights to FORX-428.

Dr Tarig Bashir, CEO of FoRx Therapeutics, commented: "We are proud to announce the nomination of our first development candidate FORX-428. The achievement of this important milestone is a testimony to FoRx Therapeutics’ ability to tackle and successfully deliver on challenging targets in the DNA Damage Response field. We look forward to advancing FORX-428 with its best-in-class profile into the clinic and to bring a novel treatment option with transformative potential to cancer patients who have at this point only limited therapy options or suffer from therapy resistance."

Dr Frank Zenke, CSO of FoRx Therapeutics, added: Our dedicated research team has achieved a remarkable milestone, conducting an extensive investigation of various chemical series aimed at identifying a development candidate with best-in-class potential. FORX-428 exhibits compelling anti-tumor efficacy and exceptional tolerability in numerous cancer models, and we are excited to advance this promising compound into clinical trials for cancer patients."

About PARG
Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) is a key protein that plays a pivotal role in repairing damaged DNA. PARG breaks down poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains, which serve to attract DNA repair factors to sites of DNA damage. Cancers are by default genomically instable and cannot tolerate excessive DNA damage as opposed to normal cells. By inhibiting PARG, the degradation of PAR chains is halted, leading to a block of DNA repair and the accumulation of persistent and lethal DNA damage. Cancers with intrinsic deficiencies in particular DNA repair pathways exhibit exceptional sensitivity to pharmacological PARG inhibition, which presents a prime opportunity for therapeutic intervention.

New Natera Publication Bolsters Evidence for Extended Surveillance with Signatera™ in Breast Cancer

On May 3, 2024 Natera, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTRA), a global leader in cell-free DNA and genetic testing, reported a new publication in JCO Precision Oncology reporting on the ability of its personalized and tumor-informed molecular residual disease (MRD) test, Signatera, to detect recurrence early in patients with early-stage breast cancer (Press release, Natera, MAY 3, 2024, View Source [SID1234642642]). The full study can be found here.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The study evaluated a total of 1,136 prospectively collected and banked plasma samples from 156 early-stage breast cancer patients enrolled in the multi-site Exploratory Breast Lead Interval Study (EBLIS). Patients were followed for up to 12 years after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, with blood samples collected semi-annually and then analyzed using Signatera. Key findings include:

Signatera detected relapse up to 38 months earlier than imaging (median lead time 10.5 months), with an overall sensitivity of 88.2% (30/34)
Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly worse in patients who were ctDNA-positive, regardless of hormone receptor and HER2 subtype (HR 52.98 and 53.69, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, ctDNA status was the most significant factor associated with RFS and OS.
"The EBLIS study shows that post-operative monitoring with Signatera can detect recurrence much earlier than scans, opening up a critical window for early therapeutic intervention and clinical trials focused on molecular recurrence," said Charles Coombes, MD, PhD professor of medical oncology at the Imperial College London and principal investigator of the EBLIS study. "Additionally, we demonstrate the value of longitudinal testing in providing reassurance to breast cancer patients, as those who test serially ctDNA-negative show better clinical outcomes."

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in the U.S. and the second leading cause of cancer death in women.1 The current standard of care for most patients with early-stage breast cancer consists of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy.2,3 However, patients with early-stage breast cancer experience a rate of local recurrence of roughly 15% and distant metastases of 21% after primary treatment.4

"This expanded EBLIS study reinforces the importance of early recurrence detection with Signatera and the potential to improve care management for patients with breast cancer," said Minetta Liu, MD, chief medical officer of oncology. "The findings also bolster the evidence for long-term monitoring of high-risk breast cancer patients, who often face late recurrences."

About Signatera

Signatera is a personalized, tumor-informed, molecular residual disease test for patients previously diagnosed with cancer. Custom-built for each individual, Signatera uses circulating tumor DNA to detect and quantify cancer left in the body, identify recurrence earlier than standard of care tools, and help optimize treatment decisions. The test is available for clinical and research use and is covered by Medicare for patients with colorectal cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and muscle invasive bladder cancer, as well as for immunotherapy monitoring of any solid tumor. Signatera has been clinically validated across multiple cancer types and indications, with published evidence in more than 60 peer-reviewed papers.

DecisionDx®-SCC Significantly Improves Prediction Accuracy of Metastatic Events after Mohs Surgery in New Study of Patients with High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tumors of the Head and Neck

On May 3, 2024 Castle Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: CSTL), a company improving health through innovative tests that guide patient care, reported that new data supporting the utility of its DecisionDx-SCC test in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tumors located on the head and neck (H&N) will be shared at the 56th American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS) Annual Meeting, being held May 2-5 in Phoenix (Press release, Castle Biosciences, MAY 3, 2024, View Source [SID1234642641]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Mohs surgery is commonly used to remove high-risk SCC tumors located on a patient’s head or neck and is the best method to ensure complete removal of the tumor," said Sherrif Ibrahim, M.D., Ph.D., lead study author and board-certified Mohs micrographic surgeon and dermatologist at Rochester Dermatologic Surgery in Victor, New York. "In most cases, once a tumor is removed completely, the patient is in the clear. However, aggressive SCC tumors may still return in the same location from which they were removed or worse, spread to other parts of the body, posing a very serious health risk to patients.

"The data being presented at ACMS show the power of DecisionDx-SCC to identify these high-risk patients, enabling more risk-appropriate surveillance or adjuvant treatments to help reduce the patient’s risk of these events occurring."

Details regarding Castle’s poster at ACMS are included below:

Title: Addition of the 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test in risk assessment improves prognostic accuracy and risk stratification for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HR-cSCC) of the head and neck successfully treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS)
Poster Number: Poster 21
First and Presenting Author: Sherrif Ibrahim, M.D., Ph.D.
Location: Valley of the Sun Ballroom foyer (2nd floor), Sheraton Phoenix Downtown
Summary: Despite reported definitive, clear tumor margins, 5-8% of patients with high-risk SCC treated with Mohs surgery will still develop metastasis. This study included 417 patients who received definitive Mohs surgery to remove high-risk SCC tumors of the H&N with reported clear margins. DecisionDx-SCC testing of the tumor tissue before removal significantly increased the prediction accuracy of metastatic events, when used alone and when combined with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) staging or American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition (AJCC8) staging, to better guide risk-aligned patient care decisions regarding metastatic surveillance or the use of adjuvant treatments like radiation.
Presenting authors will be available to answer questions regarding their posters on Saturday, May 4, from 12-1 p.m. Mountain Standard Time. Abstracts will also be in ACMS’ CME & Abstract Book and available for online viewing via the Planstone abstract site.

About DecisionDx-SCC

DecisionDx-SCC is a 40-gene expression profile test that uses an individual patient’s tumor biology to predict individual risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma metastasis for patients with one or more risk factors. The test result, in which patients are stratified into a Class 1 (low), Class 2A (higher) or Class 2B (highest) risk category, predicts individual metastatic risk to inform risk-appropriate management. Peer-reviewed publications have demonstrated that DecisionDx-SCC is an independent predictor of metastatic risk and that integrating DecisionDx-SCC with current prognostic methods can add positive predictive value to clinician decisions regarding staging and management.

TAR-200 monotherapy shows greater than 80% complete response rate in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

On May 3, 2024 Johnson & Johnson reported updated results from Cohort 2 of the Phase 2b SunRISe-1 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of investigational TAR-200 monotherapy in patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ, who are ineligible for, or decline, radical cystectomy (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, MAY 3, 2024, View Source [SID1234642640]). These data were featured today in a plenary session (Abstract #P2-01) at the 2024 American Urological Association Annual Meeting (AUA) taking place May 3-6, 2024, in San Antonio, Texas.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"The high complete response rate and durability of these responses observed in patients treated with TAR-200 underscores the potential of this treatment approach for patients with BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC," said Joseph Jacob,* M.D., M.S., Department of Urology, Upstate Medical University, presenting author. "These results address an area of high unmet need for bladder sparing therapies in this patient population."

Results included an evaluation of 85 patients (median age of 71 years old: range 40-88; 32.9% with concurrent papillary disease) who received TAR-200 monotherapy. The centrally confirmed complete response (CR) rate was 82.8% by urine cytology and/or biopsy (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.6-91.4). The study protocol did not allow retreatment for nonresponders, consistent with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. The estimated 1-year duration of response (DOR) rate is 74.6% (95% CI, 49.8-88.4), with median follow-up in responders of 29.9 weeks (range, 14-140); 41 of 48 responders (85%) remain in CR at data cutoff as of January 2, 2024, and none of the responders progressed to muscle-invasive bladder cancer or metastasis. Ninety-eight percent (47 of 48) of CRs were achieved at first disease assessment at week 12, and four of five patients who have completed two years of treatment remain in CR. The investigator-assessed confirmed CR rate correlated strongly with central results.1

Interim results from the SunRISe-1 study were featured at the European Society for Medical Oncology 2023 Congress and shared at AUA 2023. These results were also presented at the European Association of Urology 2024 Congress.

Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 61 patients (71.8%). The most common (≥10%) were pollakiuria (35.3%), dysuria (29.4%), micturition urgency (15.3%), and urinary tract infections (15.3%). Seven patients (8.2%) had Grade 3 or higher TRAEs and four patients (4.7%) had one or more serious TRAEs. Four patients (4.7%) had TRAEs leading to discontinuation and no deaths were reported.

"These study results mark a significant step in our mission to bring new treatment options to patients that focus on bladder preservation and long-term survival," said Christopher Cutie, M.D., Vice President, Disease Area Leader, Bladder Cancer, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. "These results reinforce the potential of TAR-200 to transform the treatment landscape and our ongoing dedication to address unmet needs for patients facing this challenging disease."

TAR-200 is an investigational targeted releasing system designed to provide extended local release of gemcitabine into the bladder. It is installed in a physician’s office setting during a 3- to 5-minute procedure with no anesthesia. In December 2023, the FDA granted TAR-200 Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) for the potential future treatment of patients with BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC, who are ineligible for or elected not to undergo radical cystectomy (surgical removal of the bladder).

Bladder cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the U.S., with more than 83,000 patients diagnosed each year, with NMIBC accounting for about 75-85% of all newly diagnosed bladder cancers.2,3 Although BCG immunotherapy has been accepted as the standard of care for nearly five decades, 30-40% of patients do not respond to BCG and experience disease recurrence or progression.4 In such scenarios, radical cystectomy (removal of the bladder and neighboring structures and organs) emerges as the primary treatment option. This major abdominal procedure requires a urinary diversion to be created to collect and store urine.5

About SunRISe-1
SunRISe-1 (NCT04640623) is a randomized, parallel-assignment, open-label Phase 2 clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of TAR-200 in combination with cetrelimab, TAR-200 alone, or cetrelimab alone for BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC carcinoma in situ (CIS) patients who are ineligible for, or elected not to undergo, radical cystectomy. Participants are randomized to 1 of 4 cohorts: treatment with TAR-200 in combination with cetrelimab (Cohort 1), TAR-200 alone (Cohort 2), cetrelimab alone (Cohort 3), or TAR-200 alone with papillary disease only (Cohort 4). The primary endpoint is CR rate at any time point. Secondary endpoints include DOR, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, quality of life, safety and tolerability. Cohorts 1 and 3 were closed to further enrollment effective June 1, 2023.

About TAR-200
TAR-200 is an investigational targeted releasing system, enabling controlled release of gemcitabine into the bladder, increasing the amount of time the drug delivery system spends in the bladder and sustaining local drug exposure. The safety and efficacy of TAR-200 are being evaluated in Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer in SunRISe-2 and SunRISe-4, NMIBC in SunRISe-1, SunRISe-3 and SunRISe-5.

About Cetrelimab
Administered intravenously, cetrelimab is an investigational programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody being studied for the treatment of bladder cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, and multiple myeloma as part of a combination treatment. Cetrelimab is also being evaluated in multiple other combination regimens across the Janssen Oncology portfolio.

About High-Risk Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
High-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) is a type of non-invasive bladder cancer that is more likely to recur or spread beyond the lining of the bladder, called the urothelium, and progress to invasive bladder cancer compared to low-risk NMIBC.6,7 HR-NMIBC makes up 15-44% of patients with NMIBC and is characterized by a high-grade, large tumor size, presence of multiple tumors, and CIS. Radical cystectomy is currently recommended for NMIBC patients who fail BCG therapy, with over 90% cancer-specific survival if performed before muscle-invasive progression.8,9 Given that NMIBC typically affects older patients, many may be unwilling or unfit to undergo radical cystectomy.10 The high rates of recurrence and progression can pose significant morbidity and distress for these patients.

Phase 2 data for ERLEADA® (apalutamide) plus androgen deprivation therapy following radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer show 100% biochemical free recurrence rate more than two years post-surgery

On May 3, 2024 Johnson & Johnson reported results from the open-label, single-arm Phase 2 Apa-RP study evaluating adjuvant treatment with ERLEADA (apalutamide) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with HRLPC who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, MAY 3, 2024, View Source [SID1234642639]). Following RP, patients who received the treatment regimen showed a 100% biochemical recurrence (BCR)–free rate at 24 months.1 These data were presented today at an Oral Presentation Session (Abstract #P2-07) at the 2024 American Urological Association Annual Meeting AUA, May 3-6, 2024, in San Antonio, Texas.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Findings from the Apa-RP study support the benefit of treatment intensification with apalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy following radical prostatectomy for patients who are at high risk for BCR and thus progression to metastatic prostate cancer," said Neal Shore, M.D., F.A.C.S., Steering Committee Chair and Chief Medical Officer, Surgical Oncology and Urology, Genesis Care.* "Results from this study encourage additional research for high-risk localized prostate cancer and highlight the promise of bringing treatment into earlier stages of disease following radical prostatectomy."

The study met its primary endpoint, showing that patients who received 12 months of ERLEADA plus ADT adjuvant to RP experienced no confirmed biochemical recurrence after 12 additional months of follow-up. The treatment regimen demonstrated a serum testosterone recovery (≥150 ng/dL) rate of 76.4% at 12 months (95% CI, 65.0–84.5). The safety profile of ERLEADA with ADT was consistent with previous reports: treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 99.1% of patients; 22.2% of TEAEs were grade 3-4.1

"Despite treatment advancements over the last decade, half of patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer experience disease recurrence less than two years after radical prostatectomy, highlighting a need for treatment options that reduce longer-term risks," said Luca Dezzani, M.D., Vice President, Medical Affairs, Solid Tumor, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. "Studies like Apa-RP coupled with the continued evaluation of ERLEADA in ongoing Phase 3 studies are critical steps in understanding the full potential of earlier treatment intervention, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes."

Approximately 300,000 people are diagnosed with prostate cancer each year in the U.S.2 Up to 40% of patients will be classified as high-risk.3 Despite advancements in treatment, disease recurrence remains substantial; up to 50% of patients within ten years of surgery experience recurrence and carry a significant risk of disease progression and death.4

About Apa-RP
The Phase 2 multicenter, open-label single-arm study (NCT04523207) evaluated 108 patients across 32 U.S. community urologic practices. Patients were treatment-naïve with HRLPC who had undergone RP and were treated with ERLEADA (240 mg, once daily) for 12 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) and ADT for 12 months. The primary endpoint evaluated BCR-free rate, defined as two sequential prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of <=0.2 ng/mL. The secondary endpoints included testosterone recovery rate and safety.

About ERLEADA
ERLEADA (apalutamide) is an androgen receptor inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). ERLEADA received U.S. Food and Administration (FDA) approval for nmCRPC in February 2018 and received U.S. FDA approval for mCSPC in September 2019. To date, more than 200,000 patients worldwide have been treated with ERLEADA. Additional studies are ongoing in the evaluation of ERLEADA for the treatment of localized high-risk or locally advanced prostate cancer including the Phase 3 ATLAS 15 (NCT02531516) and PROTEUS (NCT03767244) studies.

For more information, visit www.ERLEADA.com.

ERLEADA IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Cerebrovascular and Ischemic Cardiovascular Events — In a randomized study (SPARTAN) of patients with nmCRPC, ischemic cardiovascular events occurred in 3.7% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 2% of patients treated with placebo. In a randomized study (TITAN) in patients with mCSPC, ischemic cardiovascular events occurred in 4.4% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 1.5% of patients treated with placebo. Across the SPARTAN and TITAN studies, 4 patients (0.3%) treated with ERLEADA and 2 patients (0.2%) treated with placebo died from an ischemic cardiovascular event. Patients with history of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, or transient ischemic attack within 6 months of randomization were excluded from the SPARTAN and TITAN studies.

In the SPARTAN study, cerebrovascular events occurred in 2.5% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 1% of patients treated with placebo. In the TITAN study, cerebrovascular events occurred in 1.9% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 2.1% of patients treated with placebo. Across the SPARTAN and TITAN studies, 3 patients (0.2%) treated with ERLEADA, and 2 patients (0.2%) treated with placebo died from a cerebrovascular event.

Cerebrovascular and ischemic cardiovascular events, including events leading to death, occurred in patients receiving ERLEADA. Monitor for signs and symptoms of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disorders. Optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. Consider discontinuation of ERLEADA for Grade 3 and 4 events.

Fractures — In a randomized study (SPARTAN) of patients with nmCRPC, fractures occurred in 12% of patients treated with ERLEADA and in 7% of patients treated with placebo. In a randomized study (TITAN) of patients with mCSPC, fractures occurred in 9% of patients treated with ERLEADA and in 6% of patients treated with placebo. Evaluate patients for fracture risk. Monitor and manage patients at risk for fractures according to established treatment guidelines and consider use of bone-targeted agents.

Falls — In a randomized study (SPARTAN), falls occurred in 16% of patients treated with ERLEADA compared with 9% of patients treated with placebo. Falls were not associated with loss of consciousness or seizure. Falls occurred in patients receiving ERLEADA with increased frequency in the elderly. Evaluate patients for fall risk.

Seizure — In two randomized studies (SPARTAN and TITAN), 5 patients (0.4%) treated with ERLEADA and 1 patient treated with placebo (0.1%) experienced a seizure. Permanently discontinue ERLEADA in patients who develop a seizure during treatment. It is unknown whether anti-epileptic medications will prevent seizures with ERLEADA. Advise patients of the risk of developing a seizure while receiving ERLEADA and of engaging in any activity where sudden loss of consciousness could cause harm to themselves or others.

Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions — Fatal and life-threatening cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) occurred in patients receiving ERLEADA.

Monitor patients for the development of SCARs. Advise patients of the signs and symptoms of SCARs (eg, a prodrome of fever, flu-like symptoms, mucosal lesions, progressive skin rash, or lymphadenopathy). If a SCAR is suspected, interrupt ERLEADA until the etiology of the reaction has been determined. Consultation with a dermatologist is recommended. If a SCAR is confirmed, or for other Grade 4 skin reactions, permanently discontinue ERLEADA [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity — The safety and efficacy of ERLEADA have not been established in females. Based on findings from animals and its mechanism of action, ERLEADA can cause fetal harm and loss of pregnancy when administered to a pregnant female. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment and for 3 months after the last dose of ERLEADA [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)].

ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) that occurred more frequently in the ERLEADA-treated patients (≥2% over placebo) from the randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (TITAN and SPARTAN) were fatigue, arthralgia, rash, decreased appetite, fall, weight decreased, hypertension, hot flush, diarrhea, and fracture.

Laboratory Abnormalities — All Grades (Grade 3-4)

Hematology — In the TITAN study: white blood cell decreased ERLEADA 27% (0.4%), placebo 19% (0.6%). In the SPARTAN study: anemia ERLEADA 70% (0.4%), placebo 64% (0.5%); leukopenia ERLEADA 47% (0.3%), placebo 29% (0%); lymphopenia ERLEADA 41% (1.8%), placebo 21% (1.6%)
Chemistry — In the TITAN study: hypertriglyceridemia ERLEADA 17% (2.5%), placebo 12% (2.3%). In the SPARTAN study: hypercholesterolemia ERLEADA 76% (0.1%), placebo 46% (0%); hyperglycemia ERLEADA 70% (2%), placebo 59% (1.0%); hypertriglyceridemia ERLEADA 67% (1.6%), placebo 49% (0.8%); hyperkalemia ERLEADA 32% (1.9%), placebo 22% (0.5%)
Rash — In 2 randomized studies (SPARTAN and TITAN), rash was most commonly described as macular or maculopapular. Adverse reactions of rash were 26% with ERLEADA vs 8% with placebo. Grade 3 rashes (defined as covering >30% body surface area [BSA]) were reported with ERLEADA treatment (6%) vs placebo (0.5%).

The onset of rash occurred at a median of 83 days. Rash resolved in 78% of patients within a median of 78 days from onset of rash. Rash was commonly managed with oral antihistamines, topical corticosteroids, and 19% of patients received systemic corticosteroids. Dose reduction or dose interruption occurred in 14% and 28% of patients, respectively. Of the patients who had dose interruption, 59% experienced recurrence of rash upon reintroduction of ERLEADA.

Hypothyroidism — In 2 randomized studies (SPARTAN and TITAN), hypothyroidism was reported for 8% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 1.5% of patients treated with placebo based on assessments of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) every 4 months. Elevated TSH occurred in 25% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 7% of patients treated with placebo. The median onset was at the first scheduled assessment. There were no Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions. Thyroid replacement therapy, when clinically indicated, should be initiated or dose adjusted.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Effect of Other Drugs on ERLEADA — Co-administration of a strong CYP2C8 or CYP3A4 inhibitor is predicted to increase the steady-state exposure of the active moieties. No initial dose adjustment is necessary; however, reduce the ERLEADA dose based on tolerability [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

Effect of ERLEADA on Other Drugs

CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and UGT Substrates — ERLEADA is a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19, and a weak inducer of CYP2C9 in humans. Concomitant use of ERLEADA with medications that are primarily metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2C19, or CYP2C9 can result in lower exposure to these medications. Substitution for these medications is recommended when possible or evaluate for loss of activity if medication is continued. Concomitant administration of ERLEADA with medications that are substrates of UDP-glucuronosyl transferase (UGT) can result in decreased exposure. Use caution if substrates of UGT must be co-administered with ERLEADA and evaluate for loss of activity.

P-gp, BCRP, or OATP1B1 Substrates — Apalutamide is a weak inducer of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) clinically. Concomitant use of ERLEADA with medications that are substrates of P-gp, BCRP, or OATP1B1 can result in lower exposure of these medications. Use caution if substrates of P-gp, BCRP, or OATP1B1 must be co-administered with ERLEADA and evaluate for loss of activity if medication is continued.

Please see the full Prescribing Information for ERLEADA.